Scott (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scott (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scott (IN)
6,686
Total Investors in Scott (IN)
723
Investor Owned SFR in Scott (IN)
919(13.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
587
SFR Owned
599
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
136
SFR Owned
326
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 919 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Scott County, Owning 77% of Rentals and Buying 41% of Homes Sold
Investors own 919 SFR properties in Scott County (13.7% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 76.7% versus just 0.4% for institutional firms. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 40.9% of all homes sold, securing them at a 44.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Investors remain strong net buyers, acquiring 4.2 properties for every one they sell.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 919 SFR properties in Scott County, with individuals holding 65.2% of the portfolio.
A staggering 88.8% of these properties (816 of 919) are owned outright in cash, with only 103 financed. Individual landlords outnumber companies by more than 4-to-1 (587 vs 136), reinforcing the market's small-investor character.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 44.7% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $52,500.
This price advantage is highly volatile, swinging from a 27.9% landlord premium in Q3 2025 to the current deep discount. The pricing gap behavior suggests investors are highly opportunistic, capitalizing on specific deals rather than a consistent market-wide discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 40.9% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Small 'mom-and-pop' investors drove this activity, accounting for 77.8% of all landlord purchases (7 properties). New, single-property landlords were the largest group, acquiring 6 properties via 9 different entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 76.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Scott County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.4% of the market (4 properties). The single-property landlord is the backbone of the market, alone holding 44.0% of the investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own 86.1% of single-property rentals, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 21 properties or more.
Companies control 76.6% of properties in the 21-50 property tier and 71.4% in the 101-1,000 tier. This shift indicates a clear trend of incorporation as investors scale their operations beyond 20 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 47102 zip code, which contains 339 investor-owned properties.
The 47102 zip code not only has the highest count of investor properties but also the highest ownership rate at 17.8%. The next most active area, 47138, has just 63 investor properties, highlighting the hyper-local focus of investment.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.2 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with landlords adding a net 48 properties in 2025 and a net 25 in 2024. Even the small institutional segment is a net buyer, though its activity is minimal (3 buys vs. 2 sells in 2025).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 33.3% of all SFR transactions in the most recent quarter.
New, single-property landlords drove this activity, conducting 9 of the 12 total investor transactions at an average price of $65,000. Significantly, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, showing a clear focus on acquiring inventory from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 919 SFR properties in Scott County, with individuals holding 65.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Scott County, investors hold a significant 13.7% of the single-family residential market, owning 919 out of 6,686 total SFR properties. This level of ownership indicates a mature rental market with a substantial investor presence.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual landlords own 599 properties, accounting for 65.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 326 properties (35.5%).

When examining the number of landlord entities, the dominance of small operators becomes even more apparent. There are 587 individual landlords compared to just 136 company landlords, a ratio of over 4 to 1.

A key characteristic of this market is the low reliance on financing. An overwhelming 816 properties (88.8%) are owned free-and-clear as cash assets, while only 103 are financed. This suggests that local investors are well-capitalized and employ a low-leverage strategy for their real estate investing.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental income, with 875 of the 919 properties classified as rented. This high concentration underscores a clear and focused strategy on generating rental returns rather than speculative holding.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 44.7% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $52,500.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market rates, paying an average of $65,000. This was a full 44.7% less than the $117,500 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a substantial $52,500 discount on each property.

However, this price advantage is not consistent and shows extreme volatility from quarter to quarter. For instance, in Q3 2025, landlords paid a 27.9% premium over homeowners ($224,967 vs $175,957), while in Q2 2025 they secured an even larger discount of 48.4%.

This fluctuation suggests that investor purchasing is highly opportunistic. Rather than benefiting from a structural market discount, landlords in Scott County appear to be skilled at finding specific undervalued assets or distress sales, causing average prices to swing dramatically based on a small number of transactions.

The limited number of transactions in recent quarters contributes to this volatility. With zero properties purchased by investors in several reporting periods, the average price can be heavily skewed by just one or two deals, making trend analysis challenging.

Comparing prices to the 2020-2023 boom period average of $109,662 shows no clear appreciation trend for landlord acquisitions, further highlighting a strategy focused on deal-specific value rather than broad market momentum.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 40.9% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the last quarter, with landlords purchasing 9 of the 22 total SFRs sold. This represents a commanding 40.9% market share, indicating that investors were the most significant buyer category during this period.

This purchasing activity was overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 7 of the 9 acquisitions, making up 77.8% of the investor purchase volume.

The market continues to attract new participants. The single-property tier was the most active segment, with 9 new landlord entities acquiring 6 different properties. This influx of new capital is a primary driver of market dynamics.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties were completely inactive, making zero purchases. This absence underscores that the market's momentum is generated from the ground up, not from large corporate players.

The only other activity came from landlords in the 11-20 property tier, who acquired 2 properties, showing that some established mid-size investors are also expanding their local portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 76.7% of all investor-owned SFRs in Scott County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Scott County is defined by small, local operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 76.7% of all investor-held SFRs, a dominant market share.

The single-property landlord tier is the largest individual segment by a wide margin. These 447 landlords own 44.0% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, highlighting the importance of first-time and small-scale investors to the local rental market.

Contrary to common narratives about corporate landlords, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal presence. They own just 4 properties in the county, which translates to a mere 0.4% of the investor market share.

Even mid-size landlords play a significant role. The 21-50 property tier is a notable segment, holding 128 properties (12.6%), which shows a healthy path for smaller investors to scale their operations.

Overall, the ownership structure resembles a classic pyramid: a very broad base of thousands of small investors supports a tiny peak of larger operators, confirming that the rental market is primarily a local, entrepreneurial endeavor.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own 86.1% of single-property rentals, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 21 properties or more.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes. While individual investors are the norm for smaller portfolios, a crossover point occurs where companies become the dominant owners.

Individuals are most concentrated at the entry-level, owning 389 of the 447 single-property rentals (86.1%). This individual ownership majority persists through the 11-20 property tier, which is 67.4% individually owned.

The clear shift happens at the 21-50 property tier. At this level of scale, companies take a commanding 76.6% ownership share, holding 98 properties. This trend continues into the 101-1,000 tier, where companies own 71.4% of the assets.

This data suggests a typical investor lifecycle in Scott County. Investors often start as individuals, and as their portfolios grow to around 20 properties, the operational and legal benefits of incorporation lead them to transition to a company structure.

The mid-range tiers (3-10 properties) represent this transition zone, showing a more balanced mix where individuals still hold the majority but corporate ownership becomes increasingly common, with companies holding between 37.0% and 40.5% of properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 47102 zip code, which contains 339 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investment activity in Scott County is not evenly distributed but is instead hyper-concentrated in a single geographic area. The 47102 zip code is the undisputed center of investor ownership, containing 339 properties, which is 36.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

This high concentration of properties also results in the highest market penetration. In 47102, investors own 17.8% of all single-family homes, a rate significantly above the county-wide average of 13.7%.

Outside of this primary investment hub, activity drops off sharply. The second-ranked zip code by count, 47138, has only 63 investor-owned homes and an ownership rate of 11.0%, illustrating a dramatic decline in focus.

Some micro-markets show high penetration despite low counts. For example, zip code 47126 has only one investor-owned property, but this represents a 16.7% ownership rate, indicating a very small housing market where a single purchase can have a large impact. This insight is derived from comprehensive property datasets that track ownership at granular levels.

This geographic pattern suggests investors have identified specific neighborhoods within 47102 that offer the most attractive rental yields or acquisition opportunities, leading to a clustering of their portfolios.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.2 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The historical transaction data reveals a clear and sustained strategy of portfolio expansion among Scott County landlords. They are overwhelmingly net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell.

In 2025, landlords purchased 63 properties while selling only 15, resulting in a net gain of 48 properties. This equates to a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 4.2, signaling deep confidence in the local rental market.

This trend is not a recent phenomenon. In 2024, investors also expanded their holdings with 51 purchases versus 26 sales, for a net gain of 25 properties. The market has been in a clear accumulation phase for at least two years.

Even the institutional segment, despite its tiny footprint, is contributing to this growth. In 2025, institutional investors were net buyers by one property (3 buys vs. 2 sells), a reversal from their neutral position in 2024 (2 buys vs. 2 sells).

Quarterly data from Q2 2025 reinforces the broader trend, with 19 acquisitions and only 9 dispositions in a single three-month period. This consistent net-positive transaction flow is a primary force shaping the local housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 33.3% of all SFR transactions in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter, landlords were a major force in the transaction market, participating in 12 of the 36 total SFR sales. This 33.3% share of transactions underscores their importance in providing market liquidity and setting price floors.

The activity was heavily concentrated at the entry level of the market. The single-property tier accounted for 75% of all landlord transactions (9 out of 12), highlighting an influx of new investors.

These new landlords acquired properties at an average price of $65,000, establishing a key price point for starter investment properties in Scott County.

A critical strategic insight is that none of the investor purchases this quarter were from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate means that investors are sourcing their entire inventory from the traditional market, directly competing with or buying from homeowners.

Once again, institutional investors were entirely absent from the market, with zero transactions recorded in the 1,000+ property tier. The transactional energy in Scott County clearly originates from new and small-scale operators.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Scott County's Market, Buying 41% of Homes While Owning 77% of Rentals
Holdings
Landlords own 919 SFR properties, representing 13.7% of Scott County's total market of 6,686 homes. The portfolio is primarily held by individuals, who own 599 properties (65.2%), compared to 326 (35.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $65,000 per property, securing a remarkable 44.7% discount compared to the $117,500 paid by traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors were highly active in the last quarter, purchasing 9 SFR properties, which accounted for 40.9% of all sales. This activity was driven by 9 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 76.7% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors own just 0.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs at the 21-50 property tier, where companies become the majority owners, indicating a trend of incorporation as investors scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.2 buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (63 buys vs 15 sells). Institutional investors, while far less active, were also marginal net buyers (3 buys vs 2 sells).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Scott County, Indiana, is fundamentally a story of local, small-scale enterprise, not large-scale corporate ownership. Investors own 919 single-family homes, comprising 13.7% of the total market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 76.7% of investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional firms own a mere 0.4%. The ownership structure further reveals this local character, with individual investors holding 65.2% of the properties compared to 35.5% for companies, a breakdown confirmed by deep assessor data.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive, opportunistic acquisition. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 40.9% of all homes sold, with new single-property investors driving the majority of this activity. Their strategy appears effective, as they secured properties at a 44.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This acquisitive stance is a long-term trend; investors have been consistent net buyers, purchasing 4.2 properties for every one they sold in 2025, steadily growing their local footprint by acquiring inventory directly from the homeowner market.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the health and direction of the Scott County rental market are tied to the financial stability and strategic decisions of thousands of small operators. The market's concentration in the 47102 zip code and the reliance on cash purchases points to a sophisticated, localized strategy. For anyone looking to understand this housing market, the focus must be on the motivations and actions of the mom-and-pop investor, who remains the primary force shaping the rental landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:53 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Scott (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Scott (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-scott/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.