Meade (SD) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Meade (SD) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Meade (SD)
7,508
Total Investors in Meade (SD)
1,354
Investor Owned SFR in Meade (SD)
1,087(14.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,198
SFR Owned
922
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
156
SFR Owned
178
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,087 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 98% of the Investor Market in Meade County
In Meade County, investors own 1,087 SFR properties, representing 14.5% of the total market. The landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 97.9% of the rental housing supply. Recent market activity was minimal, with landlords making a single purchase in Q4 2025, which accounted for 100% of all SFR sales.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,087 SFR properties in Meade County, with individual landlords holding 84.8%.
The majority of investor properties were purchased with cash, with 904 cash-owned properties compared to only 183 that are financed. Of all properties held by landlords, 1,058 are identified as rentals. Individual entities (1,198) far outnumber company entities (156).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord acquisition prices in Meade County show extreme volatility, from an 81.4% discount to a 2.8% premium in 2025.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners fluctuated dramatically throughout 2025. In Q3, landlords paid an average of $81,250, a massive $356,182 discount compared to homeowners at $437,432. However, in Q1 2025, they paid a $11,443 premium.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 100% of the SFR market in Q4 2025, with a single purchase by a new mom-and-pop investor.
The entirety of landlord purchase activity (100.0%) came from the mom-and-pop segment (Tiers 01-04). This activity was driven by one new single-property landlord entering the market, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.9% of investor-owned SFRs in Meade County.
Single-property landlords alone account for 80.8% of all investor-owned housing, with 903 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just two properties, representing a negligible 0.2% share of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, despite individuals dominating smaller tiers.
While individuals own the vast majority of properties in the 1-5 property range, a clear crossover occurs at the 6-10 property tier where companies own 60.7% of the homes. In the single-property tier, individuals own 89.7% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with 57785 leading in volume and 57626 in density.
The 57785 zip code contains 509 investor-owned properties, the most in the county, with an 18.6% ownership rate. However, some smaller areas show extreme penetration, like zip code 57626 where investors own 82.1% of the housing stock.
Historical Transactions
Historical buy-sell transaction data for landlords in Meade County was not available for this reporting period.
Due to a lack of available transaction data, it is not possible to determine if landlords or institutional investors were net buyers or sellers, nor can landlord-to-landlord transaction rates be calculated.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 100% of the single SFR transaction in Meade County in Q4 2025.
The sole transaction was a $170,000 purchase by a new single-property (Tier 01) landlord. There was no purchasing activity from institutional investors, and this transaction was not an inter-landlord sale.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,087 SFR properties in Meade County, with individual landlords holding 84.8%.
Detailed Findings

In Meade County, landlords hold a portfolio of 1,087 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, making up 14.5% of the county's 7,508 total SFRs.

Individual investors are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 922 properties, which constitutes 84.8% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, company-owned entities hold 178 properties, or 16.4%.

A significant financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash acquisitions. Landlords own 904 properties outright (cash), substantially more than the 183 properties that carry financing, indicating a low reliance on leverage among local investors.

The number of unique landlord entities reinforces the dominance of small-scale operators. There are 1,198 individual landlords compared to just 156 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 8 to 1.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 1,058 of the 1,087 properties classified as rented, demonstrating a clear strategy of long-term holds over speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord acquisition prices in Meade County show extreme volatility, from an 81.4% discount to a 2.8% premium in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing behavior in Meade County is opportunistic and highly variable, rather than following a consistent discount model. In Q3 2025, landlords achieved an exceptional 81.4% discount, paying an average of $81,250 while homeowners paid $437,432.

This deep discount contrasts sharply with other recent quarters. In Q2 2025, the discount was a more modest 13.6% ($330,500 vs. $382,455), and in Q1 2025, investors actually paid a 2.8% premium over homeowners ($413,300 vs. $401,857).

The single landlord purchase recorded in Q1 2026 for $170,000 lacks a comparable homeowner price, making it impossible to assess the current gap, but it aligns with the lower end of the pricing spectrum seen in 2025.

This price volatility suggests that investors in this market are not consistently targeting a specific price point below market value but are instead capitalizing on specific, deeply discounted opportunities as they arise.

Comparing prices over a longer period, the average acquisition price for landlords in 2024 was $366,554, which is higher than the pandemic-era average of $308,789 from 2020-2023, reflecting overall market appreciation.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 100% of the SFR market in Q4 2025, with a single purchase by a new mom-and-pop investor.
Detailed Findings

Market activity in Meade County was extremely subdued in the last quarter, with only one single-family home purchase recorded in total. A landlord was the buyer for this transaction, giving investors 100.0% of the market share.

This lone purchase was made by a new entrant to the market. The buyer was a Tier 01 (single-property) landlord, highlighting that the minimal growth in the investor market is happening at the smallest scale.

Zero properties were acquired by mid-size or institutional investors, confirming their lack of activity in the county's current market.

The mom-and-pop landlord segment (1-10 properties) was responsible for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions this quarter, entirely due to the single transaction from the Tier 01 buyer.

This low volume indicates a slow and cautious market, where new investment is driven by individual, first-time landlords rather than portfolio expansion by larger entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.9% of investor-owned SFRs in Meade County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Meade County is defined by its overwhelming concentration of small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively own 97.9% of all investor-held SFRs.

The single-property tier is the largest segment by a wide margin, with 903 properties representing 80.8% of the total. This underscores the importance of first-time and small-scale investors to the local rental supply.

The next tiers show a steep drop-off: two-property landlords own 7.2% (80 properties), and those with 3-5 properties own 7.4% (83 properties). The market share continues to shrink as portfolio sizes increase.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal presence in the county, holding just 2 properties, which is only 0.2% of the investor market. This finding directly counters the narrative of large corporate dominance in this specific geography.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also have a very small footprint, collectively owning just 21 properties, or 1.9% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, despite individuals dominating smaller tiers.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Meade County shows a distinct shift as portfolio sizes grow. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller tiers, owning 89.7% of single-property portfolios and 78.8% of two-property portfolios.

The balance begins to shift in the 3-5 property tier, where individuals still hold a 65.1% majority, but company ownership increases to 34.9%.

A significant crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this level, companies become the majority owners, holding 17 properties (60.7%) compared to the 11 properties (39.3%) held by individuals. This suggests that as investors scale beyond five properties, they are more likely to incorporate.

This pattern highlights different strategies: individuals form the base of the market with smaller holdings, while scaling efforts are more frequently associated with formal business structures.

The data for real estate investing in Meade County shows that while individuals are more numerous, companies control larger average portfolios where they are present.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes, with 57785 leading in volume and 57626 in density.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Meade County reveals significant concentration of investor ownership in a few key areas. The zip code 57785 is the epicenter of investor activity by volume, containing 509 investor-owned SFRs at an 18.6% ownership rate.

Following in volume are 57769 with 228 properties (15.2% rate) and 57718 with 135 properties (6.5% rate), indicating these are primary targets for rental property acquisition.

In terms of market penetration, some smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high investor ownership rates. For instance, in 57626, landlords own 119 properties, which accounts for 82.1% of the housing in that area.

Two zip codes, 57748 and 57791, report a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting these may be areas with very few total properties, small communities, or specialized housing developments entirely composed of rentals.

This distinction between high-volume and high-percentage areas highlights different investment strategies, from acquiring properties in larger residential centers to dominating smaller, niche markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Historical buy-sell transaction data for landlords in Meade County was not available for this reporting period.
Detailed Findings

A detailed analysis of historical transaction dynamics for landlords in Meade County cannot be completed at this time, as buy-and-sell volume data was not available for the analysis period.

Consequently, key metrics such as the buy-to-sell ratio, which indicates whether landlords are in an accumulation or disposition phase, could not be calculated.

It is also not possible to determine the net position of institutional investors (1000+ tier) to see if their local strategy aligns with or differs from the broader investor market.

Metrics on inter-landlord trading, such as the percentage of properties bought from or sold to other investors, are also unavailable. This data is crucial for understanding market liquidity and the flow of assets within the investor community.

Future Investor Pulse reports will aim to include this data to provide a more complete picture of market behavior.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 100% of the single SFR transaction in Meade County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market in Meade County was exceptionally quiet in the most recent quarter, with landlords participating in the only SFR sale recorded. This gives landlords a 100.0% share of transaction activity.

The single purchase was made by an investor in the smallest portfolio tier, Tier 01 (single-property), at a price of $170,000.

This transaction highlights the market's reliance on new, small-scale investors for any liquidity, as no acquisitions were made by mid-size or institutional players.

The property was not purchased from another landlord, resulting in a 0.0% inter-landlord transaction rate for the quarter. This indicates the new inventory came from the traditional homeowner market.

The absence of transactions in any other tier underscores the dormant state of portfolio expansion or trading among more established investors in the county during this period.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Meade County's investor market is defined by mom-and-pop landlords, who control 98% of holdings amid minimal sales activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,087 SFR properties, representing 14.5% of Meade County's market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 922 of these properties (84.8%) compared to 178 (16.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlord pricing is highly opportunistic, with 2025 purchase prices fluctuating from an 81.4% discount in Q3 ($81,250 vs $437,432) to a 2.8% premium in Q1 ($413,300 vs $401,857) compared to homeowners.
Activity
Market activity was extremely low in Q4 2025, with landlords responsible for the single SFR purchase recorded. This sole transaction represented a 100% market share and was made by one new single-property landlord entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control investor housing with a 97.9% share. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint at just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding 60.7% of properties in that tier.
Transactions
With only one landlord purchase and no sales recorded in the most recent quarter, a net buyer or seller status cannot be determined. All recent activity was from a new mom-and-pop landlord.
Market Narrative

In Meade County, South Dakota, the property ownership landscape for investors is overwhelmingly characterized by small, individual operators. Landlords collectively own 1,087 single-family homes, or 14.5% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 84.8% of these properties. The market structure heavily favors 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 97.9% of all investor-owned SFRs, while large-scale institutional investors have a nearly non-existent share of just 0.2%.

Investor behavior reflects an opportunistic and cautious approach in a low-volume market. Purchase prices relative to traditional homeowners are not consistent, swinging from a massive 81.4% discount in one quarter of 2025 to a 2.8% premium in another. This suggests investors are not setting the market price but are capitalizing on specific deals. Recent activity has slowed to a near halt, with only a single SFR transaction in the last quarter, a purchase made by a new, single-property landlord, which accounted for 100% of all sales activity.

The key takeaway for Meade County is that its rental market is sustained by local, small-scale investors, not large corporations. The market's stability relies on the financial decisions of nearly 1,200 individual landlords. With minimal transaction velocity and a clear pattern of small portfolio ownership, the primary dynamic is one of long-term holding rather than speculative trading. This structure suggests a market that is less susceptible to national corporate strategy shifts but highly sensitive to local economic conditions affecting individual owners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:29 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Meade (SD)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Meade (SD) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-sd-meade/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.