Forest (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Forest (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Forest (WI)
7,862
Total Investors in Forest (WI)
4,302
Investor Owned SFR in Forest (WI)
3,471(44.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,679
SFR Owned
2,854
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
623
SFR Owned
653
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,471 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Forest County, Owning 99.8% of Investor Properties and Securing 39% Discounts
Investors own 44.1% of single-family homes in Forest County, a portfolio of 3,471 properties overwhelmingly controlled by individuals (82.2%). In Q1 2026, landlords, exclusively small-scale operators, captured 34.8% of all purchases while paying an average of 39.0% less than traditional homeowners. The market shows a complete absence of institutional activity, with mom-and-pop landlords defining all purchasing and ownership trends.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 3,471 homes, with individual landlords owning 82.2% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 3,145, were purchased with cash, compared to only 326 that are financed. Individual landlords comprise the bulk of owners, with 3,679 individuals versus 623 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 39.0% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $100,722 per property.
The pricing advantage for landlords is a recent reversal; in Q2 2025, landlords paid a 23.0% premium. This volatility showcases a rapidly shifting market dynamic between investor and homeowner purchasing power.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 34.8% of all Q1 home purchases, with every property bought by new investors.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of the 8 investor purchases this quarter. All acquisitions were made by single-property investors, with 9 new entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.8% of investor-owned homes.
Single-property landlords alone account for 87.7% of all investor-held SFRs, totaling 3,107 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own over 81% of single-property portfolios in Forest County.
Companies fail to achieve majority ownership at any portfolio size, holding a peak of only 30.0% in the 6-10 property tier. Individuals consistently represent the dominant owner type across all tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 54520, which holds 955 investor-owned homes.
While 54520 leads in volume, other zip codes show higher penetration rates. Zip code 54491 has the highest investor ownership rate at 66.7%, followed by 54562 at 61.3%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Forest County are strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold in Q1.
This aggressive accumulation posture is a continuation of past trends, as landlords were also net buyers in 2024 with 278 buys versus only 9 sells. There is no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions accounted for 34.6% of market activity in Q1 2026.
All 9 landlord transactions were executed by new, single-property investors at an average price of $157,389. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating investors are buying from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 3,471 homes, with individual landlords owning 82.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Forest County, investors hold a significant 44.1% of the single-family residential market, totaling 3,471 properties. This high concentration indicates a market with substantial rental and investment activity relative to its total size of 7,862 SFR properties.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 3,679 individual investors, who control 2,854 properties, or 82.2% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company investors, numbering 623, own the remaining 653 properties (18.8%), highlighting the market's reliance on small-scale, non-corporate ownership.

Financial strategies heavily favor liquidity, with 3,145 properties (90.6%) held as cash purchases. In contrast, only 326 properties (9.4%) are financed, signaling that investors in this area operate with low leverage and high equity.

The portfolio is almost entirely focused on rental income, as indicated by the 3,446 properties classified as rented. This aligns closely with the total number of investor-owned homes, underscoring the business-centric nature of these holdings.

Comparing owner types, both individuals and companies exhibit a strong preference for cash acquisitions. The sheer volume of individual landlords compared to companies, a ratio of nearly 6 to 1, reinforces the characterization of Forest County as a classic mom-and-pop landlord market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 39.0% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $100,722 per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking display of purchasing power, landlords in Q1 2026 acquired properties for an average price of $157,389, a massive 39.0% discount compared to the $258,111 paid by traditional homeowners. This price gap of $100,722 per property represents a significant financial advantage for investors in the current market.

This deep discount marks a dramatic reversal from a year prior. In Q1 and Q2 of 2025, landlords were paying premiums of 10.1% and 23.0% respectively, suggesting market conditions have shifted decidedly in their favor. This volatility indicates that the balance of power between investors and homeowners is highly fluid in Forest County.

The average acquisition price for landlords has decreased significantly, falling from a 2025 average of $241,072 to just $157,389 in Q1 2026. This trend runs counter to the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $172,988, showing recent price softening after a period of appreciation.

The shift from paying a $52,748 premium in Q2 2025 to securing a $100,722 discount in Q1 2026 highlights an exceptional change in negotiating leverage. Investors are now finding value at price points far below the general market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 34.8% of all Q1 home purchases, with every property bought by new investors.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q1 2026 market, acquiring 8 of the 23 total SFR properties sold, which constitutes a 34.8% market share. This level of activity underscores the continued demand from the investment sector in Forest County.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity was driven by the smallest operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by mid-size or institutional investors.

Analysis of purchasing tiers reveals that the market is being shaped by new entrants. All 8 properties were purchased by single-property landlords (Tier 01), representing 100% of investor buying volume. This activity was spread across 9 new landlord entities, signaling fresh capital entering the rental market at the ground level.

The complete absence of purchases from institutional investors (Tier 09) confirms that large-scale capital is not a factor in Forest County's current real estate investing landscape. The market's growth is exclusively organic and driven by small-scale ambition.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.8% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Forest County is the epitome of a mom-and-pop market. Landlords owning between 1 and 10 properties (Tiers 01-04) control 99.8% of all investor-owned single-family homes, leaving virtually no room for larger players.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone, comprising investors with just one rental, holds 3,107 properties, which accounts for a remarkable 87.7% of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies a highly fragmented ownership base with low concentration.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) have a negligible footprint, collectively owning just 0.2% of the investor-owned housing stock. The market structure clearly does not support or attract portfolio growth beyond a very small scale.

Institutional ownership (1,000+ properties) is non-existent in Forest County, with a 0.0% market share. This complete absence challenges any narrative of corporate landlords dominating the local housing market; instead, it is defined entirely by small, local investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own over 81% of single-property portfolios in Forest County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary drivers of ownership across all portfolio sizes in Forest County. In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 2,554 properties (81.5%), compared to just 579 (18.5%) owned by companies.

Unlike in larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Individual ownership remains dominant even as portfolios grow, holding 79.6% of two-property portfolios and nearly 90% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

The highest concentration for company ownership is found in the 6-10 property tier, yet even there, they own just 3 of the 10 properties (30.0%). This demonstrates that even the largest small landlords in the county are more likely to be individuals than corporate entities.

This data reinforces that the path to building a rental portfolio in this market is one pursued almost exclusively by private individuals. The corporate landlord model has failed to gain any significant traction at any scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 54520, which holds 955 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is highly concentrated within a few key zip codes in Forest County. The 54520 zip code is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 955 investor-owned SFR properties, which represents 39.4% of its housing stock.

Following closely in count are 54511 with 635 properties (44.4% rate) and 54566 with 535 properties (44.8% rate). These three areas alone account for a significant portion of the county's total investor portfolio, demonstrating clear regional preferences.

However, the highest market penetration occurs in smaller zip codes. In 54491, investors own two-thirds of the SFR properties (66.7%). Similarly, zip codes 54562 (61.3%), 54542 (57.6%), and 54465 (55.2%) all have investor ownership rates exceeding 50%, indicating markets that are majority-renter or investor-held.

This distinction between high-volume and high-percentage areas is crucial. While larger regions like 54520 have the most units, smaller communities exhibit a much higher density of investment, which can significantly influence local housing dynamics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Forest County are strong net buyers, acquiring 9 properties for every 1 sold in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Forest County are actively expanding their portfolios, demonstrating a strong net-buyer position. In Q1 2026, they purchased 9 properties while selling only 1, a buy-to-sell ratio of 9-to-1 that signals a clear strategy of accumulation.

This behavior is consistent with the prior year. Throughout 2024, landlords acquired 278 properties and sold just 9, resulting in a net gain of 269 properties for their collective portfolio. This sustained buying pressure highlights long-term confidence in the local market.

The institutional tier (1,000+ properties) recorded no transactions, reinforcing their complete absence from the market. All buying and selling activities are being conducted by smaller, mom-and-pop-level investors.

The persistent net-buyer status among landlords suggests that the supply of rental housing in Forest County is growing. Investors are absorbing available inventory rather than divesting, which directly impacts the for-sale market by converting owner-occupied homes to rentals.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions accounted for 34.6% of market activity in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were involved in 9 of the 26 total SFR transactions, capturing a 34.6% share of all market activity. This significant presence demonstrates their role as a primary source of demand in the Forest County housing market.

Transaction volume was exclusively concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 100% of the 9 investor-led transactions, with no activity from any larger tier.

The average purchase price for these new landlords was $157,389. This single price point for all of the quarter's activity reflects a homogenous group of buyers targeting a specific type of asset, likely starter homes or value-add opportunities.

A critical finding from the quarter is the source of inventory. None of the investor purchases were from other landlords (0% inter-landlord trading). This indicates that investors are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market, directly competing with owner-occupant buyers for available listings.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Forest County's real estate market is defined by small investors, who own 44.1% of homes and buy at deep discounts.
Holdings
Landlords own 3,471 single-family properties in Forest County, representing a high 44.1% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (82.2%) compared to companies (18.8%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a 39.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $157,389 versus $258,111, a savings of $100,722.
Activity
Landlords purchased 34.8% of all homes sold in Q1 (8 properties), with 100% of this activity driven by 9 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is completely dominated by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.8% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, holding over 81% of single-property portfolios. Companies do not achieve majority ownership in any tier in this market.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (9 buys vs. 1 sell), a trend consistent with prior years. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate investing landscape in Forest County, Wisconsin, is fundamentally shaped by small, individual operators, not large corporations. Investors own a substantial 3,471 single-family properties, constituting 44.1% of the county's entire SFR market. This ownership is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a near-total 99.8% of the investor-owned housing stock. Further underscoring this dynamic, 82.2% of these properties are held by individuals rather than companies, and institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 homes have zero presence.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 was characterized by strategic and opportunistic acquisitions. Landlords captured 34.8% of all home purchases, and every single one was made by a new, single-property investor. These buyers demonstrated remarkable purchasing power, acquiring homes for an average price of $157,389, a staggering 39.0% discount compared to the $258,111 paid by traditional homeowners. This aggressive, value-oriented buying is part of a larger accumulation trend; landlords were strong net buyers with a 9-to-1 buy/sell ratio, consistently adding to their portfolios without relying on inter-landlord sales.

The key takeaway from Forest County is the profound influence of the grassroots investor. The market's high investor penetration rate, combined with the complete dominance of small landlords and their ability to secure deep discounts, defines the local housing ecosystem. This environment presents opportunities for new investors to enter a market devoid of institutional competition, but it also creates significant competition for traditional homebuyers, who are bidding against cash-heavy investors adept at finding value. The health and direction of this market are directly tied to the financial capacity and strategic decisions of thousands of individual owner-operators.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 05:37 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Forest (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Forest (WI) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wi-forest/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.