Washington (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Washington (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Washington (TN)
40,756
Total Investors in Washington (TN)
9,134
Investor Owned SFR in Washington (TN)
7,665(18.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
8,406
SFR Owned
6,679
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
728
SFR Owned
1,130
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 7,665 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Washington County, Paying Premiums as Institutions Divest
Investors own 7,665 SFR properties in Washington County (18.8% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 94.0% versus a mere 0.1% for institutional investors. In Q1 2026, the traditional landlord discount vanished, flipping to a 0.5% premium over homeowners, while institutional investors became net sellers, signaling a major strategy shift between large and small players.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors hold 7,665 SFR properties, with individuals owning 87.1% of the portfolio.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with 5,921 properties owned outright versus 1,744 that are financed. The market is comprised of 9,134 distinct landlords, of which 8,406 (92.0%) are individuals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
The landlord discount vanished in Q1 2026, with investors paying a 0.5% premium.
This marks a dramatic reversal from 2025, where landlords enjoyed discounts as high as 36.5% ($146,852) in Q1 2025. The price gap shifted by over $148,000 in just one year, signaling increased competition.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 21.6% of all SFR properties sold in the previous quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 84.1% of all investor purchases. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
In contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties own just 0.1% of the investor portfolio, or 6 properties total. The market is defined by single-property landlords, who alone own 6,039 properties (76.5%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners only in portfolios of 21 or more properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller tiers, owning 92.0% of single-property portfolios and 85.1% of two-property portfolios. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 169 properties (69.3%) versus 75 for individuals.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in Johnson City zip codes 37604 and 37601.
The 37604 zip code contains 2,499 investor-owned properties, and 37601 holds another 1,716. Together, these two zip codes account for 55.0% of all investor-owned SFRs in Washington County.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 4.58x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
This trend is driven by smaller investors, as institutional players (1000+ tier) are net sellers, disposing of 3 properties while acquiring only 1 in Q1. Overall, landlords bought 119 properties and sold only 26 in the quarter.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 19.1% of all Q1 2026 property transactions.
Institutional buyers secured a 21.0% price discount compared to new mom-and-pop investors in Q1, paying $258,750 versus $327,634. New single-property landlords drove the market, accounting for 81 of the 119 investor transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors hold 7,665 SFR properties, with individuals owning 87.1% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Washington County, TN, investors hold a significant 7,665 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 18.8% of the total market of 40,756 SFRs.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards small-scale investors. Individuals own 6,679 properties, representing 87.1% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 1,130 properties (14.7%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at the number of landlord entities. Of the 9,134 total landlords, 8,406 are individuals, compared to just 728 companies. This highlights a market driven by local entrepreneurs and families rather than large corporations.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash transactions. A total of 5,921 investor-owned properties are held free and clear, more than triple the 1,744 properties that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost entirely focused on rental income, with 7,506 properties classified as rented. This demonstrates the critical role investors play in providing housing options within the local community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
The landlord discount vanished in Q1 2026, with investors paying a 0.5% premium.
Detailed Findings

A major shift occurred in Washington County's acquisition pricing in Q1 2026. For the first time in over a year, landlords paid more than traditional homeowners, with an average acquisition price of $378,706 compared to the homeowner average of $376,802, a premium of $1,904 (0.5%).

This completely reverses the significant pricing advantage investors held throughout 2025. In Q1 2025, landlords paid an average of $255,683, a staggering 36.5% discount ($146,852) compared to homeowners.

The trend shows a rapid erosion of the investor discount quarter-over-quarter. The discount narrowed from 36.5% in Q1 2025 to 30.0% in Q2, then to 22.4% in Q3, before disappearing entirely and flipping to a premium in Q1 2026.

This pricing convergence suggests that the market for investment properties has become much more competitive. Investors are now competing directly with retail buyers and are willing to pay market rates or higher to secure properties, a departure from the strategy of seeking deep off-market discounts.

Price appreciation is also evident, with the average landlord acquisition price in Q1 2026 ($378,706) being 64.3% higher than the average price during the 2020-2023 period ($231,908), showcasing significant market growth.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 21.6% of all SFR properties sold in the previous quarter.
Detailed Findings

During the last quarter, investors were a powerful force in the Washington County market, acquiring 86 of the 399 total SFR properties sold, a market share of 21.6%.

The activity was overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) purchased 74 of the 86 properties, making up 84.1% of all landlord buying activity.

New entrants are a key driver of the market. The single-property tier saw 81 new landlord entities enter the market, acquiring 56 properties. This represents 63.6% of all investor purchases, indicating a healthy and growing base of first-time investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity, acquiring 0 properties in the quarter. This highlights a clear divergence in strategy, with large-scale investors on the sidelines while smaller players actively expand their portfolios.

Mid-size landlords also contributed to the activity, with those owning 11-100 properties purchasing a combined 11 properties, or 12.5% of the investor total.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 94.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Washington County defies the narrative of corporate dominance, as mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a massive 94.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the backbone of the rental market, holding 6,039 properties, which accounts for 76.5% of the entire investor portfolio. This demonstrates that the typical real estate investing strategy here is focused on building small, individual portfolios.

The presence of large-scale investors is minimal. Institutional investors in Tier 09 (1,000+ properties) own just 6 properties, a negligible 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock. Even large landlords in Tier 08 (101-1,000 properties) hold only 14 properties (0.2%).

Mid-size investors (11-100 properties) represent a small but notable segment, collectively owning 452 properties, or 5.7% of the total. This group bridges the gap between small landlords and the nearly non-existent large players.

This distribution underscores a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market, where ownership is spread across thousands of small investors rather than concentrated in the hands of a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners only in portfolios of 21 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across most portfolio sizes in Washington County, with companies only achieving majority ownership in larger tiers.

The crossover point occurs in the 'Small-medium (21-50)' property tier. Within this segment, companies own 169 properties (69.3%), while individuals own 75 (30.7%), marking the first tier where corporate ownership is the norm.

In the smallest and most common tiers, individual ownership is near-total. Individuals own 5,659 of single-property investor homes (92.0%) and 507 of two-property investor homes (85.1%).

Even in the 'Small landlord (6-10)' tier, individuals still hold a majority, owning 127 properties (58.8%) compared to 89 for companies (41.2%).

This pattern shows a clear lifecycle for investors in the area. Most start and remain as individual owners, with a transition to a corporate structure like an LLC typically occurring only after a portfolio grows beyond 20 properties, likely for liability and management purposes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in Johnson City zip codes 37604 and 37601.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Washington County is not evenly distributed, but heavily concentrated in specific areas, primarily within Johnson City.

The 37604 zip code is the undisputed epicenter of investor activity, with 2,499 landlord-owned SFR properties. This single zip code represents 32.6% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

Following closely is the 37601 zip code, also in Johnson City, which contains 1,716 investor properties. Combined, 37604 and 37601 hold 4,215 properties, or 55.0% of all investor-owned housing in Washington County.

Other significant areas of concentration include Jonesborough (37659) with 1,526 properties and Gray (37615) with 1,132 properties, demonstrating that while Johnson City is the primary hub, investor activity is also strong in surrounding communities.

The data also reveals several smaller zip codes with 100% investor ownership rates, such as 37660 and 37643. These are likely indicative of small communities with few total SFRs or specific rental-only developments rather than broad market trends.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 4.58x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a strong accumulation trend among landlords in Washington County, who have been consistent net buyers over the past two years. In Q1 2026, investors purchased 119 properties while selling only 26, a net gain of 93 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.58 to 1.

This aggressive buying posture is not new. In 2025, landlords acquired 532 properties and sold 163 (a 3.26x ratio), and in 2024 they bought 561 while selling 135 (a 4.16x ratio), showing sustained portfolio growth.

However, a critical divergence exists between small and large investors. While the overall market is in accumulation mode, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) are actively divesting. In Q1 2026, this tier was a net seller, acquiring only 1 property while selling 3.

This pattern of institutional selling was also visible in 2025, where they were net sellers in Q2 (2 buys vs. 3 sells). This indicates that the largest players are trimming their portfolios in Washington County, while smaller, local investors are absorbing the inventory and expanding.

This dynamic suggests a transfer of assets from larger, national firms to local mom-and-pop landlords, reinforcing the trend of decentralized ownership in the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 19.1% of all Q1 2026 property transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 119 of the 623 total SFR transactions in Washington County, capturing 19.1% of all market activity.

The bulk of this activity came from the smallest investors. The single-property (Tier 01) segment was responsible for 81 transactions, representing 68.1% of all landlord purchases for the quarter. This highlights the continuous influx of new investors into the market.

A significant pricing disparity exists between investor tiers. The average purchase price for a Tier 01 buyer was $327,634. In contrast, the single institutional (Tier 09) purchase was made at $258,750, a 21.0% discount. This suggests that larger, more experienced buyers have access to better deals, potentially through off-market channels or superior negotiation.

The lowest average price was paid by medium-large investors in the 51-100 property tier at just $80,000 for one transaction, indicating a focus on lower-value assets or distressed properties.

Inter-landlord trading appears relatively uncommon. The highest rate was in the two-property tier, where 22.2% of purchases (2 of 9) were from other landlords. For the most active single-property tier, only 8.6% of acquisitions were sourced from existing investors, suggesting most purchases are from traditional homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors drive Washington County's market, buying at a premium as institutional players sell off holdings.
Holdings
Landlords own 7,665 SFR properties, representing 18.8% of Washington County's market, with individual investors holding a dominant 87.1% (6,679 properties) compared to companies at 14.7% (1,130 properties).
Pricing
The traditional landlord discount vanished in Q1 2026, flipping to a 0.5% premium as investors paid an average of $378,706 per property, $1,904 more than traditional homeowners.
Activity
Investors captured 21.6% of all sales in the previous quarter, led by mom-and-pop buyers who made up 84.1% of landlord acquisitions; institutional investors made zero purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 94.0% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows beyond 20 properties, controlling 69.3% in the 21-50 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.58x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (119 buys vs 26 sells), but institutional investors are actively divesting as net sellers (1 buy vs 3 sells).
Market Narrative

In Washington County, Tennessee, the real estate investment market is overwhelmingly defined by local, small-scale players. Investors collectively own 7,665 single-family properties, constituting 18.8% of the total market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 87.1% of these homes. The market structure is highly fragmented; mom-and-pop landlords with 1-10 properties control 94.0% of the investor-owned housing stock, while large institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint of just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 signals a newly competitive environment. The long-standing trend of investors purchasing properties at a discount has completely reversed, flipping to a 0.5% premium over what traditional homeowners pay. This suggests intense competition for limited inventory. While landlords as a whole remain aggressive net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.58-to-1, this activity is driven entirely by smaller investors. In a stark strategic divergence, the few institutional players in the market are net sellers, indicating a strategic retreat from the area.

The key takeaway for the Washington County housing market is that its stability and growth are fueled by thousands of local investors, not Wall Street. New landlords are continuously entering the market, absorbing inventory, and are now willing to pay market premiums to do so. This dynamic, coupled with the divestment from large institutions, suggests a transfer of assets to local hands, further cementing a decentralized and community-based rental market. The competitive pricing also indicates a maturing market where deep-discount opportunities may be becoming scarcer.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:04 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Washington (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Washington (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-washington/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.