Greene (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Greene (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Greene (IL)
3,544
Total Investors in Greene (IL)
602
Investor Owned SFR in Greene (IL)
673(19.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
544
SFR Owned
598
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
58
SFR Owned
81
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 673 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Greene County's Investor Market: Dominated by Cash-Heavy Mom-and-Pops as Institutions Exit
Investors own 19.0% of SFRs in Greene County, with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling a massive 93.4% of that share. While these smaller investors were net buyers in 2025, institutional players were net sellers, and all purchasing activity abruptly halted in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 673 SFRs in Greene County, with individuals holding a dominant 88.9% share.
Cash is king, with 666 properties (98.9%) owned outright versus just 7 that are financed. A total of 649 properties in the investor portfolio are actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investor pricing reversed trends in Q3 2025, paying a 141.9% premium over homeowners.
The landlord-homeowner price gap swung dramatically, from a 54.0% landlord discount in Q1 to a $101,662 premium in Q3. This indicates highly variable purchasing behavior or very low transaction volumes skewing the averages.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlord purchasing activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded.
With no purchases by any buyer type, the landlord market share for Q4 was 0.0%. Both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers were completely inactive during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 93.4% of investor-held SFRs.
Institutional investors have a negligible presence, controlling just 0.1% of the market. Single-property landlords alone account for a majority 59.3% share with 431 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single investor tier.
Companies fail to achieve majority ownership at any portfolio size, holding just 9.7% in the 21-50 property tier. Individuals own 100% of portfolios in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
The 62092 zip code holds the most investor properties (181), but 62050 has the highest concentration (29.6%).
The top 5 zip codes by count include 62092, 62016, and 62082. The highest ownership rates are found in 62050 (29.6%), 62027 (27.7%), and 62054 (23.7%).
Historical Transactions
While landlords overall are strong net buyers, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025.
In 2025, all landlords bought 26 properties and sold 12, a net gain of 14. In contrast, the institutional tier bought 1 property and sold 2, signaling divestment.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord transaction activity ceased in Q4 2025, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded.
The landlord share of market transactions was 0.0% for the quarter. No activity was seen from any investor tier, including mom-and-pop or institutional.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 673 SFRs in Greene County, with individuals holding a dominant 88.9% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 19.0% share of the single-family residential market in Greene County, totaling 673 properties out of 3,544. This highlights a substantial presence in the local housing ecosystem, particularly for a rural county.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 598 properties, accounting for 88.9% of the investor-owned portfolio. Companies hold the remaining 81 properties (12.0%), making this a classic small-investor market.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, with 544 individual landlords compared to just 58 company landlords, a ratio of more than 9 to 1. This shows the granular nature of real estate investing in the area.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the near-total absence of financing. An overwhelming 98.9% of investor-owned properties (666 out of 673) are held in cash, with only 7 properties financed, suggesting investors are not heavily leveraged.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 649 of the 673 properties classified as rented, indicating a strong and established rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investor pricing reversed trends in Q3 2025, paying a 141.9% premium over homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing prices showed extreme volatility in 2025, culminating in a surprising reversal where landlords paid a 141.9% premium over traditional homeowners in Q3, averaging $173,302 compared to the homeowner price of $71,640.

This Q3 premium marks a stark departure from the preceding quarters. In Q1 2025, landlords secured a 54.0% discount ($50,200 vs. $109,075), and in Q2, they maintained a 30.6% discount ($68,900 vs. $99,244), suggesting a significant shift in acquisition strategy or market conditions.

The average acquisition price for landlords was on a sharp upward trajectory throughout 2025, rising from $50,200 in Q1 to $173,302 in Q3, a more than threefold increase in just two quarters.

The wide fluctuations in discounts and premiums, coupled with low transaction volumes, may indicate that a small number of atypical, high-value purchases by investors are skewing the quarterly averages significantly.

There was no recorded landlord or homeowner purchase activity in Q4 2025, bringing the year's activity to an abrupt halt after a volatile Q3.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlord purchasing activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchase activity in Greene County came to a complete standstill in the fourth quarter of 2025, with zero single-family residential properties acquired by landlords.

As a result, the landlord market share of all SFR purchases for the quarter was 0.0%, a stark drop from previous periods of activity.

This market freeze was universal across all investor types, with no new acquisitions from mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) or institutional-scale investors.

The lack of activity means no new landlords entered the market in Q4, and existing investors paused portfolio expansion entirely.

This complete cessation of purchasing contrasts sharply with the active, albeit volatile, acquisition patterns observed in the first three quarters of 2025, signaling a potential market shift or seasonal shutdown.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 93.4% of investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Greene County is overwhelmingly dominated by small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively control 93.4% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Single-property landlords are the backbone of the local rental market, owning 431 properties, which represents a 59.3% majority of the entire investor portfolio.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties have a minimal footprint, owning just 0.1% of the investor-held housing stock in the county.

Mid-size landlords are also a small fraction of the market, with those owning 11-50 properties controlling a combined 6.4% of the inventory (46 properties).

This ownership structure highlights a highly fragmented market, heavily reliant on small-scale, local investors rather than large, corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners across every single investor tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across every single portfolio tier in Greene County, underscoring their comprehensive control of the market.

Unlike in larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type. Even in the 21-50 property tier, individuals own 28 of the 31 properties (90.3%).

The highest concentration of company ownership is in the 2-property tier, where they hold 19.4% of properties (14 out of 70), which is still a distinct minority share.

In the small-medium tier of 11-20 properties, ownership is exclusively individual, with companies holding zero properties.

This data illustrates that corporate investment structures have not significantly penetrated Greene County's SFR market at any scale, reinforcing its character as a market driven by local individuals.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 62092 zip code holds the most investor properties (181), but 62050 has the highest concentration (29.6%).
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Greene County is concentrated in a few key areas, with the 62092 zip code leading in sheer volume, holding 181 investor-owned properties.

However, the highest market penetration is found elsewhere. The 62050 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 29.6%, indicating nearly one in three SFRs are investor-owned.

The top five regions by property count (62092, 62016, 62082, 62044, 62054) collectively represent the core of the county's investor activity.

There is a clear distinction between regions with high volume and high penetration. For example, 62092 has the most properties but a moderate 19.0% rate, while 62050 has a much higher rate but fewer properties overall.

Zip codes 62044 and 62082 appear in the top five for both count and percentage, making them hotspots for both the volume and density of rental properties.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
While landlords overall are strong net buyers, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Greene County have consistently been net buyers, accumulating properties throughout 2024 and 2025. In 2025, they acquired 26 properties while selling only 12, resulting in a net addition of 14 SFRs to their portfolios.

This trend of accumulation was even stronger in 2024, with 19 buys against only 2 sells for a net gain of 17 properties, demonstrating sustained portfolio growth.

However, institutional investors (1000+ tier) moved in the opposite direction. In 2025, this tier was a net seller, divesting from the market by selling two properties while only acquiring one.

The most active period of buying in 2025 was Q2, when landlords purchased 17 properties and sold 8, for a net gain of 9 properties in a single quarter.

This divergence in behavior, with smaller landlords accumulating inventory while the largest players sell, suggests differing market outlooks or strategies based on investor scale.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord transaction activity ceased in Q4 2025, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded.
Detailed Findings

Following an active year, transaction volume in Greene County's investor market fell to zero in the fourth quarter of 2025.

No landlord-involved transactions, either buys or sells, were recorded, resulting in a 0.0% market share for the quarter.

This inactivity was consistent across all portfolio sizes, from single-property owners to the largest institutional tier.

Consequently, there was no inter-landlord trading activity, and average purchase prices for all tiers were $0 for the quarter.

The complete halt in transactions suggests a market-wide pause, potentially due to seasonal factors, economic uncertainty, or a lack of available inventory meeting investor criteria.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command 93.4% of Greene County's market as institutional players become net sellers.
Holdings
Investors own 673 SFR properties, representing 19.0% of the market in Greene County. Individual investors dominate, holding 88.9% of these properties (598 homes) compared to 12.0% for companies (81 homes).
Pricing
Investor pricing behavior shifted dramatically in 2025, culminating in landlords paying a 141.9% premium over homeowners in Q3 ($173,302 vs. $71,640), a sharp reversal from discounts seen in Q1 and Q2.
Activity
Acquisition and transaction activity in the investor market came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords' share of purchases and sales dropping to 0.0%.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.4% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, a unique market structure where companies never gain a controlling share, even in larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords overall remained net buyers in 2025 (26 buys vs. 12 sells), but institutional investors were net sellers (1 buy vs. 2 sells), signaling a strategic divergence.
Market Narrative

In Greene County, the single-family rental market is fundamentally shaped by small, local participants. Investors own 673 homes, a significant 19.0% of the county's total SFR inventory. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 88.9% of these properties. The market structure is highly fragmented; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command a 93.4% share, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a barely visible 0.1% stake. This composition defines Greene County as a quintessential small-investor market, distinct from more corporate-heavy metropolitan areas.

The behavior of these investors reveals a bifurcated market. Overall, landlords were net buyers in 2025, adding a net of 14 properties to their portfolios. In contrast, the small institutional segment was a net seller, divesting from the area. Pricing was exceptionally volatile, with investors securing deep discounts in early 2025 before paying a massive 141.9% premium in Q3. This activity came to an abrupt stop in Q4 2025, as all purchasing and selling ceased, suggesting a market that is either highly seasonal or sensitive to external factors.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Greene County's rental market is driven by individuals operating on a small scale, often with cash. The market's stability rests on their confidence. The divergence between small investors buying and large investors selling, though small in scale, warrants observation. The complete halt in Q4 activity signals potential fragility, and the market's direction in 2026 will depend entirely on the return of these mom-and-pop buyers.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 03:54 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Greene (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Greene (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-il-greene/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.