Belknap (NH) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Belknap (NH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Belknap (NH)
24,053
Total Investors in Belknap (NH)
12,784
Investor Owned SFR in Belknap (NH)
8,600(35.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
11,135
SFR Owned
7,546
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,649
SFR Owned
1,666
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 8,600 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Belknap County, Acquiring 57.4% of Homes Amidst Strong Market Activity
In Belknap County, NH, investors own 8,600 Single-Family Residential properties, representing 35.8% of the total market. The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) holding 98.7% of the investor-owned housing. In the latest quarter, these investors were highly active, purchasing 57.4% of all homes sold and securing a 5.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while remaining aggressive net buyers with an 11.6 to 1 buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 8,600 SFR properties in Belknap County, with individual investors holding a commanding 87.7% share.
Within the investor portfolio, 5,434 properties are owned outright with cash, far outnumbering the 3,166 that are financed. The market consists of 12,784 distinct landlords, of whom 11,135 are individuals and 1,649 are companies. Nearly the entire portfolio (8,563 properties) is classified as non-owner-occupied, confirming a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 5.6% less than homeowners, securing a $31,725 average discount per property.
This Q1 discount marks a sharp reversal from 2025, when landlords paid significant premiums, including a 27.9% premium in Q2 and an 11.7% premium in Q3. The average landlord acquisition price of $534,339 in Q1 2026 is slightly above the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $531,182.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 58 of the 101 homes sold for a 57.4% market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these investor purchases, with no activity from institutional tiers. New, single-property investors were the most active, acquiring 54 of the 58 properties (93.1%) and representing 77 new entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.7% of investor-owned SFR housing, leaving virtually no room for institutional players.
Single-property landlords alone own 8,074 properties, accounting for 92.2% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier own just a single property, representing a negligible 0.0% market share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing 84.6% of holdings in that segment.
Despite this crossover, individuals dominate nearly every other tier, including holding 98.3% of properties in the 51-100 tier. In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 7,167 properties (83.3%) compared to 1,441 for companies.
Geographic Distribution
The 03810 zip code in Belknap County is an investor hotspot with a 62.5% ownership rate.
The 03253 zip code also shows significant investor concentration, with landlords owning 1,596 properties for a 47.0% market share. The 03254 zip code follows with a 50.0% investor ownership rate. Data for top regions by property count was not available.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Belknap County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 81 properties while selling only 7 in Q1 2026.
This net-positive trend has been consistent, with a 28.8-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (725 buys vs 25 sells) and an 18.4-to-1 ratio in 2024 (700 buys vs 38 sells). Data for institutional-level transactions was not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 54.4% of all Q1 2026 transactions, purchasing 81 of the 149 properties sold.
New, single-property investors drove this activity, accounting for 77 of the 81 landlord transactions. These new entrants are primarily buying from homeowners, with only 7.8% of their purchases sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 8,600 SFR properties in Belknap County, with individual investors holding a commanding 87.7% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant stake in Belknap County's housing market, owning 8,600 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 35.8% of the total 24,053 SFRs available. This high concentration indicates a mature rental market and significant real estate investing activity in the region.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 7,546 properties (87.7% of the investor portfolio), while company-owned properties number 1,666 (19.4%). This structure underscores a market dominated by local, smaller-scale landlords rather than large corporations.

The ownership composition is further reflected in the entity count, with 11,135 individual landlords compared to just 1,649 company landlords. This 6.7-to-1 ratio of individual to company entities highlights the granular nature of property investment in the county.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 5,434 properties (63.2%) held free and clear, compared to 3,166 properties (36.8%) that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less reliant on leverage.

The vast majority of the investor-owned portfolio, 8,563 properties, is designated as non-owner-occupied. This confirms that these properties are primarily serving as rentals, playing a crucial role in the local housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 5.6% less than homeowners, securing a $31,725 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, real estate investors in Belknap County purchased properties at an average price of $534,339, which is a 5.6% discount compared to the $566,064 paid by traditional homeowners. This price advantage translated to an average savings of $31,725 per acquisition for landlords.

This trend of securing discounts is a significant market shift from the previous year. In 2025, landlords consistently paid premiums over homeowners, such as in Q2 when they paid $548,587 versus the homeowner average of $428,994, a staggering 27.9% premium.

The purchasing power of investors appears to have strengthened recently, reverting from paying above-market prices to finding value. The slight $3,155 discount (0.5%) in Q1 2025 has widened considerably to the $31,725 discount seen in Q1 2026, signaling a change in market dynamics or investor strategy.

Comparing recent activity to historical prices, the Q1 2026 average of $534,339 shows modest appreciation from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $531,182. However, it represents a notable decrease from the peak prices seen in 2024 and 2025, which averaged $601,303 and $559,336 respectively.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 58 of the 101 homes sold for a 57.4% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the last reported quarter, with landlords acquiring 58 SFR properties, which represents a commanding 57.4% of the 101 total market sales. This high absorption rate demonstrates strong investor demand in Belknap County.

The market's activity is exclusively driven by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 100% of all investor purchases in the quarter, totaling 58 properties.

A significant influx of new investors entered the market, with the single-property tier accounting for 54 of the 58 acquisitions (93.1%). These purchases were made by 77 distinct entities, signaling a broad base of new market participants.

In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases. This further reinforces the narrative that Belknap County's investor landscape is defined by small-scale, local participants rather than large corporations.

The small landlord tier (3-5 properties) also showed some activity, with 2 entities purchasing 3 properties, while a single entity in the two-property tier acquired one home, rounding out the quarter's investor buying.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 98.7% of investor-owned SFR housing, leaving virtually no room for institutional players.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Belknap County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a combined 98.7% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that challenges the common narrative of corporate dominance in housing markets.

The single-property tier is the bedrock of the investor market, with 8,074 properties (92.2% of the total). This highlights the importance of first-time and small landlords in providing rental housing in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) hold a very small fraction of the market. The three tiers combined own just 114 properties, or 1.4% of the investor portfolio, indicating limited scaling beyond the mom-and-pop level.

Institutional ownership is practically non-existent. The 1,000+ property tier contains only one property in the entire county, accounting for 0.0% of investor-owned housing. This market has not attracted large-scale corporate investment.

The distribution is heavily skewed towards the smallest investors, with the two-property tier holding 4.2% (370 properties) and the 3-5 property tier holding 2.1% (187 properties). This granular ownership pattern suggests a highly fragmented and localized rental market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing 84.6% of holdings in that segment.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall market, companies establish a majority ownership stake starting in the 6-10 property tier. In this segment, companies own 11 properties, representing an 84.6% share compared to just 2 properties (15.4%) for individuals.

This crossover point appears to be an outlier, as individuals reassert dominance in larger tiers. Surprisingly, in the 51-100 property tier, individuals own 57 of 58 properties (98.3%), suggesting high-net-worth individuals are more prevalent than corporations at this scale.

In the foundational single-property tier, which comprises the bulk of the market, individuals hold a commanding 83.3% share with 7,167 properties. Companies own 1,441 properties (16.7%) in this entry-level segment.

The ownership split is most balanced in the 3-5 property tier, where individuals own 100 properties (50.5%) and companies own 98 properties (49.5%). This tier represents a transition point where investors may begin to formalize their holdings under a corporate structure.

In the two-property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority, owning 266 properties (70.0%) versus 114 (30.0%) for companies, reinforcing the pattern of individual control over smaller portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 03810 zip code in Belknap County is an investor hotspot with a 62.5% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Belknap County reveals specific zip codes with exceptionally high concentrations of investor ownership. The 03810 area stands out as a major hub for investors, where 62.5% of all SFR properties are landlord-owned.

Another key area for investment is the 03253 zip code, which has the highest raw count of investor-owned properties among the top regions with available data. In this area, landlords own 1,596 properties, translating to a 47.0% ownership rate.

The 03254 zip code also demonstrates a strong investor presence, with exactly half of its SFR housing stock (50.0%) owned by landlords. These high penetration rates point to neighborhoods that are likely dominated by rental properties.

While the top regions by investor count could not be fully determined due to missing data for some zip codes (03217, 03235, 03245), the available information clearly identifies southern and eastern parts of the county as focal points for investment.

The concentration of investor activity in these few zip codes suggests that landlords are targeting specific communities, which can have a significant impact on local housing market dynamics, from pricing to rental availability.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Belknap County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 81 properties while selling only 7 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Belknap County are in a strong accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, they were decisive net buyers, purchasing 81 SFR properties while only selling 7, resulting in a net gain of 74 properties to their portfolios.

This aggressive buying behavior is not a new phenomenon. The trend was even more pronounced throughout 2025, when landlords acquired 725 properties and sold just 25, an impressive 28.8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio for the full year.

The pattern of net accumulation extends back to 2024, a year in which investors bought 700 properties and sold 38. This consistent, multi-year trend of high-volume buying and low-volume selling indicates strong confidence in the local real estate market.

The second and third quarters of 2025 were particularly active periods of acquisition. Investors purchased 191 properties in Q2 and another 238 in Q3, while selling only 8 and 7 properties in those respective quarters.

There was no recorded transaction data for institutional investors (1,000+ tier), which aligns with their near-zero presence in the county's overall ownership. All transactional momentum is being driven by smaller, independent investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 54.4% of all Q1 2026 transactions, purchasing 81 of the 149 properties sold.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors were the most significant players in the Belknap County market, participating in 54.4% of all SFR transactions. Their 81 purchases out of a total of 149 sales underscore their role in driving market liquidity.

The vast majority of this activity came from new market entrants. Landlords in the single-property tier were responsible for 77 of the 81 investor transactions (95.1%), indicating a robust pipeline of new investors.

These new landlords are acquiring properties primarily from the general public, not from other investors. Only 6 of their 77 purchases (7.8%) were from another landlord, suggesting they are competing directly with traditional homebuyers for inventory.

Purchase prices varied across the active tiers. The small landlord tier (3-5 properties) paid the highest average price at $689,733. In contrast, new single-property landlords paid an average of $510,971, while the two-property tier acquired its single property for $435,000.

No transactions were recorded for institutional investors, reaffirming that the transactional market, like the ownership market, is entirely controlled by mom-and-pop investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Belknap County's Investor Market is Defined by Small Landlords Who Control 98.7% of Holdings and Drive 57% of Sales
Holdings
Investors own 8,600 SFR properties, representing 35.8% of Belknap County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling the portfolio at 87.7% (7,546 properties) compared to companies at 19.4% (1,666 properties).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured a 5.6% discount compared to homeowners, paying an average of $534,339 against the homeowner price of $566,064, a savings of $31,725 per property.
Activity
Landlords captured 57.4% of all Q4 2025 sales (58 purchases), with activity almost entirely driven by new investors, as 77 new single-property landlord entities entered the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the market with a 98.7% share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a statistically insignificant 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, where they control 84.6% of the properties in that specific segment.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with an 11.6x buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (81 buys vs 7 sells), confirming a clear strategy of portfolio expansion across the market.
Market Narrative

In Belknap County, NH, the property ownership landscape is defined by a deep and commanding presence of small, individual investors. They own 8,600 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, a significant 35.8% of the total housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly comprised of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 98.7% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors have virtually no footprint, owning just a single property. The portfolio is largely held by individuals (87.7%) rather than companies (19.4%), reinforcing the local, fragmented nature of real estate investment in the area.

Investor behavior in Belknap County is characterized by aggressive acquisition and strategic purchasing. In the most recent quarter of activity, landlords bought 57.4% of all homes sold, with new, single-property investors accounting for 93% of those purchases. This signals a healthy and expanding base of new market participants. These investors demonstrated keen purchasing ability in Q1 2026, securing properties at a 5.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This is a sharp reversal from 2025, when they often paid premiums. Furthermore, landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers with an 11.6-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in the first quarter.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the Belknap County housing market is heavily influenced by a large, active, and growing contingent of small-scale landlords. They are not only the primary owners of rental housing but also the most active buyers, competing directly with homeowners and shaping market liquidity. The lack of institutional presence suggests the market's character is likely to remain localized, with investment trends dictated by thousands of individual decisions rather than a few corporate strategies. This dynamic creates a competitive environment for all buyers and a robust rental market for residents.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:43 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Belknap (NH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Belknap (NH) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nh-belknap/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.