Frio (TX) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Frio (TX) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Frio (TX)
2,812
Total Investors in Frio (TX)
793
Investor Owned SFR in Frio (TX)
789(28.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
711
SFR Owned
644
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
82
SFR Owned
165
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 789 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Frio County with 91.5% Ownership, Acquiring Properties at a 40% Discount
Investors own 28.1% of single-family homes in Frio County, with small, individual landlords controlling a staggering 91.5% of that portfolio. In Q1, these investors bought 37.5% of all homes sold, paying an average of 39.6% less than traditional homeowners. While landlords remain strong net buyers, institutional presence is nearly non-existent, highlighting a market driven by local, small-scale investment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 789 SFR properties in Frio County, with individuals holding 81.6%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held with cash (712 properties) compared to only 77 that are financed. Of the total portfolio, 763 properties are classified as rentals. This signals a low-leverage, rental-focused investor base in the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Frio County landlords paid 39.6% less than homeowners in Q1, a $51,899 discount.
This substantial discount is a consistent trend, reaching a high of 49.9% in Q2 2025. Meanwhile, the average landlord acquisition price has plummeted from $246,669 in 2024 to just $79,314 in Q1 2026, suggesting a focus on lower-cost assets.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 37.5% of all SFR properties sold in Frio County this quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 100% of these purchases, with institutional investors making zero acquisitions. Four new single-property landlords entered the market, representing 66.7% of all investor buying activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 91.5% of investor-owned SFRs in Frio County.
Single-property landlords alone own 531 homes, a 66.4% share of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just one single property, representing a 0.1% share of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual landlords dominate smaller tiers, but companies share 50% ownership at the 6-10 property level.
Individuals own 88.8% of all single-property landlord portfolios and 89.0% of two-property portfolios. The data suggests that as investors scale beyond five properties, they increasingly shift to a corporate ownership structure.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Pearsall (78061), which contains 583 investor-owned SFRs.
Investor ownership rates are consistently high across the county's primary zip codes, ranging from 26.7% to 28.7%. The areas with the highest property counts are also those with the highest investor penetration rates.
Historical Transactions
Frio County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 32 properties while selling only 7 in 2025.
This net buying trend has been steady, with investors adding a net 34 properties in 2024 and 25 properties in 2025. The single institutional entity was also a marginal net buyer, adding one property on a net basis in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 35.3% of Frio County's real estate transactions in Q1.
All 6 landlord acquisitions were made by mom-and-pop investors, with 0% of these purchases sourced from other landlords. The average purchase price for new single-property investors was $79,314.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 789 SFR properties in Frio County, with individuals holding 81.6%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 28.1% share of the single-family residential market in Frio County, owning 789 of the 2,812 total SFR properties.

Individual landlords are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 644 properties, which accounts for 81.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, companies own the remaining 165 properties (20.9%).

The financial structure of these holdings reveals a fiscally conservative approach. An overwhelming 90.2% of investor properties (712) are owned with cash, while only 9.8% (77) are financed, indicating very low leverage across the market.

The landlord base is composed of 793 distinct entities, with individual investors (711) far outnumbering company investors (82). This nearly 9-to-1 ratio of individual-to-company landlords underscores the grassroots nature of real estate investing in the area.

The portfolio is heavily focused on generating rental income, with 763 properties identified as rented, representing 96.7% of all investor-owned homes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Frio County landlords paid 39.6% less than homeowners in Q1, a $51,899 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Frio County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties at a significant discount. In Q1 2026, they paid an average of $79,314, which is 39.6% less than the $131,213 paid by traditional homeowners, a savings of $51,899 per property.

This pricing advantage is not an anomaly. The trend of securing deep discounts was even more pronounced in previous quarters, such as in Q2 2025 when landlords paid 49.9% less ($98,061 vs. $195,634) than homeowners.

Landlord acquisition prices show a sharp downward trend over the past two years. The average price fell dramatically from $246,669 in 2024 to an average of $123,747 in 2025, and further to $79,314 in the first quarter of 2026.

This steep decline in average purchase price, coupled with a widening discount, suggests a strategic shift by investors toward acquiring more affordable properties or an increasing success rate in finding off-market opportunities.

The persistent gap between what investors and homeowners pay highlights a fundamental difference in purchasing strategy, with investors consistently operating at a much lower cost basis.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 37.5% of all SFR properties sold in Frio County this quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing was a major force in the Frio County market in Q1, as landlords acquired 6 of the 16 total single-family homes sold, capturing a 37.5% market share.

The growth in investor portfolios is driven exclusively by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of the 6 properties purchased by investors this quarter.

New market entrants are a key component of this activity. Four new single-property landlords made purchases, accounting for two-thirds of all investor acquisitions and signaling a healthy, growing base of small investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q1.

This quarter's activity paints a clear picture of a market where local, small investors are expanding their holdings while large-scale investors remain on the sidelines.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 91.5% of investor-owned SFRs in Frio County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Frio County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 91.5% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

The single-property landlord is the most significant segment, with 531 properties comprising 66.4% of the total investor portfolio. This highlights the importance of first-time and small-scale investors to the local rental supply.

Institutional ownership is practically non-existent. The 1,000+ property tier accounts for only a single property in the entire county, making up just 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock.

This distribution starkly contrasts with narratives of corporate dominance in housing markets. In Frio County, ownership is highly decentralized and concentrated in the hands of local, small-scale operators.

Even mid-size landlords play a relatively minor role. The only other tier with a notable share is the 51-100 property group, which holds 65 properties for an 8.1% share.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual landlords dominate smaller tiers, but companies share 50% ownership at the 6-10 property level.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Frio County shows a clear evolution as investors grow their portfolios. Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the smallest tiers, owning 483 (88.8%) of single-property portfolios and 65 (89.0%) of two-property portfolios.

A distinct crossover point appears in the 6-10 property tier. At this level, ownership is split exactly 50/50 between individuals (9 properties) and companies (9 properties).

This 50/50 split signals that the 6-10 property range is a critical threshold where investors often choose to formalize their operations under a company structure for liability protection and financial management.

While individuals form the broad base of the market, companies become more prevalent as portfolio sizes increase, indicating a trend toward professionalization with scale.

This pattern provides a clear look into the lifecycle of a real estate investor in the region, starting as an individual and incorporating as their holdings expand.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in Pearsall (78061), which contains 583 investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The majority of investor activity in Frio County is geographically concentrated in the 78061 zip code (Pearsall), home to 583 investor-owned properties.

The 78017 zip code (Dilley) is the second-largest hub for investors, with 164 properties.

Investor penetration is remarkably high and uniform across the county's main residential areas. Ownership rates stand at 28.7% in 78017, 28.0% in 78061, 26.9% in 78005, and 26.7% in 78057.

This widespread saturation indicates that high investor ownership is a defining characteristic of the entire Frio County housing market, not just an isolated trend in one area.

Unlike in many other markets, the zip codes with the highest counts of investor-owned homes are also the ones with the highest ownership percentages, showing deep investor entrenchment in the county's core communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Frio County landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 32 properties while selling only 7 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Frio County are in an active accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell.

In 2025, landlords demonstrated strong confidence in the market by purchasing 32 homes while selling only 7, resulting in a net portfolio growth of 25 properties. This represents a buy-to-sell ratio of over 4.5-to-1.

This aggressive buying pattern is not new. In 2024, the trend was even stronger, with 40 acquisitions against just 6 sales, for a net gain of 34 properties.

Even the minimal institutional presence aligns with this growth trend. The 1,000+ tier investor was a net buyer in 2025, acquiring 2 properties and selling 1.

This sustained, multi-year trend of net buying across all investor types signals a bullish outlook on the long-term value of single-family rentals in Frio County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 35.3% of Frio County's real estate transactions in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a driving force in the Q1 market, participating in 6 of the 17 total transactions for a significant 35.3% share of all activity.

This activity was confined exclusively to small-scale investors, with 100% of landlord-involved transactions attributed to mom-and-pop tiers (1-10 properties).

New landlords entering the market paid an average of $79,314 for their first property, setting a clear benchmark for entry-level investment in Frio County.

Notably, none of the investor purchases in Q1 were from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate shows that investors are acquiring their inventory from the traditional market, likely from homeowners, rather than trading properties amongst themselves.

The complete absence of institutional transactions further solidifies the finding that Frio County's market dynamics are dictated by local, small-portfolio investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Frio County with 91.5% Ownership, Acquiring Properties at a 40% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 789 single-family properties in Frio County, TX, representing a significant 28.1% of the market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 644 properties (81.6%), while companies own 165 (20.9%).
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid an average of 39.6% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for $79,314 compared to the homeowner average of $131,213, a discount of $51,899.
Activity
Investors purchased 37.5% of all homes sold in Q1, with 100% of this activity driven by mom-and-pop landlords. This included 4 new single-property landlords entering the Frio County market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 91.5% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies reach a 50% ownership share in the 6-10 property tier, marking a key point of professionalization for growing investors.
Transactions
Landlords in Frio County are strong net buyers, acquiring 32 properties versus selling only 7 in 2025. The single institutional entity is also a marginal net buyer.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Frio County, TX is characterized by deep investor penetration and overwhelming dominance by small, individual landlords. Investors own 789 properties, a 28.1% share of the total market. This portfolio is not controlled by Wall Street, but by local operators; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a staggering 91.5% of these homes, while institutional firms hold just 0.1%. Ownership is primarily held by individuals (81.6%), who tend to operate with low financial risk, as evidenced by 90.2% of investor properties being owned with cash rather than financing.

In terms of activity, these small investors are both strategic and aggressive. In Q1, they purchased 37.5% of all homes sold in the county, demonstrating their significant impact on market dynamics. Their primary strategy appears to be value-driven acquisition; they paid an average of 39.6% less than traditional homeowners in Q1, a discount of nearly $52,000 per property. This purchasing is fueling growth, not just portfolio churn. Landlords are consistent net buyers, having added a net 25 properties in 2025, and Q1 saw the entry of 4 brand-new single-property investors, confirming the market’s appeal.

The key takeaway from these Investor Pulse reports is that Frio County represents a market defined by grassroots capitalism. The narrative of large, corporate landlords is irrelevant here. Instead, the market is shaped by hundreds of individual and small-business investors who are methodically growing their portfolios by acquiring properties at a significant discount. Their continued net buying and the influx of new entrants signal strong confidence and a stable, decentralized rental market for the foreseeable future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 03:31 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Frio (TX)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Frio (TX) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tx-frio/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.