Johnson (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Johnson (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Johnson (KS)
172,996
Total Investors in Johnson (KS)
14,059
Investor Owned SFR in Johnson (KS)
13,588(7.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
11,250
SFR Owned
8,472
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,809
SFR Owned
5,606
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 13,588 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Johnson County's Market as Institutions Divest and Sell
Investors own 7.9% of Johnson County's SFR properties, with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 82.8% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords bought properties at a 22.5% discount to homeowners, but a key divergence has emerged: while the overall market remains in an acquisition phase, institutional investors have become net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 13,588 homes in Johnson County, with individuals holding the 62.3% majority.
Investors hold significantly more properties in cash (8,615) than with financing (4,973). The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 93.5% of properties (12,702) identified as rented, confirming a strong business orientation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords bought Q1 properties at a 22.5% discount, paying $129,641 less than homeowners.
This discount is highly volatile, spiking from a much lower 8.4% in Q3 2025. The widening price gap suggests investors are finding more favorable deals or are targeting different types of properties compared to traditional buyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 11.9% of all Johnson County homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 78.4% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with 1000+ properties made up only 2.5% of acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 82.8% of investor-owned homes.
This share dwarfs the 5.4% held by institutional investors with over 1,000 properties. The market structure is highly fragmented and fundamentally centered on small-scale, local owners.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 68.0% of homes.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios (81.2% of the single-property tier), company ownership rapidly scales to over 94% in tiers with 11 or more properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 66061 and 66062, with over 1,400 properties each.
However, the highest investor penetration rates are in different areas, such as 66025 (18.2%) and 66204 (16.8%). This highlights a clear split between high-volume and high-saturation submarkets.
Historical Transactions
While landlords are net buyers overall, institutional investors have become net sellers in Johnson County.
Institutions sold 16 properties while buying only 5 in Q1, a reversal from their net buyer position in 2024. The broader landlord market remains in an acquisition phase, with a 1.5x buy-to-sell ratio.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 9.9% of all Johnson County property transactions in Q1.
In these deals, institutional investors paid 15.0% less than new single-property landlords ($396,682 vs $466,414). Smaller investors also traded more among themselves, with 27.8% of purchases in the 3-5 property tier coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 13,588 homes in Johnson County, with individuals holding the 62.3% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Johnson County, investors own 13,588 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 7.9% of the total 172,996 SFRs in the market. This highlights a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual real estate investors own 8,472 properties, making up 62.3% of the investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 5,606 properties (41.3%).

A similar pattern appears in the landlord entity count, where 11,250 individual landlords far outnumber the 2,809 company landlords. This 4-to-1 ratio of individual to company entities underscores that the market is primarily driven by small-scale, personal investment rather than large corporate ownership.

Analysis of financing reveals a strong cash position among investors. Cash-owned properties (8,615) substantially outnumber financed ones (4,973), indicating that many investors operate with low leverage, potentially providing more market stability.

The vast majority of investor-held properties are actively used as rentals. With 12,702 of the 13,588 properties identified as rented, 93.5% of the portfolio is generating rental income, demonstrating a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies over speculative flipping.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords bought Q1 properties at a 22.5% discount, paying $129,641 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Johnson County demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q1 2026, acquiring properties for an average price of $446,605. This was a stark 22.5% less than the $576,246 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a substantial discount of $129,641 per property.

The price advantage for investors has not been consistent, showing considerable volatility over the past year. The 22.5% discount in Q1 2026 marks a sharp increase from the 8.4% discount observed in Q3 2025, and is more aligned with the strong discounts of 23.9% and 20.4% seen in mid-2025.

This fluctuation suggests that investor purchasing strategies may adapt quickly to changing market conditions. The ability to secure such deep discounts could be attributed to targeting distressed properties, making cash offers, or utilizing professional deal-finding techniques not available to the average homebuyer.

The current wide margin between investor and homeowner prices signals a buyer's market for investors. It allows them to acquire assets with a built-in equity cushion, improving the financial viability of their rental portfolios from day one.

Comparing prices over a longer horizon, the 2020-2023 average acquisition price for landlords was $420,074. The recent Q1 2026 price of $446,605 indicates moderate price appreciation for investor-acquired assets since the pandemic-era housing boom.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 11.9% of all Johnson County homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter of activity (Q4 2025), landlords purchased 199 of the 1,675 total SFRs sold in Johnson County, capturing 11.9% of the market. This steady acquisition rate shows continued investor appetite for local housing stock.

The overwhelming majority of this purchasing activity comes from small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 160 purchases, or 78.4% of all investor acquisitions, reinforcing their role as the primary engine of investor market growth.

New entrants are a powerful force, with 129 new single-property landlords entering the market. These new investors acquired 98 properties, representing nearly half (48.0%) of all landlord purchases for the quarter.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal presence. They purchased only 5 properties, accounting for just 2.5% of investor activity. This low volume challenges the narrative that large corporations are dominating the market for new purchases.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) filled the gap, collectively purchasing 39 properties (19.4% of the total). This demonstrates a healthy, multi-layered market structure rather than a market dominated by the largest or smallest players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 82.8% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-held real estate in Johnson County is dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively control 82.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of this market. This group alone owns 8,333 properties, which accounts for 59.8% of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies that the typical landlord is not a large corporation but an individual with a single rental property.

Conversely, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a much smaller footprint than often perceived. They own 754 properties, representing just 5.4% of the investor-owned housing stock in the county.

The data clearly illustrates a highly fragmented market. The vast majority of rental properties are owned and managed by small, local investors, not by large, out-of-state institutions.

The mid-size tiers (11-1000 properties) bridge the gap, owning a combined 11.8% of the portfolio. This layered structure shows a path for growth but confirms that the market's center of gravity remains with small operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 68.0% of homes.
Detailed Findings

A clear crossover point exists where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in Johnson County's investor market. This transition occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own a 68.0% majority of the properties.

For smaller portfolios, individual investors are the dominant force. They own 81.2% of single-property portfolios, 55.2% of two-property portfolios, and 54.1% of portfolios with 3-5 properties. This indicates that most investors start and operate as individuals.

Once a portfolio grows beyond five properties, the corporate structure becomes the standard. Company ownership jumps to 94.7% in the 11-20 property tier and exceeds 99% for all tiers with more than 21 properties.

This trend suggests that as investors scale their operations, they adopt formal business structures like LLCs for liability protection and professional management. The shift is not gradual but a distinct step-change that occurs as investors move from a hobby to a business.

Even within the larger tiers, there is a small but persistent presence of individual ownership, showing that while uncommon, it is possible for individuals to manage larger portfolios without incorporating.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 66061 and 66062, with over 1,400 properties each.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration within Johnson County. The zip codes 66061 and 66062 contain the highest raw counts of investor-owned properties, with 1,445 and 1,432 respectively.

Interestingly, the areas with the highest counts do not have the highest rates of investor ownership. The 66061 zip code, for example, has an investor ownership rate of just 7.9%, close to the county average. This suggests these are simply large submarkets with more housing stock overall.

The markets with the highest saturation of investors are different. Zip code 66025 leads the county with an 18.2% investor ownership rate, followed by 66204 at 16.8%. These areas represent markets where investors have a much more significant share of the local housing.

This distinction between high-volume and high-penetration areas is critical for understanding market dynamics. High-volume areas indicate broad appeal, while high-penetration areas may signal markets with characteristics particularly favorable to rental strategies, such as specific school districts or proximity to employment centers.

Rounding out the top five by count are 66208 (1,085 properties) and 66212 (973 properties), which have relatively high ownership rates of 12.2% and 11.3% respectively, blending both volume and concentration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
While landlords are net buyers overall, institutional investors have become net sellers in Johnson County.
Detailed Findings

A significant divergence in strategy is emerging between institutional investors and the broader landlord market in Johnson County. Overall, landlords remain net buyers, acquiring 254 properties while selling 169 in Q1 2026, a net gain of 85 properties.

This net buyer trend has been consistent, with landlords adding 563 properties to their portfolios in 2025 and 492 in 2024. The market as a whole continues to be in an accumulation phase.

However, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have reversed this trend and are now actively divesting. In Q1 2026, they were strong net sellers, with only 5 purchases against 16 sales. This resulted in a net reduction of 11 properties from their portfolios.

This move to selling is a recent shift for institutional players. They were net sellers for the full year of 2025 (32 buys vs. 47 sells) after having been net buyers in 2024 (60 buys vs. 43 sells). This indicates a strategic retreat from the Johnson County market by the largest players.

The opposing trends signal a potential transfer of properties from large institutions to smaller local landlords, who continue to absorb housing stock. It suggests confidence among small investors, even as institutions pull back.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 9.9% of all Johnson County property transactions in Q1.
Detailed Findings

In Q1, landlords participated in 254 of the 2,559 total SFR transactions in Johnson County, accounting for 9.9% of all market activity. This share reflects a steady and persistent investor presence in the transactional market.

A clear pricing discipline separates investors by size. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) paid an average of $396,682 per property. In contrast, new single-property landlords paid an average of $466,414, which is 15.0% more. This suggests larger players are more adept at securing below-market deals.

The highest prices were paid by the smallest investors, while the lowest prices were secured by the largest. This inverse relationship between portfolio size and purchase price highlights the value of experience and scale in acquisition strategy.

Inter-landlord trading is a notable feature of the market, particularly among smaller investors. Landlords in the 3-5 property tier sourced the highest percentage of their new acquisitions (27.8%) from other landlords. This indicates a liquid secondary market where investors frequently trade assets among themselves.

Interestingly, the largest landlords (21-100 properties) sourced 0% of their acquisitions from other investors in Q1, suggesting they focus on acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or other sources rather than from their peers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Johnson County Market as Institutions Divest and Sell
Holdings
Investors own 13,588 SFR properties, 7.9% of Johnson County's market. Individual investors hold 8,472 properties (62.3%), with companies owning the remaining 5,606 (41.3%).
Pricing
Landlords achieved a significant 22.5% price discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1, paying an average of $446,605 versus the homeowner price of $576,246.
Activity
Landlords purchased 11.9% of homes sold last quarter (199 properties), with 129 new single-property landlords entering the market, demonstrating robust grass-roots entry.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market, controlling 82.8% of all investor-owned housing, while large institutional investors (1000+) own just 5.4%.
Ownership Type
Individuals are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and represent over 94% of holdings in larger tiers.
Transactions
Landlords remain net buyers with a 1.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (254 buys vs 169 sells), but institutional investors are actively divesting, becoming net sellers (5 buys vs 16 sells).
Market Narrative

This Investor Pulse report for Johnson County, Kansas, reveals a single-family rental market fundamentally shaped by small, local investors, even as the largest institutional players are beginning to retreat. Investors currently own 13,588 SFR properties, representing 7.9% of the county's total housing stock. The ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who own 62.3% of these properties. The market structure is highly fragmented: 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 82.8% of investor-owned homes, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) hold a comparatively small 5.4% share.

Investor activity in Q1 was robust, with landlords acquiring 11.9% of all homes sold while securing them at a steep 22.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This purchasing was driven by the smallest players, including 129 new landlords who bought their first rental property. This grassroots growth, however, is contrasted by a significant strategic shift at the top end of the market. While landlords overall remain net buyers with a 1.5x buy-to-sell ratio, institutional investors have become net sellers, divesting more properties than they acquired in Q1. This divergence signals a potential transfer of assets from large corporations to smaller, local operators.

The key takeaway from this analysis is the resilience and dominance of the small landlord in Johnson County. Despite narratives of corporate consolidation, the data shows a market defined by individual entrepreneurship and incremental growth. The retreat of institutional capital, paired with the continued entry of new mom-and-pop investors, suggests the local rental landscape will likely remain fragmented. This dynamic creates opportunities for local buyers who can leverage market knowledge and purchasing power to build portfolios, often acquiring assets at a significant discount.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:14 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Johnson (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Johnson (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-johnson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.