Lake (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lake (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lake (IL)
193,116
Total Investors in Lake (IL)
38,895
Investor Owned SFR in Lake (IL)
28,673(14.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
35,052
SFR Owned
24,299
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3,843
SFR Owned
5,250
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 28,673 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Lake County with 96.1% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Investors own 14.8% of SFRs in Lake County, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling 96.1% of that share versus just 1.4% for institutions. While landlords overall are net buyers (6.7x buy/sell ratio), institutions are actively selling, signaling a strategic shift in the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 28,673 SFRs in Lake County, with individuals holding 84.7% of the portfolio.
A significant portion of the investor portfolio, 16,869 properties, is financed, compared to 11,804 owned with cash. Nearly all investor properties (28,125 out of 28,673) are actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 0.5% premium in Q1 2026, paying $513,677 vs homeowners at $511,361.
This marks a reversal from early 2025, when landlords secured a 5.9% discount ($31,316). The price gap has eroded, with landlords in the most recent quarter paying slightly more than traditional buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 acquisitions, purchasing 694 properties, or 55.3% of all market sales.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 96.7% of all landlord purchases. Institutional buyers (1000+) were nearly absent, acquiring just 2 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Lake County's rental market, owning 96.1% of investor SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+) have a very small footprint, owning just 1.4% of the portfolio (396 properties). Single-property landlords alone account for 81.7% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies take majority ownership at portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 52.7% of that tier.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.1% of single-property holdings. Company ownership becomes nearly absolute in larger tiers, reaching 99.6% for portfolios of 51-100 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 60073, which holds the most properties at 2,527.
However, zip code 60075 has the highest investor penetration rate at 62.5%. The top 5 zip codes by count hold a combined 9,965 properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.7x buy/sell ratio, while institutional investors are net sellers.
In Q1 2026, landlords acquired 960 properties while selling only 143. In contrast, institutional investors sold 10 properties while buying just 2, signaling a strategic retreat.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 53.1% of all Q1 transactions, with 960 out of 1,808 total market sales.
New single-property investors paid the highest average price at $520,732, while institutional investors paid 44.2% less at $290,474. Small landlords (3-5 properties) were most likely to buy from other investors, sourcing 22.0% of their deals that way.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 28,673 SFRs in Lake County, with individuals holding 84.7% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Lake County, investors hold a significant 28,673 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 14.8% of the total 193,116 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by 35,052 individual landlords who control 24,299 properties, or 84.7% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, 3,843 company landlords own the remaining 5,250 properties (18.3%).

This demonstrates that the local rental market is primarily supported by small, private individuals rather than large corporations. The ratio of individual to company entities stands at more than 9-to-1.

Leverage appears to be a common strategy among these investors, with 16,869 properties currently financed, outnumbering the 11,804 properties that are owned free and clear with cash.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, as confirmed by the 28,125 properties classified as rented. This high rental penetration underscores the business-oriented nature of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 0.5% premium in Q1 2026, paying $513,677 vs homeowners at $511,361.
Detailed Findings

In a notable market shift during Q1 2026, landlords in Lake County paid an average price of $513,677, a slight 0.5% premium of $2,316 compared to the traditional homeowner price of $511,361.

This recent trend marks a significant reversal from just a year prior. In Q1 2025, landlords benefited from a substantial 5.9% discount, paying $31,316 less per property than homeowners, indicating a much more competitive current market.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners proved volatile throughout 2025, swinging from the 5.9% discount in Q1 to near-parity in Q2 and a 3.2% discount in Q3 before disappearing entirely.

Overall property values have shown strong appreciation. The average landlord acquisition price in Q1 2026 is 17.6% higher than the average of $436,765 paid during the 2020-2023 period.

This erosion of the typical investor discount suggests increased competition for available housing stock, forcing investors to bid more aggressively to secure properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 acquisitions, purchasing 694 properties, or 55.3% of all market sales.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity was exceptionally strong in Q4 2025, with investors acquiring 694 of the 1,256 total SFRs sold, capturing a majority 55.3% share of the market.

The driving force behind this activity was small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively purchased 678 properties, accounting for a massive 96.7% of all investor acquisitions.

A significant wave of new entrants joined the market, with 851 distinct single-property entities buying 605 homes. This tier alone was responsible for 86.3% of all properties bought by landlords.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) had a negligible impact on the market, purchasing only 2 properties, or 0.3% of the landlord total.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also played a minor role, collectively buying just 21 properties. This highlights that recent market demand is overwhelmingly fueled by new and small-scale investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Lake County's rental market, owning 96.1% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned housing market in Lake County is defined by the dominance of small-scale operators. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties, known as 'mom-and-pops', own a combined 96.1% of all investor-held SFRs.

This market structure defies the narrative of corporate consolidation, as institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties control a mere 1.4% of the local investor housing stock, totaling just 396 homes.

The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords being the largest single group. This tier alone owns 23,952 properties, which represents 81.7% of the entire investor portfolio.

There is a clear 'mid-size gap' in ownership. Tiers ranging from 11 to 1,000 properties collectively own just 2.5% of investor properties, indicating that few operators scale beyond the 10-property mark.

This distribution reveals that the vast majority of rental properties are managed by local individuals and small businesses, who form the backbone of the rental supply in Lake County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies take majority ownership at portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 52.7% of that tier.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, a distinct crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies first achieve a majority stake at 52.7%.

Individuals are the primary owners of entry-level investments, holding 88.1% of all single-property landlord portfolios and 75.7% of two-property portfolios.

As investors scale, corporate structures become the standard. Company ownership rises to 77.0% in the 11-20 property tier and becomes virtually absolute at 99.6% in the 51-100 property tier.

This trend suggests that as investment portfolios grow, operators increasingly turn to corporate entities for liability protection, financing advantages, and operational efficiency.

The data shows a strong persistence of individual ownership up to the five-property mark, with individuals still holding a 72.7% majority in the 3-5 property tier, before the strategic shift to incorporation becomes prevalent.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 60073, which holds the most properties at 2,527.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership by volume is heavily concentrated in a few key areas of Lake County. The top 5 zip codes by property count (60073, 60047, 60085, 60060, and 60002) collectively contain 9,965 investor-owned homes, representing 34.8% of the county's total investor portfolio.

The zip code 60073 leads the county in sheer volume, with 2,527 investor-owned properties, followed by 60047 with 2,164 properties.

However, the highest market penetration is found elsewhere. Zip code 60075 stands out with an exceptionally high investor ownership rate of 62.5%, suggesting a market heavily skewed towards rental properties.

Other areas with high investor density include 60081 (24.9% rate) and 60020 (23.8% rate), indicating significant rental demand or targeted investment in these communities.

The divergence between the leaders in raw count and percentage rate reveals that different investment strategies are likely at play. High-count areas are often larger suburbs, while high-rate areas may be smaller communities with unique housing stock or rental dynamics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 6.7x buy/sell ratio, while institutional investors are net sellers.
Detailed Findings

A sharp divide defines the transaction behavior between large and small investors in Lake County. Landlords as a whole are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 960 properties while selling only 143 in Q1 2026, a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.7 to 1.

This accumulation trend is consistent over time, with investors adding a net 6,018 properties in 2025 and 5,682 in 2024, signaling sustained confidence in the local market.

In direct opposition, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are actively divesting from their portfolios. In Q1 2026, they sold 10 properties but only acquired 2, positioning them as clear net sellers.

This institutional retreat is a multi-year trend. They were net sellers by 48 properties in 2025 and 35 properties in 2024, indicating a deliberate, long-term reduction of their footprint in the county.

This data reveals that market growth and housing acquisition are being driven entirely by small and mid-sized investors, while the largest corporate players are reducing their exposure.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 53.1% of all Q1 transactions, with 960 out of 1,808 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a dominant force in the Lake County market in Q1, participating in 960 of the 1,808 total SFR transactions. This gives landlords a controlling 53.1% share of all transaction activity.

A vast price disparity exists based on investor size. First-time, single-property investors paid the highest average price at $520,732, indicating they are competing directly with traditional homeowners for market-rate properties.

Conversely, institutional investors paid an average of just $290,474. This 44.2% discount compared to new entrants suggests a strategy focused on acquiring distressed or off-market properties that require less capital.

Inter-landlord trading is a key source of inventory for established small investors. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier sourced 22.0% of their new acquisitions from other landlords, the highest of any group.

In contrast, new single-property buyers were least likely to purchase from their peers, with only 10.3% of their transactions coming from other landlords, suggesting they primarily buy from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Lake County with 96.1% Ownership as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Holdings
Investors own 28,673 SFR properties in Lake County, representing 14.8% of the total market. Individual investors hold a commanding 84.7% of this portfolio (24,299 properties), with companies owning the remaining 18.3% (5,250 properties).
Pricing
In a surprising reversal of historical trends, landlords paid a 0.5% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1 2026 ($513,677 vs $511,361). However, institutional buyers paid 44.2% less than new single-property investors ($290,474 vs $520,732) in the same quarter.
Activity
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 55.3% of all SFRs sold (694 properties). The market saw an influx of 851 new single-property landlords, with mom-and-pop tiers driving 96.7% of all investor acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.1% of investor-owned housing in Lake County. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal share of just 1.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the rental market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties. This trend accelerates, with companies owning 99.6% of properties in the 51-100 property tier.
Transactions
The market shows a clear divergence: landlords overall are strong net buyers with a 6.7x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (960 buys vs 143 sells), while institutional investors are net sellers (2 buys vs 10 sells).
Market Narrative

In Lake County, Illinois, the real estate investing landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by small, independent operators, not large corporations. Investors own 28,673 single-family properties, or 14.8% of the total market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control 96.1% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, holding just 1.4% of the share. Ownership is further dominated by individuals (84.7%) over companies (18.3%), with corporate structures only becoming the majority in portfolios of six or more properties.

Investor activity reveals a tale of two markets. Overall, landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 6.7-to-1 ratio over sales in Q1 2026 and capturing over half of all market transactions. This demand is fueled by new and small investors, with 851 new single-property landlords entering the market in a single recent quarter. However, this enthusiasm comes at a cost, as landlords paid a slight premium over homeowners for the first time. Meanwhile, the largest institutional players are actively retreating, consistently selling more properties than they buy, signaling a strategic divestment from the county.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the health and growth of Lake County's rental market are dependent on the activity of thousands of small investors. While institutional capital appears to be exiting, a steady stream of new landlords is entering and expanding, albeit in a more competitive pricing environment. This dynamic concentrates the local housing supply in the hands of smaller, community-level operators and suggests a market driven by long-term individual investment strategies rather than large-scale corporate aggregation.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:13 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Lake (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Lake (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-lake/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.