Lewis and Clark (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lewis and Clark (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lewis and Clark (MT)
9,666
Total Investors in Lewis and Clark (MT)
2,321
Investor Owned SFR in Lewis and Clark (MT)
1,757(18.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,103
SFR Owned
1,550
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
218
SFR Owned
261
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,757 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Lewis and Clark County with 99.3% Ownership, Buying at a 21.8% Discount
In Lewis and Clark County, investors own 1,757 single-family properties, representing 18.2% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual investors (88.2% of holdings), who comprised 100% of Q1 purchases and secured properties at a significant 21.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. While landlords are aggressive net buyers, institutional investors have a negligible presence, owning just 0.1% of the local investor portfolio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,757 SFR properties in Lewis and Clark County, with individuals holding 88.2% of the portfolio.
The investor portfolio is nearly evenly split between properties purchased with cash (925) and those that are financed (832). A total of 2,103 individual landlords operate in the county, compared to just 218 company entities, a ratio of nearly 10 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 21.8% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $107,339.
The price advantage for investors has been consistently significant, including a massive 41.7% discount in Q2 2025 ($264,429 vs $453,660). The average Q1 2026 landlord purchase price of $383,984 marks a decrease from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $328,659 (Note: data indicates 0 properties purchased in these periods, prices are indicative).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.5% of all single-family properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 15 purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these acquisitions. New, single-property investors were the most active, making up 93.3% of all landlord purchases (14 properties).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Lewis and Clark County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the investor portfolio, or a single property. The most dominant segment is single-property landlords, who alone own 82.5% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property holders only in larger portfolios, controlling 59.1% of homes in the 6-10 property tier.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller tiers, owning 89.8% of single-property portfolios and 77.2% of two-property portfolios. The crossover where corporate ownership surpasses individual ownership happens at the 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Lewis and Clark County is heavily concentrated in the 59601 zip code, which contains 1,152 investor-owned properties.
The 59601 zip code not only has the highest count but also one of the highest ownership rates at 15.5%. The 59602 zip code follows with 108 properties, representing a 9.8% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Lewis and Clark County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 20 properties while selling only 1 in Q1 2026.
This net-buyer trend is consistent over time, with a 4.2x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (63 buys vs 15 sells) and a 7.8x ratio in 2024 (78 buys vs 10 sells). Institutional activity is minimal but also leans towards net buying, with 3 purchases versus 1 sale in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 18.2% of all single-family home transactions in Q1 2026, with 20 total purchases.
Mom-and-pop tiers accounted for 100% of these transactions. New, single-property investors paid a higher average price ($387,187) than small landlords in the 3-5 property tier ($339,150), a premium of $48,037.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,757 SFR properties in Lewis and Clark County, with individuals holding 88.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 18.2% share of the single-family residential market in Lewis and Clark County, totaling 1,757 properties out of 9,666 total SFRs.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the local market, owning 1,550 properties, which constitutes 88.2% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 261, or 14.9% of the portfolio.

The ownership structure is further reflected in the entity count, where 2,103 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 218 company landlords, highlighting a market driven by small-scale operators rather than large corporations.

The local rental market is substantial, with 1,725 properties classified as rented, representing the vast majority of the 1,757 investor-owned homes.

Financing strategies are almost evenly balanced between debt and equity. Investors hold 925 properties with cash and have financed 832, indicating a diverse mix of capitalization approaches within the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords purchased properties for 21.8% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $107,339.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Lewis and Clark County demonstrate a powerful pricing advantage, securing properties at a 21.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. Landlords paid an average of $383,984, while homeowners paid $491,323, a staggering difference of $107,339 per property.

This significant discount is not an anomaly. Throughout the previous year, investors consistently paid less, with the gap reaching an extraordinary 41.7% in Q2 2025, when landlords acquired properties for $189,231 less than homeowners on average.

The pricing gap, while fluctuating, has remained substantial, with discounts of 7.9% in Q3 2025 and 24.6% in Q1 2025, underscoring a persistent market inefficiency that skilled investors are exploiting.

Comparing recent activity to historical benchmarks, the average landlord acquisition price of $383,984 in Q1 2026 shows a notable increase over the 2020-2023 average of $328,659, reflecting broad market appreciation since the pandemic-era boom.

The data reveals a market where professional buyers are able to identify and capitalize on opportunities far below the typical consumer price point, a key driver of profitability in real estate investing.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.5% of all single-family properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 15 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 15 of the 77 available SFR properties, capturing a 19.5% market share.

The purchasing landscape was exclusively dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made up 100% of all investor acquisitions during the quarter, with zero activity recorded from institutional buyers.

New entrants are the primary driver of growth in the investor market. First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 14 of the 15 purchases, representing 93.3% of all investor buying activity.

A total of 19 distinct entities were involved in the 14 single-property tier purchases, indicating some properties were acquired through partnerships or co-ownership structures.

The data paints a clear picture of a market where growth is fueled from the ground up by new and small investors, rather than consolidation by large-scale entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned SFRs in Lewis and Clark County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lewis and Clark County is defined by the dominance of small landlords. Investors with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 99.3% of all investor-held SFRs, dispelling any notion of a corporate-dominated market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, holding 1,481 properties, which accounts for 82.5% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This highlights the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors.

The presence of institutional capital (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) is virtually nonexistent. This tier accounts for just a single property, representing a mere 0.1% of the investor market share.

Mid-size landlords also have a very limited footprint. Tiers representing 11-100 properties (05-07) collectively own only 11 properties, or about 0.7% of the total.

This distribution underscores a highly fragmented market structure, where ownership is spread across thousands of individual operators rather than being concentrated in a few large portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property holders only in larger portfolios, controlling 59.1% of homes in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors control the overall market, a clear pattern emerges as portfolio sizes increase: corporate ownership becomes more prevalent. The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 13 properties (59.1%) compared to individuals' 9 properties (40.9%).

In the smallest tiers, individual ownership is nearly absolute. Individuals own 1,363 of the single-property landlord homes (89.8%) and 105 of the two-property landlord homes (77.2%).

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority, holding 105 properties (67.3%) while companies own just 51 (32.7%).

This data illustrates a typical investor lifecycle: individuals often start and dominate the entry-level tiers, while those who scale up are more likely to incorporate for liability and operational efficiency.

The sharp shift at the 6-10 property tier suggests that managing more than five properties is a key threshold where investors begin to formalize their operations under a corporate structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Lewis and Clark County is heavily concentrated in the 59601 zip code, which contains 1,152 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership within Lewis and Clark County is not evenly distributed but is highly concentrated in specific areas. The 59601 zip code is the undisputed epicenter, home to 1,152 investor-owned properties.

This concentration in 59601 represents approximately 65.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county, indicating a strong preference for this particular submarket.

The high count in 59601 is matched by a high penetration rate of 15.5%, showing that one in every six or seven homes in the area is investor-owned. This is a crucial insight for understanding local market dynamics.

The next most significant area is the 59602 zip code, which contains 108 investor properties and has an ownership rate of 9.8%.

Other zip codes like 59410 have a high investor penetration rate (15.2%) but a very small number of actual properties (5), suggesting that while investor-friendly, they are much smaller markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Lewis and Clark County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 20 properties while selling only 1 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among landlords in Lewis and Clark County. In the first quarter of 2026, investors were strong net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 20-to-1.

This aggressive acquisition strategy is a continuation of previous years' patterns. In 2025, landlords purchased 63 properties while selling only 15, and in 2024, they bought 78 and sold just 10, demonstrating consistent, long-term market confidence.

The net buying activity shows investors are in a growth phase, expanding their holdings rather than divesting. This behavior signals a bullish outlook on the local real estate market's future performance.

Even the minimally active institutional tier follows this trend. In 2025, these large investors were net buyers, acquiring 3 properties and selling only 1.

Overall, the historical transaction data points to a market where investors are actively increasing their footprint, contributing to demand and likely influencing property values through sustained purchasing pressure.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 18.2% of all single-family home transactions in Q1 2026, with 20 total purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords represented a significant force in the transaction market, participating in 18.2% of all SFR sales with 20 purchases out of a total of 110.

All 20 of these transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords, with zero activity from institutional buyers, reinforcing that market activity is driven entirely by smaller operators.

A notable pricing dynamic emerged among tiers. First-time or single-property investors (Tier 01) paid an average of $387,187 for their 19 acquisitions. This is considerably more than the $339,150 average price paid by more experienced small landlords (Tier 03-05), suggesting new entrants may pay a premium to enter the market.

The market shows some internal liquidity, with 10.5% of the purchases made by new investors (2 out of 19) being acquired from other existing landlords.

This indicates that while most inventory comes from the broader market, a portion of transactions represents a transfer of assets within the investor community itself.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Cement Control in Lewis and Clark County, Owning 99.3% of Investor SFRs and Buying at a 22% Discount
Holdings
Investors own 1,757 SFR properties, 18.2% of the total market in Lewis and Clark County. This portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,550 properties (88.2%), while companies own just 261 (14.9%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant market leverage, paying an average of $383,984, which is 21.8% less than the $491,323 paid by traditional homeowners, a cash discount of $107,339 per home.
Activity
Landlords were highly active, purchasing 19.5% of all homes sold in the most recent quarter. Activity was driven by new entrants, with 14 new single-property landlords joining the market.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.3% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint, with just 0.1% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the smaller portfolio tiers, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property level, suggesting a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 20 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026. This trend of accumulation indicates strong confidence in the local market's growth prospects.
Market Narrative

In Lewis and Clark County, the property ownership landscape for single-family rentals is overwhelmingly shaped by small, local investors. They currently hold 1,757 properties, comprising 18.2% of the county's total SFR stock. The market structure defies the narrative of corporate consolidation; individual investors own 88.2% of these homes (1,550 properties), while companies hold a mere 14.9% (261 properties). Further drilling down, mom-and-pop landlords with 1-10 properties control a staggering 99.3% of the investor portfolio, leaving institutional giants with a nearly invisible 0.1% share.

Investor behavior in the first quarter of 2026 reveals savvy and aggressive acquisition strategies. Landlords captured 19.5% of all home sales, demonstrating significant purchasing power. Their key advantage lies in pricing; they acquired properties for an average of $383,984, a 21.8% discount compared to the $491,323 paid by traditional homeowners. This trend is driven by new market entrants, as single-property landlords accounted for 93% of investor purchases. Transaction data confirms a strong accumulation phase, with investors collectively buying 20 homes for every one they sold, signaling a bullish outlook on the region.

The key takeaway from this market report is that the Lewis and Clark County investment scene is a thriving ecosystem of small-scale entrepreneurs, not a corporate playground. The market's health and growth are fueled by the continuous entry of new individual landlords who are adept at finding value. This dynamic suggests a stable rental market with deep local roots and a competitive environment where pricing advantages, rather than sheer scale, define success. The heavy concentration of activity in the 59601 zip code further points to a market where localized knowledge is paramount.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:14 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Lewis and Clark (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Lewis and Clark (MT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mt-lewis_and_clark/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.