Teller (CO) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Teller (CO) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Teller (CO)
10,806
Total Investors in Teller (CO)
4,684
Investor Owned SFR in Teller (CO)
3,359(31.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,241
SFR Owned
2,962
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
443
SFR Owned
467
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,359 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Teller County's Real Estate Market, Owning 99.4% of Rentals
Investors own 31.1% of all Single-Family homes in Teller County, with small, individual landlords controlling a staggering 99.4% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords continued to be aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 6.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, reinforcing a market shaped almost entirely by local, small-scale investment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,359 SFR properties in Teller County, with individuals holding 88.2% of the portfolio.
The investor portfolio is heavily weighted towards cash ownership, with 1,864 properties owned outright versus 1,495 that are financed. Of the 3,359 properties owned by investors, 3,344 are classified as rented, indicating an overwhelming focus on rental income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 6.1% less than homeowners, an average discount of $33,013.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has narrowed substantially from a year ago, when it was 17.0% in Q1 2025. Investor acquisition prices have appreciated significantly from the 2020-2023 average of $434,946 to $506,059 in the latest quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 23.6% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, demonstrating significant market activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of all investor purchases this quarter. New, single-property investors were the primary drivers, acquiring 29 of the 30 properties bought by landlords.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.4% of investor-owned SFRs in Teller County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have virtually no presence, holding just one property, which accounts for 0.0% of the investor market. The most dominant segment is single-property landlords, who alone own 3,018 properties, or 88.1% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.3% of single-property rentals, while companies control larger tiers.
The clear crossover point where companies become the majority owners is in the 21-50 property tier, where they own 87.5% of the properties. In contrast, individuals own over 75% of properties in every tier with 1-5 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Teller County is highly concentrated, with the 80863 zip code alone holding 1,237 investor-owned properties.
Certain zip codes show extreme saturation levels, with 80866 being 100.0% investor-owned and 80860 at 73.8%. The zip codes with the most investor properties are not always the ones with the highest investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.2 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
This strong net accumulation trend is consistent over time, with landlords maintaining a 6.2x buy/sell ratio in 2025 and a nearly 10x ratio in 2024. No institutional buy or sell transactions were recorded in any period, highlighting their inactivity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 21.1% of all Q1 property transactions, with new investors driving the activity.
Single-property landlords accounted for 35 of the 37 investor transactions and primarily bought from the open market, with only 5.7% of their deals sourced from other landlords. These new entrants paid a premium, with an average price of $510,355.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,359 SFR properties in Teller County, with individuals holding 88.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Teller County, owning 3,359 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 31.1% of the total 10,806 SFRs in the market. This high penetration rate highlights the importance of the rental market in the local housing ecosystem.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 2,962 properties or 88.2% of the total investor portfolio. Companies account for the remaining 467 properties (13.9%), underscoring a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing rather than large corporate entities.

A look at financing reveals a financially solid investor base. Cash purchases significantly outpace financed ones, with 1,864 properties held free and clear compared to 1,495 with mortgages. This suggests that many investors have substantial equity and are not highly leveraged.

The portfolio's purpose is clear: nearly all properties (3,344 of 3,359) are rented. This near-100% rental rate confirms that the investor activity is focused on providing long-term housing rather than short-term speculation or personal use.

When comparing entity types, the data shows 4,241 individual landlords versus 443 company landlords. This 9.6-to-1 ratio of individuals to companies further emphasizes the 'mom-and-pop' character of the Teller County rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 6.1% less than homeowners, an average discount of $33,013.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Teller County consistently acquire properties at a lower price point than traditional homeowners. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords paid an average of $506,059, which is $33,013 less than the homeowner average of $539,072, representing a 6.1% discount.

However, this investor advantage is tightening. The 6.1% discount in Q1 2026 is a significant reduction from the 17.0% discount ($101,427) observed in Q1 2025, signaling increased competition in the market for investment-grade properties.

The market has seen substantial price appreciation since the pandemic era. The average acquisition price of $506,059 in Q1 2026 is 16.3% higher than the average price of $434,946 recorded between 2020 and 2023, reflecting strong and sustained growth in property values.

Quarterly price fluctuations show a dynamic market. For example, the landlord discount was just 4.7% in Q2 2025 ($25,482) before widening slightly to 5.8% in Q3 2025 ($35,417), indicating that negotiation power can shift from one quarter to the next.

Overall, while the pricing advantage for landlords persists, its compression over the past year suggests that finding discounted properties has become more challenging, forcing investors to compete more directly with retail buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 23.6% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, demonstrating significant market activity.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Teller County market in Q4 2025, acquiring 30 of the 127 total SFR properties sold. This represents a 23.6% market share of all purchases, indicating robust demand from the investor segment.

The quarter's activity was driven exclusively by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of all landlord purchases, with zero activity recorded from institutional buyers (Tier 09).

New entrants fueled the market. Landlords buying their very first investment property (Tier 01) dominated purchasing activity, acquiring 29 of the 30 properties, or 93.5% of the investor total. This influx of 35 new landlord entities signals a healthy and growing small-investor base.

The data reveals a clear absence of large-scale players in recent acquisition activity. The remaining purchases were split between an investor buying their second property and one buying their third-to-fifth, reinforcing the market's reliance on small portfolios.

This concentration of activity among new and small landlords suggests that market conditions in Q4 2025 were particularly favorable for individuals starting or modestly expanding their rental portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.4% of investor-owned SFRs in Teller County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Teller County is defined by small-scale ownership, directly challenging the narrative of corporate dominance. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 3,403 properties, representing 99.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

At the most granular level, single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market. This group owns 3,018 properties, accounting for 88.1% of the entire investor-owned housing stock on their own.

In stark contrast, institutional-scale investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in the county, with their portfolio consisting of a single property. This equates to a 0.0% market share, underscoring their irrelevance in the local market dynamics.

Even mid-size landlords are rare. Investors owning between 11 and 1000 properties combined own just 21 properties in total, or about 0.6% of the investor market. This further illustrates the extreme concentration of ownership among the smallest players.

The data paints a clear picture of a decentralized rental market powered by thousands of individual owners, where large-scale and institutional capital has not established a foothold.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.3% of single-property rentals, while companies control larger tiers.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Teller County shows a distinct pattern based on portfolio size. Individual investors are the dominant force in smaller tiers, holding 2,713 (88.3%) of single-property rentals and 166 (81.4%) of two-property portfolios.

As portfolios grow, company ownership becomes more prevalent. While individuals still hold a majority in the 3-5 property tier (76.3%) and the 6-10 property tier (56.8%), the company share steadily increases with scale.

The definitive shift occurs in the 21-50 property tier. Here, companies assert their dominance, owning 7 of the 8 properties in this category, for an 87.5% share. This tier marks the clear transition point where a corporate structure becomes the preferred vehicle for managing larger rental portfolios.

This trend highlights different strategies and operational needs. Individuals are the primary entry point into the rental market, while incorporated entities are used for asset protection and management as investment scale increases.

Even in the small-to-medium tiers, companies are present. They own 11.7% of single-property rentals and 23.7% of 3-5 property portfolios, indicating that some investors choose a corporate structure from the very beginning of their investment journey.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Teller County is highly concentrated, with the 80863 zip code alone holding 1,237 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership is not evenly distributed across Teller County but is instead concentrated in a few key areas. The zip code 80863 is the epicenter of activity, with 1,237 investor-owned properties, though its investor ownership rate is a more modest 24.2%.

Other areas with high counts of investor properties include 80816 (737 properties), 80813 (611 properties), and 80814 (456 properties). These top four zip codes collectively account for a substantial portion of the county's rental housing.

A different story emerges when looking at ownership percentage, which highlights hyper-saturated micro-markets. The 80866 zip code is entirely investor-owned at 100.0%, followed by 80860 (73.8%), 80813 (62.7%), and 80135 (60.0%). These high-penetration areas suggest neighborhoods largely composed of rental properties.

The data shows a divergence between raw count and ownership rate. For instance, 80863 leads by a large margin in property count but doesn't make the top five for percentage. Conversely, 80866 has a 100% rate but fewer properties overall. This distinction is critical for understanding different market dynamics within the county.

This concentration pattern indicates that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors like affordability, rental demand, or zoning that are unique to those zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 6.2 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear and sustained strategy of portfolio growth among landlords in Teller County. In the first quarter of 2026, investors were strong net buyers, purchasing 37 properties while selling only 6, resulting in a net gain of 31 properties.

This behavior is not a recent development but a consistent, long-term trend. Throughout 2025, investors bought 198 SFRs and sold just 32, for a net increase of 166 properties. The trend was even more pronounced in 2024, with 276 buys versus only 28 sells, a net gain of 248 properties.

Calculating the buy-to-sell ratio highlights the intensity of this accumulation. The ratio stood at 6.2-to-1 in Q1 2026 and was identical for the full year of 2025. In 2024, it was even higher at 9.9-to-1, signaling an overwhelming focus on acquisition over disposition.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) were completely absent from the transaction market. No purchases or sales were recorded for this group in any of the timeframes analyzed, reinforcing that all market activity is being driven by smaller, independent landlords.

The consistent net buying activity demonstrates strong confidence in the Teller County rental market and a long-term hold strategy among its dominant investor base.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 21.1% of all Q1 property transactions, with new investors driving the activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a significant presence in the transaction market, accounting for 37 of the 175 total SFR transactions, or a 21.1% market share. This activity level demonstrates continued investor demand for residential properties in Teller County.

The market's transaction volume is overwhelmingly driven by new and small-scale investors. Those in the single-property tier (Tier 01) were responsible for 35 of the 37 landlord transactions (94.6%), showing that new market entrants are the most active buyers.

These new investors appear to be paying a premium to enter the market. Their average purchase price was $510,355, notably higher than the $360,000 paid by investors in the slightly larger 3-5 property tier, suggesting a willingness to pay market rate to secure a first property.

Inter-landlord trading is minimal among new buyers. Only 2 of the 35 properties (5.7%) acquired by single-property landlords were purchased from another investor. This indicates they are primarily acquiring inventory from traditional homeowners rather than from a closed-loop investor network.

Institutional investors logged zero transactions in the quarter, once again confirming that the transactional market, much like the ownership landscape, is completely dominated by mom-and-pop players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Teller County, Controlling 99.4% of Rental Homes and Driving 31% of the Market
Holdings
Landlords own 3,359 SFR properties, representing a significant 31.1% of Teller County's market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 2,962 properties (88.2%) compared to companies with 467 (13.9%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a 6.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $506,059 versus $539,072, a savings of $33,013 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 23.6% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, an activity driven almost entirely by new entrants. Single-property landlords alone acquired 29 of the 30 properties bought by investors.
Market Share
The market is decentralized, with small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.4% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a near-zero presence at 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners for larger portfolios, specifically taking control in the 21-50 property tier with an 87.5% share.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive accumulators, acting as strong net buyers with a 6.2-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (37 buys vs. 6 sells). Institutional investors recorded zero transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Teller County, CO, is fundamentally shaped by small, independent operators, not large corporations. Investors own a substantial 31.1% of all Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, totaling 3,359 homes. The structure of this ownership is overwhelmingly decentralized: mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.4% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional-grade investors have a negligible presence of just 0.0%. Individual owners are the primary force, holding 88.2% of the rental portfolio compared to 13.9% for companies.

Investor behavior reflects a confident, long-term strategy of accumulation. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing over six properties for every one they sold. This activity is fueled by new entrants, with investors buying their first rental property accounting for the vast majority of recent purchases. These investors consistently demonstrate an ability to acquire assets at a discount, paying 6.1% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. This indicates a sophisticated approach to deal-finding, even among the smallest players.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Teller County's rental market is a model of decentralized, grassroots investment. The near-total absence of institutional capital and the dominance of individual, cash-heavy landlords create a stable and locally controlled housing segment. While this provides a robust rental supply, the high investor penetration rate of 31.1% and hyper-saturation in certain zip codes (like 80866 at 100% and 80860 at 73.8%) also highlight a market where rental demand and investment opportunities are highly concentrated, profoundly influencing local housing dynamics.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:40 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Teller (CO)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Teller (CO) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-co-teller/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.