Clare (MI) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clare (MI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clare (MI)
20,303
Total Investors in Clare (MI)
9,956
Investor Owned SFR in Clare (MI)
7,515(37.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
9,171
SFR Owned
6,577
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
785
SFR Owned
966
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 7,515 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Clare County with 37% Market Share But Halted All Buying Activity in Late 2025
In Clare County, MI, investors own 7,515 single-family properties, a significant 37.0% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who control 98.6% of the investor portfolio. After a period of aggressive buying, investor acquisitions completely stopped in Q4 2025, signaling a market-wide pause. Uncharacteristically, when active, local investors paid premiums as high as 36.5% over traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 7,515 properties, 37.0% of the market, with individuals holding a dominant 87.5% share.
All 7,515 investor-owned properties were acquired with cash, with no financing recorded. A staggering 99.1% of these properties are non-owner-occupied (7,449 of 7,515), indicating a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Contrary to national trends, landlords paid a 4.9% premium over homeowners in Q1 2025, averaging $6,146 more per property.
The premium paid by landlords widened significantly to 36.5% in Q2 2025, where they paid an average of $159,819 compared to the homeowner price of $117,063. Acquisition data is unavailable for later quarters due to a market freeze.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchase activity completely stopped in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the market's 0 recorded sales.
Both mom-and-pop and institutional investor tiers recorded zero purchases in Q4 2025. This reflects a complete and uniform freeze in acquisition activity across all investor types.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.6% of all investor-owned housing in Clare County.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in the county, holding 0.0% of the market. Single-property landlords alone account for 82.3% of the entire investor portfolio, with 6,411 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 65.0% of properties in that segment.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 89.6% of all single-property holdings. The 6-10 property tier marks a perfect 50/50 ownership split between individual and company investors, serving as the market's crossover point.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 48625 zip code alone accounting for 4,328 investor-owned properties.
The highest investor ownership rates are found in zip codes 48632 (44.2%) and 48625 (41.2%). These two areas represent both the highest raw counts and the highest market penetration rates, indicating deep investor saturation.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers through mid-2025, acquiring 10.5 properties for every 1 they sold in Q2.
In Q2 2025, investors purchased 42 properties while selling only 4, creating a net gain of 38 properties. This buying momentum carried over from 2024, when investors were net buyers of 433 properties for the full year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Mirroring purchase data, landlords were involved in 0% of the 0 total market transactions in Q4 2025, confirming a market standstill.
No transactions were recorded across any investor tier in Q4 2025, from mom-and-pop to institutional. This demonstrates a market-wide pause in both buying and selling among investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 7,515 properties, 37.0% of the market, with individuals holding a dominant 87.5% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Clare County represents a substantial 37.0% of the total single-family residential market, with 7,515 properties held by 9,956 distinct landlords.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership. Individuals own 6,577 properties, or 87.5% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 966 properties (12.9%) held by companies.

A critical finding is the financing method: 100% of the 7,515 investor-owned properties are designated as cash holdings, with zero properties recorded as financed. This suggests a market of highly liquid buyers who are not reliant on traditional mortgage debt.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rentals, with 7,449 properties (99.1%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This confirms that the vast majority of investor activity is focused on generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

The structure of the landlord base mirrors the property ownership, with 9,171 individual landlords compared to just 785 company entities. This reinforces the narrative of a market dominated by small, independent operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Contrary to national trends, landlords paid a 4.9% premium over homeowners in Q1 2025, averaging $6,146 more per property.
Detailed Findings

In a reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Clare County consistently paid more than traditional homeowners in early 2025. In Q1 2025, investors paid an average of $130,361, which was $6,146 (or 4.9%) higher than the homeowner average of $124,215.

This trend accelerated dramatically in the following quarter. By Q2 2025, the investor premium surged to 36.5%, with landlords paying an average of $159,819 while homeowners paid $117,063, a difference of $42,756 per property.

This pattern of paying a premium suggests a competitive local market where investors may be targeting specific property types or are willing to pay more to secure assets, a stark contrast to the investor discount often seen nationally.

While historical data from 2020-2023 shows a lower average acquisition price of $110,946 for landlords, there was no recorded purchase activity in Q4 2025, preventing a more current comparison and indicating a halt in acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchase activity completely stopped in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the market's 0 recorded sales.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a total cessation of investor purchasing activity in Clare County's SFR market. Landlords accounted for 0.0% of all purchases, as there were zero total transactions recorded for the quarter.

This market-wide standstill affected every investor segment. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who typically dominate the market, made zero acquisitions.

Likewise, institutional investors (1,000+ properties), who already have no significant holdings in the area, also recorded zero purchases, confirming their continued absence from active acquisition.

The lack of activity means no new landlords entered the market in Q4, and existing investors paused any portfolio expansion. This abrupt halt contrasts with active buying seen in prior periods and signals a significant shift in market conditions or investor sentiment at the end of the year.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.6% of all investor-owned housing in Clare County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Clare County is defined by the dominance of small-scale landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 98.6% of all investor-held SFRs.

The market's backbone is the single-property landlord. This tier alone, comprising 6,411 properties, accounts for 82.3% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, highlighting the hyper-fragmented nature of ownership.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) represent a sliver of the market, collectively owning just 1.4% of the portfolio. This includes 40 properties in the 11-20 tier and 70 in the 21-50 tier.

There is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership. The 1,000+ property tier holds zero properties, underscoring that this market operates entirely outside the purview of major corporate landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 65.0% of properties in that segment.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Clare County shows a clear transition from individual to company control as portfolio sizes increase. Individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, accounting for 89.6% of single-property holdings and 86.1% of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where ownership is split exactly 50/50, with individuals and companies each holding 36 properties.

Beyond this tier, company ownership becomes dominant. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 26 properties (65.0%), and this escalates to 98.6% (69 properties) in the 21-50 property tier.

This pattern reveals a distinct strategy: individual investors are the primary players in the entry-level to small-portfolio segment, while scaling beyond 10 properties is almost exclusively accomplished through a corporate structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 48625 zip code alone accounting for 4,328 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals significant concentration of investor ownership in specific Clare County submarkets. The top two zip codes, 48625 (4,328 properties) and 48632 (1,751 properties), together contain over 80% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

These areas of high volume also exhibit the highest rates of investor penetration. In MI-Clare-48632, investors own 44.2% of all SFR properties, while in MI-Clare-48625, the rate is 41.2%. This overlap shows that investors are not just widespread but deeply embedded in these key neighborhoods.

Other areas with notable investor presence include zip code 49665, where investors own 38.4% of the housing stock, and 48622, which has 742 investor-owned properties at a 26.7% rate.

This intense clustering suggests that local market knowledge plays a key role, with investors focusing their capital in a few well-understood areas rather than spreading it thinly across the entire county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords were aggressive net buyers through mid-2025, acquiring 10.5 properties for every 1 they sold in Q2.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Clare County were actively accumulating properties before the market halt in late 2025. In Q2 2025, they demonstrated strong buyer conviction, with 42 purchases against only 4 sales.

This translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 10.5-to-1, signaling a clear strategy of portfolio expansion during that period. For the first half of 2025, investors acquired 130 properties while divesting only 12.

This trend was a continuation of prior year activity. Throughout 2024, landlords purchased 475 properties and sold just 42, making them net buyers of 433 properties for the year.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) were completely inactive, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded in any recent timeframe, reinforcing their absence from this market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Mirroring purchase data, landlords were involved in 0% of the 0 total market transactions in Q4 2025, confirming a market standstill.
Detailed Findings

The transaction data for Q4 2025 confirms the complete cessation of investor activity in Clare County. Landlords participated in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions, reflecting a 0.0% share of a dormant market.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. The typically dominant mom-and-pop tiers (01-04) recorded zero transactions, indicating that even the smallest investors stepped back from the market.

There was no inter-landlord trading activity, with zero properties bought from other landlords. This suggests a lack of both portfolio churn and opportunistic acquisitions among existing owners.

The average purchase price across all tiers was $0, a direct result of the zero-transaction environment. This halt in capital flow represents a significant deviation from the active trading observed in previous quarters.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Investors Dominate Clare County with 37% Market Share But Halted All Buying Activity in Late 2025
Holdings
Landlords own 7,515 SFR properties (37.0% of the market in Clare County, MI), with individual investors holding 6,577 (87.5%) and companies owning 966 (12.9%).
Pricing
Investors in Clare County paid a premium over homeowners, reaching a notable 36.5% ($42,756) in Q2 2025, a reversal of typical market trends.
Activity
Investor purchase activity came to a complete stop in Q4 2025, with landlords accounting for 0 of the 0 SFR purchases in the quarter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 98.6% share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors command smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties and dominate larger tiers.
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers in Q2 2025 with a 10.5x buy/sell ratio (42 buys vs 4 sells), all transaction activity ceased by Q4 2025.
Market Narrative

In Clare County, Michigan, the single-family rental market is uniquely defined by a high concentration of small, independent investors. Landlords own 7,515 properties, a staggering 37.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly comprised of 'mom-and-pop' operators, who control 98.6% of investor-owned homes, while large-scale institutional investors have zero presence. Ownership is further dominated by individuals (87.5% of properties) who primarily use cash for acquisitions, with 100% of the investor portfolio being free of mortgage debt.

Investor behavior in Clare County presents a study in contrasts. Throughout 2024 and early 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, at one point acquiring 10.5 homes for every one they sold. Uncharacteristically, these investors consistently paid a premium over traditional homeowners, with the price gap peaking at 36.5% ($42,756) in Q2 2025. However, this fervent activity came to an abrupt halt in late 2025, with zero purchase or sale transactions recorded in the fourth quarter. This suggests a sudden, market-wide pause in capital deployment from a previously confident real estate investing community.

The key takeaway from Clare County is a portrait of a hyper-local, non-institutionalized rental market characterized by deep penetration and high fragmentation. The reliance on cash and the dominance of small landlords create a market resilient to interest rate fluctuations but potentially sensitive to shifts in local economic sentiment, as evidenced by the sudden freeze in activity. For those analyzing the housing market, Clare County serves as a powerful example of how Main Street investors, not Wall Street firms, shape the landscape in many parts of America, creating distinct local dynamics that defy national trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 06:56 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Clare (MI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Clare (MI) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mi-clare/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.