Madison (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Madison (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Madison (NY)
18,799
Total Investors in Madison (NY)
3,696
Investor Owned SFR in Madison (NY)
2,911(15.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,332
SFR Owned
2,607
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
364
SFR Owned
386
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,911 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop investors command 98.7% of Madison County's rental market as institutional presence remains minimal
Investors own 2,911 SFR properties, 15.5% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a near-total 98.7% share versus just 0.1% for institutional firms. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 41.8% of all properties sold and have shifted from paying large premiums to near-parity with homeowners. Overall, investors are strong net buyers, acquiring 11.6 properties for every one sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,911 properties in Madison County, with individual investors holding a dominant 89.6% share.
Cash-backed ownership significantly outpaces financing, with 1,918 properties owned outright versus 993 with a mortgage. The portfolio is intensely focused on rentals, as 2,885 properties (99.1% of holdings) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investor purchasing power leveled in Q1, paying just a 0.2% discount ($424) compared to homeowners.
This near-parity marks a dramatic shift from 2025, when landlords consistently paid significant premiums over homeowners, peaking at a 30.2% premium ($72,843) in Q2 2025. The market saw 46.8% price appreciation from the 2020-2023 average to 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 41.8% of all Q4 2025 home sales, acquiring 46 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for nearly all of this activity, making 97.9% of landlord purchases. A wave of 52 new single-property landlord entities entered the market, acquiring 41 properties and demonstrating robust grassroots growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.7% of Madison County's investor-owned housing.
The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords alone owning 90.0% of the entire investor portfolio (2,656 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have a negligible presence, holding just 4 properties, or 0.1% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, holding 54.1% of assets in that segment.
Individuals are the dominant force in smaller portfolios, owning 89.7% of single-property holdings. As portfolios grow, ownership increasingly shifts to corporate structures, with companies controlling 91.7% of properties in the 101-1000 tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 13032 zip code, home to 495 investor-owned properties.
The zip codes 13037 (437 properties) and 13035 (363 properties) are also major hubs for investor ownership. However, the highest market penetration is in the 13484 zip code, where investors own 50.0% of all SFRs.
Historical Transactions
Madison County landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 11.6 properties for every one sold in Q1 2026.
This aggressive accumulation has been consistent, with a 13.1-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025. Institutional investors display more volatile behavior, switching from net sellers in 2024 (net -6 properties) to net buyers in 2025 (net +3 properties).
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were a driving force in the Q1 market, participating in 41.1% of all transactions.
A vast pricing divide separates investor types: institutional buyers paid an average of $101,010, a 63.0% discount compared to the $272,988 paid by new single-property landlords. The vast majority of new investors (92.3%) purchased from non-landlord sellers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,911 properties in Madison County, with individual investors holding a dominant 89.6% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 15.5% share of the single-family residential market in Madison County, with a total portfolio of 2,911 properties.

Individual investors are the backbone of the rental market, owning 2,607 properties, which constitutes 89.6% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 386, or 13.3% of the total.

The disparity is even starker when looking at landlord entities, where 3,332 individual landlords far outnumber the 364 company landlords, a ratio of more than 9 to 1.

Cash is the preferred method for holding assets. Investors own 1,918 properties free and clear, nearly double the 993 properties that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base with low leverage.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals, with 2,885 of the 2,911 properties classified as non-owner-occupied. This 99.1% rental concentration underscores the business focus of these property owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investor purchasing power leveled in Q1, paying just a 0.2% discount ($424) compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In a significant market shift, the long-standing investor premium has vanished. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $268,805, nearly identical to the $269,229 paid by traditional homeowners, resulting in a negligible $424 discount.

This is a stark reversal from the competitive environment of 2025. Throughout last year, landlords consistently outbid homeowners, paying premiums that ranged from 5.2% ($12,561) in Q1 to a staggering 30.2% ($72,843) in Q2.

The disappearance of this premium suggests a cooling of aggressive, above-market bidding from investors or a strategic shift towards more disciplined acquisitions.

Overall property values have climbed significantly since the pandemic era. The average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($304,484) was 46.8% higher than the average from 2020-2023 ($207,399), reflecting strong market appreciation.

The trend from paying substantial premiums to achieving price parity indicates that the market may be normalizing, with investors no longer needing to bid as aggressively to secure properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 41.8% of all Q4 2025 home sales, acquiring 46 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 46 of the 110 total SFRs sold, a market share of 41.8%.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 46 purchases, or 97.9% of the investor total, while institutional investors made only a single purchase (2.1%).

New market entrants were the primary driver of demand. The single-property tier alone bought 41 homes (87.2% of the landlord total), with 52 new entities making their first purchase.

This influx of new, small landlords signals that the barrier to entry for real estate investing in Madison County remains low, fostering a dynamic and growing local investor base.

The minimal presence of institutional buyers in quarterly acquisitions reinforces that market dynamics are dictated by local individuals and small businesses, not large-scale corporate funds.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.7% of Madison County's investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Madison County is unequivocally dominated by small investors. Landlords with 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 98.7% of all investor-held SFRs.

This concentration at the small end of the market is extreme, with the single-property (Tier 01) category alone accounting for 90.0% of all properties. This highlights a market built on grassroots participation rather than large-scale consolidation.

In stark contrast, institutional investors in the 1000+ property tier hold just 4 properties, representing a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned inventory. This finding refutes any narrative of a Wall Street takeover in this market.

The mid-size investor segment (11-1000 properties) is also exceptionally small, collectively owning just 1.1% of the portfolio. This indicates a significant gap between small local landlords and large institutional players.

This tier distribution reveals a highly decentralized and fragmented rental market, where the vast majority of rental housing is provided by investors who own only one or a few properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, holding 54.1% of assets in that segment.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists where professionalization occurs through incorporation. In the 6-10 property tier, companies become the majority for the first time, owning 54.1% of properties compared to 45.9% for individuals.

Individual ownership is the standard for new and small investors. They own 89.7% of single-property portfolios and 82.1% of two-property portfolios.

The transition to corporate ownership accelerates with scale. By the 101-1000 property tier, companies own a commanding 91.7% of the assets, indicating that formal business structures are essential for managing larger portfolios.

This pattern illustrates a common investor journey: starting as an individual and later forming an LLC or other corporate entity for liability protection and financial advantages as their holdings expand.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, companies have a significant presence, holding 28.8% of properties, showing that many investors incorporate relatively early in their growth phase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in the 13032 zip code, home to 495 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Madison County shows clear geographic concentration. The top three zip codes by property count (13032, 13037, and 13035) collectively contain 1,295 investor-owned homes.

The zip code 13032 is the largest single hub for investors, with 495 properties representing a 13.6% ownership rate for that area.

A critical distinction emerges between total volume and market saturation. While 13032 leads in count, the 13484 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate, with half (50.0%) of all single-family homes being investor-owned.

This suggests different market dynamics: the top areas by count are larger, established rental markets, while areas with high penetration rates may be smaller communities with a disproportionately high share of rental housing.

The top zip codes by count all exhibit similar ownership rates in the 13-15% range, indicating a consistent level of investor activity across the county's primary population centers.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Madison County landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 11.6 properties for every one sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Madison County is in a decisive growth phase. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 58 properties while selling only 5, demonstrating strong confidence and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion.

This net buyer status is a long-term trend. In 2025, investors acquired 539 properties and sold just 41, a buy-to-sell ratio of 13.1. Similarly, in 2024, they bought 585 properties and sold only 45.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) operate with a different strategy compared to the overall market. They were net sellers in 2024, divesting 7 properties while buying only 1. They reversed this position in 2025, becoming net buyers by a small margin of 3 properties.

The steady, high-volume buying from the broader market, contrasted with the fluctuating activity of institutions, confirms that small, local investors are the engine of rental market growth in the county.

The consistently high buy/sell ratio across all landlords signals a bullish outlook on the local housing market and a continued demand for rental properties.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were a driving force in the Q1 market, participating in 41.1% of all transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a pivotal role in market activity, accounting for 58 of the 141 total SFR transactions in Q1, a share of 41.1%.

Transaction data reveals a dramatic split in acquisition strategy based on investor size. The single institutional purchase was at $101,010, which is 63.0% less than the $272,988 average price paid by the 52 single-property landlord transactions.

This price gap suggests that new, small investors are likely buying properties on the open market, while larger, more experienced players are sourcing discounted or distressed assets through other channels.

The market for new investors is not primarily supplied by existing ones. Only 7.7% of properties bought by single-property landlords came from other investors, meaning most are converting owner-occupied homes into rentals.

Activity was concentrated in the smallest tier, with single-property buyers responsible for 52 of the 58 total investor transactions, reinforcing that new entrants are the most active segment of the market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command Madison County with 98.7% ownership as institutional presence remains negligible.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,911 SFR properties, representing 15.5% of the Madison County market. Individual investors overwhelmingly lead, holding 2,607 of these properties (89.6%), while companies own 386 (13.3%).
Pricing
In a sharp reversal from 2025's investor premiums, landlords paid an average of $268,805 in Q1, a negligible 0.2% discount ($424) compared to traditional homeowners at $269,229.
Activity
Landlords captured a significant 41.8% of all Q4 2025 sales, purchasing 46 properties. This activity was driven by new entrants, with 52 new single-property landlord entities joining the market.
Market Share
Small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 98.7% of investor housing in the county. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 54.1% of assets. This demonstrates a clear trend of incorporation as investors scale their operations.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with an 11.6x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (58 buys vs 5 sells). Institutional investors show a mixed strategy, flipping from net sellers in 2024 to net buyers in 2025.
Market Narrative

In Madison County, NY, the rental market is fundamentally shaped by local, small-scale operators. Landlords own 2,911 single-family properties, constituting 15.5% of the total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly in the hands of individuals, who own 89.6% of these homes. The market structure defies the national narrative of corporate consolidation; "mom-and-pop" investors with 1-10 properties control a near-total 98.7% share, while large institutional firms own a mere 0.1%.

Investor behavior underscores a healthy, growing market driven by new entrants. In the last quarter, landlords were highly active, acquiring 41.8% of all homes sold. Pricing strategies differ vastly by scale, with new single-property landlords paying market rates ($272,988) while the lone institutional purchase occurred at a 63.0% discount ($101,010). The broader trend shows landlords are strong net buyers, accumulating assets at an 11.6-to-1 ratio in Q1 and signaling sustained confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway for Madison County is that its rental landscape is defined by accessibility and fragmentation. The market's stability and growth are fueled by a continuous flow of new, individual investors rather than large-scale acquisitions. This dynamic ensures a decentralized ownership base but also reveals a potential knowledge gap, as smaller investors pay significant premiums compared to their institutional counterparts. The dominant trend is one of continued, grassroots expansion led by community-based investors.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:18 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Madison (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Madison (NY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ny-madison/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.