Cleburne (AR) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Cleburne (AR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Cleburne (AR)
9,894
Total Investors in Cleburne (AR)
5,588
Investor Owned SFR in Cleburne (AR)
3,929(39.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,045
SFR Owned
3,421
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
543
SFR Owned
624
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,929 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Cleburne County with 98% Ownership, Buying Aggressively and Paying Premiums
Investors own a significant 39.7% of the SFR market in Cleburne County, AR, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 97.8% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers (7.5x buy/sell ratio) and paid a 2.5% premium over homeowners, demonstrating strong confidence and a market structure defined by small, local investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,929 SFRs in Cleburne County (39.7% of market), dominated by individuals at 87.1%.
Cash purchases significantly outweigh financing, with 2,817 properties owned outright versus 1,112 financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 3,881 of 3,929 properties identified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors in Cleburne County paid a 2.5% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $313,488.
This premium is a reversal from a Q2 2025 discount of 11.9% but continues a volatile trend where landlords have paid significantly more than homeowners, including a 56.5% premium in Q1 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 40.9% of all SFR properties sold in Cleburne County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 83.3% of landlord purchases. Institutional investors made up just 5.6% of acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.8% of investor-owned homes.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, owning just 6 properties, which is 0.1% of the investor market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 55.6%.
Despite this, individuals remain the dominant force in smaller portfolios, owning 88.6% of single-property rentals and 81.7% in the two-property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip codes 72530 and 72067 showing over 52% investor ownership.
The zip code 72543 contains the largest number of investor-owned homes at 1,742, though its ownership rate is lower at 35.4%.
Historical Transactions
Investors in Cleburne County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.5 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent, with landlords remaining net buyers every quarter and year on record, including a net gain of 268 properties in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were a party to 31.7% of all Q1 property transactions in Cleburne County.
Institutional buyers paid 60.2% less than new single-property landlords in Q1 ($139,877 vs $351,425), suggesting vastly different acquisition strategies.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,929 SFRs in Cleburne County (39.7% of market), dominated by individuals at 87.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Cleburne County is substantial, with landlords holding 3,929 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 39.7% of the total 9,894 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 3,421 properties, making up 87.1% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to just 624 properties (15.9%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 5,045 individual landlords operate in the market, compared to 543 company entities.

Cash is the preferred method of holding property among investors in the area. There are 2,817 cash-owned properties, more than double the 1,112 properties that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The vast majority of the investor portfolio is actively used for rental purposes. Of the 3,929 investor-owned SFRs, 3,881 are confirmed as rented, highlighting a strong focus on generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors in Cleburne County paid a 2.5% premium over homeowners in Q1, averaging $313,488.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to common market assumptions, landlords in Cleburne County paid more than traditional homeowners in the first quarter. The average landlord acquisition price was $313,488, representing a 2.5% premium, or $7,540 more than the average homeowner price of $305,948.

This pricing behavior is highly volatile when viewed over the past year. In Q1 2025, landlords paid a staggering 56.5% premium ($380,670 vs. $243,255), which then shifted to an 11.9% discount in Q2 2025 ($319,964 vs. $362,994), followed by another large premium of 27.0% in Q3 2025.

The Q1 2026 premium reverses the discount seen in mid-2025, suggesting a renewed willingness among investors to pay above market rate to secure properties in the area.

Despite the pricing data, transactional records indicate zero properties were acquired by landlords across most recent timeframes, including 2024 and 2025. This suggests a potential data anomaly, though the price comparison data consistently shows active purchasing and pricing trends.

The long-term price appreciation is clear when comparing recent activity to the 2020-2023 period. The Q1 2026 average price of $313,488 is 6.9% higher than the pandemic-era average of $293,340.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 40.9% of all SFR properties sold in Cleburne County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a major force in the Cleburne County real estate market during the last quarter, purchasing 36 of the 88 total SFRs sold, a market share of 40.9%.

The acquisition activity was dominated by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties). This group collectively purchased 30 properties, accounting for 83.3% of all investor acquisitions during the period.

New entrants are a key driver of market activity. Single-property landlords were the most active group, with 34 new entities acquiring 25 properties, which alone represents 69.4% of all landlord purchases.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact, acquiring only 2 properties, or 5.6% of the investor total. This highlights a market driven by local individuals rather than large corporations.

Mid-size landlords also participated, with investors in the 6-10, 11-20, and 101-1000 property tiers collectively purchasing 8 properties, or 22.2% of the landlord total.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.8% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Cleburne County is defined by small, independent landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 97.8% of all investor-owned SFRs, a near-total market control.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone accounts for 3,307 properties, representing 80.7% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, demonstrating the importance of first-time and small-scale investors.

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not apply here. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, owning just 6 properties in total, which equates to only 0.1% of the investor market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also represent a small fraction of the market, collectively owning 85 properties, or just 2.1% of the investor portfolio.

This distribution underscores a highly decentralized ownership structure, where market dynamics are dictated by the cumulative actions of thousands of small investors, not a few large players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners at the 11-20 property tier, holding 55.6%.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the Cleburne County market overall, a clear crossover point emerges as portfolio sizes grow. Companies become the majority stakeholders in the 11-20 property tier, owning 25 properties (55.6%) compared to individuals' 20 properties (44.4%).

In the smallest tiers, individual ownership is nearly absolute. For single-property landlords, individuals own 2,989 homes (88.6%) versus 383 for companies (11.4%). This pattern continues for two-property landlords, where individuals own 250 properties (81.7%).

The ownership split approaches parity in the 6-10 property tier, where individuals own 60 properties (54.5%) and companies own 50 (45.5%), signaling the transition toward more corporate structures as portfolios scale.

This data illustrates a typical real estate investing lifecycle: individuals enter the market at a small scale, and those who grow their portfolios are more likely to adopt a corporate structure for management and liability purposes.

The pattern reveals that while the market's foundation is built on individual effort, scaling operations beyond 10 properties often coincides with professionalization under a company entity.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with zip codes 72530 and 72067 showing over 52% investor ownership.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Cleburne County is not evenly distributed, but rather concentrated in specific zip codes. The highest penetration rates are in 72530 (54.2% investor-owned) and 72067 (52.9% investor-owned), where more than half of all SFRs are held by investors.

A distinction exists between the areas with the highest rate and the highest volume of investment. The 72543 zip code holds the largest number of investor properties at 1,742, but its investor ownership rate is a more moderate 35.4%.

This indicates different market characteristics; some smaller zip codes are saturated with investors, while larger residential areas have more properties overall but a lower relative investor share.

The top five areas for investor ownership percentage all exceed a 47% share, including 72044 (51.2%) and 72179 (47.5%), highlighting pockets of intense investment activity.

One zip code, 72143, shows an anomaly with no available investor-owned property data, suggesting either a lack of SFR properties or an issue in data collection for that specific area.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investors in Cleburne County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.5 properties for every 1 they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Cleburne County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, they purchased 45 SFRs while selling only 6, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.5x and a net gain of 39 properties.

This aggressive net buying is not a new phenomenon. The trend held throughout the previous year, with a net gain of 268 properties in 2025 (315 buys vs. 47 sells) and 257 properties in 2024 (288 buys vs. 31 sells).

The quarterly data reinforces this pattern of sustained growth. In Q3 2025, investors added a net 92 properties to their portfolios, and in Q2 2025, they added a net 55 properties.

Even the market's small contingent of institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are net buyers. In 2025, this group acquired 2 properties and sold only 1, signaling that investors of all sizes see value and opportunity in the Cleburne County market.

This persistent and high-velocity net acquisition across all recent timeframes points to strong investor confidence and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion in the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were a party to 31.7% of all Q1 property transactions in Cleburne County.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a significant role in market liquidity in the first quarter, participating in 45 of the 142 total SFR transactions, for a market share of 31.7%.

A massive pricing disparity exists between the smallest and largest investors. Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $351,425 per transaction, while institutional investors paid the second-lowest at just $139,877.

This price gap of over $211,000 suggests that institutional players are targeting completely different asset classes, likely distressed or lower-value properties that do not appeal to new, smaller-scale investors.

The overwhelming majority of transactions were driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 39 of the 45 investor transactions. Institutional investors were involved in just 2 transactions.

Inter-landlord trading is minimal in this market. Only 8.8% of purchases made by single-property landlords came from another landlord, and no other tier acquired properties from existing investors, indicating that most acquisitions are from the traditional homeowner market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Cleburne County with 98% Ownership, Buying Aggressively and Paying Premiums
Holdings
Investors own 3,929 SFR properties, a significant 39.7% of the market in Cleburne County, AR. Individual investors overwhelmingly lead, holding 87.1% (3,421 properties) compared to 15.9% (624 properties) for companies.
Pricing
Defying national trends, landlords in Q1 paid a 2.5% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average price of $313,488 versus the homeowner's $305,948.
Activity
Landlords purchased 40.9% of all homes sold in the last quarter, with 34 new single-property landlords entering the market, demonstrating robust new investor formation.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control 97.8% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%, or 6 properties total.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, signaling a strategic shift at a modest scale.
Transactions
All investor segments are in accumulation mode; landlords were strong net buyers in Q1 with a 7.5x buy-to-sell ratio (45 buys vs 6 sells), and even institutions were net buyers.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Cleburne County, AR is heavily influenced by investors, who own a substantial 39.7% of the total housing stock, amounting to 3,929 properties. This market is not defined by large corporations but by local, individual participants. Individual investors hold 87.1% of the portfolio, and small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.8% of all investor-owned homes. In contrast, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, owning just six properties in the entire county. This decentralized structure indicates that market trends are driven by the collective actions of thousands of small-scale investors.

Investor behavior in Cleburne County is marked by aggressive acquisition and a willingness to pay premium prices. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 40.9% of all homes sold and were strong net buyers, acquiring 7.5 properties for every one they sold. This demonstrates a clear strategy of portfolio expansion across all investor sizes. Uncharacteristically, these investors paid an average of 2.5% more than traditional homeowners in Q1, a volatile trend that suggests intense competition for available inventory. Further analysis shows a vast strategic difference between investor types, with new single-property landlords paying an average of $351,425 while institutional buyers acquired properties for just $139,877.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that the Cleburne County housing market is a stronghold for the small, independent landlord. The narrative of institutional dominance is completely inverted here, with a highly fragmented and localized investor base that is actively and confidently expanding its holdings. This dynamic creates a competitive environment where investors are willing to outbid homeowners, particularly in concentrated zip codes where investor ownership already exceeds 50%. The market's future will be shaped by the continued appetite of these thousands of individual investors who form the backbone of the local rental market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 08:56 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Cleburne (AR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Cleburne (AR) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ar-cleburne/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.