Macon (AL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Macon (AL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Macon (AL)
3,605
Total Investors in Macon (AL)
698
Investor Owned SFR in Macon (AL)
672(18.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
601
SFR Owned
540
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
97
SFR Owned
134
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 672 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Macon County's Investor Market: 97% Mom-and-Pop Owned, Activity Freezes in Q1
Investors own 672 SFR properties in Macon County, AL (18.6% of the market), with small, individual landlords controlling 97.4% of that portfolio. While landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, purchasing activity came to a complete halt in Q1 2025, with zero properties acquired by investors during the quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 672 SFR properties in Macon County, with individuals holding 80.4%.
The investor market is overwhelmingly cash-driven, with 669 properties owned outright versus only 3 financed. Of the total portfolio, 656 properties are classified as rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Macon County see a massive 53.7% price discount compared to homeowners.
In Q1 2025, the listed landlord acquisition price was $102,500 versus the homeowner price of $221,167, a raw discount of $118,667. However, this is based on zero recorded landlord purchases, indicating a lack of recent transactional data.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity completely halted in Q1 2025, capturing 0.0% of the market.
There were zero recorded SFR purchases by any investor type in Q1 2025, including mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors. This indicates a total freeze in investor acquisition activity for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control Macon County, owning 97.4% of investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 72.6% of all investor-owned housing in the county. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, a key strategic shift.
While individuals own 85.9% of single-property portfolios, companies control 83.8% of portfolios in the 6-10 property range. This demonstrates a clear crossover point where corporate structures become preferred for larger holdings.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Macon County is concentrated in zip codes 36083 and 36088.
The 36083 zip code has the highest volume with 388 investor-owned properties. However, 36088 has the highest penetration rate, with investors owning 35.2% of the area's single-family homes.
Historical Transactions
In 2024, Macon County landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 41-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.
Landlords purchased 41 properties while selling only 1 throughout 2024, demonstrating a strong appetite for acquisition. No data was available for institutional-level transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor transactions ceased in Q1 2025, with landlords comprising 0.0% of all market deals.
Data for Q1 2025 shows zero transactions across all investor tiers, from single-property landlords to larger operators. Consequently, there were no inter-landlord trades recorded during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 672 SFR properties in Macon County, with individuals holding 80.4%.
Detailed Findings

In Macon County, Alabama, investors hold a significant 18.6% of the single-family residential market, totaling 672 properties. This demonstrates a notable concentration of real estate investing activity within the local housing stock.

The ownership structure is dominated by individual investors, who own 540 properties, or 80.4% of the investor-held SFR inventory. In contrast, company-owned properties number 134, representing just 19.9% of the total, underscoring the market's reliance on smaller, non-corporate landlords.

A defining characteristic of this market is its reliance on cash transactions. An overwhelming 99.6% of investor-owned properties (669) were purchased with cash, with only 3 properties being financed. This suggests a market of financially liquid investors who do not depend on traditional lending.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 656 of the 672 properties classified as rented. This high rental penetration highlights that the primary strategy for investors in Macon County is long-term, buy-and-hold rental housing.

The landlord landscape consists of 601 individual entities and 97 company entities. This nearly 6-to-1 ratio of individual to company landlords further solidifies the characterization of Macon County as a market driven by local, small-scale investment rather than large corporations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Macon County see a massive 53.7% price discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

A stark pricing disparity exists between investors and traditional homeowners in Macon County. In Q1 2025, the average acquisition price for landlords was listed at $102,500, which is 53.7% less than the $221,167 paid by homeowners. This represents a potential savings of $118,667 per property for investors.

It is critical to note that despite the listed average price, data indicates landlords purchased zero properties in Q1 2025 and Q4 2024. This lack of recent activity makes it difficult to establish a definitive trend, but the existing price gap suggests investors target significantly lower-priced properties than the general market.

Historically, prices have shown volatility. The average investor acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was just $53,300, far below the more recent price points listed for 2024 ($99,520) and Q1 2025 ($102,500). This highlights significant price appreciation in the types of properties investors target, even with low transaction volumes.

The absence of landlord purchases in the last two quarters prevents a direct quarter-over-quarter analysis of the price gap's evolution. The market appears to be in a holding pattern, with the significant price difference between investor and homeowner purchases remaining a key structural feature.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity completely halted in Q1 2025, capturing 0.0% of the market.
Detailed Findings

The first quarter of 2025 marked a complete cessation of investor buying activity in Macon County's SFR market. Landlords acquired zero properties, resulting in a 0.0% market share of all SFR purchases for the period.

This halt in activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who form the backbone of the local market, made no new acquisitions during the quarter.

Similarly, mid-size and institutional investors were also inactive, with zero properties purchased. This lack of participation from any investor tier signals a broad-based pause in the market, rather than a retreat by a specific segment.

The data shows no new landlords entering the market, as there were no purchases within the single-property (Tier 01) category. This contrasts with more active markets where new entrants are common each quarter.

The complete absence of purchases represents a significant shift from previous periods and suggests that investors are currently on the sidelines, potentially due to pricing, interest rates, or a lack of desirable inventory in Macon County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control Macon County, owning 97.4% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Macon County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, hold 97.4% of all investor-owned SFRs, making them the undisputed dominant force in the rental market.

First-time or single-property landlords are the most significant segment, owning 501 properties. This represents 72.6% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the granular, community-level nature of real estate investment in the area.

In stark contrast to national headlines, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint in Macon County, with a 0.0% market share. The largest investor tier present holds just a single property, confirming the absence of large-scale corporate ownership.

The ownership concentration at the small end of the spectrum is profound. Tiers representing owners with 1-5 properties collectively control 92.0% of the investor-owned housing stock (635 properties).

This distribution pattern underscores a market built on small, local capital rather than institutional funds. The lack of large investors suggests that opportunities may be better suited for individuals or that the market lacks the scale necessary to attract larger portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, a key strategic shift.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes in Macon County. While individual investors dominate the overall market, companies strategically control larger portfolios, signaling a shift from personal investment to a business operation.

Individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios. They account for 85.9% of single-property holdings (432 properties) and 83.5% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier (76 properties), establishing them as the foundation of the market.

The crossover point occurs decisively in the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies own 31 properties, representing an 83.8% majority share, while individuals own just 6 properties (16.2%). This indicates that as portfolios scale beyond five properties, incorporating becomes the standard practice.

Even in the two-property tier, company presence is notable, with companies owning 12 properties for a 27.9% share. This is significantly higher than their share of single-property portfolios (14.1%), suggesting that even the first step in portfolio growth prompts some investors to incorporate.

This clear demarcation shows two different investor strategies at play. Individuals drive market entry and small-scale operations, while companies are the vehicle for portfolio growth and management at a slightly larger, more professionalized scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Macon County is concentrated in zip codes 36083 and 36088.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of investor ownership within Macon County reveals significant concentration in specific zip codes. The vast majority of activity is centered in just a few key areas, rather than being evenly distributed.

The zip code 36083 is the volume leader, containing 388 investor-owned SFRs. This single area accounts for over half of the entire investor portfolio in the county, making it the primary hub for rental properties.

In terms of market saturation, the 36088 zip code stands out with an investor ownership rate of 35.2%. This means more than one in every three SFRs in this area is investor-owned, a remarkably high concentration that likely impacts local market dynamics and rental availability.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 36866 (43 properties, 8.9% rate) and 36075 (37 properties, 9.8% rate). While smaller in scale, these zip codes still show a level of investor penetration above the national average.

The data highlights a clear distinction between the leader in raw count (36083) and the leader in ownership percentage (36088). This suggests different types of opportunities may exist in each, one defined by scale and the other by high investor density.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
In 2024, Macon County landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 41-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024 paints a picture of a highly acquisitive investor market in Macon County. Landlords acted as decisive net buyers, significantly expanding their portfolios throughout the year.

The buy/sell ratio was an overwhelming 41-to-1. Investors purchased 41 SFR properties while only selling a single property, indicating a strong belief in the market's potential and a clear strategy of accumulation.

This net accumulation of 40 properties in a single year represents a substantial growth phase for the local investor community, a stark contrast to the market freeze observed in Q1 2025.

There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors (1,000+ tier), which aligns with their 0.0% ownership share in the county. All buying and selling activity was driven by smaller mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords.

The aggressive buying in 2024 followed by a complete halt in Q1 2025 suggests a dramatic shift in market conditions or investor sentiment. The prior year's activity shows a capacity for rapid acquisition that is currently dormant.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor transactions ceased in Q1 2025, with landlords comprising 0.0% of all market deals.
Detailed Findings

The first quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete absence of transaction activity from real estate investors in Macon County. Landlords were involved in 0.0% of the total 0 SFR transactions, indicating a market at a standstill.

This inactivity was consistent across all portfolio sizes. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who dominate ownership, did not transact, nor did any mid-size landlords. This confirms the market-wide nature of the pause.

With no purchases, there was no variation in acquisition prices across tiers. The average purchase price was effectively $0 for all investor types, reflecting the lack of deals.

The market for inter-landlord trading was also frozen, with 0% of transactions originating from another landlord. This lack of liquidity between investors can be a sign of market uncertainty, where existing owners are holding onto their properties.

Comparing this zero-transaction quarter to the high ownership concentration reveals a potential disconnect. While investors own a significant share of housing (18.6%), their recent impact on market velocity has been nonexistent, signaling a shift from acquisition to pure portfolio management.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by small investors, Macon County's SFR market saw a 2024 buying surge followed by a complete Q1 2025 freeze.
Holdings
Investors own 672 SFR properties, 18.6% of Macon County's market, with individual investors holding a commanding 80.4% (540 properties) and companies owning 19.9% (134 properties).
Pricing
Landlords in Macon County target properties at a significant discount, with a listed Q1 2025 price of $102,500 that is 53.7% lower than the traditional homeowner average of $221,167.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity came to a complete stop in Q1 2025, with landlords accounting for 0 of the 0 total home sales and no new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 97.4% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 83.8% of properties at that scale.
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 41-to-1 buy/sell ratio, transaction activity completely halted in Q1 2025 with zero buys and zero sells recorded.
Market Narrative

Macon County, Alabama's single-family rental market is fundamentally a grassroots ecosystem, shaped by small, local investors rather than large corporations. Investors own 672 properties, constituting 18.6% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The market structure heavily favors individual owners, who control 80.4% of this portfolio. This is further emphasized by the tier distribution: 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command an overwhelming 97.4% share, while institutional investors have zero presence. This composition points to a market driven by personal capital and long-term holds, a fact reinforced by the revelation that 99.6% of these properties are owned with cash.

Investor behavior in Macon County has undergone a dramatic shift. After a year of aggressive acquisition in 2024, where landlords were strong net buyers with a 41-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, activity came to an abrupt halt. In Q1 2025, investors made zero purchases, accounting for 0.0% of all transactions. This market-wide freeze suggests a collective pause as investors assess conditions. When they are active, their strategy is clear: target value. The listed Q1 2025 price for landlords was $102,500, a staggering 53.7% below the average price paid by traditional homeowners ($221,167), demonstrating a disciplined approach to acquiring properties well below the retail market rate.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Macon County is a market of contrasts. It has a significant investor presence that is almost entirely composed of small, individual operators who prefer to use cash. This market showed strong acquisitive momentum in 2024 but entered a state of hibernation in Q1 2025. For the local housing market, this means that a substantial portion of the housing stock is controlled by long-term holders focused on rental income, but the force that drove acquisitions in the prior year has, for now, stepped completely to the sidelines. The future direction will depend on whether these small investors see a reason to re-engage their acquisition strategies.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 07:37 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Macon (AL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Macon (AL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-al-macon/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.