Hudson (NJ) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hudson (NJ) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hudson (NJ)
100,779
Total Investors in Hudson (NJ)
39,730
Investor Owned SFR in Hudson (NJ)
33,108(32.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
35,146
SFR Owned
26,243
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
4,584
SFR Owned
7,027
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 33,108 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Hudson County with 95% Share as Institutions Vanish
Investors own 32.9% of all Single-Family Residential properties in Hudson County, NJ, a portfolio of 33,108 homes. Individual, small-scale landlords control a staggering 95.1% of these properties, while institutional ownership is negligible at 0.0%. In Q1 2026, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a 16.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 33,108 SFRs in Hudson County, with individuals holding 79.3%.
Within the landlord portfolio, cash-owned properties (18,116) outnumber financed ones (14,992). The vast majority of these properties (32,742) are operated as rentals, confirming their non-owner-occupied status.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 16.3% discount in Q1, paying $129,508 less than homeowners.
The price gap has widened significantly, reversing a 5.0% premium landlords paid in Q1 2025. This shows a dramatic shift in purchasing power in favor of investors over the past year. Acquisition prices have also risen, with the Q1 2026 average of $666,367 up from the 2020-2023 average of $611,718.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 30.6% of all SFR properties sold in Hudson County last quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for an overwhelming 98.7% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors with 1000+ properties made zero acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors control 95.1% of all landlord-owned SFRs in Hudson County.
This small landlord dominance is starkly contrasted with institutional investors (1000+ properties), who own a negligible 0.0% of the market, or just 15 properties. The vast majority, 79.1%, is held by single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
While individuals own 86.2% of single-property portfolios, companies control 72.6% of the 6-10 property tier and over 88% of all larger tiers. This shows a clear crossover point where professionalization and incorporation take over.
Geographic Distribution
Jersey City zip codes 07030 and 07305 lead Hudson County in investor-owned properties.
The 07030 zip code has the highest count with 4,937 investor properties, while 07306 has one of the highest penetration rates at 46.4%. Several smaller zip codes, like 07097, show 100% investor ownership, indicating specialized housing areas.
Historical Transactions
Hudson County landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.8x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1.
This accumulation trend is consistent, with landlords purchasing 1,557 properties while selling only 388 in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors with 1000+ properties were net sellers in 2025, divesting more properties than they acquired.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 29.6% of all Hudson County SFR transactions in Q1 2026.
New, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $635,266, significantly more than smaller landlords in the 3-10 property range. This suggests new entrants are paying a premium to enter the market. Institutional investors conducted zero transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 33,108 SFRs in Hudson County, with individuals holding 79.3%.
Detailed Findings

In Hudson County, NJ, landlords hold a significant 32.9% of the single-family residential market, totaling 33,108 properties out of 100,779.

Individual investors are the primary force in the local real estate investing landscape, owning 26,243 properties, or 79.3% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 21.2%, with 7,027 SFRs.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 35,146 individual landlords operate in the market, compared to just 4,584 companies. This demonstrates a market structure built on small-scale ownership rather than large corporate landlords.

A review of portfolio financing reveals a strong cash position among investors. Cash-owned properties total 18,116, surpassing the 14,992 properties that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The rental focus of this portfolio is clear, with 32,742 properties classified as rented. This high concentration confirms that the vast majority of investor-owned homes are actively serving as rental housing supply in Hudson County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 16.3% discount in Q1, paying $129,508 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors in Hudson County demonstrated a strong pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $666,367. This was $129,508, or 16.3%, below the average price of $795,875 paid by traditional homeowners during the same period.

This significant discount marks a dramatic reversal from just one year prior. In Q1 2025, investors were actually paying a 5.0% premium ($38,654) over homeowners, signaling a major market shift that now heavily favors landlord purchasing strategies.

The pricing dynamic has fluctuated, with the discount narrowing through mid-2025 (9.9% in Q2, 10.3% in Q3) before expanding to its current high in Q1 2026. This trend suggests investors are becoming more effective at securing favorable prices.

Despite quarterly fluctuations, overall property values have appreciated. The Q1 2026 average landlord acquisition price of $666,367 is a notable increase from the $611,718 average seen during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom.

This ability to acquire properties well below the typical market rate for homeowners is a key competitive advantage for investors, allowing for potentially higher returns and a stronger hedge against market volatility.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 30.6% of all SFR properties sold in Hudson County last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 30.6% of all SFR market purchases in the last quarter, with landlords acquiring 221 of the 722 homes sold in Hudson County. This highlights a substantial and active investor presence in the local market.

The purchasing activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 220 of the 221 properties, representing 98.7% of all landlord buying activity.

First-time or single-property investors were the most active group, with 182 new entities purchasing 173 properties. This influx of new landlords made up 77.6% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

Mid-size and institutional investors were largely absent from the market. Landlords with 11-100 properties purchased only 3 homes combined, and institutional investors (1000+ properties) made no acquisitions at all.

This data confirms that the growth in investor ownership in Hudson County is being fueled by new and existing small landlords, not by large corporations. The market continues to be defined by the accumulation of properties by individuals and small entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors control 95.1% of all landlord-owned SFRs in Hudson County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investor-held real estate in Hudson County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 95.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, alone accounting for 26,710 properties, or 79.1% of the entire investor portfolio. This underscores the fragmented and individualized nature of rental property ownership in the area.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties have a virtually nonexistent footprint, holding just 15 properties. This equates to 0.0% of the market share, challenging the narrative that large corporations are controlling the local housing market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also hold a relatively small portion of the market. Combined, these tiers own 1,624 properties, which is only 4.8% of the total investor-owned housing stock.

This distribution reveals a highly decentralized market where the decisions of thousands of individual landlords, rather than a few large firms, shape the rental landscape in Hudson County. This structure is further confirmed by property ownership by owner type report data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear demarcation exists between individual and company ownership based on portfolio size in Hudson County. Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, holding 86.2% of single-property assets and 77.9% of two-property portfolios.

The strategic crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners, holding 376 properties (72.6%) compared to the 142 (27.4%) held by individuals.

Beyond this tier, company ownership becomes nearly absolute. In the 11-20 property tier, companies own 88.3% of the assets, and in the 21-50 property tier, their share rises to an overwhelming 98.8%.

This pattern suggests that as investors scale their operations beyond a handful of properties, they overwhelmingly choose to operate under a corporate structure for liability, financing, or management purposes. The assessor data reflects this shift in titling as portfolios grow.

Even though individuals constitute the vast majority of landlords, corporate entities control the more concentrated, mid-sized portfolios, indicating a different operational strategy for investors who move beyond the mom-and-pop level.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Jersey City zip codes 07030 and 07305 lead Hudson County in investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Hudson County is heavily concentrated in specific zip codes, particularly within Jersey City. The 07030 zip code leads by volume, containing 4,937 investor-owned properties, which represents 32.0% of its housing stock.

Other areas with high investor counts include North Bergen (07047) with 3,483 properties (33.1% rate) and Jersey City's 07305 zip code with 3,103 properties (29.5% rate).

When analyzing by ownership rate, the 07306 zip code stands out with a 46.4% investor ownership rate, indicating that nearly half of the SFR properties in that area are not owner-occupied. This points to a market with very high rental demand.

Anomalies exist in smaller zip codes like 07097, 07104, and 07202, which report 100% investor ownership. These are likely areas with specific housing types, such as blocks of townhomes or condos managed entirely as rentals, rather than entire residential communities.

This geographic analysis reveals that investor activity is not uniform across the county but is instead focused in dense urban areas with strong rental markets, such as Jersey City and North Bergen.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Hudson County landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.8x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hudson County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they purchased 237 properties while selling only 49, resulting in a net gain of 188 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.8 to 1.

This net buyer behavior is a long-term trend. Throughout 2025, investors bought 1,557 homes and sold 388, a net increase of 1,169 properties. Similarly, in 2024, they added a net 1,197 properties to their portfolios (1,540 buys vs. 343 sells).

However, a significant divergence in strategy appears when looking at institutional investors. In 2025, the 1000+ tier was a net seller, acquiring only 4 properties while selling 10. This indicates a strategic retreat or portfolio rebalancing by the largest players, even as the broader market of smaller landlords expands.

The data clearly shows that the growth of investor ownership in the county is driven by the consistent, high-volume purchasing of small-to-mid-sized landlords who are actively expanding their holdings.

This sustained net buying activity from the largest segment of the investor market signals strong confidence in the future of the Hudson County rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 29.6% of all Hudson County SFR transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 237 of the 800 total SFR transactions in Hudson County, capturing a 29.6% market share. This robust activity demonstrates their significant and ongoing impact on local market liquidity.

Transaction volume was dominated by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 234 of the 237 landlord transactions. Institutional investors in Tier 09 recorded no transaction activity during the quarter.

A notable pricing pattern emerged among tiers. New investors buying their first property (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $635,266. In contrast, more established small landlords in the 3-5 and 6-10 property tiers paid considerably less, at $372,153 and $420,643 respectively. This suggests a potential 'entry premium' for new market participants.

Inter-landlord trading appears relatively low for new buyers, with only 7.7% (14 out of 182) of single-property landlord purchases coming from another landlord. This indicates that most new investors are acquiring properties from homeowners or other sources.

Conversely, a mid-size investor in the 11-20 property tier showed a higher reliance on this channel, with 50% of its two purchases sourced from another landlord, pointing to different acquisition strategies for more established players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual Landlords Dominate Hudson County with 95% Ownership as Institutions Retreat
Holdings
Landlords own 33,108 SFR properties, representing a high 32.9% of Hudson County's market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 26,243 properties (79.3%), while companies own the remaining 7,027 (21.2%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of 16.3% less than traditional homeowners, securing a significant discount of $129,508 per property ($666,367 vs $795,875).
Activity
Landlords purchased 30.6% of all homes sold in the last quarter, with an overwhelming 98.7% of that activity coming from mom-and-pop investors. The market saw 182 new single-property landlords enter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.1% of all investor-owned housing in Hudson County. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and control over 88% of all larger tiers.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.8x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (237 buys vs 49 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were net sellers in 2025, signaling a divestment strategy.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Hudson County, NJ, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, individual landlords. Investors own a substantial 32.9% of the single-family housing market, a total of 33,108 properties. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties), who control 95.1% of all investor-owned homes. Individual owners account for 79.3% of these properties, reinforcing a market structure built on local, small-scale ownership rather than large corporate entities. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, holding just 0.0% of the market share.

Investor activity in Q1 2026 was robust and strategic. Landlords acquired 30.6% of all properties sold, demonstrating significant purchasing power. They achieved this while securing an average 16.3% price discount compared to traditional homeowners, a gap of $129,508 per transaction. This buying activity is expansion-focused, as landlords acted as strong net buyers with a 4.8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. This trend contrasts sharply with institutional investors, who were net sellers in the prior year, indicating a strategic withdrawal or rebalancing from the largest players while smaller investors double down.

The key takeaway for the Hudson County housing market is that its rental stock is provided and shaped by thousands of individual investors, not a handful of Wall Street firms. The market is witnessing an influx of new, small landlords who are fueling demand and expanding the rental inventory. This dynamic suggests a resilient and decentralized rental market, but also highlights the competitive pressure on traditional homebuyers, who are consistently out-negotiated on price by a large and active investor base. Comprehensive market reports can provide further detail on these localized trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 11:48 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Hudson (NJ)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Hudson (NJ) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-nj-hudson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.