Lincoln (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lincoln (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lincoln (TN)
9,989
Total Investors in Lincoln (TN)
2,863
Investor Owned SFR in Lincoln (TN)
2,514(25.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,732
SFR Owned
2,382
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
131
SFR Owned
147
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,514 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Lincoln County with 85% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
Investors own 25.2% of Single-Family homes in Lincoln County, with individual mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 85.0% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at a 46.1% discount compared to homeowners, and while the overall market saw investors as strong net buyers, institutional-level players were net sellers, signaling a clear divestment trend.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,514 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 94.7% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held as cash assets (2,038) compared to financed ones (476). Nearly all properties in the portfolio (2,487 of 2,514) are non-owner-occupied rentals, confirming a strong focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 46.1% discount in Q1 2026, paying $127,261 less than homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been consistently wide, ranging from 17.8% to 43.0% in the prior three quarters. This persistent discount suggests landlords are targeting a different, lower-priced segment of the housing market, such as distressed or off-market properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 21.2% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, totaling 25 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords were overwhelmingly the most active buyers, accounting for 24 of the 25 landlord purchases (92.3%). Institutional investors made only one purchase, representing just 3.8% of investor activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 85.0% of investor-owned SFRs in Lincoln County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 4 properties, which is 0.2% of the investor market. Single-property landlords alone make up the largest segment by a wide margin, holding 71.3% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every single ownership tier, including 99.7% of the 'Large' landlord category.
There is no tier where companies become the majority owner; their highest penetration is 23.5% in the 6-10 property tier. This market structure shows that even the largest portfolios in Lincoln County are managed by individuals, not corporations.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Fayetteville (37334), with 1,764 properties.
While Fayetteville has the highest count, smaller zip codes show higher penetration rates. The 37359 zip code leads with a 35.3% investor ownership rate, followed by 37348 at 31.2%, indicating deep investor focus in specific sub-markets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with 36 acquisitions vs 13 sales in Q1 2026.
This net-buyer trend is consistent over time, with a 4.02x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (185 buys vs 46 sells). In contrast, institutional investors are net sellers, divesting more properties than they acquired in both 2024 and 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 19.0% of all market transactions in Q1 2026, buying 36 properties.
There is virtually no price difference in Q1 acquisitions between the smallest and largest investors; single-property buyers paid $156,246 while institutional buyers paid $156,762. Inter-landlord sales are uncommon, with only 9.7% of single-property landlord purchases sourced from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,514 SFR properties, with individuals holding a dominant 94.7% share.
Detailed Findings

In Lincoln County, investors hold a significant 25.2% of the total Single-Family Residential market, with a portfolio of 2,514 properties. This indicates a high level of real estate investing activity relative to the total market size of 9,989 SFRs.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 2,382 properties, or 94.7% of the investor-owned portfolio. Companies represent a minor stake with just 147 properties (5.8%), highlighting a market driven by local, small-scale investors rather than large corporations.

A similar pattern is seen in the entity count, where 2,732 of the 2,863 total landlords are individuals. This 95.4% share reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of the county's rental market.

Financial strategies among these landlords heavily favor outright ownership. A clear majority of properties, 2,038 in total, are owned free of financing (cash properties), while only 476 are financed. This suggests a fiscally conservative or equity-rich investor base.

The portfolio's purpose is clear, with 2,487 properties classified as rented (non-owner-occupied). This accounts for 99% of the investor-owned stock, underscoring that these properties are actively serving as rental housing for the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 46.1% discount in Q1 2026, paying $127,261 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

A stark pricing difference defines the acquisition strategy for investors in Lincoln County. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $148,893, a remarkable 46.1% less than the $276,154 paid by traditional homeowners, creating a discount of $127,261 per property.

This significant price advantage is not a new phenomenon. The trend of deep discounts was consistent throughout the previous year, with landlords paying 17.8% less in Q3 2025, 20.1% less in Q2 2025, and 43.0% less in Q1 2025.

The persistence of such a large gap indicates that landlords and homeowners are operating in different segments of the market. Investors are likely focusing on properties that require renovation, are in distress, or are acquired through off-market channels that allow for lower purchase prices.

Comparing prices over time, the average landlord acquisition price has fluctuated, but the average for 2024 ($205,023) and 2025 ($203,068) remained relatively stable, suggesting a disciplined approach to purchasing despite broader market shifts.

The data highlights a key investor behavior: value-hunting. Rather than competing directly with homeowners for turn-key properties, landlords in this market are leveraging market knowledge and deal-sourcing strategies to acquire assets well below the retail market rate.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 21.2% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, totaling 25 properties.
Detailed Findings

During Q4 2025, investors demonstrated significant market influence by purchasing 25 of the 118 SFRs sold, capturing a 21.2% share of all transactions in Lincoln County. This level of activity underscores their consistent role in the local housing market.

The purchasing activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 92.3% of all landlord acquisitions, with 24 properties purchased during the quarter.

New entrants are a key driver of this activity. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone bought 21 properties, which is 80.8% of the investor total, facilitated by 29 new landlord entities entering the market. This signals a healthy and accessible entry point for new investors.

In stark contrast, institutional-level activity was minimal. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) accounted for just one purchase, or 3.8% of the investor total, reinforcing the narrative of a market dominated by smaller players.

The data clearly shows that the lifeblood of investor purchasing in Lincoln County is not large corporations but rather new and existing small landlords expanding their portfolios one or two properties at a time.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 85.0% of investor-owned SFRs in Lincoln County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Lincoln County is unequivocally controlled by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) hold a combined 85.0% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that highlights their foundational role in providing rental housing.

The concentration at the smallest end of the spectrum is particularly noteworthy. Landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) own 1,878 homes, representing 71.3% of the entire investor portfolio. This demonstrates that the market is highly fragmented and characterized by entry-level investment.

Conversely, institutional ownership (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) is virtually non-existent. This tier controls a mere 4 properties, making up only 0.2% of the market and challenging any narrative of a corporate takeover in this region.

An interesting outlier is the 'Large' tier (101-1000 properties), which holds 325 properties for a 12.3% share. This suggests the presence of a few significant, yet not institutional-scale, regional investors.

Overall, the tier distribution reveals a market built on a broad base of small landlords, with a steep drop-off in ownership as portfolio sizes increase. This structure points to a stable, community-integrated rental market rather than one dominated by large, remote entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every single ownership tier, including 99.7% of the 'Large' landlord category.
Detailed Findings

In Lincoln County, individual investors are the primary owners across every single portfolio size, a highly unusual pattern. Even in the 'Large' tier (101-1000 properties), individuals own 324 of the 325 properties, a staggering 99.7% share.

The data shows there is no crossover point where companies gain majority control. The highest concentration of company ownership is in the 6-10 property tier, and even there, they only account for 23.5% of the properties (16 of 68).

For the smallest investors, individual ownership is near-total. In the single-property tier, individuals own 1,803 properties (95.3%), compared to just 89 owned by companies. This pattern holds true across all mom-and-pop tiers.

This market structure definitively shows that the property ownership landscape, from the smallest entrant to the largest local player, is driven by personal investment rather than corporate strategy.

The lack of corporate penetration, even at scale, suggests that the investment environment in Lincoln County may favor hands-on management and local market knowledge, characteristics more common among individual landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Fayetteville (37334), with 1,764 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor holdings in Lincoln County are not evenly distributed. The zip code 37334 (Fayetteville) is the clear hub of activity, containing 1,764 investor-owned properties, which represents 24.9% of its local SFR market.

While Fayetteville has the largest absolute number of investor properties, several smaller zip codes exhibit a much higher concentration. Topping the list is 37359, where investors own 35.3% of the homes, followed by 37348 (31.2%) and 38453 (30.6%).

This distinction between high-count and high-percentage areas is critical. It shows that while the bulk of the portfolio is in the county's main town, the most saturated investment markets are in smaller, surrounding communities.

The top five zip codes by investor count (37334, 37335, 38488, 37144) all have investor ownership rates between 23.0% and 26.0%, indicating a consistent and significant investor presence across the county's primary residential areas.

Data for the zip code 37047 was unavailable, preventing a complete county-wide comparison but highlighting where the current core of investment lies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with 36 acquisitions vs 13 sales in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear trend of portfolio growth among landlords in Lincoln County. In Q1 2026, they were strong net buyers, acquiring 36 properties while selling only 13.

This pattern of accumulation is not isolated to the recent quarter. For the full year of 2025, landlords purchased 185 properties and sold only 46, resulting in a net gain of 139 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of over 4-to-1. The trend was similar in 2024, with 143 buys and 31 sells.

However, a crucial divergence emerges when analyzing institutional investors (1000+ tier). This segment has been actively divesting, posting a net seller position in both 2025 (6 buys vs. 7 sells) and 2024 (1 buy vs. 2 sells).

The behavior of institutional players, while small in volume, runs directly counter to the broader market. While small and mid-size landlords are expanding their footprint, the largest players are strategically retreating from the Lincoln County market.

This dynamic signals strong confidence among local investors who are actively accumulating properties, while institutional capital appears to be exiting, likely reallocating to different markets or asset classes.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 19.0% of all market transactions in Q1 2026, buying 36 properties.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords played a significant role in market liquidity, participating in 19.0% of all 189 SFR transactions with 36 purchases. This sustained activity reinforces their importance to the local real estate ecosystem.

Transaction volume was heavily concentrated among the smallest investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active group, responsible for 31 of the 36 investor transactions during the quarter.

A surprising finding from Q1 is the lack of a price advantage based on scale. The average purchase price for a single-property buyer was $156,246, almost identical to the $156,762 paid by the institutional tier, a difference of just 0.3%. This suggests all investors are targeting similarly priced assets.

The market does not appear to have a high volume of landlord-to-landlord trading. Among the most active tier (single-property buyers), only 3 of 31 transactions (9.7%) involved purchasing from an existing landlord. This indicates that new inventory for investors is primarily coming from the homeowner market.

Overall, Q1 transaction data confirms that market activity is driven by new and small investors acquiring properties from the general market, with little price differentiation or portfolio trading between investor tiers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Own 85% of Lincoln County's Rental Homes as Institutions Divest
Holdings
In Lincoln County, landlords own 2,514 single-family properties, representing 25.2% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 2,382 properties (94.7%), while companies own just 147 (5.8%).
Pricing
Landlords acquired properties for 46.1% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, reflecting an average discount of $127,261 per property ($148,893 vs. $276,154).
Activity
Investors purchased 21.2% of homes sold in Q4 2025, an effort led by 29 new single-property landlords entering the market and acquiring 21 properties.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 85.0% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single portfolio tier, with no crossover point to company ownership. Even among the largest portfolios (101-1000 properties), individuals own 99.7% of the assets.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 36 properties versus selling 13 in Q1 2026. Conversely, institutional investors are net sellers, having sold more properties than they bought in both 2024 and 2025.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Lincoln County, Tennessee, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual landlords. Investors own 2,514 single-family homes, a significant 25.2% of the total market. This portfolio is not in the hands of corporations; individuals own 94.7% of these properties. The market structure is highly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) controlling 85.0% of all investor-held housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a nearly invisible footprint, holding just 0.2% of the portfolio.

Investor behavior in Lincoln County is characterized by value-driven acquisitions and steady portfolio growth. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties at a massive 46.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, signaling a focus on distressed or off-market opportunities. This buying activity is robust, with landlords consistently acting as net buyers; they acquired properties at nearly a 3-to-1 ratio over sales in the last quarter. This trend is driven by new entrants, with 29 new single-property investors joining the market in Q4 2025. This grass-roots expansion contrasts sharply with the activity of institutional players, who have been net sellers over the past two years, indicating a strategic retreat.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Lincoln County's rental housing market is firmly controlled by local, small-scale entrepreneurs, not Wall Street. The data dispels the narrative of a corporate takeover and instead reveals a healthy, accessible market where new investors are actively participating and building wealth. The deep acquisition discounts and the divestment by the largest players suggest that success in this market relies on local knowledge and the ability to source value, reinforcing the strength and stability of the mom-and-pop investor base.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:51 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Lincoln (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Lincoln (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-lincoln/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.