Door (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Door (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Door (WI)
16,860
Total Investors in Door (WI)
8,247
Investor Owned SFR in Door (WI)
6,243(37.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
6,600
SFR Owned
4,680
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,647
SFR Owned
1,701
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,243 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Define Door County, Owning 37% of Homes and Controlling 99.9% of the Rental Market
In Door County, WI, landlords own 6,243 single-family properties, representing a significant 37.0% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' investors (99.9%), not institutions. In the most recent quarter, these investors secured a massive 32.3% price discount compared to traditional homeowners and were highly active, purchasing 56.2% of all homes sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6,243 homes, 37.0% of the market, with individuals holding 75.0% of the portfolio.
The portfolio is overwhelmingly cash-based, with 5,908 properties owned outright versus only 335 financed. A total of 6,195 properties, or 99.2% of the investor-owned stock, are rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 32.3% less than homeowners, securing a $152,111 average discount.
This massive discount marks a dramatic reversal from 2025, when landlords consistently paid a premium, including 29.7% more than homeowners in Q3 2025. This volatility highlights a rapidly changing market dynamic.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 9 of 16 homes for a 56.2% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords were the only active buyers, accounting for 100% of investor purchases. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions. The market welcomed 10 new single-property landlords this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.9% of investor-owned properties in Door County.
Single-property landlords alone own 5,697 homes, representing 88.7% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.0% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners across all active tiers, with no company crossover point.
Companies represent between 20% and 30% of holdings in smaller tiers but never achieve majority status. For example, in the single-property tier, individuals own 74.0% of the 5,813 properties held by that group.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is concentrated in zip code 54235, which contains 2,371 landlord-owned homes.
While 54235 leads by sheer volume, several other zip codes show extreme market penetration. Zip code 54211 has the highest rate, with 71.1% of its homes owned by investors.
Historical Transactions
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 548 properties and selling only 24.
This activity resulted in a powerful 22.8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, indicating strong confidence and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion across the market during that year. No data on institutional transactions was available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove over half of market activity in Q4 2025, accounting for 54.5% of all transactions.
All 12 landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero activity from institutions. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, meaning all acquisitions came from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6,243 homes, 37.0% of the market, with individuals holding 75.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Door County is remarkably high, with 6,243 single-family residential properties held by landlords, constituting 37.0% of the area's 16,860 total SFRs. This indicates a market with significant rental and investment activity relative to its size.

The investor landscape is dominated by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 4,680 properties, accounting for 75.0% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own 1,701 properties (27.2%). This 3-to-1 ratio underscores the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local market.

A striking financial pattern emerges from the data: 94.6% of investor-owned properties (5,908) were acquired with cash, compared to just 5.4% (335) that are financed. This suggests that local real estate investing is driven by well-capitalized individuals rather than leveraged financing strategies.

The portfolio is almost entirely geared toward rentals, with 6,195 properties (99.2%) classified as rented. This confirms that the vast majority of investor-owned homes are active units in the rental market, not held for other purposes.

The market comprises 8,247 distinct landlord entities, with individual landlords (6,600) outnumbering company landlords (1,647) by a four-to-one margin. This reinforces that the high investor penetration is the result of a large number of small players, not a few large firms.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 32.3% less than homeowners, securing a $152,111 average discount.
Detailed Findings

A significant pricing advantage emerged for landlords in Q1 2026. They acquired properties at an average price of $319,000, which is 32.3% lower than the $471,111 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a substantial average discount of $152,111 per property.

The current discount represents a stark reversal of recent trends. Throughout 2025, landlords consistently paid more than homeowners. For example, in Q3 2025, landlords paid a 29.7% premium ($633,382 vs. $488,422), and in Q2 2025, they paid a 16.3% premium ($464,583 vs. $399,490).

This shift from paying significant premiums to securing deep discounts in just two quarters suggests a major change in market conditions. It may indicate that investors are now finding more off-market deals, or that the properties available to them are different from the mainstream market.

Overall price appreciation is evident when comparing recent figures to the pandemic era. The average acquisition price during 2020-2023 was $419,671, which rose to $490,294 in 2024 and $525,952 in 2025, signaling steady market value growth before the pricing dynamics shifted in early 2026.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 9 of 16 homes for a 56.2% market share.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity was robust in Q4 2025, capturing a majority 56.2% of all single-family home sales in Door County. Investors bought 9 of the 16 total properties that transacted during the period.

The quarter's activity was exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of all investor acquisitions, with 9 properties purchased. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity.

New entrants are a key driver of the market. The single-property tier was the most active, with 10 new landlord entities acquiring 8 properties, which represents 88.9% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

The data shows a clear pattern of grassroots growth, with new, small investors entering the market rather than existing large players expanding their portfolios. This highlights the accessibility of the Door County investment market.

The remaining investor activity came from the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), where 2 entities purchased 1 property, making up 11.1% of the quarter's landlord acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a near-total 99.9% of investor-owned properties in Door County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Door County's investor market is overwhelmingly concentrated among small landlords. The 'mom-and-pop' segment (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) controls 99.9% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating a complete absence of large-scale corporate ownership.

First-time or single-holding investors are the bedrock of the market. Landlords with just one property own 5,697 homes, which accounts for a massive 88.7% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This is the most defining characteristic of the local market.

The scale of ownership drops off sharply after the first tier. Two-property landlords hold 387 properties (6.0%), and those with 3-5 properties hold 314 (4.9%). Portfolios larger than 10 properties are exceptionally rare.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have a statistically insignificant footprint in Door County, with just 2 properties owned. This finding directly counters the narrative of large institutional funds dominating local housing markets.

The data paints a clear picture of a decentralized market, composed of thousands of individual owners rather than a handful of large portfolio holders. This structure has significant implications for market stability, rental pricing, and property management.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners across all active tiers, with no company crossover point.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across every significant portfolio size in Door County, a pattern that challenges typical market structures where companies dominate larger tiers. There is no 'crossover point' at which companies become the primary owners.

In the largest and most active tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 4,302 properties (74.0%) compared to 1,511 owned by companies (26.0%). This demonstrates that even at the entry level, the market is primarily driven by private individuals.

This trend continues into larger portfolio sizes. For two-property owners, individuals hold 277 properties (70.5%) versus 116 for companies (29.5%). For small landlords with 3-5 properties, individuals own 251 homes (79.2%) against 66 for companies (20.8%).

The consistent minority share held by companies suggests they play a supporting role in the market, perhaps as vehicles for more sophisticated individual investors or family partnerships, rather than as large-scale corporate entities.

The complete absence of company dominance at any level reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the Door County market, where personal ownership is the standard regardless of portfolio size.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is concentrated in zip code 54235, which contains 2,371 landlord-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a key feature of the Door County investor market, with a single zip code, 54235, accounting for 2,371 investor-owned properties. This is more than triple the number in the next-highest zip code, 54202 (704 properties).

High investor penetration is widespread, with five zip codes having more than 50% of their housing stock owned by investors. This points to specific areas being dominated by rental and second-home activity.

The areas with the highest investor ownership rates are distinct from the volume leader. The top five zip codes by penetration are 54211 (71.1%), 54246 (54.4%), 54210 (53.2%), 54202 (52.1%), and 54212 (51.0%). These high-density investor markets likely correspond to key tourism or vacation areas.

The top region by count, 54235, has a comparatively lower ownership rate of 28.4%. This indicates it is a larger, more mixed-use residential area where investors have a substantial footprint but do not constitute the majority of owners.

This bifurcation between one high-volume area and several high-penetration areas provides a detailed map of investor strategy, targeting both larger population centers and smaller, high-demand vacation spots.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 548 properties and selling only 24.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024 reveals a period of aggressive accumulation by landlords in Door County. Investors purchased 548 properties while selling only 24, establishing themselves as decisive net buyers.

The buy-to-sell ratio of 22.8-to-1 for the year is exceptionally high and signals overwhelming demand from investors to increase their holdings in the region. This indicates a strong belief in the market's future appreciation and rental income potential.

This intense buying pressure in 2024 helps provide context for the current high levels of investor ownership. It was a period of significant portfolio growth that expanded the investor footprint across the county.

The absence of transaction data for institutional investors during this period aligns with the ownership data, which shows a negligible presence. All buying and selling activity was driven by the dominant mom-and-pop segment of the market.

This trend of strong net buying highlights a market where investors were actively taking supply off the market and converting it to rental stock, a key dynamic shaping local housing availability.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove over half of market activity in Q4 2025, accounting for 54.5% of all transactions.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter of activity, Q4 2025, landlords played a central role in the market, participating in 12 of the 22 total SFR transactions. This 54.5% share demonstrates that investors are the most active buyer group in Door County.

Transaction volume was entirely concentrated in the mom-and-pop segment. Single-property landlords conducted 10 transactions, while small landlords (3-5 properties) conducted 2. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions, reinforcing their absence from the active market.

New entrants paid an average of $319,000 per property, establishing a benchmark price point for small investors acquiring their first rental home in the current market.

A notable finding is that 0% of landlord purchases were from other landlords. This indicates that investors are acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or new construction, rather than trading assets among themselves. This pattern expands the overall rental pool rather than just churning existing rental stock.

The data clearly shows a market where new and small investors are the primary drivers of sales activity, actively converting owner-occupied housing into rental properties.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Define Door County's Market, Owning 37.0% of Homes and Controlling 99.9% of Rentals
Holdings
Landlords own 6,243 single-family properties, a 37.0% share of the Door County market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 4,680 properties (75.0%), compared to 1,701 (27.2%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties for 32.3% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $152,111 per home ($319,000 vs. $471,111).
Activity
Investors purchased 56.2% of all homes sold in Q4 2025 (9 properties), with activity driven by small players as 10 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 99.9% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors own a mere 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes, and there is no crossover tier where companies take majority control from individuals.
Transactions
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 22.8x buy-to-sell ratio (548 buys vs. 24 sells). Data on institutional transactions is unavailable due to their negligible market presence.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Door County, WI, is uniquely characterized by a high concentration of small, individual investors. Landlords own 6,243 properties, a significant 37.0% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 99.9% of all investor-owned homes. The market is propelled by individuals, who own 75.0% of these properties, while institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent footprint with only two properties. This structure points to a decentralized, grassroots rental market built by a large number of local or regional players.

Investor behavior underscores their critical role in market liquidity and pricing. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 56.2% of all homes sold, with all purchases made by the mom-and-pop segment. Their purchasing strategy appears effective; in Q1 2026, they secured a massive 32.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying $319,000 on average versus $471,111. This is a dramatic reversal from 2025, when they often paid premiums. Historically, investors have been in a strong accumulation phase, evidenced by a 22.8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2024, signaling deep confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Door County is a market defined by high investor penetration but not by corporate ownership. It is a prime example of a vacation and second-home destination where thousands of individual investors create a robust rental economy. The market's health and rental availability are directly tied to the financial capacity and sentiment of these small landlords, who continue to actively acquire properties from the general housing market rather than from each other. This dynamic suggests a continuous conversion of housing stock to rental use, a trend that shapes the character and affordability of the community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 05:35 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Door (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Door (WI) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wi-door/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.