Cheatham (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Cheatham (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Cheatham (TN)
13,136
Total Investors in Cheatham (TN)
2,629
Investor Owned SFR in Cheatham (TN)
2,136(16.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,418
SFR Owned
1,871
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
211
SFR Owned
285
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,136 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 94.7% of Cheatham County's Investor Market as Institutions Remain Sidelined
Investors own 2,136 SFR properties in Cheatham County, representing 16.3% of the market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (94.7%) versus just 1.6% for institutional investors. In Q1 2026, landlords were active net buyers, but surprisingly paid a 4.3% premium over homeowners, reversing a long-standing trend of purchasing at a discount.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,136 properties in Cheatham County, with individuals holding 87.6%.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with cash-owned properties (1,553) outnumbering financed ones (583) by nearly three to one. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 2,101 of the 2,136 investor-owned properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 4.3% premium over homeowners in Q1, a reversal from previous discounts.
This $18,384 premium in Q1 2026 contrasts sharply with the significant discounts seen in 2025, including a 17.2% ($73,281) discount in Q2 and a 14.3% ($66,027) discount in Q3. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated significantly, rising from a 2020-2023 average of $299,277 to $448,851 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 17.3% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove nearly all investor activity, accounting for 90.0% of landlord purchases (18 of 20 properties). Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, underscoring their absence from the current market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a minimal 1.6% share of the investor market, with just 36 properties. Single-property landlords alone represent the largest segment, owning 1,775 properties, or 80.6% of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing 70.7% of that segment.
Despite company dominance in mid-size tiers, individuals still own 92.6% of all single-property landlord holdings. The crossover point where companies take a majority share is at the 6-10 property tier, a relatively small portfolio size.
Geographic Distribution
The 37015 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 1,055 investor-owned properties.
The 37015 zip code not only has the highest count of investor properties but also a high ownership rate of 20.3%. The 37036 zip code has the highest concentration, with a 33.3% investor ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.3 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This trend of net accumulation is consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.5x in 2025 (183 buys vs 41 sells) and 3.6x in 2024 (156 buys vs 43 sells). Institutional investors have also been net buyers recently, acquiring 7 properties and selling 4 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.1% of all Q1 transactions, purchasing 26 properties.
First-time landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, accounting for 20 transactions and paying the highest average price at $509,587. Only 5.0% of properties purchased by this tier were acquired from other landlords, suggesting they are primarily buying from homeowners.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,136 properties in Cheatham County, with individuals holding 87.6%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 16.3% share of the single-family residential market in Cheatham County, controlling 2,136 out of 13,136 total SFR properties.

The market is defined by small, individual investors rather than large corporations. Individuals own 1,871 properties, making up 87.6% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies hold the remaining 285 properties (13.3%).

This individual dominance extends to the number of landlords, with 2,418 individual entities compared to just 211 company entities, a ratio of more than 11 to 1.

Cash is the preferred acquisition strategy among investors in this market. A total of 1,553 properties are owned outright, substantially more than the 583 properties that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The primary objective for these investors is clear, as 2,101 of the 2,136 properties are rented, confirming that the portfolio is actively managed for rental income rather than short-term speculation.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 4.3% premium over homeowners in Q1, a reversal from previous discounts.
Detailed Findings

In a striking market shift, investors paid more than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026, acquiring properties at an average price of $448,851 versus the homeowner average of $430,467. This represents a 4.3% premium, or an additional $18,384 per property.

This recent premium marks a significant reversal of the 2025 trend, where landlords consistently purchased properties at a substantial discount. For example, investors secured a 17.2% discount ($73,281) in Q2 2025 and a 14.3% discount ($66,027) in Q3 2025, highlighting their previous ability to find value.

A clear trend of price appreciation is evident in investor acquisition costs. The Q1 2026 average price of $448,851 is a dramatic increase from the 2020-2023 average of $299,277, reflecting broader market price growth.

The lack of purchases in several recent quarters suggests inconsistent acquisition activity, possibly due to low inventory or unfavorable pricing, making the Q1 2026 price premium even more noteworthy as a signal of renewed, aggressive buying.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 17.3% of all single-family homes sold in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 17.3% of the Cheatham County market in the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 19 of the 110 total SFRs sold.

The acquisition landscape was entirely controlled by smaller investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 90.0% of these purchases, acquiring 18 properties.

New market entrants made a significant impact, with 20 new single-property landlords acquiring 15 homes. This group alone constituted 75.0% of all investor purchases for the quarter, signaling a healthy influx of new capital.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made no acquisitions. Their 0.0% share of purchases indicates a complete halt in their activity in this market, leaving the field open for smaller players.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) also had minimal presence, collectively purchasing just 2 properties, which further cements the market's reliance on small-scale investment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Cheatham County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, who own between 1 and 10 properties, collectively control 94.7% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

Defying the narrative of corporate dominance, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 36 properties, which amounts to a mere 1.6% market share.

The backbone of the local rental market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 1,775 properties, representing 80.6% of the entire investor-owned portfolio, highlighting the fragmented and granular nature of ownership.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) represent a small fraction of the market, collectively owning 118 properties or just 5.4% of the total. This indicates a sharp drop-off in ownership after the 10-property threshold.

The data clearly shows that the rental housing supply provided by investors in this county is almost entirely managed by local, small-portfolio owners, not large, out-of-state institutions.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owners at the 6-10 property tier, capturing 70.7% of that segment.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall market, companies strategically concentrate ownership in larger portfolio tiers. The crossover occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 29 properties (70.7%) compared to individuals' 12 properties (29.3%).

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, controlling the smallest tiers. They own 92.6% of single-property portfolios (1,654 homes) and 87.6% of two-property portfolios (113 homes).

Company ownership becomes even more pronounced in the 11-20 property tier, where they control 80.0% of the properties. This pattern suggests that as portfolios scale, owners are more likely to incorporate for liability and operational efficiency.

Interestingly, individual ownership reappears in larger segments. Individuals own 61.7% of properties in the 21-50 tier and 50.0% in the 51-100 tier, indicating that even some larger-scale operators prefer to hold assets personally.

This tiered analysis reveals a distinct market structure: individuals fuel market entry and small portfolios, while corporate structures are favored for scaling operations beyond five properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 37015 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 1,055 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated within Cheatham County, with the 37015 zip code serving as the primary hub. This single area contains 1,055 investor-owned properties, representing a 20.3% ownership rate.

While 37015 leads in raw numbers, the 37036 zip code exhibits the highest density of investor ownership. In this area, one in three single-family homes (33.3%) is investor-owned, signaling a heavily saturated rental market.

Other key areas for investors include 37082 (283 properties, 13.6% rate), 37146 (266 properties, 11.3% rate), and 37143 (169 properties, 13.8% rate), showing a clear geographic focus.

The top 5 zip codes by investor count collectively hold a significant majority of all investor properties in the county, indicating that investment strategies are targeted rather than spread evenly.

There is a notable difference between leadership in count versus percentage. While 37015 has the most properties, smaller zip codes like 37036 and 37032 (18.8% rate) demonstrate deeper market penetration by investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.3 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Cheatham County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they purchased 26 homes while selling only 6, resulting in a net gain of 20 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.3.

This net-buyer behavior is a multi-year trend. In 2025, landlords acquired 183 properties and sold just 41, and in 2024 they bought 156 while selling 43, underscoring a long-term strategy of portfolio growth.

Even the typically cautious institutional investors (1,000+ tier) have been expanding their local footprint. In 2025, they were net buyers with 7 purchases against 4 sales, a shift from their neutral position in 2024 (4 buys, 4 sells).

The transaction data from a real estate investing perspective shows a liquid and active market, but one where assets are being consolidated into rental portfolios rather than being flipped back to homeowners.

The sustained net-buying activity across all investor types signals strong confidence in the Cheatham County rental market's future performance.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.1% of all Q1 transactions, purchasing 26 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q1, landlords participated in 16.1% of all market transactions, with 26 total purchases. This activity was heavily concentrated at the entry level of the market.

New and single-property investors (Tier 01) drove the bulk of the activity, responsible for 20 of the 26 transactions. This group also paid the highest average price of any tier at $509,587, indicating they are competing directly with traditional homebuyers for desirable properties.

Mid-size investors were far less active, with tiers representing portfolios of 2-100 properties combining for only 6 transactions. Institutional investors made no transactions in the quarter.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal among the most active group. Only 5.0% of the properties bought by single-property investors came from other landlords, showing that the primary source of new inventory is the owner-occupant market.

The price paid by new investors ($509,587) is significantly higher than the average paid by more established, larger landlords in the quarter, such as the $304,000 average for the 51-100 tier, suggesting different acquisition strategies or target assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate 94.7% of Cheatham County's Investor Market, Actively Buying at Premium Prices
Holdings
Landlords own 2,136 SFR properties, representing 16.3% of the Cheatham County market. Ownership is overwhelmingly individual, with non-corporate investors holding 1,871 properties (87.6%) compared to companies at 285 (13.3%).
Pricing
In a significant market shift, landlords paid a 4.3% premium over homeowners in Q1 2026, with an average acquisition price of $448,851 versus $430,467. This reverses a consistent trend of purchasing at a discount seen throughout 2025.
Activity
Investors purchased 17.3% of all homes sold last quarter, with 20 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors were the driving force, accounting for 90.0% of all landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 94.7% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a minimal 1.6% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors command the entry-level tiers, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 70.7% of that segment. This indicates a strategic shift to corporate structures as portfolios grow.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers with a 4.3x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (26 buys vs 6 sells), continuing a multi-year growth trend. Institutional investors have also been modest net buyers, adding 3 properties to their portfolios in 2025.
Market Narrative

In Cheatham County, the investor market is fundamentally shaped by small, local participants, not large institutions. Investors own 2,136 single-family homes, comprising 16.3% of the total market. The ownership structure is dominated by individuals, who hold 87.6% of these properties. A detailed look at portfolio size reveals that 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.7% of investor-owned housing, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a negligible 1.6% footprint. This granular ownership, identifiable through comprehensive assessor data, underscores a market built on grassroots investment rather than corporate consolidation.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 signals strong confidence and heightened competition. Landlords were active net buyers, acquiring 4.3 properties for every one they sold and capturing 17.3% of all home sales. In a significant reversal of previous trends, they paid a 4.3% premium over traditional homeowners, suggesting they are competing aggressively for limited inventory. This activity was fueled by new entrants, with 20 single-property landlords joining the market. The minimal trading between investors indicates that new supply is being sourced primarily from the owner-occupant market.

The key takeaway for the Cheatham County housing market is its stability and growth are heavily influenced by a large base of small-scale landlords. The narrative of institutional takeover does not apply here; instead, the market's health is tied to the financial capacity of thousands of individual owners. The recent trend of paying a premium suggests that competition is increasing, potentially making it more difficult for both first-time homebuyers and new investors to enter the market. This dynamic points to a mature, competitive rental market where acquiring new properties requires paying a premium.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:38 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Cheatham (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Cheatham (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-cheatham/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.