Grant (WI) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Grant (WI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Grant (WI)
13,144
Total Investors in Grant (WI)
1,742
Investor Owned SFR in Grant (WI)
1,468(11.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,585
SFR Owned
1,330
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
157
SFR Owned
168
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,468 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Grant County's Investor Market is Defined by Small Landlords, Who Own 98% of Rentals and Buy at a 53% Discount
In Grant County, investors own 1,468 SFR properties, representing 11.2% of the market. The landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by 'mom-and-pop' landlords who control 97.6% of investor-owned housing, while individuals, not companies, own 90.6% of the portfolio. These investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a staggering 52.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,468 SFR properties in Grant County, with individual investors holding a dominant 90.6% share.
The investor portfolio is largely owned free and clear, with 1,165 properties held as cash versus just 303 that are financed. Of all landlord-owned properties, 95.6% (1,403) are classified as rentals, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 52.6% less than homeowners, securing a massive $120,447 average discount per property.
This significant price gap is a consistent trend, with landlords achieving discounts of 29.2% in Q3 2025 and 42.9% in Q2 2025. Landlords consistently purchase properties at a much lower price point ($108,600 in Q1) than traditional homeowners ($229,047).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 13.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of that activity.
New investors are actively entering the market, with 12 new single-property entities acquiring 9 homes, representing 69.2% of all landlord purchases. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made zero acquisitions in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Grant County's rental market, owning 97.6% of all investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 70.5% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio, which amounts to 2 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors own over 87% of properties across every small-to-midsize landlord tier in Grant County, showing no corporate shift.
In the single-property tier, individuals own 89.8% of the homes. Companies fail to become the majority owner in any reported portfolio size, holding just 3.8% in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Grant County is led by Platteville (53818) with 267 properties, while Boscobel (53801) has the highest concentration at 41.0%.
Platteville (53818) and Cuba City (53805) are the top two areas by sheer volume of investor-owned homes. However, smaller zip codes like Boscobel (53801) and Wyalusing (53827) show much deeper market penetration, with investor ownership rates of 41.0% and 29.5%, respectively.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Grant County are strong net buyers, acquiring 16 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of accumulation has been consistent for years, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 5.1x in 2025 (82 buys vs. 16 sells) and 3.75x in 2024 (75 buys vs. 20 sells). No transaction data was available for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 12.8% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, with all 16 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
Single-property investors paid the highest average price at $107,727. The only recorded landlord-to-landlord transaction occurred in the 3-5 property tier, with the property acquired for a low price of $50,000.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,468 SFR properties in Grant County, with individual investors holding a dominant 90.6% share.
Detailed Findings

In Grant County, investors hold 1,468 single-family residential properties, accounting for 11.2% of the total SFR market. This presence is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale, individual ownership rather than corporate consolidation.

Individual investors are the backbone of the market, owning 1,330 properties, which constitutes a commanding 90.6% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 168, or 11.4%, underscoring the local, non-institutional nature of real estate investment in the area.

A significant indicator of market stability is the financing structure of these holdings. A remarkable 79.4% of investor-owned properties (1,165) are held in cash, compared to only 20.6% (303) that are financed. This low leverage suggests a financially resilient investor base less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations.

The data on landlord entities versus properties reveals a highly fragmented market. There are 1,742 distinct landlord entities for 1,468 properties, with individuals making up 1,585 of those landlords. This indicates that co-ownership is common and the average investor's portfolio is extremely small.

The primary use for these properties is clear, with 1,403 of the 1,468 properties (95.6%) being rented. This high rental penetration confirms that the vast majority of investor-owned homes are actively contributing to the local rental housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 52.6% less than homeowners, securing a massive $120,447 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Grant County demonstrate a consistent and remarkable ability to acquire properties far below the prices paid by traditional homeowners. In Q1 2026, the average landlord acquisition price was $108,600, a staggering 52.6% less than the homeowner average of $229,047, representing a discount of $120,447 per home.

This is not a recent phenomenon but a persistent market dynamic. In Q3 2025, landlords paid 29.2% less ($176,405 vs. $249,066), and in Q2 2025, they paid 42.9% less ($146,456 vs. $256,450). This sustained gap suggests investors are targeting a different class of properties, such as those needing repairs or in less desirable locations, that are not competitive in the primary retail market.

The data reveals a clear segmentation in the housing market. Landlords operate in a sub-$180,000 price range, while traditional homebuyers are active in the $220,000 to $290,000 range. This indicates two parallel markets with minimal price overlap between buyer types.

While the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price for landlords was $128,711, the Q1 2026 price of $108,600 suggests a potential softening in the specific types of properties investors are targeting, or an increased focus on securing deeper discounts.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 13.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of that activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 13 of the 96 total SFRs sold in Grant County, capturing 13.5% of the market's purchase activity. This rate of acquisition is slightly higher than their overall market ownership of 11.2%, indicating continued portfolio growth.

The purchasing activity is exclusively driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of the 13 properties bought by investors, highlighting their complete dominance in the acquisitions market.

The market is seeing a steady influx of new participants. Single-property landlords were the most active group, with 12 new entities purchasing 9 properties. This makes up 69.2% of all investor buying and signals a healthy, growing base of first-time investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties had no presence in the Grant County acquisitions market, recording zero purchases in Q4. This reinforces the narrative that this is a market shaped by local individuals, not large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Grant County's rental market, owning 97.6% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of Grant County's investor market is extremely fragmented and concentrated at the smallest scale. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 97.6% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Landlords owning just a single property are the most significant group, holding 1,079 properties, which represents 70.5% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This segment forms the bedrock of the county's rental market, a finding that challenges any narrative of corporate landlord dominance.

The next largest tiers are also small-scale, with two-property owners holding 8.2% and landlords with 3-5 properties holding 14.1%. Together, these smallest three tiers control 92.8% of all investor properties.

At the other end of the spectrum, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a virtually nonexistent presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the investor-owned market. This data confirms that the local rental landscape is shaped by individuals and small businesses, not large-scale institutional capital.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors own over 87% of properties across every small-to-midsize landlord tier in Grant County, showing no corporate shift.
Detailed Findings

The dominance of individual ownership is a consistent theme across all investor portfolio sizes in Grant County. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; individuals maintain overwhelming control throughout.

In the largest segment, single-property landlords, individuals own 985 properties (89.8%) compared to just 112 for companies (10.2%). This pattern persists as portfolios grow.

Even among more established landlords with 6-10 properties, individuals own 64 homes (87.7%), while companies own only 9 (12.3%). This indicates that as local investors expand, they tend to do so under their own names rather than through formal corporate structures.

The data for the 11-20 property tier, the largest provided, shows this trend at its most extreme. Individuals own 25 properties (96.2%), with only a single property being company-owned (3.8%). This confirms that the investor landscape in Grant County is fundamentally driven by private individuals at every level.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Grant County is led by Platteville (53818) with 267 properties, while Boscobel (53801) has the highest concentration at 41.0%.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Grant County reveals distinct patterns of investor concentration. The zip code 53818 (Platteville) holds the highest absolute number of investor-owned properties at 267, making it the volume leader for real estate investing.

Following Platteville, the areas with the next highest counts are 53805 (Cuba City) with 188 properties and 53801 (Boscobel) with 186 properties. These three zip codes represent the core hubs of investor ownership in the county.

However, a different story emerges when looking at ownership as a percentage of the total market. The zip code 53801 (Boscobel) has the highest investor penetration rate by a wide margin, with 41.0% of all SFRs owned by investors. This is nearly four times the county-wide average of 11.2%.

Other areas with high concentration include 53827 (Wyalusing) at 29.5% and 53810 (Glen Haven) at 21.0%. This highlights that while some areas have more investor properties, others have a much higher proportion of their housing stock dedicated to rentals.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Grant County are strong net buyers, acquiring 16 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among Grant County landlords. In Q1 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 16 properties while selling only one, a 16-to-1 ratio that signals strong confidence in the local market.

This is not a short-term spike in activity but the continuation of a multi-year pattern. In 2025, landlords bought 82 properties and sold just 16, resulting in a net gain of 66 properties and a buy/sell ratio of 5.1x.

The pattern was similar in 2024, with 75 properties purchased and 20 sold, for a net gain of 55 properties and a 3.75x buy/sell ratio. This consistent, high-velocity acquisition demonstrates a long-term strategy of growth among the local investor base.

The absence of any transaction data for institutional investors (1,000+ tier) further confirms that all market-making activity, both buying and selling, is being conducted by the smaller mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords who define the area.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 12.8% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, with all 16 purchases made by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 16 of the 125 total SFR transactions in Grant County, accounting for 12.8% of market activity. All of this activity was concentrated within the mom-and-pop segment (Tiers 01-04).

First-time or single-property landlords were the most active, conducting 12 of the 16 investor transactions. They also paid the highest average price among investors at $107,727, suggesting they are competing for slightly higher-quality assets to begin their portfolios.

The data shows a wide price disparity even among small investors. While single-property landlords paid over $100,000, a landlord in the 3-5 property tier acquired a home for just $50,000, and an investor in the 6-10 property tier paid $190,000.

Inter-landlord trading appears to be minimal. Only one transaction, the $50,000 purchase by a 3-5 property landlord, was sourced from another landlord. This indicates that most investors are acquiring properties from the open market or traditional homeowners rather than from other investors.

Institutional investors were completely absent from the Q1 transaction landscape, further cementing the fact that Grant County's investor market is driven entirely by small, local operators.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Grant County's investor market is defined by small landlords, who own 98% of rentals and buy at a 53% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,468 SFR properties, representing 11.2% of Grant County's market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 1,330 properties (90.6%), compared to just 168 (11.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords paid 52.6% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average property for $108,600 compared to the homeowner price of $229,047, a discount of $120,447.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 13.5% of all homes sold (13 properties), with 12 new single-property landlords entering the market. All acquisition activity came from mom-and-pop investors.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 97.6% of investor housing, demonstrating near-total market dominance. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, holding 90.6% of all investor properties. Companies never achieve majority ownership, indicating that growth occurs primarily through private, not corporate, investment.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 16-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (16 buys vs. 1 sell). Institutional investors recorded zero transactions, showing no activity in the market.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Grant County, Wisconsin, is a landscape defined by small, local operators, not large corporations. Investors own 1,468 single-family properties, comprising 11.2% of the county's total SFR housing stock. Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of individuals, who hold 90.6% of these properties. The market structure is extremely fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 97.6% of all investor-owned homes, while institutional investors have a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Grant County is characterized by strategic acquisition and consistent growth. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 16-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, continuing a multi-year trend of portfolio expansion. They demonstrate a keen ability to find value, paying an average of 52.6% less than traditional homeowners for properties in the same period. This massive discount suggests a focus on acquiring distressed or undervalued assets that fall outside the primary retail market, a strategy that defines their niche.

The key takeaway is that Grant County’s rental housing supply is provided by a deeply rooted base of local, individual investors who are steadily growing their small portfolios. The complete absence of institutional buying, combined with the influx of new single-property landlords, points to a stable, community-based investment ecosystem. This dynamic ensures that the benefits and control of the local rental market remain within the community, a stark contrast to national trends of corporate consolidation.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 05:37 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Grant (WI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Grant (WI) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wi-grant/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.