Dodge (MN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Dodge (MN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Dodge (MN)
6,770
Total Investors in Dodge (MN)
364
Investor Owned SFR in Dodge (MN)
315(4.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
301
SFR Owned
228
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
63
SFR Owned
98
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 315 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Dodge County's Investor Market Cools as Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate with 93.2% Ownership
In Dodge County, landlords own 315 SFR properties, representing 4.7% of the market. Individual, mom-and-pop investors are the overwhelming majority, controlling 93.2% of investor-owned homes compared to just 1.6% for institutional owners. In Q1 2026, investor activity slowed significantly, with landlords becoming market-neutral (2 buys, 2 sells) after two years as net buyers, while securing properties at a 60.3% discount to homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 315 SFR properties in Dodge County, with individuals holding a dominant 72.4% share.
Of the 315 investor-owned homes, a significant majority (68.0%) are owned free and clear with no financing. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 295 properties classified as Rented. Individual investors make up 82.7% of all landlords by entity count (301 out of 364).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Q1 2026 acquired properties for $135,000, a massive 60.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 22.6% premium paid by landlords in Q2 2025 to the current 60.3% discount. This suggests a thin market where individual deals can heavily skew quarterly averages. Prices for landlord acquisitions have fallen significantly from the 2025 average of $319,505.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing was minimal in the last quarter, accounting for just 1.9% of all 53 SFR sales.
All landlord purchase activity came from mom-and-pop investors, who acquired 1 property, representing 100% of investor buying. No institutional investors were active. The acquisitions were made by new market entrants, with 2 new single-property entities established.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 93.2% of investor-owned SFRs in Dodge County.
This dominance by small investors leaves little room for large-scale players. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 5 properties, accounting for a mere 1.6% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone own 67.7% of all investor-held SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, despite individuals dominating overall.
While individuals own 85.3% of single-property portfolios, their share drops with scale. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 66.7% of the homes, marking the clear crossover point where professionalization and incorporation take hold.
Geographic Distribution
The 55944 zip code (Kasson) leads Dodge County with 98 investor-owned properties, the highest count in the region.
While Kasson has the highest volume, the 55946 zip code (Mantorville) has the highest concentration, with a 16.7% investor ownership rate. This is followed by 55920 (Claremont) at 14.3%, showing that the highest penetration rates are in smaller communities.
Historical Transactions
Investor activity halted in Q1 2026 as landlords became neutral, with 2 buys and 2 sells, a sharp reversal from 2025's net buying.
This recent slowdown follows a period of strong acquisition. In 2025, landlords were clear net buyers, acquiring 25 properties while selling only 11. Similarly, in 2024 they bought 25 and sold 14, steadily growing their portfolios.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for just 2.5% of the 79 total market transactions in Q1 2026, signaling very low investor participation.
The two landlord purchases were executed by new, single-property investors at an average price of $135,000. Notably, neither of these purchases came from another landlord, indicating that new investors are acquiring properties from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 315 SFR properties in Dodge County, with individuals holding a dominant 72.4% share.
Detailed Findings

In Dodge County, investors hold 315 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 4.7% of the total 6,770 SFRs in the market. This reflects a modest but notable presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors are the backbone of the rental market, owning 228 properties, which is 72.4% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number 98, making up the remaining 31.1%.

A defining characteristic of this market is the high rate of cash ownership. A total of 214 investor properties are held without financing, compared to 101 that are financed. This suggests a fiscally conservative approach or a market with accessible price points for cash buyers.

The investor base itself is overwhelmingly composed of small-scale operators. There are 364 unique landlord entities, with 301 (82.7%) being individuals and only 63 (17.3%) registered as companies.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 295 of the 315 properties identified as rented. This strong rental focus underscores the primary strategy of investors in Dodge County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Q1 2026 acquired properties for $135,000, a massive 60.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated an ability to acquire properties at a significant discount, paying an average of just $135,000. This was $204,802 less than the average traditional homeowner price of $339,802, representing a 60.3% price advantage for investors.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners in Dodge County has shown extreme volatility. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords paid a premium of 22.6% ($478,000 vs $390,040). This fluctuation indicates that quarterly averages are highly sensitive to the small number of transactions and the specific nature of each deal, rather than a consistent market-wide trend.

Acquisition prices have trended downward for investors recently. The Q1 2026 average of $135,000 is a sharp drop from the average prices seen in 2025 ($319,505) and 2024 ($244,393), suggesting a shift towards lower-cost or distressed assets.

Comparing recent prices to the pandemic era (2020-2023), where the average price was $177,661, the most recent quarter's activity is well below historical norms. This signals a cooling in the type and value of properties investors are targeting.

The dramatic discount in the latest quarter may point to investors successfully sourcing off-market deals or properties requiring significant renovation, allowing them to enter the market at a much lower price point than typical buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlord purchasing was minimal in the last quarter, accounting for just 1.9% of all 53 SFR sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Dodge County was very limited in the final quarter of 2025. Landlords acquired just 1 of the 53 total SFR properties sold, capturing a mere 1.9% of the market's purchase volume.

The entirety of investor buying was driven by the smallest players. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of the quarter's investor acquisitions, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) making no purchases.

The activity that did occur signaled new entrants into the rental market. The single property purchased was by an investor in the 'Single-property' tier, with 2 new landlord entities being created. This highlights the market's reliance on new, small-scale participants for growth.

The low purchase volume suggests a cautious stance from investors or a lack of available properties that meet their investment criteria. This contrasts with more active periods in previous years.

With only one landlord purchase, the market shows a high concentration of activity within the entry-level tier, reinforcing the area's character as a market for aspiring and small-time investors rather than large-scale operators.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 93.2% of investor-owned SFRs in Dodge County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Dodge County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties own a combined 93.2% of all investor-held SFRs, demonstrating a highly fragmented market structure.

Single-property landlords are the largest group by a wide margin, holding 218 properties, which accounts for 67.7% of the total investor portfolio. This underscores the importance of first-time and small investors to the local rental supply.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000 or more properties have a minimal footprint. They own just 5 properties, representing only 1.6% of the investor market, a figure that challenges the narrative of large corporations dominating smaller housing markets.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also have a limited presence, collectively owning 17 properties or 5.3% of the investor-owned housing stock. The market clearly favors smaller, more localized ownership.

This distribution reveals a market where growth is driven by incremental, small-scale real estate investing rather than large portfolio acquisitions, creating a distinct dynamic compared to more urbanized areas.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, despite individuals dominating overall.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Dodge County market, owning the vast majority of properties in smaller portfolios. In the single-property tier, individuals own 191 homes (85.3%) compared to just 33 for companies (14.7%).

A distinct crossover point occurs as portfolio sizes increase. Companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, holding 8 properties (66.7%) compared to 4 for individuals (33.3%). This suggests that as landlords scale, they are more likely to incorporate.

The 3-5 property tier represents a near-even split, with individuals owning 28 properties (52.8%) and companies owning 25 (47.2%). This tier appears to be the transition zone where investors begin to formalize their operations.

The two-property tier is also majority-individual, with individuals owning 12 properties (54.5%) versus 10 for companies (45.5%), reinforcing the pattern of individual dominance at the lower end of the market.

This data illustrates a clear lifecycle for investors in the region: starting as individuals and transitioning to corporate structures as their portfolios grow beyond a handful of properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 55944 zip code (Kasson) leads Dodge County with 98 investor-owned properties, the highest count in the region.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Dodge County is geographically concentrated, with the zip code 55944 (Kasson) hosting the largest number of investor-owned SFRs at 98 properties.

Following Kasson, the areas with the next highest counts of investor properties are 55927 (Dodge Center) with 65 properties, 55924 (Hayfield) with 30, and 55940 (Kasson) with 29.

However, the highest concentration of investor ownership is found elsewhere. The 55946 zip code (Mantorville) leads the county with a 16.7% investor ownership rate, indicating a much higher saturation of rental properties relative to its housing stock.

Other areas with high investor penetration include 55920 (Claremont) at 14.3%, and both 55924 (Hayfield) and 55917 (Byron) at 9.3%. This highlights a key pattern: the areas with the highest counts are not necessarily those with the highest market share.

This distinction between raw count and ownership percentage is critical for understanding market dynamics, revealing that smaller towns like Mantorville and Claremont have a proportionately larger rental-focused housing sector than the volume leader, Kasson.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investor activity halted in Q1 2026 as landlords became neutral, with 2 buys and 2 sells, a sharp reversal from 2025's net buying.
Detailed Findings

In a significant shift, landlord transaction activity in Dodge County reached a standstill in Q1 2026. Investors were market-neutral, with acquisitions (2) perfectly matching dispositions (2), halting the portfolio growth seen in previous years.

This slowdown marks a stark contrast to 2025, when landlords were decisive net buyers. Over the course of that year, they added a net of 14 properties to their portfolios, with 25 purchases versus only 11 sales.

The pattern of accumulation was also evident in 2024, a year in which investors were net buyers of 11 properties (25 buys vs. 14 sells). The recent neutral stance represents the first break in this multi-year expansion trend.

Activity in Q3 2025 was particularly strong, with investors buying 9 properties and selling only 2, resulting in a net gain of 7 properties in a single quarter.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were completely inactive on both the buy and sell sides in all recent timeframes, underscoring that all market dynamics are being driven by smaller, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for just 2.5% of the 79 total market transactions in Q1 2026, signaling very low investor participation.
Detailed Findings

Investor involvement in the Dodge County housing market was minimal in Q1 2026. Of the 79 total SFR transactions during the quarter, only 2 involved a landlord buyer, representing a small 2.5% share of market activity.

All landlord transaction activity was concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Both transactions were made by investors in the 'Single-property' tier, reflecting new entrants to the market.

These new landlords acquired properties at a very low average price of $135,000, significantly below the prices paid by traditional homeowners in the same period. This suggests a focus on value-add or distressed properties.

Inter-landlord trading was non-existent. Zero percent of the properties purchased by investors were acquired from other landlords, meaning all new inventory came from the homeowner market.

The data shows a market where large-scale and institutional investors were completely absent from Q1 transactions, while the only active investors were new mom-and-pop landlords securing properties at a deep discount.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dodge County's investor market is defined by small, local landlords who control 93.2% of rental homes and have recently paused acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords own 315 SFR properties in Dodge County, 4.7% of the total market, with individual investors holding a commanding 72.4% share (228 properties) compared to companies' 31.1% (98 properties).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $135,000, securing an extreme 60.3% discount ($204,802) compared to the $339,802 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investor purchase activity was minimal in Q1 2026, with landlords comprising only 2.5% of transactions. All buying came from new, single-property landlords, with no institutional participation.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 93.2% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 1.6%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, holding 66.7% of properties at that level.
Transactions
After years as net buyers, landlords became market-neutral in Q1 2026 with a 1.0x buy/sell ratio (2 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Dodge County, Minnesota, is a microcosm of a market driven by local, small-scale operators. Investors own 315 single-family homes, representing 4.7% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 228 properties (72.4%), far outpacing corporate ownership. The market structure detailed in this investor pulse report defies the national narrative of corporate consolidation; mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control a massive 93.2% of rental homes, while large institutional firms hold a mere 1.6%.

Investor behavior has shifted dramatically in early 2026. After two consecutive years as strong net buyers, landlords became market-neutral in Q1, with buys (2) equaling sells (2). This slowdown in acquisition is accompanied by a tactical pricing strategy. The few active investors, all new single-property landlords, purchased homes at an average price of $135,000, a staggering 60.3% discount compared to the $339,802 paid by traditional homeowners. This suggests a strategic focus on finding off-market or distressed deals that are inaccessible to the general public.

The key takeaway for Dodge County is the stability and dominance of the local landlord. The market is not driven by large, fast-moving capital but by patient, individual investors who are deeply embedded in the community. The recent pause in net acquisitions, coupled with opportunistic, low-priced purchases, signals a cautious, value-driven approach in the current economic climate. This dynamic suggests the local rental market's future will be shaped by the decisions of hundreds of small operators rather than a handful of institutional players.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:34 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Dodge (MN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Dodge (MN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mn-dodge/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.