Bonneville (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bonneville (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bonneville (ID)
35,612
Total Investors in Bonneville (ID)
4,684
Investor Owned SFR in Bonneville (ID)
4,194(11.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,950
SFR Owned
3,115
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
734
SFR Owned
1,161
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,194 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Bonneville County, Owning 94.4% of Rental Homes and Buying at a 14.3% Discount
In Bonneville County, investors own 4,194 SFR properties, representing 11.8% of the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 94.4% of this portfolio, compared to just 0.1% for institutional investors. In Q1 2026, landlords remained net buyers and purchased properties at a 14.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,194 SFR properties in Bonneville County, with individuals holding 74.3%.
Of the investor-owned properties, 2,663 were purchased with cash, significantly outnumbering the 1,531 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 4,029 properties (96.1%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 14.3% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $59,331 per property.
The price gap has narrowed significantly from a year ago when landlords enjoyed a 25.0% discount in Q1 2025. This trend suggests increasing competition for properties in the market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 11.7% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 89.6% of all investor purchases, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions. During the quarter, 29 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own 94.4% of all investor-held SFRs.
This share overwhelmingly dwarfs the institutional tier (1,000+ properties), which controls a mere 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock. Single-property landlords alone account for 62.4% of all investor-owned homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a key crossover point.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 83.6% of single-property rentals, companies control 53.9% of portfolios in the 6-10 property range. In the largest tier (101-1000), company ownership skyrockets to 92.0%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83428 zip code at 51.9% ownership.
While the 83401 zip code has the highest total count of investor properties at 1,279, its 10.4% ownership rate is far lower than more saturated areas. The top five zip codes by ownership percentage all have rates above 15.8%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Bonneville County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 2.25 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1.
This trend of accumulation has been consistent, with landlords buying 334 properties and selling only 96 in 2024. Institutional investors, though small, are also net buyers, acquiring 8 properties while selling only 1 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 9.5% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
Single-property landlords were the most active, accounting for 29 transactions and paying the highest average price at $379,177. In contrast, large landlords (101-1000 properties) sourced 100% of their two acquisitions from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,194 SFR properties in Bonneville County, with individuals holding 74.3%.
Detailed Findings

In Bonneville County, investors hold a total of 4,194 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 11.8% of the total 35,612 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a significant, yet not overwhelming, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors are the primary drivers of the rental market, owning 3,115 properties, or 74.3% of the total investor portfolio. Companies own the remaining 1,161 properties (27.7%), indicating that the market is defined by smaller-scale real estate investing rather than large corporate ownership.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly focused on generating rental income, with 4,029 properties (96.1%) currently rented. This high rental concentration underscores the role these properties play in supplying housing for the local community.

When analyzing financing, cash is the preferred method for acquisitions. Investors own 2,663 properties outright, compared to 1,531 that carry a mortgage. This 1.7-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio suggests that many investors have significant capital and are less reliant on leverage.

The market structure consists of 4,684 distinct landlord entities, with individual landlords (3,950) outnumbering company landlords (734) by more than five to one. This further reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' character of Bonneville County's investor landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 14.3% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $59,331 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors in Bonneville County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $354,241 while traditional homeowners paid $413,572. This represents a substantial 14.3% discount, saving investors an average of $59,331 on each purchase.

This price gap, while still significant, has tightened considerably over the past year. In Q1 2025, landlords secured an even larger 25.0% discount ($103,570). The narrowing gap indicates that the market is becoming more competitive, reducing the pricing power investors previously held.

The trend of a shrinking discount continued throughout 2025, moving from 25.0% in Q1 to 16.6% in Q2 and just 8.6% in Q3. The rebound to a 14.3% discount in the latest quarter suggests a potential stabilization of this dynamic.

Examining longer-term price appreciation, the average investor acquisition price in 2024 was $400,325. This highlights the volatility in quarterly pricing, as the Q1 2026 average of $354,241 is lower than the annual average from two years prior.

This consistent ability to purchase below the homeowner average suggests investors are targeting different types of properties or are more effective at negotiation, perhaps using tools like an automated valuation (AVM) to identify undervalued assets.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 11.7% of all SFR properties sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors purchased 46 of the 394 SFR properties sold in Bonneville County, capturing 11.7% of the total market activity. This level of activity highlights a steady and continued interest from investors in expanding their local portfolios.

The purchasing activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 43 of the 46 investor purchases, representing a dominant 89.6% share of acquisition volume.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made no purchases in Bonneville County during the quarter. This zero-activity level underscores their minimal impact on the local market, which is defined by smaller players.

New market entrants were a significant force, with 29 new landlords making their first rental property purchase. These single-property owners acquired 24 homes, accounting for 50.0% of all properties bought by investors in Q4.

The data reveals a clear pattern: the lifeblood of investor activity in Bonneville County is not large corporations, but new and existing small landlords building their portfolios one or two properties at a time, often using a property search platform to find opportunities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) own 94.4% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor properties in Bonneville County is heavily concentrated at the small-scale level. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 94.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 2,751 properties. This represents 62.4% of the entire investor portfolio, highlighting the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors in providing rental housing.

Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible footprint in the county. Their portfolio of just 4 properties amounts to only 0.1% of the investor market, challenging any narrative of a corporate takeover of local housing.

The mid-size landlord category (11-1,000 properties) collectively owns the remaining 5.5% of the portfolio. This segment, while larger than the institutional tier, still plays a minor role compared to the thousands of small landlords.

This distribution, detailed in our property ownership by owner type report, confirms that market power is highly decentralized and lies firmly in the hands of local and small-scale operators.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a key crossover point.
Detailed Findings

A clear trend emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across portfolio sizes: individuals dominate smaller tiers, while companies control larger ones. Individual landlords own 83.6% of single-property portfolios and 71.2% of two-property portfolios.

The market reaches a critical inflection point in the 6-10 property tier. At this level, company ownership surpasses individual ownership for the first time, with companies holding 153 properties (53.9%) compared to individuals' 131 properties (46.1%).

This pattern accelerates in larger tiers. In the 21-50 property bracket, companies control 62.7% of the properties. This suggests that as investors scale their operations, they are more likely to incorporate for liability and financial reasons.

At the highest end of the local market (101-1,000 properties), company ownership is almost total. Companies own 23 of the 25 properties in this tier, a commanding 92.0% share.

This crossover from individual to company control as portfolios grow indicates a professionalization trend. What starts as a personal investment often transitions into a formal business structure to manage a larger number of assets.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83428 zip code at 51.9% ownership.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis of Bonneville County reveals significant concentration of investor ownership in specific zip codes. The 83428 zip code stands out with an investor ownership rate of 51.9%, meaning more than half of all SFRs there are investor-owned.

There is a clear distinction between areas with the highest count versus the highest percentage of investor properties. The 83401 zip code has the most investor-owned homes at 1,279, but its ownership rate is a more modest 10.4%.

In contrast, areas with the highest penetration rates, like 83428 (51.9%), 83285 (40.0%), and 83449 (37.6%), represent markets where investors have a much deeper presence relative to the total housing stock.

The top five regions by investor-owned property count are 83401 (1,279), 83402 (1,032), 83404 (737), 83406 (654), and 83428 (243). These five zip codes collectively account for a large portion of the county's rental housing.

This data, often visualized in market reports, shows that investor strategy is not uniform across the county. Some areas are targeted for scale, while others are targeted for market saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Bonneville County are consistent net buyers, acquiring 2.25 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Bonneville County are in an accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, they purchased 54 properties while selling only 24, resulting in a net gain of 30 properties and a strong 2.25-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This net-buyer behavior is a long-term trend. In the full year of 2025, investors bought 222 properties and sold 93 (a 2.4x ratio). The pattern was even stronger in 2024, with 334 buys versus 96 sells (a 3.5x ratio), indicating sustained portfolio growth over several years.

Even the small contingent of institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are expanding their local footprint. In 2025, this group acquired 8 properties and sold only 1, signaling a strategy of targeted growth rather than divestment.

This consistent net buying activity across all investor types demonstrates strong confidence in the Bonneville County rental market. Investors are actively choosing to increase their holdings rather than exit their positions.

Analyzing historical buying and selling provides insight into market liquidity and sentiment, often supplemented with deeper mortgage transaction data to understand financing trends behind these moves.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 9.5% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 54 of the 567 total SFR transactions in Bonneville County, giving them a 9.5% share of market activity. This shows a continued, albeit minority, role in the flow of property sales.

Transaction volume was dominated by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 49 of the 54 landlord transactions. Single-property landlords were the most active group, making up 29 of these transactions.

A clear pricing difference emerged by tier. New single-property investors paid the highest average price at $379,177. In contrast, small landlords in the 3-5 property tier acquired homes for a much lower average of $81,127, suggesting they are targeting different segments of the market or finding better deals.

Sourcing strategies also vary by size. Large landlords (101-1000 tier) engaged in landlord-to-landlord deals, with 100% of their purchases coming from other investors. Meanwhile, new single-property landlords sourced only 10.3% of their purchases from other investors, primarily buying from homeowners.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded zero transactions in the quarter, reinforcing their passive role in the day-to-day market churn in Bonneville County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop investors control 94.4% of Bonneville County's investor market, buying at a 14.3% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 4,194 SFR properties, representing 11.8% of the total market in Bonneville County, ID. Individual investors hold a 74.3% majority of these properties (3,115), with companies owning the remaining 25.7% (1,161).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 14.3% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $59,331 per property ($354,241 vs $413,572).
Activity
Landlords purchased 11.7% of all properties sold in the most recent quarter's activity (Q4 2025), with 29 new single-property investors entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords dominated, making 89.6% of all investor acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 94.4% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift toward professionalization with scale.
Transactions
Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase as net buyers, with a 2.25-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (54 buys vs 24 sells). Institutional investors, while far less active, are also net buyers.
Market Narrative

In Bonneville County, ID, the real estate investor landscape is defined by small, independent operators, not large corporations. Investors own 4,194 single-family properties, or 11.8% of the total housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a staggering 94.4% of all investor-owned homes. In contrast, institutional investors own just 0.1%. The market is further characterized by individual ownership, with individuals controlling 74.3% of the rental properties compared to 25.7% for companies, reinforcing the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Investor behavior in Bonneville County is marked by strategic acquisitions and consistent growth. In the most recent quarter, landlords remained strong net buyers, purchasing 2.25 homes for every one they sold. This activity is fueled by a significant pricing advantage; in Q1 2026, investors paid an average of 14.3% less than traditional homeowners, a discount of $59,331 per property. This purchasing power is largely wielded by new and small investors, who accounted for 89.6% of all investor acquisitions in the last measured quarter, with 29 new landlords entering the market.

The key takeaway from this data is that the narrative of a corporate takeover of housing does not apply in Bonneville County. The market's health and the supply of rental housing are dependent on thousands of individual and small-scale investors. Their continued confidence, demonstrated by their net-buyer status and ability to find value, shapes the local market. This decentralized ownership structure suggests a resilient and competitive rental environment, driven by local operators rather than distant institutional funds. Understanding these dynamics with a robust property data API is crucial for anyone operating in the housing sector.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 02:08 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bonneville (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bonneville (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-id-bonneville/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.