Trimble (KY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Trimble (KY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Trimble (KY)
2,284
Total Investors in Trimble (KY)
506
Investor Owned SFR in Trimble (KY)
486(21.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
447
SFR Owned
401
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
59
SFR Owned
94
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 486 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Trimble County, Controlling 89% of Investor Housing and Driving Aggressive Accumulation
Investors own 21.3% of Single-Family Residential properties in Trimble County, with small, individual landlords controlling 88.8% of that portfolio. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers with a 7-to-1 buy/sell ratio, and defied national trends by paying a 50.9% premium over traditional homeowners, signaling intense competition in a concentrated market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 486 SFR properties in Trimble County, with individuals holding a dominant 82.5% share.
Investor portfolios are overwhelmingly purchased with cash, with 398 properties owned outright versus 88 financed. The vast majority of these holdings, 471 of 486 properties, are actively rented and non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 50.9% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $297,500 per acquisition.
The price gap is highly volatile, swinging from a 26.9% landlord discount in Q3 2025 to significant premiums in other recent quarters. This volatility reflects a thin market with intense competition for desirable properties.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 37.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, a total of 6 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors drove the market, accounting for 5 of the 6 landlord purchases (83.3%). Activity was led by new entrants, with 4 single-property landlords making their first acquisition.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 88.8% of all investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the largest group, holding 312 properties, which is 60.2% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 15 homes, a 2.9% share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point to company dominance.
Even in the larger 'mom-and-pop' tiers, individuals maintain strong control, owning 74.0% of properties in the 3-5 portfolio size and 69.6% in the 6-10 size. Companies' highest ownership share is just 30.4% in the 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated, with two zip codes, 40006 and 40045, containing 92.2% of all investor-owned homes.
The zip code with the highest ownership count is 40006, with 245 investor properties. However, the highest ownership *rate* is in 40070, where 75.0% of homes are investor-owned, though this is based on a very small sample of just 3 properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This accumulation trend has been consistent and accelerating, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.25-to-1 in 2025 (50 buys vs. 8 sells) and 4.1-to-1 in 2024 (49 buys vs. 12 sells). No institutional transaction data was available to compare against this trend.
Current Quarter Transactions
In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 30.4% of all SFR transactions, purchasing 7 properties.
A massive price disparity exists between tiers, with single-property investors paying $361,875 on average, while two-property investors paid only $90,000. Additionally, 0% of landlord purchases came from other landlords, indicating acquisitions are sourced from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 486 SFR properties in Trimble County, with individuals holding a dominant 82.5% share.
Detailed Findings

In Trimble County, investors hold a significant 21.3% of the total Single-Family Residential market, with a portfolio of 486 properties. This demonstrates a substantial level of real estate investing activity relative to the market size of 2,284 SFR homes.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individuals over corporations. Individual landlords own 401 properties (82.5%), while companies own just 94 (19.3%), challenging the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental market.

A striking financial pattern is the preference for all-cash purchases. Investors own 398 properties free of financing, compared to only 88 that carry a mortgage. This 4.5-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio suggests a market of financially stable investors who are not reliant on leverage.

The portfolio is almost entirely geared towards rental income, with 471 of the 486 properties (96.9%) classified as non-owner-occupied. This high concentration underscores a clear business focus on generating rental revenue rather than speculative holding.

When comparing entity counts to property counts, the 59 company landlords own an average of 1.6 properties each, while the 447 individual landlords own approximately 0.9 properties each, indicating many individuals co-own a single property or are just starting their portfolio.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a market reversal, landlords paid a 50.9% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, averaging $297,500 per acquisition.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition pricing in Trimble County defies the national trend of securing discounts. In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $297,500, a staggering $100,357 (50.9%) more than the average traditional homeowner price of $197,143.

Pricing dynamics have been extremely volatile, highlighting the effects of low transaction volume. After securing a 26.9% discount in Q3 2025 (paying $191,042 vs. $261,200), investors paid premiums of 29.7% in Q2 2025 and 32.4% in Q1 2025, indicating that pricing is highly dependent on the specific properties available each quarter.

The long-term price appreciation is substantial. The average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $166,592, which climbed to $215,127 in 2024. This trend signals strong, sustained value growth in the local market.

The absence of a consistent landlord discount suggests a competitive environment where investors may be targeting higher-value properties or are willing to pay above market rate to secure assets, a departure from typical investment strategies.

The erratic shifts between paying a premium and securing a discount from one quarter to the next underscore a market characterized by unique opportunities and inconsistent pricing, rather than predictable, scaled acquisition patterns.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 37.5% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, a total of 6 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing accounted for a significant portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords buying 6 of the 16 total SFRs sold, capturing a 37.5% market share.

The acquisition activity was dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made up 83.3% of investor purchases, reinforcing their role as the primary drivers of market demand.

New market participants were a key feature of the quarter. Four different single-property landlords entered the market, each acquiring their first rental home and collectively accounting for 66.7% of all investor purchases.

In stark contrast to the active small investors, institutional landlords (1,000+ properties) made zero acquisitions in Q4, indicating their focus lies elsewhere or that the local market scale does not suit their model.

The purchasing was concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with Tiers 1 (1 property), 2 (2 properties), and 5 (11-20 properties) being the only active groups, highlighting a very grassroots level of investment activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 88.8% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Trimble County is defined by small, local owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning between 1 and 10 properties, hold 88.8% of the investor-owned housing stock, demonstrating a highly decentralized market structure.

First-time and single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone accounts for 312 properties, representing 60.2% of all investor-owned SFRs, showing the accessibility of the local market to new entrants.

Despite their small number, there is a surprising institutional presence. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier own 15 homes, a 2.9% share. This is an unusual concentration for a smaller county and suggests a specific, targeted investment strategy by a large operator.

Mid-size landlords play a minimal role. Tiers representing 21-1,000 properties are nearly absent, with only one small tier (21-50 properties) holding 4 homes (0.8%). The market is clearly divided between very small landlords and a single institutional player.

The combined share of the smallest landlords (Tiers 1-4) illustrates a market far from corporate control, with local investors providing the vast majority of rental housing in the county.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every portfolio tier, with no crossover point to company dominance.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across every single investor tier in Trimble County, reinforcing the local, non-corporate nature of the rental market. There is no portfolio size at which companies become the majority owner.

In the single-property tier, individuals own 285 of the 320 properties, an overwhelming 89.1% share, indicating that new market entrants are almost exclusively individuals.

As portfolio sizes increase, company ownership grows but never surpasses individual control. In the 6-10 property tier, companies reach their highest market share at 30.4% (7 properties), but individuals still hold the majority with 16 properties (69.6%).

The data clearly shows that even as investors scale their operations into the 11-20 property range, they tend to remain individually owned. In this tier, individuals own 29 properties (74.4%) compared to just 10 owned by companies (25.6%).

This persistent individual dominance across all tiers suggests that the path to scaling in Trimble County does not typically involve incorporation, distinguishing it from more corporatized urban rental markets.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated, with two zip codes, 40006 and 40045, containing 92.2% of all investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is extreme in Trimble County's investor market. Just two zip codes, 40006 (Bedford) and 40045 (Milton), account for 448 of the 486 investor-owned properties, representing a combined 92.2% share.

The zip code 40006 is the largest hub for investor activity by volume, with 245 properties and an investor ownership rate of 19.8%. It is closely followed by 40045, which has 203 properties and a higher penetration rate of 25.8%.

A significant outlier is zip code 40070, which has the highest investor ownership rate in the county at 75.0%. However, this percentage is based on a very small market of only 4 total SFRs, of which investors own 3, making it a statistical anomaly rather than a major investment zone.

The sharp drop-off in activity outside the top two zip codes is stark. The third-largest area, 40055, has only 20 investor-owned homes, highlighting the targeted nature of investment in the county.

This data from our market reports dashboard reveals that investors are not spread evenly but are focused on specific community pockets, likely driven by local demand, property availability, and regulatory factors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Trimble County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they demonstrated this with a 7-to-1 buy/sell ratio, adding a net of 6 properties to their portfolios.

This net buyer behavior is a persistent, multi-year trend. In 2025, landlords purchased 50 homes while selling only 8, resulting in a net gain of 42 properties. The year prior, in 2024, they added a net of 37 properties (49 buys vs. 12 sells).

The buy/sell ratio appears to be accelerating, moving from 4.1 in 2024 to 6.25 in 2025, and reaching 7.0 in the first quarter of 2026. This suggests investor confidence and acquisition appetite is growing over time.

The transaction data indicates a steady flow of acquisitions throughout the year, with double-digit purchase volumes in quarters like Q3 2025 (14 buys) and Q2 2025 (11 buys).

With no institutional transaction data available, this powerful net buying trend is entirely attributable to the smaller mom-and-pop and mid-size investors who dominate the local market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 30.4% of all SFR transactions, purchasing 7 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords maintained a strong presence in the Q1 2026 market, securing 7 of the 23 total SFR transactions for a 30.4% market share. This activity was entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors.

Purchase prices varied dramatically by investor size, revealing different acquisition strategies. Single-property investors paid the most, averaging $361,875, while the small-medium tier (11-20 properties) paid the highest at $455,000 for one property. In contrast, two-property investors spent an average of just $90,000.

The market showed no signs of inter-landlord trading activity. In Q1, 100% of investor acquisitions were from non-landlord sellers, such as traditional homeowners. This suggests a focus on expanding the total rental pool rather than trading existing rental assets.

Transaction volume was concentrated in the smallest tiers. Single-property landlords were the most active, conducting 4 transactions, followed by two-property investors with 2 transactions.

The wide pricing gap between tiers likely reflects investors targeting different asset classes, such as varying property sizes, conditions, or locations within the county, rather than direct competition for the same homes.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Trimble County, Driving 89% of Ownership and Aggressively Buying
Holdings
Landlords own 486 SFR properties, representing 21.3% of the market in Trimble County. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 401 properties (82.5%), compared to 94 properties (19.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a striking market anomaly, landlords in Q1 2026 paid an average of $297,500, a 50.9% premium over the $197,143 paid by traditional homeowners, indicating intense competition for limited inventory.
Activity
Investors captured 37.5% of all sales in the most recent quarter of purchasing data (Q4 2025), with mom-and-pop landlords responsible for 83.3% of that activity. This included 4 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 88.8% of investor-owned housing in the county. In sharp contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 2.9% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio-size tier. Companies never achieve a majority, peaking at just 30.4% ownership in the 6-10 property tier, underscoring a market built by individuals.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, with a 7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (7 buys vs. 1 sell), a trend that has accelerated over the past two years. Institutional transaction data was not available.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Trimble County, KY, is a story of local dominance and focused growth. Investors own 486 single-family homes, a significant 21.3% of the total market. This landscape is shaped not by large corporations, but by 506 individual and small-scale landlords. Individual investors control 82.5% of the rental properties, a fact reflected in the tier structure: 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) own a commanding 88.8% of the portfolio, while institutional firms hold a mere 2.9%.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive and consistent accumulation. In Q1 2026, landlords were staunch net buyers with a 7-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, a trend that has accelerated annually. Their purchasing power is significant, capturing 30.4% of all transactions in the quarter. In a notable departure from national norms, these investors paid a 50.9% premium over homeowners, signaling a highly competitive local market where desirable properties command top dollar. This activity is overwhelmingly financed by cash, with 4.5 cash-owned properties for every one with a mortgage.

Ultimately, the Trimble County market exemplifies a grassroots rental ecosystem. It is hyper-concentrated in just two zip codes and is fueled by financially stable, individual investors who are expanding the rental supply by acquiring homes from the general market. The surprising institutional pocket and the volatile pricing dynamics highlight a complex market, but the overarching narrative is one of small investors building portfolios and shaping the local housing landscape, one property at a time. For more in-depth analysis, explore our full suite of Investor Pulse reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 06:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Trimble (KY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Trimble (KY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ky-trimble/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.