Haakon (SD) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Haakon (SD) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Haakon (SD)
547
Total Investors in Haakon (SD)
8
Investor Owned SFR in Haakon (SD)
6(1.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4
SFR Owned
2
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
4
SFR Owned
4
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Haakon County Investor Market Stagnant with Zero Q4 Sales and Only 6 Total Rental Properties
The real estate investor market in Haakon County is exceptionally small and dormant, with investors owning just 6 properties, or 1.1% of the total SFR market. Companies surprisingly hold a majority 66.7% of these properties. The market saw zero investor purchase activity in Q4 2025, underscoring its illiquid nature.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 6 SFRs in Haakon County; companies hold a majority 66.7%.
All 6 investor-owned properties were purchased with cash, with none recorded as financed. Half of the portfolio, or 3 properties, is currently classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord or homeowner transactions were recorded, preventing all price analysis.
The complete absence of sales in recent timeframes makes it impossible to analyze pricing trends, compare landlord vs. homeowner prices, or determine if a price gap exists in this market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchase activity was zero in Q4 2025, representing a completely dormant market.
Landlords acquired 0 properties out of 0 total SFR purchases in the county during Q4 2025. Consequently, mom-and-pop and institutional investors both had zero purchase volume.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords own 83.3% of rental properties, with zero institutional presence.
Single-property landlords alone account for 50% of all investor-owned homes in the county. No pricing data is available by tier due to the lack of recent sales transactions.
Ownership by Tier & Type
While companies own 66.7% of properties, individuals form the majority of single-property landlords.
In the single-property tier, individuals own 2 properties (66.7%) compared to just 1 for companies. This contrasts with the overall market where companies hold a majority of the assets.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is limited to 6 properties, primarily in the 57567 zip code.
The highest investor ownership rate is just 1.3% in zip code 57567, which is home to 5 of the 6 investor-owned properties. The only other property is in 57552, with a 0.9% rate.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, indicating extremely low market liquidity.
The absence of any recorded buy or sell transactions over historical periods makes it impossible to determine a buy/sell ratio, assess inter-landlord trading, or analyze price margins.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords conducted zero transactions in Q4 2025, for a 0.0% share of market activity.
With zero transactions across the board, there were no purchases by any tier, no inter-landlord trades, and no pricing data to compare mom-and-pop investors against larger players.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 6 SFRs in Haakon County; companies hold a majority 66.7%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Haakon County is minimal, comprising just 6 single-family residential properties out of a total of 547, which is a market penetration of only 1.1%.

In a reversal of typical market structures, companies are the dominant owners, holding 4 properties (66.7%), while individual investors own the remaining 2 properties (33.3%).

The ownership is split between 8 distinct landlord entities, with 4 being individuals and 4 being companies, indicating very small portfolio sizes for each.

A significant financial characteristic of this portfolio is that 100% of the properties (6 total) are owned with cash, with no properties currently financed through mortgages.

Of the 6 properties, 3 are classified as rented, representing 50% of the investor-owned stock being actively used as rental units.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord or homeowner transactions were recorded, preventing all price analysis.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Haakon County is characterized by extremely low liquidity, with no recorded acquisitions in the available timeframes, including Q4 2025.

Due to the lack of transactions, no average acquisition price could be calculated for landlords or traditional homeowners, preventing any comparative analysis.

It is not possible to identify a price gap between what investors and homeowners pay, a common metric in more active markets.

Analysis of price appreciation or depreciation over time is unachievable, as there are no historical or recent sales data points to establish a benchmark.

The absence of data itself is a key finding, signaling a stable, hold-oriented market where properties rarely change hands rather than an active market for real estate investing.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchase activity was zero in Q4 2025, representing a completely dormant market.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing was completely stagnant in Q4 2025, with investors acquiring 0 of the 0 total SFR properties sold in Haakon County, for a 0.0% share of market activity.

No new landlords entered the market during the quarter, as the number of purchases by single-property (Tier 01) investors was zero.

Activity was nonexistent across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) making up 0.0% of the quarter's purchases.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) also showed no activity, recording zero acquisitions and reflecting their overall absence from this rural market.

The lack of any purchases highlights a market with little to no investor-driven demand or turnover in the final quarter of 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords own 83.3% of rental properties, with zero institutional presence.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Haakon County is exclusively controlled by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 5 of the 6 properties, an 83.3% share.

The most common type of landlord is the smallest, as single-property owners (Tier 01) control 3 properties, a full 50.0% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

There is zero presence from large institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties), underscoring the market's small, local character.

The remaining investor-owned properties are thinly spread, with one property held by a landlord in the 3-5 property tier, one in the 6-10 tier, and one in the 11-20 tier.

Due to a lack of sales, it's impossible to analyze acquisition prices by tier to determine if larger landlords pay more or less than smaller ones.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
While companies own 66.7% of properties, individuals form the majority of single-property landlords.
Detailed Findings

A key dynamic in Haakon County is the split between individual and company ownership. While companies own the majority of properties overall (4 of 6), individuals are more prevalent at the entry level.

Within the single-property (Tier 01) landlord segment, individuals are the dominant force, owning 2 of the 3 properties (66.7%).

This indicates that while individuals are more likely to be first-time or small-scale landlords, the slightly larger holdings are structured as companies.

A definitive crossover point where companies become the majority owners is immediate, as they own a portion of the smallest tier and all properties in the tiers above it for which data is available.

No pricing data exists to compare acquisition costs between individual and company buyers within any tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is limited to 6 properties, primarily in the 57567 zip code.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Haakon County is highly concentrated geographically, with all 6 properties located in just two zip codes.

The zip code 57567 is the center of this limited activity, containing 5 of the 6 investor-owned SFRs.

Despite this concentration, the investor ownership rate remains extremely low at just 1.3% in 57567, indicating a market dominated by traditional homeowners.

The second zip code with any investor presence is 57552, which contains a single investor-owned property and an ownership rate of 0.9%.

Other zip codes in the county, such as 57537, 57553, and 57775, show no recorded investor-owned SFR properties.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, indicating extremely low market liquidity.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction velocity for landlords in Haakon County is effectively zero, with no buys or sells recorded in the provided data.

This lack of activity prevents the calculation of a buy/sell ratio, making it impossible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers.

There is no data on landlord-to-landlord transactions, a key indicator of market liquidity and portfolio trading in more active areas.

Without buy and sell prices, an analysis of implied profit margins or price appreciation over holding periods cannot be performed.

The complete absence of historical transactions is the primary finding, painting a picture of a buy-and-hold market with virtually no turnover.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords conducted zero transactions in Q4 2025, for a 0.0% share of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The transactional market for real estate investors in Haakon County was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords involved in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes, from single-property owners (Tier 01) to mid-size landlords, with every tier recording zero transactions.

Consequently, no inter-landlord trading occurred, as the percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%.

Average purchase prices by tier could not be calculated, so it is impossible to know if different investor sizes employ different pricing strategies.

The transactional data for Q4 2025 reinforces the broader theme of a dormant, non-transactional investor market in the county.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Haakon County's investor market is nearly nonexistent, with only 6 properties and zero Q4 2025 sales.
Holdings
Investors own just 6 SFR properties in Haakon County, 1.1% of the market. Companies hold a 66.7% majority (4 properties), while individuals own the remaining 33.3% (2 properties).
Pricing
No sales were recorded in Q4 2025, making a price comparison between landlords and homeowners impossible and highlighting a highly illiquid market.
Activity
Investor purchase activity was nonexistent in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all market sales. No new landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 83.3% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional investors have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Despite individuals comprising half of all landlord entities, companies own the majority of properties (66.7%). A crossover to company dominance occurs immediately.
Transactions
With zero buys and zero sells recorded in Q4 2025, the market was dormant. The landlord buy/sell ratio is undefined, reflecting a complete halt in transactional activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Haakon County, SD is exceptionally small and stable, characterized by a lack of transactional activity. Investors own a mere 6 single-family homes, which constitutes just 1.1% of the county's total SFR housing stock. In a notable departure from national trends, companies own a two-thirds majority of these properties (4 homes), despite the owner base being evenly split between 4 individuals and 4 companies. This entire micro-portfolio is dominated by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 83.3% of the assets and no presence from institutional-scale investors.

Investor behavior in Haakon County points to a long-term, buy-and-hold strategy rather than active trading. The market saw a complete absence of investor activity in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased or sold. This lack of transactions makes it impossible to analyze pricing strategies or compare investor purchase prices against those of traditional homeowners. Furthermore, the entire 6-property portfolio is owned outright with cash, with no mortgage financing recorded, signaling a low-risk, low-leverage approach to ownership.

The key takeaway for Haakon County is that it is not an active market for real estate investment. The extremely low number of investor-owned properties, combined with zero recent sales and a lack of institutional interest, depicts a landscape dominated by primary homeowners. Any future activity would be a significant departure from the current state of dormancy. The market's structure suggests that existing rentals are likely held by local individuals or small businesses as long-term assets rather than for speculative purposes.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:24 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Haakon (SD)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Haakon (SD) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-sd-haakon/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.