Sevier (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sevier (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sevier (UT)
7,925
Total Investors in Sevier (UT)
4,759
Investor Owned SFR in Sevier (UT)
3,222(40.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,138
SFR Owned
2,936
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
621
SFR Owned
710
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,222 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Sevier County, Owning 98.7% of Rentals and Paying Premiums to Expand
Investors own 3,222 SFR properties in Sevier County, UT, representing a high 40.7% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (98.7%) who are in an aggressive accumulation phase, paying a 9.9% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026. While institutional investors are absent, landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 41 properties while selling only 2 in the last quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,222 SFR properties in Sevier County, with individuals holding a dominant 91.1% share.
The majority of investor-owned homes are held in cash (2,136 properties) compared to financed (1,086 properties). The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 3,195 of 3,222 properties (99.2%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a surprising reversal of national trends, landlords in Q1 2026 paid a 9.9% premium over homeowners.
Landlords paid an average of $419,445 versus the homeowner average of $381,681, a $37,764 premium. This trend is volatile, following a 2.9% discount in Q3 2025 and a massive 33.9% premium in Q2 2025, showing unpredictable pricing behavior.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 36.8% of all SFR properties sold in Sevier County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for nearly all of this activity, purchasing 29 of the 30 properties (96.7%) acquired by landlords. Institutional investors made zero purchases, highlighting their absence from the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market. Single-property landlords are the largest group, owning 2,802 properties, which is 82.6% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all active portfolio tiers in Sevier County.
There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Even in the 6-10 and 11-20 property tiers, individuals own 54.5% of the properties, defying typical national patterns where corporations dominate larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
The 84701 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, containing 892 landlord-owned properties.
High-penetration pockets exist elsewhere, with five zip codes showing over 81% investor ownership rates, led by 84657 at 85.1%. This shows a clear distinction between areas with high counts and areas with high saturation.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Sevier County are aggressive net buyers, with a 20.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
This trend of strong accumulation is long-standing, with a buy ratio of 7.0x in 2025 and 6.4x in 2024. Institutional investors are completely dormant, with balanced activity of one buy and one sell in both 2024 and 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords captured 33.9% of all Q1 2026 transactions, driven almost entirely by new investors.
New, single-property landlords dominated activity, conducting 34 of the 41 investor transactions and paying the highest average price at $450,467. These new entrants rarely buy from other investors, with only 2.9% of their purchases coming from existing landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,222 SFR properties in Sevier County, with individuals holding a dominant 91.1% share.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investors have a significant footprint in Sevier County, owning 3,222 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 40.7% of the total 7,925 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is dominated by 4,138 individual landlords, who own 2,936 properties (91.1% of the investor portfolio), compared to just 621 company landlords owning 710 properties (22.0%), indicating some co-ownership.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 2,136 properties owned outright versus 1,086 that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized base of local investors less reliant on leverage.

The portfolio is almost exclusively geared toward rentals, with 3,195 properties (99.2%) being non-owner-occupied. This signals a mature rental market where investors are primarily focused on generating rental income.

The sheer number of individual landlords (4,138) relative to the number of properties they own points to a highly fragmented market composed of many small-scale operators rather than a few large portfolio holders.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a surprising reversal of national trends, landlords in Q1 2026 paid a 9.9% premium over homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Sevier County are paying more than traditional homeowners, defying the common expectation of securing discounted properties. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $419,445, a significant $37,764 (9.9%) premium over the homeowner price of $381,681.

This premium-paying behavior is not an isolated event but shows significant volatility. In Q2 2025, landlords paid an extraordinary 33.9% premium ($130,289 more per property), while in Q3 2025 they secured a slight 2.9% discount. This indicates a competitive market where investors are willing to pay above market rate to acquire properties.

Acquisition prices have appreciated significantly since the 2020-2023 period. The average price during that timeframe was $292,902, substantially lower than the recent quarterly averages, which have consistently been above $350,000.

The willingness of investors to pay above homeowner prices suggests strong competition for limited inventory or a focus on properties with specific features that command higher values, such as those suited for high-yield rentals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 36.8% of all SFR properties sold in Sevier County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was robust in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 28 out of 76 total SFRs sold, capturing a 36.8% market share.

New and small investors drove nearly all Q4 activity. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone purchased 25 properties, representing 83.3% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

The market saw the entry of 34 new landlord entities in the single-property tier, signaling a continuous influx of first-time investors into Sevier County's rental market.

Mid-size and institutional investors were largely inactive. Only one property was purchased by an investor in the 101-1000 property tier, and institutional investors (1000+) made no acquisitions at all.

The concentration of purchasing power among new entrants and small landlords underscores the grassroots nature of the real estate investing landscape in this county.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Sevier County is the epitome of a mom-and-pop landscape. Landlords with 1-10 properties control a staggering 98.7% of the entire investor-owned SFR housing stock.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, with 2,802 properties (82.6%) under their ownership. This extreme concentration at the smallest tier indicates a market built by thousands of individual investment decisions rather than large-scale corporate strategy.

In stark contrast to national headlines, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in this market, with a 0.0% ownership share. The largest active tier holds just a single property.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with Tiers 1 and 2 (1-2 properties) combined accounting for 91.5% of all investor-held properties. This fragmentation suggests a market with low barriers to entry for new investors.

This distribution reveals a market completely insulated from the influence of large institutional players, with market dynamics dictated almost entirely by local and small-scale landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all active portfolio tiers in Sevier County.
Detailed Findings

Unlike most markets where companies take over as portfolios grow, individual investors in Sevier County retain majority ownership across every single investor tier.

In the single-property tier, individuals dominate with 2,592 properties (83.4%) versus 516 for companies. This pattern continues into larger portfolios, a unique local characteristic.

The data shows no crossover point. For landlords with 6-10 properties and 11-20 properties, individuals still own a 54.5% majority share in both tiers, indicating that even as investors scale, they tend to operate as individuals rather than incorporating.

This consistent dominance by individual owners suggests that the local investment climate may favor personal ownership, or that the investors scaling their portfolios are local residents who do not see a need for corporate structuring.

The market structure challenges the assumption that portfolio growth is synonymous with corporatization, highlighting a distinct local preference for individual ownership in property ownership.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 84701 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, containing 892 landlord-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Sevier County is geographically concentrated, with the 84701 zip code hosting the highest number of investor-owned properties at 892.

While 84701 leads in sheer volume, its investor ownership rate is a more moderate 29.1%. In contrast, several other zip codes demonstrate extreme investor saturation.

The highest investor penetration is found in 84657, where landlords own 85.1% of the SFR housing stock. Four other zip codes also exceed an 80% investor ownership rate: 84620 (84.0%), 84652 (83.6%), 84711 (83.5%), and 84744 (81.3%).

This bifurcation between high-volume and high-penetration areas suggests different market dynamics. The high-volume areas may be larger population centers, while the high-penetration zones could be smaller communities or areas with housing stock particularly attractive for rentals, like vacation homes.

The top five zip codes by count (84701, 84754, 84654, 84652, 84620) collectively hold 2,243 properties, representing nearly 70% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Sevier County are aggressive net buyers, with a 20.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The transaction data reveals a clear strategy of portfolio expansion among Sevier County landlords. In Q1 2026, investors purchased 41 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a powerful 20.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio.

This net buyer stance is not a new phenomenon but an accelerating trend. In 2025, landlords bought 160 SFRs and sold 23 (a 7.0x ratio), and in 2024 they bought 174 and sold 27 (a 6.4x ratio), showing sustained market confidence.

Institutional transaction activity is negligible, underscoring their absence from this market. Their activity was perfectly balanced in both 2025 and 2024, with one purchase and one sale each year, resulting in zero net portfolio growth.

The high volume of acquisitions compared to dispositions indicates that landlords are in a long-term holding pattern, focusing on building their portfolios rather than flipping properties for short-term gains.

This persistent and accelerating net buying behavior signals strong belief in the future appreciation and rental income potential of the Sevier County housing market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords captured 33.9% of all Q1 2026 transactions, driven almost entirely by new investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a major force in the market, participating in 41 of the 121 total SFR transactions for a 33.9% share of all activity.

The vast majority of this activity came from the smallest investors. The single-property (Tier 01) cohort accounted for 34 of the 41 landlord transactions, demonstrating that new market entrants are the primary drivers of investor demand.

These new investors are paying top dollar to enter the market, with an average purchase price of $450,467. This is more than double the price paid by the 'Large' tier investors ($207,360), suggesting new buyers are competing directly for retail-priced, homeowner-quality properties.

There is very little churn between investors. Only 2.9% of properties bought by single-property landlords were purchased from other landlords, indicating they are acquiring inventory from the general market, likely from homeowners.

The combination of high transaction volume and premium pricing from new entrants points to a highly competitive environment for starter investment properties in Sevier County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Sevier County, Owning 98.7% of Rentals and Paying Premiums to Expand
Holdings
Landlords own 3,222 SFR properties, a 40.7% penetration of the Sevier County, UT market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 2,936 properties (91.1%), while companies own 710 (22.0%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords defied national trends by paying a 9.9% premium over traditional homeowners, spending an average of $37,764 more per property ($419,445 vs $381,681).
Activity
Landlords captured 33.9% of market transactions in Q1 2026 (41 of 121), with new single-property investors driving the activity by accounting for 34 of those purchases.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise near-total control, owning 98.7% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single portfolio tier, meaning companies never achieve majority control, a sharp contrast to typical market structures.
Transactions
Landlords are in an aggressive accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers with a 20.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (41 buys vs 2 sells), while institutional players remain neutral.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment market in Sevier County, UT is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own a significant 3,222 single-family properties, representing 40.7% of the entire SFR market. This landscape is controlled not by corporations, but by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own a staggering 98.7% of all investor-held housing. Further emphasizing this structure, individual investors hold 91.1% of the portfolio, and institutional firms with over 1,000 properties are entirely absent from the market.

Investor behavior in Sevier County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and a willingness to pay premium prices. In Q1 2026, landlords captured 33.9% of all market transactions and were strong net buyers with a 20.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. Breaking from national norms, they paid 9.9% more than traditional homeowners, signaling intense competition for limited inventory. This activity is fueled by new entrants; single-property landlords accounted for 34 of the 41 investor purchases in the quarter and paid the highest average price, showing a rush of new capital into the local rental market.

The key takeaway from these market reports is that Sevier County operates as a distinct ecosystem, insulated from large-scale institutional influence and driven by local, individual capital. The high ownership penetration, premium pricing, and strong net-buying activity point to a confident and competitive market where small investors are actively building long-term rental portfolios. This dynamic suggests a stable, highly localized rental market where ownership is deeply fragmented and competition for new acquisitions is fierce.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 04:30 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Sevier (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Sevier (UT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ut-sevier/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.