Macon (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Macon (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Macon (NC)
20,213
Total Investors in Macon (NC)
10,905
Investor Owned SFR in Macon (NC)
8,646(42.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
9,380
SFR Owned
7,244
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,525
SFR Owned
1,659
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 8,646 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Macon County with 99% Ownership, Paying Nearly 50% More Than Homeowners
Investors own 42.8% of single-family homes in Macon County, NC, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling an astounding 99.2% of that portfolio. In a highly unusual market dynamic, investors paid a 48.8% premium over homeowners in Q1. Activity remains high, with landlords acting as aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9.7 properties for every one they sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 42.8% of SFRs in Macon County, with individuals holding 83.8% of the 8,646 properties.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties were purchased with cash (6,751) versus financing (1,895). The portfolio is intensely rental-focused, with 99.1% of properties (8,565) classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 48.8% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $176,113 more per property.
This premium is a persistent and pronounced trend, reaching as high as 76.9% ($308,521) in Q3 2025. This behavior contrasts sharply with the common investor strategy of acquiring properties at a discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured a commanding 46.5% share of all SFR purchases in the market's most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) were the primary drivers of this activity, accounting for 96.4% of all landlord acquisitions. In contrast, institutional investors represented only 1.2% of purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords with 1-10 properties control an overwhelming 99.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 5 properties, or 0.1% of the investor market. Single-property landlords alone own 84.5% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners once a portfolio size reaches the 6-10 property tier.
While individuals dominate smaller tiers, owning 83.2% of single-property portfolios, companies control 56.8% of the 6-10 property tier and 64.9% of the 11-20 tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is intensely concentrated, with the 28775 zip code reaching a 64.2% penetration rate.
Two zip codes, 28775 (64.2%) and 28741 (64.1%), show investor ownership rates above 64%. The 28734 zip code has the highest raw count of investor properties at 4,304.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9.7 times more properties than they sold in Q1 2026.
In Q1, landlords purchased 107 SFRs while selling only 11. This strong net buying trend is consistent, with a 10x buy-to-sell ratio for all of 2025 (581 buys vs 58 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 39.8% of all property transactions in Q1, purchasing 107 SFRs.
Institutional buyers demonstrated a sharp pricing advantage, paying 50.2% less than single-property landlords in Q1 ($237,600 vs $476,890). Inter-investor trades were infrequent for new entrants (2.3%).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 42.8% of SFRs in Macon County, with individuals holding 83.8% of the 8,646 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership has a significant footprint in Macon County, with landlords holding 8,646 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 42.8% of the total 20,213 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is dominated by 9,380 individual landlords who collectively own 7,244 properties, representing 83.8% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, 1,525 company landlords own the remaining 1,659 properties (19.2%).

The ratio of individual to company landlords is over 6-to-1, highlighting the grassroots nature of real estate investing in this region.

Cash is the preferred method for acquisitions. The data shows 6,751 properties are owned outright, more than triple the 1,895 properties that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, with 8,565 of the 8,646 properties being rented. This 99.1% rental rate underscores the market's function as a significant source of rental housing supply.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 48.8% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $176,113 more per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking deviation from national trends, landlords in Macon County paid significantly more than traditional homeowners in 2026-Q1. The average landlord acquisition price was $537,074, a 48.8% premium over the homeowner average of $360,961.

This is not a one-time anomaly but a consistent pattern. In Q3 2025, landlords paid a 76.9% premium ($709,513 vs. $400,992), and in Q2 2025, they paid a 50.4% premium ($590,253 vs. $392,412).

The data suggests investors in this market may be targeting higher-value properties or are operating in a highly competitive environment that erodes typical pricing advantages.

Despite the high premiums, overall price appreciation is evident. The average landlord acquisition price of $537,074 in Q1 2026 is a notable increase from the 2020-2023 average of $501,670.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured a commanding 46.5% share of all SFR purchases in the market's most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor demand remains robust, with landlords purchasing 79 of the 170 SFR properties sold in the last quarter, capturing 46.5% of the total market volume.

The bulk of this activity came from the smallest investors. Single-property landlords alone acquired 65 properties, which is 78.3% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

A wave of new entrants is visible, with 85 distinct entities making their first SFR purchase. This indicates a healthy and growing base of small-scale investors.

Activity from larger investors was minimal. Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) and institutional investors (1000+) each acquired just a single property, underscoring their limited role in this market's transaction volume.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords with 1-10 properties control an overwhelming 99.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Macon County is almost entirely composed of small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties hold a combined 99.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the foundation of the market, holding 7,478 properties, which accounts for 84.5% of the total investor portfolio.

The 'missing middle' is pronounced, as landlords in the 11-1000 property tiers collectively own less than 1% of investor-held housing stock.

Institutional capital has virtually no presence. With just 5 properties, the 1000+ tier owns only 0.1% of the market, which defies the common narrative of large corporate ownership in the rental space.

This distribution highlights a market characterized by widespread, decentralized ownership rather than consolidation by large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners once a portfolio size reaches the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual ownership is the standard for new and small investors. Individuals own 83.2% of properties in the single-property tier and 77.3% in the two-property tier.

A distinct crossover point appears at the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership (56.8%) surpasses individual ownership (43.2%) for the first time.

This trend toward incorporation accelerates as portfolios expand. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own nearly two-thirds of the properties (64.9%).

This pattern suggests a common business lifecycle for investors in Macon County, where they tend to form a legal entity for liability and management purposes as their portfolio grows beyond five properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is intensely concentrated, with the 28775 zip code reaching a 64.2% penetration rate.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals hyper-concentrated pockets of investor ownership. In the 28775 zip code, nearly two out of every three SFRs (64.2%) are investor-owned.

The 28741 zip code shows similar saturation, with a 64.1% investor ownership rate. These extremely high rates suggest these areas are primary targets for rental property investment.

There is a clear distinction between the areas with the highest investor count and those with the highest rate. The 28734 zip code contains the most investor properties by volume (4,304) but has a much lower saturation rate of 33.6%.

This data indicates different market dynamics across the county, with some zip codes being saturated with investors while others simply have a larger overall housing stock that attracts more investors in absolute numbers.

Five zip codes in the county have investor ownership rates at or above 50%, a remarkably high level of concentration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 9.7 times more properties than they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Macon County are in a clear accumulation phase. In the first quarter of 2026, they purchased 107 properties and sold only 11, resulting in a net gain of 96 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.73.

This behavior is not a recent shift. The trend was even stronger throughout 2025, when landlords acquired 581 properties and sold just 58, a ratio of 10-to-1.

The consistent, high-volume net buying activity over the past two years signals strong confidence in the local market among investors.

Data on institutional-level transactions was not available, so it is unclear if larger investors share the same bullish outlook as the broader market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 39.8% of all property transactions in Q1, purchasing 107 SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investors are a primary driver of market activity, participating in 107 of the 269 total SFR transactions in Q1, a market share of 39.8%.

A dramatic pricing gap exists between the smallest and largest investors. The average purchase price for a single-property landlord was $476,890, while the institutional tier paid an average of just $237,600 for its acquisition.

This 50.2% discount for the institutional buyer suggests a strategy focused on different asset types, off-market acquisitions, or superior negotiating power.

The market for new investors is not primarily sourced from other landlords. Only 2.3% of purchases made by single-property landlords came from an existing investor, indicating they are mostly buying from homeowners.

In contrast, more established small investors (two-property tier) are more active in the investor-to-investor market, with 20% of their purchases coming from other landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Macon County with 99% Ownership, Paying Nearly 50% More Than Homeowners
Holdings
Landlords own 8,646 SFR properties, representing a high 42.8% of the market in Macon County, NC. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals at 83.8% (7,244 properties) compared to companies at 19.2% (1,659 properties).
Pricing
In a highly unusual trend, landlords paid a 48.8% premium over traditional homeowners in Q1, averaging $537,074 per property compared to the homeowner price of $360,961.
Activity
Investor activity is strong, with landlords acquiring 46.5% of all SFRs sold last quarter. This influx was led by 85 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.2% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear shift occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners with a 56.8% share.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive accumulators with a 9.73x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (107 buys vs 11 sells). Institutional net position is unknown due to lack of historical sales data.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Macon County, NC is characterized by an exceptionally high degree of investor penetration and is overwhelmingly dominated by small, individual landlords. Investors own 8,646 SFR properties, a 42.8% share of the entire market. This portfolio is controlled by a vast base of local players, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 99.2% of investor-held homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a negligible footprint of just 0.1%. Ownership is primarily individual-based (83.8%), though investors tend to incorporate as their portfolios grow beyond five properties.

Recent market activity shows these small investors are aggressively expanding their holdings. Landlords were responsible for 46.5% of all SFR purchases last quarter and are strong net buyers, acquiring 9.7 properties for every one sold in Q1. In a surprising local dynamic that defies national norms, these investors are paying a premium, averaging 48.8% more than traditional homeowners in Q1. This may indicate a focus on high-value properties or intense competition for available inventory. While the smallest landlords pay the highest prices, institutional buyers demonstrate significant pricing power, securing properties at a 50.2% discount compared to new entrants.

The key takeaway from this market report is that Macon County operates as a landlord's market driven by grassroots capital, not corporate investment. The high ownership rates, some exceeding 64% in certain zip codes, and the persistent net-buying behavior signal strong local confidence. The unusual price premium paid by investors warrants further analysis but suggests a unique, highly competitive environment where access to rental-capable housing commands a significant cost. For homeowners, this means competing with a large, well-capitalized base of local investors for nearly half of the properties that come to market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:42 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Macon (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Macon (NC) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nc-macon/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.