Dickey (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dickey (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dickey (ND)
1,479
Total Investors in Dickey (ND)
482
Investor Owned SFR in Dickey (ND)
488(33.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
441
SFR Owned
447
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
41
SFR Owned
49
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 488 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Dickey County, Owning 33% of Homes with Zero Institutional Presence
Investors own 488 SFR properties, a significant 33.0% of the market in Dickey County, with 100% of this ownership concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords. In Q1, landlords purchased 40.0% of all homes sold while securing a massive 55.3% discount compared to homeowners. The market is defined by small, individual investors who are actively accumulating properties, while institutional firms have no footprint.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individuals hold 91.6% of the 488 investor-owned homes in Dickey County.
The vast majority (87.7%) of these properties were purchased with cash, not financing. Nearly all investor properties (484 of 488) are operated as rentals, indicating a strong focus on non-owner-occupied strategies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors in Q1 paid 55.3% less than homeowners, a $135,071 discount per property.
This discount is highly volatile, swinging from an 87.0% discount in Q3 2025 to a 0.7% premium in Q2 2025. This fluctuation highlights the pricing instability and potential for deep-value buys in a low-transaction market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 40.0% of all home purchases in the first quarter.
All (100.0%) of these purchases were made by mom-and-pop landlords. The market welcomed 3 new single-property landlords, who accounted for 75.0% of all investor buying activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 100.0% of the investor-owned housing stock in Dickey County.
Single-property landlords alone account for an overwhelming 85.5% of all investor-owned homes. There is zero institutional (1000+ properties) ownership recorded in the county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across all tiers, with no company dominance.
Companies have a minimal presence, with their highest share being 24.3% in the 3-5 property tier. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 58436 (277 properties) and 58474 (157 properties).
Certain zip codes show extreme investor penetration, with 58458 at 100.0% and 58413 at 83.3% investor-owned. This signals that in some very small communities, nearly all rental housing is provided by investors.
Historical Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1.
This accumulation trend is consistent over time, with a powerful 34-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 and a 12-to-1 ratio in 2024. There were no recorded institutional transactions in any period, meaning all activity is from small landlords.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 40.0% of all Q1 property transactions.
All investor purchases were by the smallest mom-and-pop tiers (1-2 properties). Notably, 0% of these acquisitions were from other landlords, indicating investors are buying directly from the homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individuals hold 91.6% of the 488 investor-owned homes in Dickey County.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Dickey County, owning 488 single-family properties, which accounts for 33.0% of the total 1,479 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate indicates that rental properties managed by investors play a crucial role in the local housing ecosystem.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 447 properties, or 91.6% of the investor portfolio, compared to just 49 properties (10.0%) owned by companies. This dynamic underscores a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing.

Cash is the dominant financing method for investors in this region. A total of 428 properties (87.7%) are owned outright without a mortgage, while only 60 properties (12.3%) are financed. This suggests that investors are well-capitalized and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 484 of the 488 investor-owned properties identified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This near-total focus on rentals highlights the primary strategy of investors in Dickey County.

The market structure consists of 482 distinct landlords, with 441 being individuals and 41 being companies. The data reveals that the average individual landlord holds a very small portfolio, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local investment scene.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors in Q1 paid 55.3% less than homeowners, a $135,071 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Dickey County secured properties at a significant discount in the first quarter of 2026. Their average acquisition price was $109,167, a full 55.3% lower than the $244,238 average paid by traditional homeowners, representing a savings of $135,071 per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners shows extreme volatility, a characteristic of a market with low transaction volume. For instance, the discount was an even larger 87.0% in Q3 2025 ($39,144 vs $301,935), but investors actually paid a slight 0.7% premium in Q2 2025. This variability suggests that average prices are heavily influenced by the specific properties sold each quarter.

Despite the lack of recent acquisitions shown in some timeframes, the historical data indicates price appreciation. The average price during the 2020-2023 period was $112,408, slightly higher than the most recent Q1 2026 average of $109,167, though pricing in 2025 fluctuated significantly.

This pricing behavior suggests investors in this market are highly price-sensitive and likely target distressed or off-market properties that traditional buyers may overlook, enabling them to acquire assets far below the typical market rate.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 40.0% of all home purchases in the first quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the housing market in Q1, with landlords purchasing 4 of the 10 total SFRs sold, a 40.0% market share. This high level of activity demonstrates that investors are a primary source of demand in Dickey County.

The acquisition market is exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 100.0% of all investor purchases during the quarter, with zero activity from mid-size or institutional buyers.

New entrants are the primary drivers of growth. Landlords purchasing their very first investment property (Tier 01) made up the bulk of activity, acquiring 3 of the 4 properties (75.0%) bought by investors.

The remaining 25.0% of purchases (1 property) was made by a landlord in the two-property tier. This concentration at the smallest end of the spectrum reinforces the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) had no presence in the Q1 acquisition market, acquiring 0 properties. This complete absence stands in stark contrast to narratives of corporate consolidation and highlights a market dominated by local capital.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 100.0% of the investor-owned housing stock in Dickey County.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership landscape in Dickey County is completely defined by mom-and-pop landlords, who control 100.0% of the 488 investor-owned SFRs. This market structure shows no influence from larger, consolidated investors.

The single-property landlord tier is the bedrock of the rental market. This group owns 418 properties, representing a commanding 85.5% of all investor-held housing. This signifies a market with a very low barrier to entry, dominated by first-time and small-scale investors.

Ownership concentration dissipates quickly in larger tiers. Landlords with two properties hold just 5.5% of the market (27 properties), followed by those with 3-5 properties at 7.6% (37 properties). The largest investors in the county own between 6-10 properties, controlling a mere 1.4% of the portfolio.

There is absolutely no institutional investor presence in Dickey County. The 1000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds 0.0% of the market, a clear indication that this area is not a target for large-scale corporate rental firms.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market composed of numerous small landlords, which can lead to diverse management styles and a lack of centralized control over the rental housing supply.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own the vast majority of properties across all tiers, with no company dominance.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across every single portfolio tier in Dickey County. In the largest single-property tier, individuals own 392 of the 418 properties, a 92.0% share.

There is no tier where corporate ownership becomes dominant. Even in the relatively larger 3-5 property tier, individuals still own 75.7% of the properties (28 homes), while companies own just 9 properties (24.3%).

The role of companies in this market is limited to small-scale holdings. The data shows companies are most active in the 1-5 property range but never approach a majority stake, indicating they are likely small, local businesses rather than arms of larger corporations.

Landlords in the 6-10 property tier are exclusively individuals, with 100.0% of the 7 properties in this bracket owned by individual investors. This further emphasizes the lack of corporate scaling in the local market.

This ownership pattern highlights a market where personal capital and direct management are the norms, with corporate structures being the exception rather than the rule for holding rental properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 58436 (277 properties) and 58474 (157 properties).
Detailed Findings

The majority of investor-owned properties in Dickey County are concentrated in just a few zip codes. The 58436 area leads with 277 properties, followed by 58474 with 157 properties. Together, these two areas account for the bulk of the county's rental housing stock.

While some zip codes lead by sheer volume, others stand out for their exceptionally high rate of investor ownership. In 58458, 100.0% of the housing is investor-owned, and in 58413, the rate is 83.3%. This suggests these are small communities where homeownership is rare and the housing market is almost entirely rental-based.

The data reveals a distinction between areas with the most investor properties and those with the highest investor penetration. For example, 58436 has the most properties (277) but a 46.7% ownership rate, while 58458 has a 100.0% rate but far fewer properties total. This highlights different market dynamics within the same county.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 58441, with 21 investor properties representing a 33.3% ownership rate, and 58439, with 14 properties at a high 48.3% rate.

This geographic distribution points to specific towns or communities within Dickey County where rental demand is highest, drawing concentrated investment from local landlords.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Investors are strong net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Dickey County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In the first quarter of 2026, investors purchased 4 properties while only selling 1, establishing their position as net buyers.

This pattern of net buying has been persistent over the last several years. In 2025, the trend was even more pronounced, with 34 buys and only 1 sale. Similarly, 2024 saw 24 properties purchased by investors versus only 2 sold.

The market shows no signs of divestment from the landlord community; instead, the data points to a steady expansion of rental portfolios across the county. This reflects strong confidence in the local rental market's stability and profitability.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were completely absent from the transaction market. There were zero recorded buy or sell transactions for this group in any timeframe, confirming that market dynamics are dictated exclusively by mom-and-pop investors.

The consistent net buying behavior from small landlords indicates a long-term commitment to the area and a belief in the continued demand for rental housing in Dickey County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 40.0% of all Q1 property transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a significant role in Q1 market activity, participating in 4 out of the 10 total transactions for a 40.0% market share. This high level of involvement underscores their importance as a source of liquidity and demand.

All transaction activity was concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Landlords in the single-property tier conducted 3 transactions, while those in the two-property tier conducted 1. No transactions were recorded for any investors with portfolios larger than two properties.

A key finding from the quarter is the absence of inter-landlord trading. None of the properties purchased by investors were acquired from other landlords (0% 'Bought From Landlords'). This shows that investors are expanding the rental pool by purchasing homes from traditional homeowners or from new stock, rather than trading existing rental assets among themselves.

Purchase prices were very similar between the active tiers, with single-property buyers paying an average of $108,750 and two-property buyers paying $110,000. This narrow price spread suggests a similar acquisition strategy focused on affordable properties.

The complete lack of activity from institutional investors reinforces that the transactional market, like the ownership market, is entirely a mom-and-pop affair in Dickey County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Dickey County, Owning 33% of Homes with Zero Institutional Presence
Holdings
Investors own 488 single-family properties in Dickey County, representing a significant 33.0% of the total market. Individual investors hold a commanding 91.6% of this portfolio (447 properties), with companies owning the remaining 10.0% (49 properties).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired properties at a staggering 55.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $109,167 versus the homeowner price of $244,238.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q1, purchasing 40.0% of all homes sold (4 properties). Activity was driven by new entrants, with 3 new single-property landlords making up 75.0% of investor acquisitions.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) completely define the investor market, controlling 100.0% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero ownership share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio size tier, maintaining majority ownership from single-property landlords up to the 6-10 property tier. Companies do not achieve majority ownership at any scale in this market.
Transactions
Landlords are actively accumulating properties, posting a 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (4 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Dickey County, North Dakota, is defined by the complete dominance of small, individual landlords who own a substantial 33.0% of all single-family residential properties. The total investor portfolio consists of 488 homes, with 91.6% (447 properties) held by individuals and only 10.0% by companies. This structure counters the national narrative of corporate consolidation, as 100% of these properties are controlled by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), while institutional firms have zero presence in the county.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 40.0% of all homes sold, securing them at an average price of $109,167, a remarkable 55.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by new market entrants, with single-property landlords accounting for 75.0% of investor purchases. Transaction data confirms a strong accumulation trend, with investors acting as net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the first quarter, a pattern consistent with previous years.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Dickey County represents a microcosm of a highly localized, grassroots rental market. It operates entirely independent of large-scale capital, driven by local individuals acquiring properties with cash at deep discounts. The high investor penetration rate and concentration in specific zip codes highlight the critical role these small landlords play in providing rental housing to the community, a dynamic that shapes local housing availability and affordability.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:00 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Dickey (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Dickey (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-dickey/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.