Crosby (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Crosby (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Crosby (TX)
1,797
Total Investors in Crosby (TX)
724
Investor Owned SFR in Crosby (TX)
598(33.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
677
SFR Owned
558
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
47
SFR Owned
50
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 598 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Crosby County, TX with 98% Ownership and Zero Institutional Presence
Investors own 33.3% of Single-Family Residential properties in Crosby County, TX, a share controlled almost entirely by small landlords (98.2%). In Q4 2025, these local investors were net buyers, acquiring 36.4% of all homes sold while consistently purchasing properties with cash.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 598 SFRs, with individuals holding 93.3% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (507) versus financed (91), a ratio of over 5-to-1. Nearly all properties in landlord portfolios (588 of 598) are designated as rentals, indicating a strong focus on non-owner-occupied strategies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord pricing is volatile, securing a 26.4% discount in Q1 but paying premiums in 2025.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners fluctuates dramatically, from a $29,432 landlord discount in 2026-Q1 to a $74,822 landlord premium in 2025-Q2. Low transaction volumes in the area likely contribute to this price volatility.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 36.4% of all SFR properties sold in the fourth quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of investor purchases in Q4, acquiring all 8 properties. Activity was concentrated at the entry-level, with 7 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 80.3% of all investor-held housing, making them the backbone of the rental market. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in Crosby County, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in the 11-20 property tier, a rare exception.
Individual landlords dominate every other tier, holding 100% of properties in the two-property tier and over 90% in the 1 and 3-5 property tiers. This crossover point at 11-20 properties involves only 7 total properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 79357 holding 245 properties.
Investor ownership rates are extremely high in specific pockets, reaching 57.7% in zip code 79370 and 100% in 79235, which contains only one SFR property. The top four zip codes by count also have high ownership rates, ranging from 25.8% to 57.7%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Crosby County are strong net buyers, acquiring 55 properties while selling only 7 in 2025.
This aggressive accumulation trend continued from 2024, when investors bought 41 properties and sold only 8. The buy-to-sell ratio for 2025 stands at nearly 8-to-1, signaling a clear strategy of portfolio growth.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords captured 36.4% of all Q4 transactions, entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors.
New, single-property investors were the most active, accounting for 7 of the 8 landlord transactions. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, meaning investors are acquiring property from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 598 SFRs, with individuals holding 93.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Crosby County, TX, landlords hold a significant 33.3% of the single-family residential market, owning 598 out of 1,797 total SFR properties. This high concentration underscores the importance of real estate investing in the local housing landscape.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals rather than companies. Individual investors own 558 properties, accounting for 93.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies hold just 50 properties (8.4%).

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash purchases. A remarkable 507 investor-owned properties are owned outright without financing, compared to only 91 that are financed. This suggests a market of well-capitalized investors or a prevalence of lower-cost properties.

The investor base itself reflects this individual dominance, with 677 individual landlords compared to just 47 company entities. This nearly 14-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company landlords highlights a classic 'mom-and-pop' market structure.

The portfolio is almost entirely geared towards rentals, with 588 of the 598 properties classified as non-owner-occupied. This 98.3% rental rate confirms that investor activity in Crosby County is focused on generating rental income, not speculative flipping.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord pricing is volatile, securing a 26.4% discount in Q1 but paying premiums in 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords in Crosby County paid an average of $82,059, which was 26.4% less than the $111,491 paid by traditional homeowners. This resulted in a significant average discount of $29,432 per property for investors.

However, this discount is not consistent and shows extreme volatility, likely due to low transaction volumes. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords paid a staggering 61.5% premium ($196,474 vs $121,652 for homeowners), while in Q3 2025 they paid a 12.0% premium ($115,458 vs $103,075).

The trend of inconsistent pricing advantages suggests that in a smaller market like Crosby County, individual deal characteristics have a much larger impact on average prices than broad market forces. There is no reliable, persistent discount for investors.

Comparing prices over time shows a market with fluctuating values. The average landlord acquisition price of $82,059 in Q1 2026 is higher than the annual average for 2024 ($61,072) but lower than the 2025 average ($100,959).

The data from 2024-Q4 shows no transactions, highlighting the sparse nature of sales activity in the county. This lack of consistent deal flow is a primary driver of the dramatic quarter-to-quarter swings in average acquisition prices.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 36.4% of all SFR properties sold in the fourth quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the Crosby County market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 8 of the 22 total SFRs sold, a market share of 36.4%.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) acquired 100% of the investor-bought homes, with institutional investors making zero acquisitions.

The market is characterized by new entrants. Seven of the eight properties (87.5%) were bought by new single-property landlords, indicating a healthy influx of first-time investors rather than portfolio expansion by existing players.

The purchasing was highly concentrated in the smallest tier. The single-property (Tier 01) and small landlord (Tier 03-05) tiers were the only active groups, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of investment in the area.

There was no recorded purchasing activity from any landlord tier owning more than 5 properties, and zero properties were purchased by institutional-scale investors (1,000+ properties). This complete absence of larger investors defines the market's structure.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Crosby County is completely dominated by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control 98.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time and single-property investors are the most significant group, with the 'Tier 01' cohort alone owning 488 properties, which represents 80.3% of the entire investor-owned housing stock in the county.

The distribution is heavily skewed toward the smallest portfolios. The top four tiers combined (1-10 properties) account for 597 of the 598 investor-owned homes, leaving just one property spread across the larger tiers.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in Crosby County, with 0.0% ownership. This highlights a market entirely driven by local, individual capital.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) are also nearly non-existent, collectively owning just 1.9% of the investor portfolio. This further emphasizes the lack of scaled, professional real estate investment operations in the region.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in the 11-20 property tier, a rare exception.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across nearly all portfolio sizes in Crosby County. For example, individuals own 93.2% of single-property portfolios and 100% of two-property portfolios.

A distinct crossover point occurs in the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, where companies become the majority owners. In this tier, companies hold 6 properties (85.7%) compared to just 1 held by an individual.

This crossover is an anomaly in an otherwise individual-dominated market. It suggests that while most residents invest personally, a small number of local businesses may use a corporate structure to manage a slightly larger, yet still modest, portfolio.

Even in tiers where companies have a presence, individuals maintain a strong foothold. In the 6-10 property tier, individuals still own 77.8% of the homes, and in the 3-5 property tier, they own 91.1%.

The data from larger tiers (51-100 and 101-1,000 properties) shows only one property each, both owned by individuals. This reinforces that scale in this market does not correlate with corporate ownership structures.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 79357 holding 245 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Crosby County is geographically concentrated in a few key zip codes. The area of 79357 is the epicenter of activity, with 245 investor-owned properties, representing a high ownership rate of 35.8%.

Certain zip codes exhibit extremely high investor penetration rates. Zip code 79370 has a 57.7% investor ownership rate, and 79235 shows a 100% rate, although this is based on a single property which is investor-owned.

The top regions for investor-owned property counts are also among the leaders in ownership percentage. The top four areas by count (79357, 79322, 79343, 79370) all feature investor ownership rates above 25%, indicating widespread activity in these communities.

The top five zip codes by property count collectively house 598 investor-owned homes, which is the total for the entire county. This demonstrates that investor activity is confined to these specific areas.

This intense geographic clustering suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or towns within the county, rather than spreading their acquisitions evenly. Such patterns can be further analyzed using detailed assessor data to understand property characteristics in these hotbeds.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Crosby County are strong net buyers, acquiring 55 properties while selling only 7 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Crosby County are overwhelmingly net buyers, consistently acquiring far more properties than they sell. In 2025, they purchased 55 SFRs while only selling 7, resulting in a net gain of 48 properties to their portfolios.

This pattern of accumulation is not new. In 2024, landlords also acted as strong net buyers, with 41 acquisitions against just 8 sales, a net increase of 33 properties.

The buy-to-sell ratio demonstrates a clear long-term hold strategy. For 2025, this ratio was a powerful 7.86 (55 buys / 7 sells), indicating a market where landlords are focused on building their rental holdings, not flipping.

Quarterly data reinforces this trend. In Q2 2025, investors bought 15 properties and sold only 1. In Q3 2025, they bought 5 and sold 2. In every recorded period, acquisitions have significantly outpaced dispositions.

Because there is no institutional (1,000+ tier) activity in Crosby County, this net buying behavior is entirely driven by mom-and-pop and small-scale investors who are steadily increasing their footprint in the local housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords captured 36.4% of all Q4 transactions, entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords were involved in 36.4% of all SFR transactions in Crosby County, purchasing 8 of the 22 total properties sold.

All 8 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors in the 1-10 property tiers. Institutional investors had zero transaction activity, mirroring their 0% ownership share in the county.

First-time investors drove the market, with single-property landlords making 7 of the 8 purchases at an average price of $82,059. This highlights a market continually refreshed by new, small-scale participants.

A significant finding from the quarter is the source of these properties. None of the 8 properties purchased by landlords were acquired from other landlords (0% inter-landlord trading). This indicates that investors are buying from homeowners or other sources, not trading assets among themselves.

The lack of landlord-to-landlord sales suggests a market focused on accumulation rather than portfolio churning. Existing investors are holding their assets, while new investors expand the overall share of rental housing by acquiring from the owner-occupied stock.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Crosby County, TX is a quintessential mom-and-pop rental market, where small landlords control 98% of investor housing with zero institutional competition.
Holdings
Landlords own 598 SFR properties, representing a significant 33.3% of the market in Crosby County, TX. This portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 558 properties (93.3%), versus just 50 (8.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties for 26.4% less than homeowners, paying an average of $82,059 versus $111,491. However, this pricing advantage is highly volatile, with investors paying significant premiums in prior quarters.
Activity
Landlords purchased 36.4% of all homes sold in Q4 2025 (8 of 22 sales), with activity driven entirely by small investors. The market saw 7 new single-property landlords enter, accounting for 87.5% of investor acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the rental market, owning 98.2% of all investor-held SFRs. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across almost all portfolio sizes. The only exception is the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners, though this represents a very small number of properties.
Transactions
Landlords in Crosby County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 55 properties while selling only 7 in 2025 for a nearly 8-to-1 buy/sell ratio. With no institutional presence, this accumulation is entirely driven by small investors.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Crosby County, TX is a definitive example of a 'mom-and-pop' dominated market. Investors hold a substantial 33.3% of the county's single-family housing, a total of 598 properties. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of small, individual investors, who control 93.3% of the portfolio, compared to just 8.4% for companies. The market structure is granular, with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling a staggering 98.2% of all investor-owned homes, while institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have zero presence. This detailed analysis, reflected in our market reports, paints a picture of a community-based rental market, not one shaped by corporate interests.

Investor behavior in Crosby County is characterized by aggressive accumulation and tactical purchasing. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 36.4% of all homes sold, with every purchase made by a small-scale investor. The market is continuously energized by new entrants, as 7 of the 8 investor acquisitions were made by first-time landlords. While pricing can be volatile due to low transaction volumes, investors demonstrated an ability to secure a 26.4% discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2026. Transaction data further reveals a clear buy-and-hold strategy, with landlords acting as strong net buyers, acquiring nearly eight properties for every one they sold in 2025.

The key takeaway for Crosby County is that the high investor ownership rate is not a sign of a corporate takeover, but rather a reflection of deep, local participation in the rental market. The market's health and growth are driven by individuals, often entering with their first property and frequently paying with cash. This dynamic suggests a stable, long-term approach to providing rental housing, a stark contrast to the high-velocity, corporate-driven narratives seen in major metropolitan areas. For anyone analyzing this region, understanding this hyper-local, small-investor foundation is critical to grasping the true nature of the housing market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:22 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Crosby (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Crosby (TX) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tx-crosby/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.