Clay (SD) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clay (SD) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clay (SD)
3,546
Total Investors in Clay (SD)
878
Investor Owned SFR in Clay (SD)
885(25.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
699
SFR Owned
575
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
179
SFR Owned
321
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 885 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Clay County, Owning 96.5% of Investor-Held SFRs
Investors own 25.0% of the Single-Family Residential market in Clay County, with individual, small-scale landlords making up the vast majority of activity. While historically net buyers, investor purchasing activity paused in the most recent quarter. Landlords who did purchase in the past year secured properties at significant discounts compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 885 SFR properties, with individuals holding a 65.0% majority share.
Investor portfolios are overwhelmingly owned with cash (810 properties) versus financing (75 properties). Individual landlords (699 entities) vastly outnumber company landlords (179 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 57.9% price discount versus homeowners in Q3 2025.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been highly variable, ranging from a 4.2% discount ($13,647) in Q1 2025 to a 57.9% discount ($105,800) in Q3 2025. Prices for investor acquisitions appear to have peaked in 2024 at $237,353 before settling to $231,071 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity halted, with 0 properties acquired in Q4 2025.
Landlords captured 0.0% of the market share for SFR purchases in the fourth quarter. Both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recorded zero acquisitions, reflecting a complete stop in transactional flow for investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.5% of investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, owning 543 properties, which is 59.4% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors with 1000+ properties have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 76.9% share.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 79.9% of single-property holdings and 59.4% of two-property portfolios. The crossover from individual to company majority occurs once a portfolio exceeds five properties.
Geographic Distribution
The 57069 zip code contains 75% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Clay County.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in the 57037 zip code at 47.9%, despite having a much smaller portfolio of 34 properties. In contrast, the top region by count, 57069, has a 24.0% ownership rate across its 664 properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Clay County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 12 properties and selling only 2 in Q2 2025.
This net-buyer trend has been consistent, with investors buying 57 properties versus selling 24 in 2024. For the full year of 2025, landlords added a net of 17 properties to their portfolios (21 buys vs. 4 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Mirroring purchase data, landlord transaction activity was zero in Q4 2025.
All investor tiers, from single-property to institutional, recorded zero transactions in the quarter. Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading, and the landlord share of all market transactions was 0.0%.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 885 SFR properties, with individuals holding a 65.0% majority share.
Detailed Findings

In Clay County, investors hold a significant 25.0% of the single-family residential market, totaling 885 properties out of 3,546 total SFRs.

Ownership is heavily skewed towards private individuals, who own 575 properties (65.0% of the investor portfolio), compared to 321 properties (36.3%) owned by companies. This pattern extends to the entities themselves, with 699 individual landlords comprising the market versus just 179 company landlords.

The financial structure of these holdings reveals a strong preference for liquidity and minimal leverage. A staggering 810 investor-owned properties are held with cash, while only 75 are financed, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The rental focus of these portfolios is clear, with 862 properties classified as rented. This high rental penetration underscores the primary business model for investors in the region.

The dominance of individual owners and cash-based holdings paints a picture of a market driven by local, financially stable real estate investing rather than large, leveraged institutions.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 57.9% price discount versus homeowners in Q3 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Clay County demonstrate a consistent ability to acquire properties below homeowner market rates, though the margin varies significantly. In Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $77,000, a steep 57.9% discount ($105,800) compared to the $182,800 paid by traditional homeowners.

This price advantage has been dynamic. The discount was smaller earlier in the year, at 30.8% ($91,230) in Q2 and just 4.2% ($13,647) in Q1 2025, suggesting that deal-finding opportunities may fluctuate wildly by quarter.

Longer-term price trends show significant appreciation since the pandemic era. The average acquisition price of $192,782 during 2020-2023 rose to $237,353 in 2024, before a slight moderation to $231,071 in 2025.

It is critical to note that despite the pricing data, property purchase counts for landlords were zero across all recent quarters of 2025, indicating a market pause or data lag. The pricing reflects underlying valuation models rather than active transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity halted, with 0 properties acquired in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In a stark shift from historical trends, landlord purchasing activity in Clay County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025. Investors acquired 0 of the 0 total SFR properties sold during the quarter, representing 0.0% of market activity.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), typically the most active segment, made zero purchases.

Likewise, institutional investors (1000+ properties) also recorded zero acquisitions, maintaining their non-existent presence in the county's transaction market.

The lack of new acquisitions indicates a potential market shift, where investors are either holding existing assets, waiting for better pricing, or facing a lack of desirable inventory.

This pause in buying contrasts with previous years' activity and will be a key trend to monitor for signs of market re-engagement or a prolonged investor retreat.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.5% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Clay County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively hold 96.5% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest single segment, owning 543 properties, or 59.4% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the accessible, ground-level nature of real estate investment in the area.

The remainder of the mom-and-pop category includes landlords with two properties (10.5%), 3-5 properties (15.2%), and 6-10 properties (11.4%).

Mid-size investors (11-100 properties) have a very small footprint, collectively owning just 3.5% of the portfolio. This group includes owners with 11-20 properties (2.1%), 21-50 properties (1.3%), and 51-100 properties (0.1%).

Notably, large-scale institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no presence in Clay County, owning 0.0% of the SFR rental market. This finding directly counters the narrative of corporate landlords taking over smaller markets.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 76.9% share.
Detailed Findings

While individuals own the majority of investor properties overall (65.0%), the ownership structure shifts decisively as portfolios grow. Companies become the dominant owner type for landlords holding 6-10 properties, controlling 80 properties (76.9%) in this tier.

This establishes a clear crossover point. Individual investors are the majority in smaller tiers, holding 79.9% of single-property portfolios (438 properties) and 59.4% of two-property portfolios (57 properties).

In the small landlord tier of 3-5 properties, ownership is nearly balanced, with individuals holding a slight majority at 56.8% (79 properties) compared to companies at 43.2% (60 properties).

This pattern suggests a strategic shift where investors incorporate as their holdings expand, likely for liability protection and operational efficiency.

The data reveals that while individuals are the entry point into the market, scaling investment activity is strongly correlated with adopting a corporate structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 57069 zip code contains 75% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Clay County.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Clay County is geographically hyper-concentrated. The zip code 57069 is the undisputed hub, containing 664 investor-owned properties, which accounts for 75% of the county's entire investor SFR portfolio.

While 57069 dominates by volume, the zip code 57037 has the highest penetration rate, with investors owning 47.9% of its housing stock (34 properties). This highlights the difference between areas with the most investor properties versus those where investors have the largest market share.

Other areas with significant investor ownership rates include 57073 (37.9%), 57072 (24.1%), and 57010 (22.2%), demonstrating that investor presence is felt strongly in several distinct communities.

The concentration in 57069 suggests a central hub for rental demand or investment opportunity that draws the vast majority of capital in the county.

This deep dive into local submarkets shows that overall county statistics can mask extreme variations at the neighborhood level. A comprehensive property search would reveal these granular differences.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Clay County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 12 properties and selling only 2 in Q2 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows that landlords in Clay County have been actively expanding their portfolios. They are decidedly net buyers, consistently acquiring more properties than they sell.

In the most recent active quarter, Q2 2025, investors demonstrated a 6-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, purchasing 12 SFRs while only disposing of 2, resulting in a net gain of 10 properties.

This accumulation strategy is a multi-year trend. Throughout 2024, landlords purchased 57 properties and sold 24, for a net increase of 33 properties. The trend continued through 2025, with a total of 21 buys against 4 sells.

This sustained net-positive acquisition activity signals strong confidence in the local rental market and a long-term hold strategy among the county's investor base.

No transaction data was available for institutional (1000+ tier) investors, aligning with their 0.0% ownership stake in the county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Mirroring purchase data, landlord transaction activity was zero in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 marked a period of inactivity for investor transactions in Clay County. Landlords were involved in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions, making their share of market activity 0.0%.

This pause was observed across the entire spectrum of investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who constitute the vast majority of owners, recorded no transactions during this period.

Similarly, institutional investors (Tier 09) also posted zero transactions, consistent with their lack of holdings in the county.

As a result of the halt in buying and selling, there was no inter-landlord trading activity. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%.

This transactional silence in the most recent quarter is a significant data point, suggesting a market-wide 'wait-and-see' approach among investors leading into the new year.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, local landlords control 96.5% of investor properties in Clay County, owning 25% of the total SFR market.
Holdings
Investors own 885 single-family residential properties in Clay County, representing 25.0% of the market. Individual investors hold the majority with 575 properties (65.0%), while companies own 321 (36.3%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, securing properties in Q3 2025 for 57.9% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $105,800 per property ($77,000 vs $182,800).
Activity
Recent investor purchase activity has halted, with 0 properties acquired by landlords in Q4 2025. This follows a more active 2024, when landlords purchased 57 properties.
Market Share
The market is definitively controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 96.5% of investor housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence with a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 76.9% of SFRs in that tier.
Transactions
Landlords are historically net buyers, with a 2.38x buy/sell ratio in 2024 (57 buys vs 24 sells). There is no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Clay County, South Dakota is characterized by a significant and highly concentrated investor presence. Landlords own 885 properties, a full 25.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly driven by local, private capital, as individual investors own 65.0% of these properties, and small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 homes) control a staggering 96.5% of the entire investor portfolio. In stark contrast, large-scale institutional investors have zero footprint here, highlighting a market structure built from the ground up by community members.

Investor behavior reflects a strategic and historically confident approach. Portfolios are predominantly owned with cash (810 of 885 properties), and landlords have consistently been net buyers, accumulating properties year over year. In 2024, for example, they purchased 57 homes while selling only 24. This activity, however, came to an abrupt halt in the latter half of 2025, with zero purchases recorded, signaling a potential shift in market dynamics or a temporary pause. When active, these investors secure significant discounts, paying up to 57.9% less than traditional homeowners in some quarters.

The key takeaway from this investor pulse is that Clay County is a quintessential mom-and-pop landlord market. The narrative of faceless corporations is absent; instead, the data reveals a landscape shaped by 878 local landlords, most of whom own just one or a few properties. While their recent pause in acquisitions is a critical trend to watch, their deep, cash-heavy, and geographically concentrated ownership solidifies their role as a fundamental and stable component of the local housing ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:20 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Clay (SD)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Clay (SD) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-sd-clay/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.