Madison (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Madison (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Madison (OH)
11,614
Total Investors in Madison (OH)
1,356
Investor Owned SFR in Madison (OH)
1,211(10.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,136
SFR Owned
862
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
220
SFR Owned
368
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,211 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Madison County, Controlling 93.7% of Investor Housing
Investors own 1,211 SFR properties in Madison County, representing 10.4% of the market, with small landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 93.7% share. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 22.1% of all homes sold, securing a massive 39.1% price discount compared to traditional homeowners, and are acting as aggressive net buyers with a 4.3x buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,211 SFR properties in Madison County, with individuals holding 71.2%.
Cash is the preferred financing method, used for 773 properties compared to 438 financed properties. An overwhelming 95.3% of the investor-owned portfolio consists of rented, non-owner-occupied homes (1,154 properties), confirming a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired properties for 39.1% less than homeowners in Q1 2026.
This Q1 discount of $131,552 ($204,733 vs $336,285) marks a dramatic reversal from a year prior, when landlords paid a 6.5% premium in Q1 2025. The price gap has widened significantly each quarter, indicating a growing purchasing advantage for investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 22.1% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 95.2% of these acquisitions, purchasing 20 of the 21 investor-bought homes. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made only a single purchase, accounting for just 4.8% of investor activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.7% of all investor-owned SFR housing in Madison County.
This overwhelming share contrasts sharply with institutional investors (1000+ properties), who own just 1.0% of the investor portfolio (12 properties). Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment, holding 66.7% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding a 76.8% share.
While individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 85.1% of single-property portfolios and 70.0% of two-property portfolios, companies take control as portfolio complexity grows. The crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership occurs between the 3-5 and 6-10 property tiers.
Geographic Distribution
The 43140 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 620 properties.
While 43140 has the highest count of investor-owned homes, the 43151 zip code has the highest concentration, with a 17.6% investor ownership rate. This is followed by 43153 (15.6%) and 43029 (13.5%), highlighting specific neighborhoods with high rental density.
Historical Transactions
Madison County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.3 properties for every one they sold in Q1.
This strong net buyer position is a consistent trend, with landlords purchasing 238 properties and selling only 33 in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors showed no net growth, with an equal number of buys and sells in their limited 2024 activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 20.2% of all SFR transactions in the last quarter.
New single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $230,125, which is 33.4% more than the $153,334 paid by institutional investors. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases were from other landlords, indicating all acquisitions came from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,211 SFR properties in Madison County, with individuals holding 71.2%.
Detailed Findings

In Madison County, investors hold a significant portfolio of 1,211 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 10.4% of the total 11,614 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a notable concentration of properties dedicated to real estate investing.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual investors own 862 properties, representing 71.2% of the investor-owned market, while companies own the remaining 368 properties (30.4%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, with 1,136 individual landlords compared to just 220 company landlords. This highlights that the local rental market is primarily supported by small-scale, private investors rather than large corporations.

A clear confirmation of the rental focus is that 1,154 of the 1,211 properties (95.3%) are classified as rented. This high percentage underscores that the vast majority of these homes are actively serving as rental housing for the community.

When analyzing financing, cash transactions are significantly more prevalent than mortgaged ones. Investors own 773 properties outright (cash), compared to 438 that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base in Madison County that can move quickly on acquisitions without relying on traditional financing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired properties for 39.1% less than homeowners in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Madison County demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties at a significant discount in the first quarter of 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $204,733, a staggering 39.1% less than the $336,285 paid by traditional homeowners, resulting in a savings of $131,552 per property.

This massive price gap represents a sharp and accelerating trend. In Q3 2025, the discount was a more modest 12.6% ($43,084), and in Q2 2025 it was 16.2% ($63,606). The current 39.1% discount highlights a rapidly strengthening buyer's advantage for investors.

The Q1 2026 pricing reverses a trend from early 2025, when market conditions were completely different. In Q1 2025, landlords actually paid a 6.5% premium over homeowners ($345,750 vs $324,690), signaling a major shift in market dynamics over the past year.

Current acquisition prices are also hovering just above pandemic-era levels. The Q1 average of $204,733 is only slightly higher than the average price of $199,591 seen from 2020-2023, suggesting that recent market corrections have erased most of the price appreciation from 2024 and 2025 for investor-targeted properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 22.1% of all SFR properties sold in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the Madison County housing market in the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 21 of the 95 total SFRs sold, a market share of 22.1%.

The purchasing activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, bought 20 of the 21 properties (95.2% of investor purchases), underscoring their role as the primary engine of investor demand.

New entrants and the smallest investors (Tier 01, single-property owners) led the charge, acquiring 16 properties, which represents 76.2% of all landlord purchases for the quarter. This signals a healthy influx of new capital from first-time or small-scale landlords.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties had a minimal impact, purchasing only a single property. This accounted for just 4.8% of investor buying activity, reinforcing the narrative of a market dominated by local investors rather than large, remote institutions.

The data shows a clear hierarchy of purchasing volume, with activity heavily concentrated in the smallest tiers and diminishing rapidly as portfolio sizes increase, with no purchases recorded in the mid-size tiers (11-1000 properties).

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 93.7% of all investor-owned SFR housing in Madison County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Madison County is unequivocally dominated by mom-and-pop landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 93.7% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that firmly establishes small-scale operators as the backbone of the local rental market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest single group by a wide margin, owning 828 properties. This accounts for 66.7%, or two-thirds, of the entire investor-owned housing stock, highlighting the importance of new and small investors.

The holdings of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) are minimal in comparison. This tier owns just 12 properties, representing a mere 1.0% of the investor market. This finding challenges the common narrative of large corporations controlling residential housing, at least within this county.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also have a very small footprint. Tiers 05 through 08 combined own only 66 properties, or 5.2% of the total. Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum and fades quickly as portfolio sizes increase.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market structure, with thousands of individual decisions by small landlords shaping the local rental environment, rather than the centralized strategies of a few large players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding a 76.8% share.
Detailed Findings

While individuals own the majority of investor properties overall, the data reveals a distinct crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type. This transition occurs as landlords scale their portfolios beyond five properties.

In smaller tiers, individual ownership is overwhelming. Individuals own 712 of the single-property landlord homes (85.1%) and 63 of the two-property portfolios (70.0%). Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals still hold a majority at 59.2%.

The dynamic shifts dramatically in the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies own 76 properties, a commanding 76.8% share, while individuals own just 23 properties (23.2%). This indicates that as investors grow, they are more likely to incorporate for liability and operational efficiency.

This pattern suggests a typical investor lifecycle in Madison County: an individual starts with one or a few properties and later formalizes their operations under a company structure as their portfolio expands and becomes more complex.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 43140 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 620 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Madison County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 43140 zip code serving as the clear hub of activity. This single area contains 620 investor-owned SFRs, which is more than half of the county's entire investor portfolio of 1,211 properties.

However, the highest number of properties does not equate to the highest market penetration. The 43151 zip code boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 17.6%, indicating that more than one in every six SFRs there is investor-owned. This is a key insight available from detailed property datasets.

Other areas with high investor concentration include 43153, with a 15.6% ownership rate, and 43029, at 13.5%. These zip codes represent pockets of the county with a particularly strong rental presence.

In contrast, the zip code with the most investor properties, 43140, has a more moderate ownership rate of 11.1%. This suggests it is a larger area with more total housing stock, where investors have a significant but less saturated presence.

The data highlights a clear distinction between raw volume and market saturation, with different zip codes leading in each metric. This allows for a more nuanced understanding of where investors are most active versus where they have the deepest market penetration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Madison County landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.3 properties for every one they sold in Q1.
Detailed Findings

The transaction data reveals a clear and consistent trend of accumulation among landlords in Madison County. In the first quarter of 2026, they were strong net buyers, purchasing 26 properties while selling only 6, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 4.3 to 1.

This aggressive acquisition strategy is not a new phenomenon. In 2025, investors bought 238 SFRs and sold only 33, for a net gain of 205 properties. Similarly, in 2024, they added a net of 82 properties to their portfolios (115 buys vs. 33 sells).

This sustained net buying activity signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term hold strategy among the county's investor base.

The behavior of institutional investors (1000+ tier) provides a stark contrast. Their only recorded recent activity was in 2024, when they bought one property and sold one property, resulting in zero net growth. This inactivity suggests large-scale investors are not currently focused on accumulating assets in this market.

The data firmly establishes that the growth in investor-owned housing in Madison County is being driven by the continuous acquisitions of smaller, local landlords, not by large institutional players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 20.2% of all SFR transactions in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter's transactions, landlords played a significant role by participating in 26 of the 129 total SFR sales, capturing a 20.2% share of all market activity.

A clear pricing hierarchy emerged among different investor tiers. New, single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $230,125 per home. This suggests they are competing directly with traditional homebuyers for market-rate properties.

In contrast, the one institutional purchase (Tier 09) was made at a much lower price of $153,334. This represents a 33.4% discount compared to what the smallest landlords paid, indicating a different acquisition strategy likely focused on distressed or off-market opportunities.

Smaller, multi-property landlords also secured properties for less than new entrants. Those in the 3-5 property tier paid an average of $92,950, and those in the 6-10 tier paid $116,600, suggesting experienced local investors are adept at finding better deals.

Significantly, none of the 26 landlord purchases in the quarter were from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate means that investors exclusively acquired properties from the non-investor market, such as traditional homeowners, rather than trading assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Madison County with 93.7% ownership, buying at a 39% discount
Holdings
Landlords own 1,211 SFR properties, representing 10.4% of Madison County's market. Individual investors are the primary owners, holding 862 of these properties (71.2%), with companies owning the remaining 368 (30.4%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of 39.1% less than traditional homeowners, securing a substantial discount of $131,552 per property ($204,733 vs $336,285).
Activity
Investors purchased 22.1% of all homes sold last quarter (21 properties), with activity almost entirely driven by small landlords who accounted for 95.2% of these acquisitions.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 93.7% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 1.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, capturing a 76.8% share as portfolios grow in scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 4.3x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (26 buys vs 6 sells), while institutional investors remain on the sidelines with no net portfolio growth.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Madison County, OH, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, local landlords. According to the latest Investor Pulse reports, investors own 1,211 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, making up 10.4% of the total market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop operators (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 93.7% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors have a negligible footprint, with just a 1.0% share. The market is primarily driven by individuals, who own 71.2% of investor properties, solidifying the image of a fragmented market shaped by thousands of local stakeholders.

In terms of recent activity, these small investors are not only dominant but also highly active and strategic. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords purchased 22.1% of all SFRs sold in the county. They demonstrated remarkable purchasing power, securing properties at an average price of $204,733, a massive 39.1% discount compared to the $336,285 paid by traditional homeowners. This behavior is part of a broader accumulation trend; landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.3 properties for every one they sell. This indicates strong confidence and a clear strategy to expand their local portfolios.

The key takeaway for Madison County is that its rental housing market is robustly supported by a large base of small, individual investors who are actively growing and finding significant value. The narrative of large, corporate landlords taking over is not supported by the data here. Instead, the market's health and direction are tied to the financial decisions of local entrepreneurs. The high concentration of ownership in the 43140 zip code and high penetration rates in areas like 43151 point to specific sub-markets where this investor activity is most pronounced, shaping the community's housing dynamics from the ground up.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:46 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Madison (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Madison (OH) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-oh-madison/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.