Sedgwick (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sedgwick (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sedgwick (CO)
882
Total Investors in Sedgwick (CO)
372
Investor Owned SFR in Sedgwick (CO)
323(36.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
356
SFR Owned
308
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
16
SFR Owned
19
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 323 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Sedgwick County Investors Own 36.6% of Homes but Halted All New Purchases
Investors own 323 single-family properties in Sedgwick County, CO, representing a significant 36.6% of the market. The landscape is entirely controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (100%), with individuals owning 95.4% of the portfolio. However, investor purchasing activity came to a complete stop in early 2026, with zero acquisitions recorded, signaling a major shift from previous years of net buying.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 323 properties, 36.6% of the market, with individuals holding 95.4%.
The majority of investor properties are owned outright, with 258 held in cash versus just 65 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 320 of the 323 properties (99.1%) are non-owner-occupied. Individual landlords (356) vastly outnumber company landlords (16).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a $100,000 (54.1%) discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025.
The price gap was even wider in Q2 2025, when landlords paid 80.2% less than traditional homeowners. However, transaction volume was extremely low in these periods. No landlord acquisitions were recorded in Q1 2025, making a price comparison impossible for that quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchase activity was 0% in Q4 2025, with no acquisitions recorded.
Both mom-and-pop and institutional investor tiers recorded zero purchases in Q4. This lack of activity indicates a market-wide pause from all investor types, continuing a trend of extremely low volume from earlier in the year.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, owning 262 properties, which is 79.6% of all investor-held homes. There is zero institutional (1000+ properties) ownership in Sedgwick County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate all tiers, owning 95.5% of single-property portfolios.
Companies have a minimal footprint, with their highest concentration being just 16.0% in the two-property tier. A crossover point where companies become the majority owner does not exist in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with 65.2% and 63.1% ownership in two zip codes.
The zip codes 80749 (65.2% investor-owned) and 80744 (63.1%) show an extreme density of rental properties. Together, these two areas contain 248 of the 323 investor-owned properties in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords have been consistent net buyers, purchasing 3.4 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
In 2025, landlords acquired 17 properties while selling only 5. A similar trend was observed in 2024, with 9 buys and 3 sells. There is no institutional activity to compare against.
Current Quarter Transactions
The landlord share of transactions was 0% in Q1 2026, with no recorded activity.
The absence of transactions was consistent across all mom-and-pop tiers, which represent the entire investor market in the county. This reflects a complete pause in portfolio adjustments or new entries into the market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 323 properties, 36.6% of the market, with individuals holding 95.4%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 36.6% share of the single-family residential market in Sedgwick County, CO, with a total of 323 properties under their control out of 882 total SFRs.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 356 individual landlords, who own 308 properties, accounting for 95.4% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, 16 companies own the remaining 19 properties (5.9%), underscoring the market's 'mom-and-pop' character.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 258 properties (79.9%) owned free of financing. This is nearly four times the number of financed properties (65), indicating a financially conservative or cash-heavy investor base.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals. A total of 320 properties are classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, representing 99.1% of all investor-owned homes and confirming a focus on rental income over speculation.

This composition of high penetration by small, individual, cash-centric landlords defines the core of Sedgwick County's real estate investing landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a $100,000 (54.1%) discount compared to homeowners in Q3 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Sedgwick County acquire properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners, though on very low transaction volumes. In Q3 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was $85,000, which was 54.1% lower than the homeowner average of $185,000, a staggering $100,000 difference.

This trend of deep discounts was even more pronounced in the prior quarter. In Q2 2025, landlords paid an average of just $45,000, a massive 80.2% discount compared to the $227,333 paid by homeowners.

However, recent acquisition prices represent a cooling from the pandemic-era boom. The average price during 2020-2023 was $117,440, significantly higher than the prices recorded in mid-2025.

The most recent data from Q1 2026 shows a complete halt in purchasing activity, with zero properties acquired by landlords, preventing any price comparison for the current period and signaling a pause in market engagement.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord purchase activity was 0% in Q4 2025, with no acquisitions recorded.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity in Sedgwick County came to a standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords making zero purchases out of the 6 total SFR sales in the market. This marks a landlord market share of 0% for the quarter.

The halt in purchasing was comprehensive across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who constitute the entirety of the local investor base, recorded no new acquisitions.

Correspondingly, there was no activity from mid-size or institutional investors, as these segments have no presence in the county's ownership landscape.

This complete lack of new investment follows several quarters of extremely low volume, indicating either a satisfaction with current holdings, unfavorable market conditions, or a lack of desirable inventory for investors in the area.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Sedgwick County is exclusively composed of small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 100% of the 329 investor-owned properties for which tier data is available.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, with 262 properties representing 79.6% of the total. This highlights a market dominated by new or small-scale investors rather than professional portfolio holders.

The next largest tiers are small landlords with 3-5 properties (42 properties, 12.8%) and two-property owners (25 properties, 7.6%).

There is a complete absence of mid-size (11-1000 properties) and institutional (1000+ properties) investors in the county. This market structure defies the common narrative of large corporate landlords and points to a purely local, small-investor ecosystem.

The data from these market reports indicates that any market shifts are driven entirely by the decisions of these small landlords, not larger outside capital.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate all tiers, owning 95.5% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the prevailing ownership type across every single investor tier in Sedgwick County, reinforcing the market's 'mom-and-pop' nature. In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 254 of 266 properties (95.5%).

The minimal corporate presence is slightly more visible in the two-property tier, yet companies still only account for 4 of 25 properties (16.0%).

For landlords holding 3-5 properties, individual ownership remains dominant at 92.9% (39 properties), with companies holding the remaining 3 properties (7.1%).

Unlike larger metropolitan markets, there is no crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. Individuals maintain a vast majority across the entire portfolio spectrum present in the county.

This data confirms that both the number of landlords and the properties they own are overwhelmingly associated with private individuals, not corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with 65.2% and 63.1% ownership in two zip codes.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Sedgwick County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific zip codes. The highest investor penetration is found in 80749, where investors own 65.2% of the 115 SFR properties.

Following closely is zip code 80744, with an investor ownership rate of 63.1% across 118 properties. These incredibly high rates suggest these areas function as primary rental hubs within the county.

In contrast, the 80737 zip code has a much lower, though still significant, investor ownership rate of 22.5%, with 130 properties owned by investors.

This geographic concentration indicates that investment strategies are location-specific, targeting distinct communities. The vast majority of rental housing is located in just a few key areas, a crucial insight for understanding the local housing market.

Analysis of this assessor data reveals that understanding the county requires a zip-code-level perspective, as market dynamics vary significantly by location.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords have been consistent net buyers, purchasing 3.4 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historically, landlords in Sedgwick County have been actively expanding their portfolios. In 2025, they were strong net buyers, acquiring 17 properties while only selling 5, resulting in a net gain of 12 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.4-to-1.

This pattern of accumulation was also evident in 2024, when landlords purchased 9 properties and sold 3, for a net gain of 6 properties and a 3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

The most recent quarterly data for Q3 2025 shows this trend continuing, albeit at a smaller scale, with 2 properties bought and 1 sold.

This consistent history of net buying stands in stark contrast to the complete halt in acquisitions seen in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026, signaling a significant and abrupt shift in investor strategy or market conditions.

As there is no institutional investor presence in the county, these transaction trends are driven entirely by the behavior of small, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
The landlord share of transactions was 0% in Q1 2026, with no recorded activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investor activity in Sedgwick County's real estate market was non-existent. Out of 7 total single-family residential transactions, none involved a landlord as a buyer, resulting in a 0% market share for investor purchases.

This inactivity was universal across all investor tiers. The mom-and-pop segments (Tiers 01-04), which make up 100% of the local investor base, recorded zero transactions during the quarter.

Consequently, no pricing data is available for any tier, and it is impossible to analyze purchasing strategies or inter-landlord trading for the period.

The complete cessation of investor buying activity in the most recent quarter is the most critical market signal. It represents a sharp break from previous years of consistent net purchasing and suggests a 'wait-and-see' approach has been adopted by the local investor community.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Sedgwick County with 36.6% Market Share but Halted All New Buying in 2026
Holdings
Investors own 323 single-family properties in Sedgwick County, CO, representing a substantial 36.6% of the market. The portfolio is almost entirely held by individuals (95.4%) rather than companies (5.9%).
Pricing
Based on the most recent transactional data (Q3 2025), landlords acquired properties for 54.1% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $100,000 per property ($85,000 vs. $185,000).
Activity
Investor purchasing came to a complete stop in Q1 2026, with landlords accounting for 0% of the 7 SFR sales. This follows a Q4 2025 with similarly zero recorded landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
'Mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control, owning 100% of the investor-held housing stock. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes, holding over 92% of properties in every tier. There is no point at which companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
While landlords were historically net buyers, with a 3.4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025, they have become completely inactive recently. No landlord buy-side transactions were recorded in the latest quarter.
Market Narrative

In Sedgwick County, CO, the single-family rental market is defined by deep penetration and local control. Investors own 323 homes, a significant 36.6% of the total SFR stock. This market is overwhelmingly composed of small-scale 'mom-and-pop' operators, who control 100% of investor-owned properties. Individuals, not companies, are the driving force, owning 95.4% of these homes. This structure points to a mature, community-embedded rental market rather than one influenced by large, outside capital.

Despite their significant presence, investor behavior has shifted dramatically. Historically, these landlords were active net buyers, expanding their portfolios consistently through 2024 and 2025. When they did purchase, they secured properties at massive discounts, paying over 50% less than traditional homeowners in mid-2025. However, this acquisition activity came to an abrupt halt at the end of 2025 and into 2026, with zero landlord purchases recorded in the most recent quarter. This sudden inactivity suggests a major change in market sentiment or conditions.

The key takeaway for Sedgwick County is the story of a deeply penetrated, locally-owned rental market that has hit the brakes. The high concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes (over 60% in some areas) makes the behavior of these small landlords a critical factor in local housing stability. Their collective pause on new investment is the most important trend, signaling a potential peak in investor expansion and a new phase of holding and managing existing assets.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:37 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Sedgwick (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Sedgwick (CO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-co-sedgwick/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.