Wells (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Wells (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Wells (ND)
1,268
Total Investors in Wells (ND)
513
Investor Owned SFR in Wells (ND)
406(32.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
485
SFR Owned
379
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
28
SFR Owned
32
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 406 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Wells County with 99% Ownership, Actively Accumulating Properties
Investors own 406 SFR properties in Wells County, ND, representing 32.0% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 99.0% of the investor-owned housing stock. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 28.6% of homes sold, securing them at a 17.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners, and continue to be strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 406 SFR properties in Wells County, with individuals holding 93.3%.
Of the 406 investor-owned properties, 342 were purchased with cash, representing 84.2% of the portfolio, while only 64 are financed. All 406 properties are identified as rented, non-owner-occupied units. Individual landlords (485) vastly outnumber company landlords (28), a ratio of more than 17 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 17.7% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, an average discount of $23,550.
The pricing advantage for landlords has been highly volatile, following a year of fluctuations where they paid a 52.4% premium in Q1 2025 but secured a 12.8% discount in Q2 2025. The Q1 2026 average acquisition price of $109,750 shows a notable increase from the 2024 average of $81,106.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 28.6% of all SFR properties sold in Wells County in the most recent quarter.
All investor purchasing activity (100.0%) this quarter came from mom-and-pop landlords, specifically new single-property investors. In total, 2 new landlords entered the market, acquiring 2 properties, while institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
The market is dominated by single-property landlords, who alone own 351 properties, representing 84.0% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single portfolio tier in Wells County.
There is no crossover point where companies become majority owners. Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 72.2% of homes, and in the largest active tier (6-10 properties), they own 100%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 58341 holding 192 properties.
Certain zip codes show extremely high investor penetration rates, with 58374 at 100.0% and 58438 at 57.3%. The latter, 58438, is a significant hotspot, combining a high count (138 properties) with a high ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Wells County are strong net buyers, acquiring 35 properties while selling only 2 in 2025.
The buy-to-sell ratio for landlords was an overwhelming 17.5-to-1 in 2025, a significant increase from an already strong 10-to-1 ratio in 2024. Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity during these periods.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transactions accounted for 28.6% of the Wells County market in Q1 2026.
All 2 landlord transactions were conducted by new, single-property investors at an average price of $109,750. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, meaning all acquisitions were sourced from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 406 SFR properties in Wells County, with individuals holding 93.3%.
Detailed Findings

In Wells County, ND, investors hold a significant 32.0% share of the Single-Family Residential market, with a portfolio of 406 properties. This market is overwhelmingly driven by individual real estate investing, as individuals own 379 of these homes, accounting for 93.3% of the total investor portfolio, compared to just 32 properties (7.9%) owned by companies.

The financial structure of these holdings reveals a strong preference for cash ownership. A remarkable 84.2% of investor-owned properties (342 homes) are owned outright, free of financing. This suggests a market of financially stable investors who are not heavily reliant on leverage.

The number of individual landlord entities (485) dwarfs the number of company entities (28), highlighting that the market is composed of a large base of small-scale operators rather than a few large consolidated players.

All 406 investor-owned properties are classified as rented, indicating a 100% focus on generating rental income from their portfolios. This aligns with the definition of an investor-focused market where properties are acquired for business purposes rather than personal use.

The dominance of cash purchases and individual ownership paints a picture of a stable, locally-driven rental market. This structure differs significantly from markets with high concentrations of leveraged, corporate ownership.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 17.7% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, an average discount of $23,550.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords in Wells County demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $109,750. This was 17.7% less than the $133,300 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a substantial $23,550 discount per property.

This Q1 discount marks a return to a more favorable buying position for investors after a period of extreme volatility in 2025. For instance, in Q1 2025, landlords paid a staggering 52.4% premium ($116,980 vs. $76,750), while in Q3 2025 they paid a slight 1.4% premium. This fluctuation suggests pricing dynamics are highly sensitive to market conditions and inventory.

The average acquisition price for landlords has been on an upward trend. The Q1 2026 price of $109,750 is significantly higher than the average price in 2024 ($81,106) and the 2020-2023 period ($96,389), indicating property value appreciation in the region.

The ability to secure a nearly 18% discount in the most recent quarter suggests that investors are adept at identifying undervalued assets or negotiating favorable terms, a key strategic advantage in a competitive market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 28.6% of all SFR properties sold in Wells County in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 28.6% of all SFR sales in Wells County during the most recent quarter, with landlords acquiring 2 of the 7 properties sold. This demonstrates a continued and significant presence in the local real estate market.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investor segment. One hundred percent of landlord acquisitions were made by mom-and-pop landlords, specifically those in the single-property tier, indicating new entrants to the market.

Two new landlord entities entered the Wells County market, each purchasing their first investment property. This grassroots-level growth underscores the accessible nature of the local investment landscape.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no acquisition activity, with their market share of purchases at 0.0%. The market's growth is exclusively fueled by small-scale, local capital.

This pattern of new, small investors driving acquisition volume suggests a healthy and growing rental market at the local level, without the influence of large, corporate buyers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Wells County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 99.0% of all investor-owned SFRs, a near-monopoly on the local rental market.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 351 properties, which is 84.0% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This highlights the highly fragmented and decentralized nature of ownership.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off sharply. Landlords with two properties hold 10.0% of the market, while those with 3-5 properties hold just 4.3%.

The narrative of large-scale, corporate landlords does not apply to Wells County. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have zero footprint in the market, owning 0.0% of the properties. This market belongs entirely to local and small-scale operators.

This extreme concentration in the mom-and-pop segment, as this investor pulse report reveals, shows a market insulated from the trends of institutional consolidation seen in larger metropolitan areas.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every single portfolio tier in Wells County.
Detailed Findings

In Wells County, individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single investor tier, a clear sign of a market dominated by personal holdings rather than corporate entities. Companies have failed to establish a significant foothold at any level of portfolio size.

The data shows no crossover point where corporate ownership overtakes individual ownership. In the single-property tier, individuals own 95.2% of the homes. This dominance continues even as portfolios grow, with individuals holding 72.2% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier.

In the largest recorded segment (6-10 properties), individual ownership is absolute at 100%. This indicates that even the most established local investors operate primarily as individuals rather than through corporate structures.

Company ownership is limited to a minor share in the smallest tiers, holding just 4.8% of single-property portfolios and 27.8% in the 3-5 property tier. This suggests companies are either nascent or serve niche purposes rather than acting as primary investment vehicles.

This persistent dominance by individuals across all tiers reinforces the character of Wells County's rental market as one built on personal investment and local management, distinct from corporatized rental markets elsewhere.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip code 58341 holding 192 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Wells County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific zip codes. The zip code 58341 is the largest hub for investor activity, containing 192 investor-owned properties.

While 58341 leads by sheer volume, other zip codes exhibit far higher rates of investor penetration. The small zip code of 58374 is entirely investor-owned at a 100.0% rate, indicating a specialized rental-focused area.

The zip code 58438 stands out as a critical investor hotspot, with 138 properties owned by investors. This accounts for 57.3% of all SFR properties in that area, an exceptionally high concentration that significantly shapes the local housing market.

Similarly, zip code 58486 shows a high penetration with 48.9% of its homes owned by investors, further demonstrating the pocketed nature of rental ownership in the county.

This pattern of concentration suggests that investors target specific neighborhoods or communities, likely driven by factors like rental demand, property values, and local economic conditions, rather than pursuing a broad, county-wide strategy.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Wells County are strong net buyers, acquiring 35 properties while selling only 2 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Wells County are in a phase of aggressive accumulation. In 2025, they purchased 35 SFR properties while selling only 2, making them decisive net buyers with a net gain of 33 properties.

This trend of portfolio growth is consistent, as it follows a similar pattern from 2024 when investors bought 30 properties and sold just 3. The buy-to-sell ratio accelerated from 10-to-1 in 2024 to an even more robust 17.5-to-1 in 2025.

This sustained, high-volume net buying activity signals strong investor confidence in the future of the Wells County real estate market and a clear strategy of long-term holding and expansion.

In line with ownership data, institutional investors (1,000+ tier) were completely inactive, recording zero buy or sell transactions. The market's liquidity and growth are entirely fueled by smaller, local landlords.

The consistent pattern of net acquisitions over the past two years points to a healthy, expanding rental market where investors are actively increasing their holdings rather than divesting.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transactions accounted for 28.6% of the Wells County market in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were involved in 28.6% of all SFR transactions in Wells County, acquiring 2 of the 7 total properties sold. This share underscores their role as a consistent source of demand in the market.

All investor transaction activity was concentrated at the entry level of the market. The 2 properties purchased were by landlords in the single-property tier, indicating that market growth is being driven by new participants.

These new investors paid an average price of $109,750 for their properties. This price point appears to be the entry ticket for starting a rental portfolio in the county.

Significantly, 0% of these Q1 landlord purchases were from other landlords. This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests that new acquisitions are expanding the overall rental pool rather than just churning existing rental stock between investors.

The sourcing of all new inventory from the non-investor market highlights a direct conversion of owner-occupied housing into rental properties, a key dynamic shaping the local housing supply.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 99% of the Wells County rental market and are aggressively accumulating properties.
Holdings
Landlords own 406 SFR properties in Wells County, ND, representing a 32.0% market penetration rate, with individual investors holding a dominant 93.3% share (379 properties) of the portfolio.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 17.7% less than traditional homeowners, securing a significant $23,550 discount per property with an average purchase price of $109,750.
Activity
Landlords purchased 28.6% of all homes sold in Q1 2026, with all activity driven by 2 new single-property investors entering the market.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have a near-total grip on the market, controlling 99.0% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every portfolio tier, with companies never surpassing them; even in the largest active tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 100%.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 17.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (35 buys vs 2 sells), while institutional investors remain completely inactive with zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Wells County, North Dakota, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual operators. Investors control a significant 32.0% of the single-family housing stock, totaling 406 properties. This portfolio is almost entirely in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who own 99.0% of all investor-held homes. Further underscoring this dynamic, 93.3% of these properties are owned by individuals, not companies. The influence of large institutional investors is nonexistent, making this a truly grassroots rental market.

Investor behavior in Wells County is characterized by strategic acquisition and strong market confidence. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 28.6% of all homes sold, securing them at a sharp 17.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by new entrants, as all recent purchases were made by first-time, single-property investors. Historically, landlords have been aggressive net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio that soared to 17.5-to-1 in 2025, signaling a clear strategy of portfolio expansion and long-term investment in the community.

The key takeaway from the Wells County market is its insulation from the national trend of corporate consolidation in the rental sector. It remains a market powered by local capital, where individuals can enter and build portfolios. The high rate of investor ownership in specific zip codes, such as 58438 (57.3% investor-owned), indicates that while ownership is decentralized among many small players, their collective impact on the housing landscape is highly concentrated and significant. This market reports dashboard, which leverages deep assessor data, reveals a stable, cash-heavy, and growing local rental economy.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:13 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Wells (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Wells (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-wells/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.