McMinn (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McMinn (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McMinn (TN)
15,442
Total Investors in McMinn (TN)
5,076
Investor Owned SFR in McMinn (TN)
4,209(27.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,863
SFR Owned
3,932
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
213
SFR Owned
299
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,209 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate McMinn County's Market, Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Investors own 4,209 SFR properties in McMinn County, representing 27.3% of the market. Individual, small-scale landlords control a staggering 93.8% of this portfolio, while institutional investors hold a mere 0.1%. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 21.7% of all homes sold, securing them at a 24.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, even as institutional firms began to sell off assets.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,209 SFR properties in McMinn County, with individuals holding 93.4%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (3,487 properties) rather than financed (722 properties). Nearly the entire portfolio is focused on rentals, with 98.6% of properties (4,150) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords purchased Q1 properties for 24.1% less than homeowners, a $66,091 discount.
The significant price gap favoring landlords has been a consistent trend, with discounts reaching as high as 30.1% ($90,177) in Q3 2025. Landlord acquisition prices peaked in 2025 at an average of $220,476 before dipping slightly to $208,191 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 24.9% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter's activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 83.3% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made up just 4.8% of landlord acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.8% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the landlord portfolio, or 3 homes total. The single-property tier alone accounts for 79.7% of all investor-owned SFRs, underscoring the market's hyper-fragmentation.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner only in large portfolios of 51-100 properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 96.2% of single-property holdings and 71.8% of 6-10 property portfolios. The clear crossover point occurs at the 51-100 property tier, where companies own 90.0% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 37303 zip code, holding 1,892 properties.
While 37303 has the highest volume, the 37846 zip code has the highest penetration rate, with investors owning 40.9% of all SFRs. Other high-penetration areas include 37309 (38.6%) and 37325 (36.4%), showing targeted investment pockets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 3.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
This trend is directly opposed by institutional investors, who became net sellers in Q1 2026 with 2 purchases versus 3 sales. This marks a strategic reversal from 2025, when institutions were net buyers.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors accounted for 21.7% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
During Q1, new mom-and-pop landlords paid the highest prices at $226,770 per property. In contrast, institutional investors paid 12.1% less, averaging just $199,259, demonstrating a clear pricing advantage for larger players.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,209 SFR properties in McMinn County, with individuals holding 93.4%.
Detailed Findings

In McMinn County, investors hold a significant 27.3% of the single-family residential market, totaling 4,209 properties out of 15,442. This highlights a strong local focus on real estate investing.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by 4,863 individual landlords who control 3,932 properties, or 93.4% of the investor-owned market. In contrast, 213 company entities own just 299 properties, making up the remaining 7.1%.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions over financing. A remarkable 82.9% of the investor portfolio (3,487 properties) is owned outright in cash, compared to only 722 financed properties, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals, with 4,150 properties (98.6% of holdings) classified as non-owner-occupied. This near-total focus underscores that investment activity is primarily geared towards generating rental income rather than speculation or secondary home ownership.

While individuals make up 95.8% of all landlord entities, they own 93.4% of properties, showing a slightly smaller average portfolio size compared to their company counterparts. This structure points to a market built on a large number of small-scale, independent operators rather than a few large firms.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords purchased Q1 properties for 24.1% less than homeowners, a $66,091 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in McMinn County demonstrate a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q1 2026 for an average of $208,191. This is a substantial 24.1% less than the $274,282 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a $66,091 cash discount on the average purchase.

This price gap is not a new phenomenon but a persistent market feature. Over the past year, the investor discount has consistently been above 25%, peaking in Q3 2025 when landlords paid 30.1% less than homeowners, a savings of $90,177 per property.

While homeowner prices have remained high, landlord acquisition prices show signs of softening. After rising from a 2020-2023 average of $174,488 to a peak of $220,476 in 2025, the average landlord purchase price decreased to $208,191 in the first quarter of 2026.

The ability to secure properties well below the typical market rate paid by homeowners is a key strategic advantage for investors in this region. This suggests a focus on off-market deals, distressed properties, or superior negotiation tactics that general homebuyers cannot replicate.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 24.9% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter's activity.
Detailed Findings

During the most recent quarter of recorded purchases (Q4 2025), investors were highly active, acquiring 42 of the 169 single-family homes sold in McMinn County. This represents a significant 24.9% market share for landlords.

The market's growth is fueled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 35 of the 42 investor purchases, or 83.3% of the total. This highlights their role as the primary engine of investor-led acquisitions.

New entrants are a key feature of the market. The single-property tier saw 35 new landlord entities acquire 24 properties, demonstrating a continuous influx of first-time investors.

Institutional activity remains minimal. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier purchased only 2 properties, accounting for a mere 4.8% of landlord acquisitions. This low volume contrasts sharply with the high activity from smaller players.

Activity was concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with the single-property tier alone making up 57.1% of all properties purchased by investors. This further reinforces the grassroots nature of McMinn County's investor market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.8% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in McMinn County is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 93.8% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

First-time or single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market. This tier alone accounts for 3,476 properties, representing 79.7% of the entire investor portfolio. This extreme concentration at the smallest level signifies a highly fragmented and decentralized market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 3 properties in total. Their 0.1% market share challenges the common narrative of large corporations dominating residential real estate.

The mid-size tiers (11-100 properties) also represent a small fraction of the market, collectively owning just 6.0% of the investor portfolio. Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly as portfolio sizes increase, as seen in a detailed property ownership by owner type report.

This ownership structure indicates that the local rental market is primarily supplied by thousands of individual community members rather than a handful of large, professionalized asset managers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner only in large portfolios of 51-100 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across nearly all small and mid-sized portfolio tiers in McMinn County. Their dominance is most pronounced in the single-property tier, where they own 3,354 of 3,486 properties (96.2%).

As portfolio sizes grow, company ownership increases but remains the minority for some time. Even in the 21-50 property tier, individuals still own a 68.1% majority of the homes.

The structural shift from individual to corporate ownership occurs definitively in the 51-100 property tier. At this level, companies own 9 out of 10 properties, a 90.0% share, marking the clear point where professionalization and scale favor corporate structures.

The data reveals a clear lifecycle pattern: investors typically start and operate as individuals, and only those who scale to own more than 50 properties tend to transition to a corporate ownership structure.

This tiered breakdown shows that for the vast majority of the market (Tiers 1-5, owning up to 20 properties), individual ownership is the standard operating model.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 37303 zip code, holding 1,892 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in McMinn County shows significant geographic concentration, with the 37303 zip code serving as the epicenter of activity. This single area contains 1,892 investor-owned properties, representing 44.9% of the entire county's investor portfolio.

However, the highest raw count does not equate to the highest market saturation. The 37846 zip code holds the top spot for investor ownership rate, where landlords own 40.9% of all single-family homes, indicating intense focus in that smaller market.

A clear distinction exists between areas with high volume and areas with high penetration. The top 5 zip codes by property count are different from the top 5 by ownership percentage, suggesting different investment strategies are at play across the county. A detailed property search reveals these nuanced patterns.

Zip codes like 37329 appear on both lists, with 536 properties and a high 33.9% ownership rate, marking it as a hotspot for both volume and concentration.

This data reveals that investors are not uniformly spread out but are clustered in specific zip codes, creating pockets of very high rental density within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 3.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in McMinn County continues to be in an aggressive accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 56 properties while selling only 16, resulting in a strong 3.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio and a net gain of 40 properties.

This behavior is consistent with prior periods, including Year 2025, where investors bought 309 homes and sold just 70, a ratio of 4.4-to-1. The sustained net buying activity signals long-term confidence in the local rental market.

A major divergence in strategy is emerging at the institutional level. While the broader market buys, investors in the 1,000+ property tier became net sellers in Q1 2026, selling 3 properties while acquiring only 2.

This institutional retreat is a recent development, reversing their position from 2025 when they were net buyers (13 buys vs. 8 sells). This shift could signal a belief that the market has peaked or a strategic reallocation of capital to other regions.

The contrast is stark: the small, local investors who dominate the market are doubling down on McMinn County, while the few large, national players are beginning to divest. Tracking such transactions often relies on timely assessor data feeds.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors accounted for 21.7% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were a significant force in the transaction market, participating in 56 of the 258 total SFR sales. This activity gives investors a 21.7% share of all transactions in McMinn County.

A distinct pricing hierarchy exists among different investor tiers. First-time, single-property landlords paid the most for their acquisitions, averaging $226,770. This premium suggests they may be competing more directly with traditional homeowners for on-market properties.

Conversely, the largest institutional investors secured the best prices, paying an average of just $199,259. This represents a 12.1% discount compared to what new mom-and-pop buyers paid, highlighting the benefits of scale and market access.

Inter-landlord trading is concentrated in the mid-sized tiers. Landlords with 6-10 properties sourced 40.0% of their new acquisitions from other investors, the highest rate of any group. The smallest and largest tiers, however, conducted zero landlord-to-landlord transactions.

The highest transaction volume came from the single-property tier, with 35 transactions, far outpacing all other segments. This confirms that market entry by new, small investors is the primary driver of landlord activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords control 94% of McMinn County's investor market as large institutions begin to sell.
Holdings
Landlords own 4,209 single-family properties in McMinn County, representing 27.3% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who hold 3,932 properties (93.4%), compared to just 299 (7.1%) held by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at a significant 24.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $208,191 versus the homeowner's $274,282, a savings of $66,091 per home.
Activity
Investors accounted for 21.7% of all home purchases in Q1 2026, with 35 new single-property landlord entities entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) dominated acquisitions, making up 85.7% of landlord transactions.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have a near-total grip on the market, controlling 93.8% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a minuscule 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 51-100 property tier, where they control 90.0% of the assets. This marks the clear crossover from personal to corporate ownership.
Transactions
While landlords overall are strong net buyers with a 3.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1, institutional investors have reversed course to become net sellers, divesting more properties than they acquired (2 buys vs. 3 sells).
Market Narrative

In McMinn County, Tennessee, the real estate investor market is fundamentally a story of the small, independent operator. Investors command a notable 27.3% of the single-family housing stock, totaling 4,209 properties. However, this market is not the domain of Wall Street; it is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 93.4% of these homes. The dominance of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) is absolute, as they control 93.8% of all investor-held properties, while large institutional firms have a negligible presence of just 0.1%. This structure points to a deeply fragmented and localized rental market built by community members.

Investor behavior in the first quarter of 2026 reveals savvy acquisition strategies and a diverging market sentiment. Landlords as a whole continued to accumulate properties, purchasing 21.7% of all homes sold and acting as strong net buyers with a 3.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio. They achieved this growth while securing a remarkable 24.1% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. However, a critical fissure is appearing: while smaller investors buy aggressively, the few institutional players in the market have become net sellers, signaling a potential strategic exit or a belief that local market prices have peaked.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the health and direction of McMinn County's rental market are dictated by thousands of small landlords, not a handful of corporations. Their continued buying, funded heavily by cash, indicates sustained confidence. The retreat of institutional capital, though minor in volume, is a trend to watch, as it contrasts sharply with the bullish sentiment of local players. For anyone tracking this market, understanding the motivations and actions of the mom-and-pop segment is essential to predicting future trends in rental supply and property values.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:54 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography McMinn (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 McMinn (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-mcminn/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.