Murray (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Murray (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Murray (OK)
4,185
Total Investors in Murray (OK)
1,331
Investor Owned SFR in Murray (OK)
1,184(28.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,182
SFR Owned
936
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
149
SFR Owned
255
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,184 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Murray County with 93% Ownership, Securing 36.5% Purchase Discounts
Investors own 28.3% of single-family homes in Murray County, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 93.0% of that portfolio. In the most recent quarter, these investors demonstrated significant market leverage by purchasing properties at a 36.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners and remaining strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,184 SFRs, 28.3% of the market, with individuals holding a 79.1% majority.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (947) versus financed (237), a ratio of 4-to-1. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 1,150 of 1,184 properties (97.1%) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 36.5% less than homeowners, an average discount of $73,692 per property.
This massive discount represents extreme volatility, swinging from a 30.0% premium ($58,992) that landlords paid just one year prior in Q1 2025. The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been inconsistent, ranging from that premium to a discount of $106,842 in Q3 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 20.0% of all SFR properties sold in Murray County during Q4 2025.
Small mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these landlord purchases, with zero activity from institutional buyers. The quarter saw 2 new single-property landlords enter the market, acquiring 33.3% of all investor-purchased homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 93.0% of investor-owned SFRs in Murray County.
Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, alone owning 796 properties, which is 64.6% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, despite individuals dominating smaller portfolios.
In the single-property tier, individuals own a staggering 89.8% of the homes. This ownership share flips in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own a 59.2% majority, signaling a clear structural shift as portfolios expand.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with two zip codes, 73086 and 73030, holding 98.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
These two primary zip codes also exhibit very high investor ownership rates of 29.4% and 27.0%, respectively. While zip code 73444 has the single highest rate at 33.3%, it contains a negligible number of properties compared to the core investor submarkets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Murray County are strong net buyers, acquiring over six properties for every one they sold in 2025.
In 2025, investors purchased 67 SFRs while selling only 11, resulting in a net gain of 56 properties. This aggressive accumulation strategy continued a similar trend from 2024, when the buy-to-sell ratio was also above 6-to-1 (99 buys vs. 16 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 11.8% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, with all activity driven by small investors.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) conducted 100% of the 6 investor transactions. One of these deals was a landlord-to-landlord trade, which occurred in the 6-10 property tier at a price of $175,500.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,184 SFRs, 28.3% of the market, with individuals holding a 79.1% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Murray County, owning 1,184 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 28.3% of the total 4,185 SFRs in the market.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly composed of small, individual investors. Individuals own 936 properties, making up 79.1% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to 255 properties (21.5%) owned by companies.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. Landlords own 947 properties outright with cash, compared to just 237 that are financed, indicating a financially stable and low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,150 of the 1,184 properties (97.1%) being non-owner-occupied. This confirms a clear focus on generating rental income rather than short-term speculation.

On average, company landlords hold slightly larger portfolios (1.71 properties per entity) than individual landlords (0.79 properties per entity), reflecting a tendency to incorporate as portfolio size increases.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 36.5% less than homeowners, an average discount of $73,692 per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated remarkable purchasing power in Q1 2026, acquiring properties for an average price of $128,417. This was a substantial 36.5% less than the $202,109 paid by traditional homeowners, saving investors an average of $73,692 per home.

The pricing advantage for investors has been exceptionally volatile over the past year. The Q1 2026 discount is a dramatic reversal from Q1 2025, when landlords paid a 30.0% premium, or $58,992 more than homeowners, for properties.

This quarter-over-quarter fluctuation is significant. After paying a premium in Q1 2025, landlords secured a marginal 0.8% discount in Q2, which then ballooned to a 38.3% discount in Q3 before settling at the current 36.5% level.

The data indicates a market where investors can opportunistically acquire properties at deep discounts, but this advantage is not consistent. The shift from paying a premium to securing a major discount suggests a change in either inventory, deal-sourcing strategy, or negotiation power.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 20.0% of all SFR properties sold in Murray County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors were a significant force in the market, purchasing 6 of the 30 total SFRs sold, capturing a 20.0% market share of all acquisitions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, accounted for 100% of the 6 properties acquired by investors.

Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties had no purchasing activity in the county, underscoring the market's local, small-investor character.

The market continues to attract new entrants. Two new single-property landlords made their first purchases in Q4, representing a third of all active landlord entities and acquiring two of the six properties bought by investors.

Acquisition activity was distributed across the smallest tiers, with 2 properties bought by single-property landlords, 1 by a two-property landlord, 2 by landlords with 3-5 properties, and 1 by a landlord with 6-10 properties.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 93.0% of investor-owned SFRs in Murray County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Murray County is unequivocally dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 93.0% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

The market is highly fragmented, with the smallest tier of single-property landlords representing the largest single group. This tier alone accounts for 796 properties, or 64.6% of the total investor portfolio.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off sharply. Landlords with 2 properties hold 9.4% of the market, while those with 3-5 properties hold 12.9%.

Mid-size investors (11-1,000 properties) own the remaining 7.0% of the portfolio, highlighting a significant gap between the small landlord base and larger operators.

There is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier hold 0.0% of the market, reinforcing the narrative that this is a classic mom-and-pop rental market where deep local knowledge may be a competitive advantage. Finding these owners often requires access to detailed assessor data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, despite individuals dominating smaller portfolios.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes. While individuals own the vast majority of smaller portfolios, companies take control as landlords scale up.

Individuals overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 89.8% of single-property portfolios and 78.4% of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier. At this level, company ownership jumps to a 59.2% majority, while individual ownership falls to 40.8%. This suggests that landlords tend to incorporate their holdings for liability or financial reasons once they reach this size.

This trend continues into the next tier (11-20 properties), where companies maintain their majority with 52.1% of property ownership.

This data clearly illustrates the lifecycle of a growing real estate investor, beginning as an individual and formalizing into a corporate structure as their portfolio expands beyond a handful of properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with two zip codes, 73086 and 73030, holding 98.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Murray County is not evenly distributed; instead, it is highly concentrated in specific geographic pockets. Just two zip codes, 73086 and 73030, contain the vast majority of investment properties.

Together, these two areas account for a combined 1,163 of the 1,184 investor-owned SFRs in the county. This represents an astonishing 98.2% concentration, defining them as the clear nexus of rental activity.

Zip code 73086 is the epicenter, with 828 investor-owned properties and a high ownership rate of 29.4%. Following is 73030, with 335 properties and a 27.0% ownership rate.

While other zip codes show high percentage rates of investor ownership, their total property counts are minimal. For instance, 73444 has the highest rate at 33.3%, but this is based on a very small number of total homes, making it statistically less significant than the high-count, high-rate areas.

This geographic clustering indicates that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors like proximity to amenities, school districts, or established rental demand.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Murray County are strong net buyers, acquiring over six properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Transaction history reveals a clear and consistent strategy of portfolio growth among Murray County landlords. For the last several years, they have been aggressive net buyers of residential property.

In the full year of 2025, investors demonstrated a strong accumulation trend with 67 purchases against only 11 sales. This equates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.09x, meaning they acquired more than six homes for every one they sold.

This pattern was even more pronounced in 2024, which saw 99 landlord purchases and only 16 sales, for a net gain of 83 properties and a ratio of 6.19x.

While still in accumulation mode, the pace has moderated slightly in the most recent quarter. In Q1 2026, landlords bought 6 properties and sold 4, a ratio of 1.5x, which is significantly lower than prior years but still represents a net positive acquisition.

The consistent net buying behavior signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term hold strategy among the county's investor base.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 11.8% of all SFR transactions in Q1 2026, with all activity driven by small investors.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords participated in 6 of the 51 total single-family home transactions, accounting for an 11.8% share of market activity.

All investor-involved transactions were driven by mom-and-pop landlords. Tiers 01-04 were responsible for 100% of this activity, with zero transactions recorded by mid-size or institutional investors.

The data reveals some liquidity within the investor community itself. One of the six transactions (16.7%) was a landlord-to-landlord sale, where a landlord in the 6-10 property tier purchased a home from another investor.

Purchase prices varied significantly across the small tiers, though the low transaction volume makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions. The two purchases in the 3-5 property tier averaged just $67,500, while the single purchase in the 6-10 property tier was $175,500.

New, single-property landlords were the most active group by transaction count, making two purchases at an average price of $150,000, signaling continued new investment in the area.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Individual Investors Define Murray County's Market, Controlling 93% of Rentals and Buying at a 36.5% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 1,184 SFR properties in Murray County, representing 28.3% of the total market. Ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 936 of these homes (79.1%), compared to 255 (21.5%) held by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of $128,417, which is 36.5% less than the $202,109 paid by traditional homeowners, reflecting a significant discount of $73,692 per property.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 20.0% of all homes sold, with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 100% of this activity. The quarter also saw the entrance of 2 new single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 93.0% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, indicating a trend of incorporation as portfolios grow.
Transactions
Landlords are consistent net buyers, acquiring 6 properties for every 1 sold in 2025 (67 buys vs 11 sells). This trend continued in Q1 2026, though at a slower pace, with 6 buys and 4 sells. There was no institutional transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Murray County, Oklahoma, is defined by the overwhelming presence of small, individual investors. Landlords own 1,184 properties, a significant 28.3% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop operators (1-10 properties), who control 93.0% of all investor-owned homes, while large-scale institutional investors have zero footprint. The ownership structure leans heavily toward individuals (79.1%) over companies (21.5%), reinforcing the market's fragmented and locally-driven character.

Investor behavior reflects a confident, long-term strategy. In the most recent quarter, landlords demonstrated savvy purchasing by acquiring homes at a 36.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is part of a consistent accumulation trend; investors were strong net buyers over the past two years, acquiring more than six homes for every one they sold. This aggressive growth, detailed in similar Investor Pulse reports, is funded largely by cash, with four times as many properties owned outright as are financed, pointing to a financially resilient investor base.

The key takeaway from Murray County is the stability and dominance of the small landlord. The market operates almost entirely without institutional influence, creating an environment where local knowledge and deal-sourcing are paramount. The high concentration of investment in just two zip codes (73086 and 73030) suggests that while opportunities are abundant, they are geographically focused. For other investors, a granular property search is essential to identify similar pockets of opportunity in this classic mom-and-pop market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 01:17 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Murray (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Murray (OK) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ok-murray/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.