Coryell (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Coryell (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Coryell (TX)
16,771
Total Investors in Coryell (TX)
3,288
Investor Owned SFR in Coryell (TX)
3,269(19.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,813
SFR Owned
2,393
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
475
SFR Owned
923
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,269 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Coryell County's Investor Market, But Institutions Are Actively Buying
Investors own 3,269 SFR properties (19.5% of the market) in Coryell County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 87.4% versus 1.2% for institutions. In Q1, landlords purchased properties at a 17.1% discount to homeowners, and both small and large investors remain aggressive net buyers, signaling continued market accumulation.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,269 properties in Coryell County, with individuals holding 73.2% of the portfolio.
Cash-based ownership is prevalent, with 2,152 properties held free of financing compared to 1,117 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 96.1% of these homes (3,140 properties) are classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 17.1% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $40,882 per property.
The price advantage for landlords is volatile, having been a 26.7% discount in Q3 2025 and an unusual 10.3% premium in Q2 2025. Current landlord prices of $198,071 are up 12.3% from the 2020-2023 average of $176,446.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 41.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 90 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 53.8% of all investor purchases. Their volume of 49 properties was over 3.7 times greater than the 13 properties bought by institutional investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 87.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) own just 1.2% of the investor portfolio. However, recent transactional data shows institutions are very active, purchasing at a higher rate than their ownership share suggests and paying 13.0% less than new landlords.
Ownership by Tier & Type
The data does not specify price differences between individual and company buyers within tiers.
A clear crossover to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios scale. Companies become the majority holders in the 11-20 property tier (66.9% ownership), after individuals dominate the smaller tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Coryell County is highly concentrated in the 76522 zip code, home to 2,352 properties.
The highest investor ownership rate is found in the 76558 zip code at 33.3%, while 76525 follows at 25.7%. The top two zip codes by count, 76522 and 76528, together contain 97% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Coryell County are strong net buyers, acquiring 109 properties while selling only 41 in Q1 2026.
This accumulation trend is accelerating, with total acquisitions growing 57% from 255 in 2024 to 401 in 2025. Institutional investors are also in a growth phase, remaining net buyers in every recent quarter.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 37.5% of all SFR transactions in Q1, totaling 109 landlord-involved sales.
Institutional buyers secured properties for 13.0% less than mom-and-pop buyers ($170,041 vs $195,423). Institutions also sourced 50% of their purchases from other landlords, compared to 32% for new landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,269 properties in Coryell County, with individuals holding 73.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Coryell County, investors own 3,269 single-family residential properties, representing a significant 19.5% of the total 16,771 SFRs in the market. This penetration highlights the importance of real estate investing activity in the local housing landscape.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors, who own 2,393 properties (73.2%), compared to 923 properties (28.2%) held by companies. This 3-to-1 ratio underscores the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the rental market.

A similar pattern exists among landlord entities, where 2,813 individual landlords far outnumber the 475 company landlords, reinforcing that the market is driven by smaller-scale operators rather than large corporations.

The financial profile of these holdings shows a preference for liquidity, with cash-owned properties (2,152) being nearly twice as common as financed ones (1,117). This suggests that many investors have substantial capital and are not highly leveraged.

The primary use of these properties is clear, with 3,140 of the 3,269 investor-owned homes (96.1%) being rented. This confirms the portfolio is actively serving as rental housing for the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 17.1% less than homeowners in Q1, an average discount of $40,882 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $198,071. This is a substantial 17.1% less than the $238,953 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a $40,882 savings on each purchase.

This landlord discount fluctuates significantly over time. It marks a return to the norm after an anomalous Q2 2025, where investors surprisingly paid a 10.3% premium. In other recent quarters, the discount has been as high as 26.7% (Q3 2025), indicating a variable but generally strong purchasing position for investors.

When comparing to the pandemic-era boom, today's prices show notable appreciation. The Q1 2026 average price of $198,071 is 12.3% higher than the $176,446 average from 2020-2023.

However, a quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year comparison reveals a recent cooling trend. The Q1 2026 average price for landlords is lower than the prices seen in Q1, Q2, and Q3 of 2025, suggesting a market that is softening from its recent peaks.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 41.9% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 90 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing was a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, with landlords acquiring 90 of the 215 total SFR properties sold, a market share of 41.9%.

Small-scale investors were the primary drivers of this activity. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 49 of these purchases, representing 53.8% of the investor total.

The market saw a significant influx of new participants, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 38 purchases (41.8% of investor buys) by 50 different entities, indicating a healthy stream of first-time landlords.

While smaller investors dominated, institutional players (1000+ properties) also made their presence known by acquiring 13 properties, or 14.3% of the landlord total, showing that large-scale capital is also active in the county.

Mid-size landlords in the 11-20 property tier were also notably active, purchasing 20 properties and making up 22.0% of the quarter's investor acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a dominant 87.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Coryell County is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale ownership. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 87.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, owning 2,003 properties. This single tier accounts for 59.0% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, highlighting the importance of new and small investors.

Institutional ownership is minimal in comparison. Investors in the 1000+ property tier hold just 41 properties, a mere 1.2% of the total, challenging the narrative of a market dominated by Wall Street.

Despite their small current footprint, institutional investors are disproportionately active in acquisitions. They accounted for 14.3% of landlord purchases in Q4 2025, a rate more than 10 times their ownership share, which signals a clear strategy of portfolio growth in the area.

Furthermore, these larger investors leverage their scale to secure better prices. Q1 2026 transaction data shows institutional buyers paid an average of $170,041, a 13.0% discount compared to the $195,423 paid by first-time landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
The data does not specify price differences between individual and company buyers within tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of the small-portfolio rental market, owning 88.9% of the homes in the single-property tier and 73.3% in the two-property tier.

As investors scale their operations, a distinct shift toward corporate structures becomes evident. The 11-20 property tier marks the crossover point, where companies own a 66.9% majority of the properties for the first time.

This trend intensifies in larger tiers. In portfolios of 101-1000 properties, company ownership is nearly absolute at 98.4%, indicating that professionalization and incorporation are standard for large-scale operations.

The 6-10 property tier represents a transition zone, where ownership is almost evenly split between individuals (53.4%) and companies (46.6%).

This pattern suggests a lifecycle for real estate investors: they often start as individuals and then incorporate as their portfolios expand to manage complexity and limit liability.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Coryell County is highly concentrated in the 76522 zip code, home to 2,352 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership within Coryell County is not evenly distributed; it is intensely focused on a few key areas. The 76522 zip code is the clear epicenter, containing 2,352 investor-owned properties at a 19.6% ownership rate.

The 76528 zip code is the second-largest concentration, with 817 investor-owned SFRs and a 20.2% ownership rate. Combined, these two zip codes hold 3,169 properties, accounting for 97% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

While volume is concentrated in 76522, some smaller zip codes show higher market penetration. The 76558 zip code leads with a 33.3% investor ownership rate, followed by 76525 at 25.7%, making them the most saturated sub-markets for investors.

This highlights a key distinction between markets with the highest count of investor properties versus those with the highest percentage. Investors appear to target both large, liquid markets and smaller, high-penetration areas.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors have identified specific neighborhoods with favorable conditions for rentals, such as proximity to employment centers or specific amenities, and have focused their capital accordingly.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Coryell County are strong net buyers, acquiring 109 properties while selling only 41 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The transaction data reveals a clear and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among landlords in Coryell County. In Q1 2026, they were strong net buyers, with 109 acquisitions versus only 41 sales.

This pattern is not new; landlords were net buyers for all of 2025 (401 buys vs. 177 sells) and 2024 (255 buys vs. 118 sells), consistently adding to the rental housing stock.

Acquisition velocity is increasing. The total number of properties bought by landlords jumped from 255 in 2024 to 401 in 2025, a 57% year-over-year increase, and Q1 2026 is on pace to continue this robust activity.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are aligned with this growth strategy. They were net buyers in Q1 2026 with 16 purchases and 10 sales, and maintained a net positive position throughout 2025 and 2024, signaling confidence in the local market.

This consistent net buying activity across all investor types points to a strong belief in the future performance of Coryell County's single-family rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 37.5% of all SFR transactions in Q1, totaling 109 landlord-involved sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords were a formidable presence in the transaction market, participating in 109 of the 291 total SFR sales for a 37.5% market share.

Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) were the most active, conducting 61 transactions. This volume was nearly four times higher than the 16 transactions completed by institutional investors, demonstrating that small players drive market liquidity.

A distinct pricing hierarchy exists based on investor size. Institutional buyers paid an average of $170,041, achieving a 13.0% discount compared to the $195,423 average paid by first-time, single-property landlords.

The source of acquisitions also varies significantly by tier. Institutional investors strategically acquired 50.0% of their new properties from other landlords, suggesting a focus on purchasing existing rental assets. This is much higher than the 32.0% of properties sourced from landlords by new investors.

This indicates different acquisition strategies: large investors often buy stabilized portfolios from their peers, while new investors are more likely to purchase from homeowners or other sources.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 87.4% of investor SFRs in Coryell County as institutional buyers accelerate acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords own 3,269 SFR properties in Coryell County (19.5% of the market), with individual investors holding 2,393 (73.2%) and companies owning 923 (28.2%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 17.1% less than homeowners in Q1, securing an average discount of $40,882 per property ($198,071 vs $238,953).
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 41.9% of all sales (90 properties), with 50 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 87.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 1.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control in portfolios larger than 10 properties, owning 66.9% in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
All investors are strong net buyers (109 buys vs 41 sells in Q1), and institutional investors are also accumulating properties (16 buys vs 10 sells in Q1).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Coryell County, TX, is fundamentally driven by small, independent operators. Investors own 3,269 properties, making up 19.5% of the county's total SFR housing stock. The ownership landscape is dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 87.4% of these homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 1.2%. This structure, with individuals owning 73.2% of investor properties, paints a picture of a market built on local, small-scale real estate investing rather than corporate consolidation.

Despite this ownership structure, investor behavior reveals a sophisticated and active market. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired a staggering 41.9% of all homes sold. They consistently secure significant pricing advantages, paying 17.1% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. Transaction trends show that all investor segments, from first-time landlords to large institutions, are aggressive net buyers, signaling strong confidence and a continued phase of accumulation. Institutional players, while small in current holdings, are particularly active, acquiring properties at a rate far exceeding their market share and at a 13.0% discount compared to new landlords.

The key takeaway for the Coryell County housing market is this dichotomy: a stable ownership base of small landlords coexists with dynamic and aggressive acquisition activity from larger, more professionalized investors. While mom-and-pop landlords define the current market, the accelerated, discounted purchasing by institutional funds suggests a potential future shift. This activity is highly concentrated in specific zip codes like 76522, indicating that these larger players are strategically targeting areas for growth, which could reshape the local rental landscape over time.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:21 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Coryell (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Coryell (TX) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tx-coryell/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.