Iron (MI) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Iron (MI) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Iron (MI)
7,669
Total Investors in Iron (MI)
3,145
Investor Owned SFR in Iron (MI)
2,430(31.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,745
SFR Owned
2,064
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
400
SFR Owned
458
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,430 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Iron County's real estate investor market is dominated by cash-heavy mom-and-pops, with purchasing activity recently frozen.
In Iron County, investors own 31.7% of single-family homes, with small, individual landlords controlling 99.4% of this portfolio. While historically net buyers, investor purchasing activity halted in the most recent quarter. The market is defined by cash transactions, with virtually no financing used by landlords.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,430 SFRs in Iron County; individuals hold 84.9% of the portfolio.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (2,422) versus being financed (8), a ratio of over 300 to 1. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 2,393 rented properties. Individual landlords (2,745) far outnumber company entities (400).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 16.6% premium over homeowners in Q2 2025, a reversal of typical discount trends.
In Q2 2025, landlords paid an average of $137,533 versus homeowners at $117,932, a $19,601 premium. This contrasts with Q1 2025, where prices were nearly identical, with landlords paying just 0.6% ($872) less. These pricing figures exist despite data showing zero actual property purchases by investors in those periods, suggesting modeled or low-volume data.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity in Iron County came to a complete halt, with 0% of market purchases in the last quarter.
There were zero SFR properties purchased by any investor tier in the most recent quarter. This includes a total absence of activity from both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and any larger institutional buyers.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.4% of investor-owned SFRs in Iron County.
Single-property landlords alone make up the vast majority, owning 2,075 properties or 83.5% of the total investor portfolio. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own the vast majority of properties, but companies take a 58.1% majority in the 6-10 property tier.
Across all tiers, individual investors own the dominant share of properties, including 84.1% of single-property portfolios. The 6-10 property tier is the only segment where companies own more than half of the assets (25 of 43 properties).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Iron County is highly concentrated, with two zip codes holding 86.7% of all investor-owned properties.
The 49935 zip code leads with 1,246 investor-owned homes (32.0% rate), followed by 49920 with 860 properties (30.6% rate). Some smaller areas show extreme penetration, like 49028, where 100% of properties are investor-owned.
Historical Transactions
Despite a recent freeze, landlords have historically been aggressive net buyers, with a 12.3x buy-to-sell ratio in 2024.
In 2024, landlords purchased 111 properties while selling only 9. This net buying trend continued into 2025 with 35 buys versus 8 sells before activity halted. There is no transaction data for institutional investors, as they have no presence in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor transaction share was 0% in the most recent quarter, as the market for acquisitions came to a standstill.
With zero total transactions involving landlords, there was no purchasing activity to analyze by tier. This applies to all investor sizes, from single-property owners to the largest portfolios in the county.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,430 SFRs in Iron County; individuals hold 84.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 31.7% share of the single-family residential market in Iron County, totaling 2,430 properties.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by private individuals, not corporations. Individual landlords own 2,064 SFRs, which constitutes 84.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 458 properties (18.8%) owned by companies.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash ownership. An astonishing 2,422 properties are owned outright, while only 8 are financed, indicating a low reliance on leverage and a highly capitalized investor base.

The entity count mirrors the property ownership split, with 2,745 individual landlords compared to 400 company landlords. This highlights a broad base of small-scale real estate investing rather than concentrated corporate ownership.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, with 2,393 of the 2,430 properties classified as rented, demonstrating the primary strategy for investors in Iron County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 16.6% premium over homeowners in Q2 2025, a reversal of typical discount trends.
Detailed Findings

Pricing dynamics in Iron County defy national trends, with landlords paying a significant premium in the most recent period with available data. In Q2 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was $137,533, which is 16.6% higher than the $117,932 paid by traditional homeowners.

This premium marks a sharp reversal from the prior quarter. In Q1 2025, landlord and homeowner prices were nearly at parity, with landlords paying an average of $136,741, a negligible 0.6% or $872 less than homeowners at $137,613.

It is critical to note that despite the existence of pricing data, transaction logs show zero properties were purchased by landlords in 2024 or 2025. This suggests the pricing may be based on models or a very small number of transactions not captured in the activity data, rather than a high-volume trend.

Historically, prices have risen significantly from the 2020-2023 average of $125,668, indicating overall market appreciation even as recent investor purchasing activity has stalled.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity in Iron County came to a complete halt, with 0% of market purchases in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity in Iron County has completely frozen. Landlords made zero purchases in the most recent quarter, accounting for 0.0% of all SFR sales in the market.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords, who constitute the entirety of the local market, acquired zero new properties.

Similarly, there was no purchasing from mid-size or institutional investors, reflecting a market-wide pause in acquisitions.

The data indicates no new landlords entered the market, as the single-property (Tier 01) category recorded zero new entities and zero property purchases.

This halt in purchasing stands in stark contrast to the significant existing portfolio of 2,430 investor-owned homes, signaling a major shift from accumulation to a holding pattern.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.4% of investor-owned SFRs in Iron County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Iron County is exclusively the domain of small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 99.4% of all investor-held SFRs, a near-total market dominance.

First-time or single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, holding 2,075 properties. This represents 83.5% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, demonstrating a highly fragmented ownership structure.

The remaining small landlord tiers are also significant. Two-property owners hold 7.0% of the portfolio, and those with 3-5 properties hold another 7.1%.

There is virtually no concentration of ownership in larger portfolios. Landlords with 11-50 properties collectively own just 0.6% of the investor-owned homes.

Institutional capital is completely absent from Iron County's SFR market. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds zero properties, reinforcing the local, small-scale nature of real estate investment here.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own the vast majority of properties, but companies take a 58.1% majority in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across nearly every portfolio size in Iron County. In the largest tier, single-property owners, individuals hold 1,814 properties (84.1%) compared to 344 for companies.

A notable exception to this pattern occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this level, companies become the majority owners, holding 25 properties, or 58.1% of the assets in that specific bracket, compared to 18 properties for individuals.

This crossover point suggests that as landlords scale beyond a handful of properties, incorporating becomes a more common strategy, though the overall number of properties in this tier remains small.

Even in the largest active tier (21-50 properties), individuals still maintain a two-thirds majority, owning 2 of the 3 properties in this category.

The data shows a clear market structure: individuals dominate entry-level and small portfolios, with a strategic shift towards corporate ownership for landlords managing a mid-sized 'mom-and-pop' portfolio.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Iron County is highly concentrated, with two zip codes holding 86.7% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration defines investor ownership in Iron County. Just two zip codes, 49935 and 49920, contain the vast majority of the rental housing stock, with 1,246 and 860 properties respectively.

Together, these two areas account for 2,106 of the 2,430 investor-owned SFRs in the county, representing an 86.7% share and indicating they are the primary targets for investment.

While concentration by count is high, some smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high rates of investor ownership. The 49028 zip code is 100.0% investor-owned, and 49967 has a 57.3% investor ownership rate, suggesting these may be vacation rental hotspots or areas with very low housing stock.

The top regions by property count, 49935 (32.0%) and 49920 (30.6%), also have high investor ownership rates, showing that primary investment hubs are heavily saturated.

This intense focus on a few key areas suggests that local market knowledge is a critical factor for successful real estate investor activity in Iron County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Despite a recent freeze, landlords have historically been aggressive net buyers, with a 12.3x buy-to-sell ratio in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Historically, landlords in Iron County have been overwhelmingly net buyers, aggressively expanding their portfolios. In 2024, the market saw 111 purchases by investors compared to only 9 sales, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 12-to-1.

This strong net accumulation trend carried into 2025, where landlords acquired 35 properties and sold just 8, resulting in a net gain of 27 properties for the year.

The most recent quarterly data shows a stark shift. In Q2 2025, landlords were still net buyers with 10 purchases against 2 sales, but this activity has since ceased entirely according to other datasets.

Given the complete absence of institutional investors (1000+ tier) in Iron County, all historical transaction activity is attributable to mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords.

This pattern of strong historical buying followed by a sudden stop suggests the market has entered a significant period of consolidation or caution among its base of small, local investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor transaction share was 0% in the most recent quarter, as the market for acquisitions came to a standstill.
Detailed Findings

In the most recent quarter, landlords represented 0.0% of all transactions in Iron County, as purchasing activity completely stopped.

The transaction freeze was consistent across all investor tiers. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own 99.4% of the rental stock, recorded zero transactions.

There was no inter-landlord trading activity, with 0% of transactions originating from other landlords, indicating a lack of portfolio churning or sales between investors.

Consequently, analysis of purchase price by tier is not possible, as there were no acquisitions to compare.

This halt in transactions is the most significant recent development, suggesting that local investors, despite being well-capitalized with cash-owned properties, are currently not finding opportunities that meet their criteria.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Iron County's investor market, 99.4% mom-and-pop owned and cash-heavy, hits pause on new acquisitions.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,430 single-family properties in Iron County, representing a 31.7% market share. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors who hold 84.9% of these properties, while companies own the remaining 18.8%.
Pricing
Pricing data shows landlords paid a 16.6% premium over homeowners in Q2 2025 ($137,533 vs $117,932), a reversal of typical trends, though this is based on models or low volume as recent investor buying activity was zero.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity in the most recent quarter was nonexistent, with landlords accounting for 0 properties and 0.0% of all SFR sales. No new single-property landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market, owning 99.4% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, capturing a 58.1% share at that specific size.
Transactions
While historically strong net buyers (111 buys vs 9 sells in 2024), landlords recorded zero transactions in the most recent quarter. The institutional net position is neutral, with zero activity recorded.
Market Narrative

In Iron County, Michigan, the single-family rental market is defined by a deep-rooted, small-scale investor base. Landlords own 2,430 properties, a significant 31.7% of the county's total SFR stock. This market is overwhelmingly driven by private individuals, who own 84.9% of the investor-held homes, compared to just 18.8% for companies. The structure is highly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 99.4% of the portfolio, while institutional capital is entirely absent.

Investor behavior in Iron County is characterized by a strong preference for cash and a recent, abrupt halt in acquisitions. An analysis of holdings shows that 2,422 of 2,430 properties are owned free and clear, signaling a highly capitalized and low-leverage environment. While historically aggressive net buyers, with a buy-to-sell ratio exceeding 12-to-1 in 2024, landlords made zero purchases in the most recent quarter. This pause comes after a period where pricing models showed landlords paying a premium over traditional homeowners, a departure from the norm.

The key takeaway from Iron County is a portrait of a hyper-local, cash-driven market that has reached a point of equilibrium or caution. The dominance of individual, small-scale landlords and the lack of institutional presence create a market insulated from broader corporate strategies. The current freeze in transactions, following years of steady accumulation, suggests that these local investors are now in a holding pattern, potentially waiting for more favorable pricing or market conditions before expanding their portfolios further.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 08:12 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Iron (MI)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Iron (MI) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mi-iron/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.