McIntosh (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McIntosh (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McIntosh (ND)
1,085
Total Investors in McIntosh (ND)
638
Investor Owned SFR in McIntosh (ND)
495(45.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
587
SFR Owned
452
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
51
SFR Owned
52
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 495 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

McIntosh County: A Hyper-Local Market Dominated by Individual Investors Owning 45.6% of Homes
In McIntosh County, investors own 495 single-family properties, representing a significant 45.6% of the market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals (91.3%) and small mom-and-pop landlords (97.8%), with zero institutional presence. In the latest quarter, these local investors were highly active, purchasing 83.3% of all homes sold while being strong net buyers throughout the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 495 homes, with individuals holding 91.3% of the portfolio.
Cash is the dominant financing method, used for 448 properties compared to just 47 financed. The portfolio is clearly investment-focused, with 491 of the 495 properties (99.2%) being rented or non-owner-occupied. There are 587 individual landlords compared to just 51 company entities.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired property at a 36.5% discount to homeowners in Q1 2026.
The price gap is extremely volatile, swinging from a 120.1% landlord premium in Q3 2025 to the current 36.5% discount, likely due to low transaction volumes. In Q1 2026, this translated to a $27,342 savings for landlords, who paid an average of $47,658 versus the homeowner price of $75,000.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 83.3% of all properties sold.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of these landlord purchases. The activity was led by new investors, with four single-property landlords entering the market, acquiring 80.0% of the investor-bought homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors control a near-total 97.8% of landlord-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 416 properties, a commanding 82.9% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors in the 1000+ property tier have absolutely no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own property across all investor tiers, with no company ownership above the 2-property tier.
Companies own just 10.9% of single-property portfolios and 15.8% of two-property portfolios. In every tier with 3 or more properties, individual ownership is 100%. This shows companies play only a minor, entry-level role in the county.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 58413 zip code holding 267 properties.
This single zip code, 58413, accounts for 54% of all investor-owned properties in McIntosh County. Investor ownership rates are extremely high across the board, with three of the top five zip codes showing over 50% of homes owned by investors.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 32 properties while selling only 1 in 2025.
This net buyer trend has been consistent, with 28 properties bought versus 4 sold in 2024. The data shows a strong pattern of portfolio accumulation among the county's investors. There is no institutional transaction data, aligning with their zero ownership.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 83.3% of all Q4 2025 transactions, buying 5 of 6 homes sold.
All transactions were driven by mom-and-pop tiers, with zero institutional activity. Notably, none of the investor purchases in the quarter were from other landlords, suggesting investors are acquiring properties from homeowners or other non-investor sellers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 495 homes, with individuals holding 91.3% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In McIntosh County, North Dakota, investors hold a substantial 495 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 45.6% of the county's total 1,085 SFRs. This high penetration rate indicates a market with significant real estate investing activity.

The ownership structure is overwhelmingly dominated by individual landlords, who own 452 properties, or 91.3% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company investors hold a much smaller stake with 52 properties (10.5%), highlighting the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local market.

By entity count, the disparity is even more pronounced. There are 587 individual landlords operating in the county, compared to only 51 company landlords. This 11.5-to-1 ratio of individuals to companies reinforces that the market is driven by small-scale, local participants rather than large corporations.

Cash is the preferred acquisition method. A remarkable 448 investor-owned properties were purchased with cash, while only 47 are financed. This suggests a market of financially stable investors who are not heavily reliant on leverage.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental purposes, with 491 of the 495 properties (99.2%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This signals a clear focus on generating rental income rather than speculative flipping or personal use.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired property at a 36.5% discount to homeowners in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords in McIntosh County paid an average price of $47,658, which is 36.5% less than the $75,000 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a significant price advantage of $27,342 per property for investors in the most recent quarter.

However, the pricing dynamics in this low-volume market are highly volatile. The Q1 discount is a sharp reversal from previous quarters. For example, in Q3 2025, landlords paid a staggering 120.1% premium ($159,300 vs $72,389), and in Q2 2025, they paid a 33.3% premium ($69,967 vs $52,500).

This quarter-to-quarter volatility suggests that average prices are heavily influenced by the specific type and condition of the few properties transacted, rather than a stable market-wide trend. The small number of sales makes the "average" price susceptible to outliers.

Comparing broader timeframes, the average landlord acquisition price has fluctuated, with an average of $64,738 during the 2020-2023 period and $82,774 for the full year of 2024. The low transaction count makes it difficult to establish a clear long-term appreciation trend from this data.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 2025 activity, purchasing 83.3% of all properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the fourth quarter of 2025, with landlords acquiring 5 of the 6 total SFR properties sold in McIntosh County. This represents a commanding 83.3% market share of all purchases for the period, indicating investors were the primary buyers.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from mom-and-pop landlords (those owning 1-10 properties), who accounted for 100% of investor acquisitions. There was zero purchasing activity from mid-size or institutional investors, reinforcing the local nature of the market.

New entrants drove the market activity. Four of the five properties purchased by investors were acquired by new single-property landlords. These four new entities made up 80.0% of all landlord acquisitions, signaling a growing base of small-scale investors.

The remaining 20.0% of purchases were made by one entity in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), which acquired a single property. This concentration of activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum is a defining characteristic of the county's market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors control a near-total 97.8% of landlord-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in McIntosh County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 97.8% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that showcases an almost complete absence of larger players.

The concentration is most extreme at the entry level. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the backbone of the market, owning 416 properties. This single tier accounts for a staggering 82.9% of the entire investor-owned housing stock in the county.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off dramatically. Landlords with two properties hold 7.4% of the stock, while those with 3-5 properties hold 7.2%. There is no significant ownership beyond the 11-20 property tier.

Confirming the hyper-local market structure, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have zero footprint in McIntosh County. Their market share is 0.0%, a stark contrast to narratives of corporate landlord takeovers seen in other regions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individuals own property across all investor tiers, with no company ownership above the 2-property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the sole drivers of portfolio growth in McIntosh County's real estate market. In every single investor tier, individuals hold the majority of properties, and for tiers of 3 properties or more, they represent 100% of ownership.

Companies have a very limited and targeted presence, appearing only at the smallest scale. They own 46 properties (10.9%) in the single-property tier and 6 properties (15.8%) in the two-property tier. There is no evidence of companies scaling up their operations in this market.

The data shows a clear crossover point where company ownership ceases entirely. Once an investor portfolio reaches 3 or more properties, it is exclusively held by individuals. This indicates that the local market structure does not support or attract corporate growth strategies.

Even the largest investor portfolios in the county, such as the 11-20 property tier, are 100% owned by individuals. This pattern confirms that the investor base is composed of local residents and small operators rather than formalized corporate entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 58413 zip code holding 267 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in McIntosh County is geographically concentrated, with the 58413 zip code serving as the epicenter. This area alone contains 267 investor-owned properties, which is more than half (53.9%) of the county's entire investor portfolio.

The investor penetration rate is remarkably high across the county. The top three zip codes by ownership percentage are 58581 (57.5%), 58460 (51.4%), and 58413 (51.3%), all of which have a majority of their SFR properties owned by investors.

Following the top region, the 58495 zip code holds the second-highest count of investor properties at 158, with a significant ownership rate of 36.3%. This demonstrates that while activity is concentrated, high investor presence is a county-wide phenomenon.

The data reveals a strong correlation between the areas with the highest count of investor properties and the highest ownership rates. Unlike in larger metro areas, in McIntosh County the places where investors own the most homes are also the places where they dominate the local housing market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 32 properties while selling only 1 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in McIntosh County are in a clear accumulation phase, consistently acting as strong net buyers. Throughout 2025, landlords purchased 32 SFR properties while selling only 1, resulting in a net gain of 31 properties to their portfolios and a 32-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This aggressive buying pattern is not a new development. In 2024, investors followed a similar strategy, acquiring 28 properties and selling only 4, for a net gain of 24 properties. The consistent, high-volume buying relative to selling points to long-term confidence in the local rental market.

The most recent quarterly data from Q3 2025 continues this trend, with 16 properties purchased and only 1 sold. This demonstrates that the momentum of portfolio growth has remained strong through the most recent periods with transaction data.

Given that institutional investors have no holdings in McIntosh County, all transaction activity is driven by the smaller mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords. Their collective behavior indicates a market characterized by sustained acquisition and portfolio expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 83.3% of all Q4 2025 transactions, buying 5 of 6 homes sold.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlord transactions represented the vast majority of market activity in McIntosh County. Investors were involved in 5 of the 6 total SFR transactions, capturing an 83.3% share of the market's sales volume.

The transaction activity was exclusively concentrated among the smallest investors. The single-property tier was most active, with 4 transactions, while the small landlord tier (3-5 properties) conducted 1 transaction. There were no transactions by institutional investors.

Interestingly, 0% of the properties purchased by investors in Q4 were acquired from other landlords. This indicates that investors are expanding their portfolios by purchasing from the general market, such as traditional homeowners, rather than trading assets among themselves.

There was a notable price difference between the tiers active in Q4. New single-property investors paid an average of $52,073, while the small landlord in the 3-5 property tier acquired their property for $30,000. This could reflect differences in property type, condition, or negotiation strategy between new and slightly more experienced local investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual investors dominate McIntosh County, owning 45.6% of all SFR homes with zero institutional competition.
Holdings
Landlords own 495 SFR properties in McIntosh County, representing 45.6% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 452 properties (91.3%), compared to just 52 (10.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of $47,658, which is 36.5% less than the $75,000 paid by traditional homeowners, a discount of $27,342 per home.
Activity
Investors were the primary buyers in Q4 2025, purchasing 5 of the 6 homes sold for an 83.3% market share. This activity was driven entirely by new and small investors, with 4 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 97.8% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a 0.0% market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, while company ownership is nonexistent in portfolios of 3 or more properties. This signals a market driven exclusively by personal holdings, not corporate entities.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers, with a 32-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (32 buys vs 1 sell), consistently expanding their local portfolios. Institutional investors are not a factor, showing no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in McIntosh County, North Dakota is characterized by an exceptionally high concentration of investor ownership, driven almost exclusively by local, small-scale individuals. Investors own 495 single-family properties, a remarkable 45.6% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. The ownership structure is not corporate; it's personal. Individual landlords own 452 (91.3%) of these homes, while mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) collectively control 97.8% of the investor-owned market. Institutional investors have zero presence, making this a true Main Street-driven rental market.

Investor behavior reflects a strategy of aggressive accumulation. In the most recent quarter with activity (Q4 2025), landlords purchased 83.3% of all homes sold, with new single-property landlords leading the charge. This buying is done at a significant advantage; in Q1 2026, investors paid 36.5% less than traditional homeowners. This pattern of net buying is a long-term trend, as investors bought 32 properties while selling only one in 2025, consistently expanding their holdings in the county.

The key takeaway from McIntosh County is the profound impact a dedicated base of individual investors can have on a rural market. With nearly half the homes owned by landlords and high ownership rates exceeding 50% in key zip codes, this is a market shaped by rental demand and local capital. The absence of institutional players underscores that in many parts of the country, the primary force in the single-family rental space remains the individual 'mom-and-pop' investor, a trend detailed in our wider market reports.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:06 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography McIntosh (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 McIntosh (ND) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nd-mcintosh/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.