Franklin (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin (IN)
5,550
Total Investors in Franklin (IN)
703
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin (IN)
644(11.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
604
SFR Owned
516
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
99
SFR Owned
128
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 644 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 99% of Franklin County's Investor Market, Pausing Activity in Q4
Investors own 644 SFR properties in Franklin County, IN, representing 11.6% of the market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.1%), with individuals owning 80.1% of all investor properties. While historically net buyers, landlords made zero purchases in the last quarter of 2025, and pricing has shown extreme volatility due to low transaction volumes.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 644 properties, with individuals holding 80.1% and companies 19.9%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 97.9% (631 properties), were purchased with cash, while only 13 are financed. Of the total portfolio, 617 properties are classified as rented. Individual landlords (604) vastly outnumber company landlords (99).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord pricing shows extreme volatility, swinging from a 149.4% premium in Q1 to a 45.4% discount in Q3.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is inconsistent due to low transaction volumes. In Q3 2025, landlords paid $135,194 less than homeowners ($162,367 vs $297,561). Conversely, in Q1 2025, they paid $341,426 more ($570,000 vs $228,574), likely due to a single high-value acquisition skewing the average.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0% of the 9 total market sales.
With no landlord acquisitions in Q4, both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recorded zero purchases. This marks a complete halt in investor buying activity for the period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 78.7% of the investor-held housing stock (516 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 80% of properties.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 85.5% of single-property holdings and 75.0% of two-property portfolios, a strategic shift occurs in larger tiers. This crossover point signals where more professionalized, entity-based ownership strategies take hold.
Geographic Distribution
The 47012 zip code (Brookville) contains the highest volume of investor properties at 343.
While Brookville (47012) leads in sheer count, smaller zip codes exhibit higher investor saturation. The 47240 zip code has the highest ownership rate at 21.6%, followed by 47035 at 21.2%, revealing pockets of concentrated investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Franklin County are consistent net buyers, purchasing 34 properties and selling only 9 in 2025.
This net-buyer trend was consistent quarterly, with 12 buys versus 4 sells in Q3 and 8 buys versus 2 sells in Q2. As there is no institutional presence, all transaction activity is driven by smaller investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors accounted for 0% of the 9 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, indicating a period of inactivity.
This lack of activity was consistent across all tiers, with both mom-and-pop and institutional investors recording zero transactions for the quarter. No inter-landlord trading occurred during this period.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 644 properties, with individuals holding 80.1% and companies 19.9%.
Detailed Findings

In Franklin County, investors hold 644 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 11.6% of the total 5,550 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the local rental market, owning 516 properties, which is 80.1% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties total 128, making up the remaining 19.9%.

The number of individual landlords (604) is more than six times the number of company landlords (99), underscoring the market's reliance on small-scale, non-corporate ownership.

An overwhelming 97.9% of the investor-owned portfolio was acquired with cash, with 631 cash-bought properties compared to just 13 that are financed. This indicates a market with very low leverage and high investor equity.

The primary focus of these holdings is rentals, with 617 properties currently being rented out, confirming the portfolio's use as a source of housing for tenants in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord pricing shows extreme volatility, swinging from a 149.4% premium in Q1 to a 45.4% discount in Q3.
Detailed Findings

Acquisition pricing for landlords in Franklin County has demonstrated extreme volatility throughout 2025, a pattern driven by very low transaction volumes which can cause averages to fluctuate dramatically.

In Q3 2025, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $162,367, representing a significant 45.4% discount compared to the traditional homeowner price of $297,561. This amounted to a $135,194 price advantage for investors.

This trend reversed sharply from Q1 2025, where landlord acquisitions averaged $570,000, a staggering 149.4% premium over the homeowner average of $228,574. Such a large premium is likely the result of one or very few high-value, non-typical purchases rather than a broader market trend.

In Q2 2025, the market showed a more moderate dynamic, with landlords paying $217,000, or 9.2% less than homeowners who paid an average of $239,064.

The lack of consistent purchasing activity, with zero properties purchased in several recent quarters, makes it difficult to establish a stable pricing trend, highlighting a sporadic and opportunistic acquisition environment for investors in this county.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero SFR purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0% of the 9 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity came to a complete standstill in the fourth quarter of 2025. Landlords purchased zero of the 9 SFR properties that sold in Franklin County, resulting in a 0% market share for the period.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made no purchases, contributing 0% of the non-existent landlord total.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) also recorded zero purchases, which is consistent with their complete absence from this market's ownership landscape.

The data indicates a significant pause in investor demand, with no new properties being added to landlord portfolios during the final quarter of the year.

This halt in purchasing contrasts with previous periods of activity and may signal a wait-and-see approach from local investors in response to market conditions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Franklin County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords. Owners with 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, holding 516 properties, which constitutes a massive 78.7% share of the total investor portfolio. This highlights the importance of first-time and small investors to the local rental supply.

Mid-size landlords are a rarity. Tiers holding 11-100 properties are nearly non-existent, and the large landlord tier (101-1000) accounts for just 2 properties, or 0.3% of the total.

There is absolutely no institutional investor (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) presence in Franklin County, with their market share standing at 0.0%. This market is entirely driven by local and small-scale capital.

The ownership structure is highly concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with two-property landlords holding 6.7% and those with 3-5 properties holding 9.1% of the inventory.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 80% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the Franklin County market, holding a commanding 85.5% share (441 properties) in the single-property tier.

This pattern of individual dominance continues into the two-property tier, where individuals own 33 properties (75.0%) compared to 11 owned by companies (25.0%).

A significant shift in ownership structure occurs in the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies become the majority owners, holding 24 properties, which represents an 80.0% share of that segment, while individuals own just 6 properties (20.0%).

This crossover from individual to company-majority ownership indicates that as portfolios grow beyond five properties, investors in this market tend to adopt more formal, corporate structures for their holdings.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain strong control, owning 48 properties (80.0%), reinforcing that the sub-five property market is the domain of personal investment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 47012 zip code (Brookville) contains the highest volume of investor properties at 343.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Franklin County is geographically concentrated, with the 47012 zip code (Brookville) serving as the hub for real estate investing. It contains 343 investor-owned properties, far surpassing any other area in the county by volume.

The second most active area by count is the 47024 zip code (Laurel) with 85 investor properties, followed by 47030 (Metamora) with 55 properties.

However, the highest rates of investor penetration are found in smaller communities. The 47240 zip code has the highest concentration with 21.6% of its housing stock owned by investors.

Close behind are the 47035 and 47353 zip codes, with investor ownership rates of 21.2% and 21.1%, respectively. This highlights that while volume is in Brookville, market saturation is higher elsewhere.

This distinction between high-volume and high-percentage areas suggests different types of investment opportunities, from the larger rental market in Brookville to potentially less competitive, higher-yield niches in surrounding zip codes.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Franklin County are consistent net buyers, purchasing 34 properties and selling only 9 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Despite a pause in the most recent quarter, historical data shows that landlords in Franklin County are strong net buyers, consistently adding more properties to their portfolios than they sell.

In 2025, landlords acquired 34 properties while selling only 9, demonstrating a clear strategy of accumulation and a positive outlook on the local rental market.

This trend holds true on a quarterly basis. In Q3 2025, investors were net buyers by a margin of 8 properties (12 buys vs. 4 sells), and in Q2 2025, they were net buyers by 6 properties (8 buys vs. 2 sells).

The year prior, in 2024, the pattern was similar, with investors acquiring 16 properties and selling 9, resulting in a net gain of 7 properties for their portfolios.

Given the market is composed almost entirely of mom-and-pop investors, this activity reflects the collective sentiment of small, local operators who continue to build their holdings over time.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors accounted for 0% of the 9 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, indicating a period of inactivity.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, the investor market in Franklin County was dormant. Landlords were not party to any of the 9 SFR transactions that occurred, bringing their market share of transactions to 0%.

This inactivity spanned the entire spectrum of investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who dominate ownership in the county, recorded zero transactions during this period.

Unsurprisingly, institutional investors (Tier 09) also had no transaction activity, aligning with their 0% ownership stake in the market.

The data shows no inter-landlord trading, with 0% of transactions being properties bought from other landlords. This suggests a lack of portfolio churning or repositioning among existing owners.

The complete absence of landlord transactions in Q4 marks a significant deviation from the net-buying patterns observed in previous quarters and years, suggesting a temporary retreat from the market.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Franklin County's investor market is defined by mom-and-pop landlords who own 99% of the portfolio and paused all buying in Q4.
Holdings
Landlords own 644 SFR properties, representing 11.6% of Franklin County's market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 516 of these properties (80.1%) compared to 128 (19.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlord acquisition pricing is highly volatile due to low transaction volumes, swinging from a 149.4% premium over homeowners in Q1 2025 to a 45.4% discount in Q3.
Activity
Investor activity halted in the final quarter of 2025, with landlords accounting for 0 of the 9 total SFR purchases. This contrasts with earlier in the year when they were active net buyers.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 99.1% share of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, capturing an 80.0% share of properties in that segment.
Transactions
While landlords paused buying in Q4, they were strong net buyers for the full year 2025, with 34 acquisitions versus only 9 sales. All transactional activity is driven by non-institutional investors.
Market Narrative

In Franklin County, Indiana, the real estate investor landscape is exclusively local and small-scale. Investors own 644 single-family properties, making up 11.6% of the total market. This sector is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties), who own a combined 99.1% of all investor-held housing. Individual investors, rather than corporations, own 80.1% of these properties, highlighting a market built on personal capital, a fact reinforced by the 97.9% of holdings that were purchased with cash. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence here.

Investor behavior is characterized by opportunistic buying and, recently, a significant pause. In the final quarter of 2025, landlords made zero purchases, a stark contrast to their activity earlier in the year when they were consistent net buyers (34 buys vs. 9 sells for the full year). Pricing is highly volatile due to thin transaction volumes, swinging from landlords paying a 149.4% premium in Q1 to securing a 45.4% discount compared to homeowners in Q3. This volatility reflects a market where individual deals, rather than broad trends, dictate pricing.

The key takeaway for Franklin County is a stable, self-contained rental market dominated by small, debt-free landlords who are deeply embedded in the community. The absence of institutional capital and the recent halt in buying activity suggest a cautious, non-speculative environment. Future trends will be dictated not by large corporate strategies, but by the collective decisions of hundreds of individual investors responding to local economic conditions. The market's structure, with a crossover to company ownership for portfolios larger than five properties, indicates a path for growth is through professionalization, not large-scale acquisition.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:36 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Franklin (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Franklin (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-franklin/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.