Daviess (MO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Daviess (MO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Daviess (MO)
3,091
Total Investors in Daviess (MO)
1,521
Investor Owned SFR in Daviess (MO)
1,154(37.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,287
SFR Owned
915
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
234
SFR Owned
282
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,154 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Daviess County, Owning 37.3% of Homes and Driving All Recent Purchase Activity
Landlords own 1,154 single-family homes in Daviess County, representing a significant 37.3% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small 'mom-and-pop' investors (97.1% of portfolio), who were responsible for 100% of landlord purchases in Q1. In a departure from typical trends, these investors paid a 138.2% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 and are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 34 properties while selling only one.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,154 SFR properties in Daviess County, with individual investors holding a dominant 79.3% share.
The majority of investor-owned properties were acquired with cash (945) rather than financing (209), a ratio of more than 4-to-1. Individual investors comprise the vast majority of landlords by entity count, with 1,287 individuals compared to just 234 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors in Q1 paid a stunning 138.2% premium over homeowners, averaging $540,320 per purchase.
This Q1 premium of $313,464 per property ($540,320 vs $226,856) marks a sharp reversal from Q2 2025, when landlords secured a 38.4% discount. Pricing behavior has been extremely volatile, with landlords paying significant premiums in three of the last four quarters.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q1 activity, acquiring 25 of 39 total homes sold, a 64.1% market share.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of all landlord purchases in the quarter. Activity was led by new market entrants, with 26 new single-property landlords acquiring 18 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors own 97.1% of all landlord-held SFRs, cementing their control of the local market.
Single-property landlords alone account for 78.9% of all investor-owned housing, with 936 properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, holding just one property, or 0.1% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
The ownership crossover from individual to company control occurs in the 11-20 property tier.
While individuals own over 73% of properties in every tier from 1 to 10 units, companies become the dominant owner in the 11-20 property tier, holding 32 properties (71.1%).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Gallatin (64640), which contains 542 investor-owned properties.
While Gallatin has the highest raw count, other zip codes show extreme investor penetration rates. The 64654 zip code is 100% investor-owned, and Coffey (64620) has an investor ownership rate of 51.9%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Daviess County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 34 properties while selling only one in Q1.
This net-buyer trend has been consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.9-to-1 in 2025 (158 buys vs. 20 sells) and 11.9-to-1 in 2024 (155 buys vs. 13 sells). No institutional transaction data was available, reflecting their inactivity in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 64.2% of all Q1 market transactions, with all 34 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
New investors in the single-property tier paid the highest average price at $540,320. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases were from other landlords, indicating they are acquiring properties from the homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,154 SFR properties in Daviess County, with individual investors holding a dominant 79.3% share.
Detailed Findings

In Daviess County, MO, investors hold a substantial 1,154 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 37.3% of the total 3,091 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate indicates a significant level of real estate investing activity relative to the market size.

Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual landlords own 915 properties, accounting for 79.3% of the investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 282 properties (24.4%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at entity counts. There are 1,287 individual landlords compared to only 234 company landlords, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local investor landscape.

A key indicator of financial strategy in this market is the preference for cash acquisitions. Of the properties held by investors, 945 were purchased with cash, starkly contrasting with the 209 that are financed. This suggests investors in Daviess County are well-capitalized and less reliant on leverage.

The rental focus of these investors is clear, with 1,138 of the 1,154 properties classified as rented, confirming that the vast majority of the portfolio is actively used for generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors in Q1 paid a stunning 138.2% premium over homeowners, averaging $540,320 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a striking deviation from national trends, landlords in Daviess County paid a significant premium for properties in the first quarter of 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $540,320, a staggering 138.2% more than the $226,856 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a price gap of $313,464.

This pricing behavior is not an isolated event but part of a volatile trend. While investors managed a 38.4% discount in Q2 2025 (paying $214,724 vs. the homeowner price of $348,792), they paid massive premiums in other recent quarters, including 49.3% in Q3 2025 and 183.3% in Q1 2025.

The data suggests a market where investors may be targeting specific high-value properties or competing aggressively for limited inventory, driving their acquisition costs well above the average for typical homebuyers.

Despite zero recorded landlord purchases in 2024 and 2025, historical pricing data shows a significant run-up. The average price during the 2020-2023 period was $310,234, indicating substantial price appreciation in the assets investors are now targeting.

This unusual pricing dynamic challenges the common assumption that investors always acquire properties at a discount. In Daviess County, the opposite has recently been true, signaling intense competition or a focus on a different class of asset than the average homebuyer.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q1 activity, acquiring 25 of 39 total homes sold, a 64.1% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the first quarter, with landlords purchasing 25 of the 39 SFRs sold in Daviess County. This represents a commanding 64.1% share of all market transactions, underscoring their role as the primary drivers of demand.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, accounted for 100% of the 26 properties acquired by investors, with zero purchases recorded from institutional buyers.

New investors were the most significant force in the market. The single-property tier saw 26 new entities enter the market, collectively buying 18 properties, which is 69.2% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

This influx of new, small-scale landlords highlights a grassroots expansion of real estate investment in the county, rather than a consolidation by larger players.

The remaining activity was distributed among slightly larger small investors, with four entities in the two-property tier buying 5 homes (19.2%) and one entity in the 3-5 property tier acquiring 3 homes (11.5%).

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors own 97.1% of all landlord-held SFRs, cementing their control of the local market.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Daviess County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a combined 97.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that showcases a highly fragmented and decentralized market structure.

The single-property landlord tier is the bedrock of this market. These investors, often considered new or small-scale, own 936 properties, which alone represents 78.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

As portfolio size increases, the number of properties drops off sharply. Landlords with 2 properties hold 8.4% of the stock, while those with 3-5 properties hold 7.7%, and those with 6-10 properties hold just 2.2%.

Mid-size landlords (11-50 properties) represent a very small fraction of the market, controlling a combined 2.8% of properties.

In stark contrast to narratives of corporate consolidation, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have virtually no footprint in Daviess County. Their entire portfolio consists of a single property, accounting for a mere 0.1% of investor-held housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
The ownership crossover from individual to company control occurs in the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership structure by portfolio size: individual investors command the smaller tiers, while companies take control as portfolios grow. Individuals own a commanding majority of properties in the mom-and-pop tiers, holding 79.4% of single-property portfolios and 79.1% of 3-5 property portfolios.

The tipping point occurs in the small-to-medium range. In the 11-20 property tier, ownership flips dramatically, with companies controlling 32 of the properties (71.1%) compared to just 13 properties (28.9%) held by individuals.

This indicates that as investors scale their operations beyond 10 properties in Daviess County, they are more likely to adopt a formal corporate structure for management and liability purposes.

Even so, individual ownership persists across nearly all tiers, demonstrating that private capital is the primary force in the local rental market, regardless of scale.

In the largest tiers represented locally, company ownership solidifies, illustrating a strategic shift from personal investment to a more formalized business operation as portfolios expand.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Gallatin (64640), which contains 542 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Daviess County reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration. The zip code 64640 (Gallatin) is the epicenter of activity by volume, with 542 investor-owned SFRs, representing 38.8% of its housing stock.

However, the highest penetration rates are found in smaller communities. The 64654 zip code stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, indicating it may be an area with specialized housing or a very small sample size completely acquired by investors.

Other areas also show remarkably high investor saturation. The zip code 64620 (Coffey) has a 51.9% investor ownership rate, meaning landlords own more than half of the single-family homes. Similarly, 64642 (Jameson) and 64647 (Pattonsburg) have rates of 46.9% and 43.4%, respectively.

This distinction between high-volume areas like Gallatin and high-penetration areas like Coffey and Jameson highlights different market dynamics. One shows scale, while the others show an exceptionally high density of rental properties.

Following Gallatin, the areas with the next highest counts of investor properties are 64648 (Jamesport) with 177 properties and 64620 (Coffey) with 108 properties.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Daviess County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 34 properties while selling only one in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords are in a strong accumulation phase in Daviess County. In the first quarter of 2026, they purchased 34 properties and sold only one, making them decisive net buyers and signaling confidence in the local market.

This behavior is not a recent development but a sustained trend. Throughout 2025, landlords acquired 158 properties while divesting only 20, resulting in a net gain of 138 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 8-to-1.

The pattern was even stronger in 2024, when investors bought 155 properties and sold just 13, for a net increase of 142 properties and a ratio of almost 12-to-1.

The consistent, high-volume net buying activity demonstrates a long-term strategy of portfolio expansion among investors in the region.

Given the near-total absence of institutional players in the county, this transaction volume is driven entirely by individual and small-scale company investors who are actively growing their local holdings.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 64.2% of all Q1 market transactions, with all 34 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter, landlords were the primary movers in the Daviess County real estate market, participating in 34 of the 53 total SFR transactions for a 64.2% market share.

This activity was exclusively driven by smaller investors. All 34 landlord transactions were conducted by entities in the mom-and-pop tiers (1-10 properties), with zero activity from mid-size or institutional tiers.

New entrants to the market paid top dollar for their acquisitions. Landlords purchasing their first rental property (Tier 01) recorded an average purchase price of $540,320, significantly higher than prices paid by traditional homeowners in the same period.

A significant finding is the source of these acquisitions. None of the 34 properties purchased by investors were bought from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate shows that investors are expanding the total rental pool by buying homes from owner-occupants, not just trading assets among themselves.

The concentration of transactions in the smallest tiers, particularly the 26 purchases by single-property landlords, reaffirms that the market's growth is fueled by new, small-scale capital.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors command Daviess County's housing market, owning 37.3% of all homes and driving 100% of recent investor buying.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,154 single-family properties in Daviess County, MO, a 37.3% share of the market's 3,091 SFRs. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 915 properties (79.3%) compared to 282 (24.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a highly unusual trend, landlords paid an average of $540,320 in Q1, a 138.2% premium over the $226,856 paid by traditional homeowners, reflecting aggressive competition for properties.
Activity
Investors purchased 64.1% of all homes sold in Q1 (25 properties), with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop tiers. The market saw an influx of 26 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 97.1% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a near-zero presence, owning just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, controlling 71.1% of properties at that scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 34-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (34 buys vs 1 sell), a trend of aggressive accumulation. Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Daviess County, Missouri is heavily shaped by small, independent investors. Landlords own 1,154 homes, a remarkable 37.3% of the total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is not in the hands of large corporations; instead, individual investors own 79.3% of these properties. The market structure is definitively 'mom-and-pop,' with investors holding 1-10 properties controlling 97.1% of the rental inventory, while institutional-scale investors have a negligible footprint of just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Q1 underscores their market dominance and aggressive strategy. They were responsible for 64.1% of all home purchases, with 100% of this activity coming from mom-and-pop buyers. In a stark reversal of typical market dynamics, these investors paid a 138.2% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average acquisition price of $540,320. This indicates intense competition for desirable assets. Furthermore, they are in a phase of rapid accumulation, buying 34 properties for every one they sold in Q1, and acquiring all new inventory from the general market rather than from other investors.

The key takeaway for Daviess County is that its rental market is a localized, fragmented ecosystem fueled by well-capitalized private investors. The high penetration rate, combined with premium pricing and net-buying activity, signals strong confidence and demand for rental properties in the area. This dynamic, driven almost entirely by new and existing small landlords, defines the local housing landscape and suggests continued growth in the rental sector, independent of national institutional trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Daviess (MO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Daviess (MO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mo-daviess/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.