Clark (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clark (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clark (IN)
38,132
Total Investors in Clark (IN)
4,847
Investor Owned SFR in Clark (IN)
4,598(12.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,036
SFR Owned
3,348
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
811
SFR Owned
1,324
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,598 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Clark County with 93.2% Ownership, Buying Properties at a 19.8% Discount
In Clark County, investors own 4,598 single-family properties, representing 12.1% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (93.2%), with individuals owning 72.8% of the assets. In Q1 2026, investors purchased properties for 19.8% less than traditional homeowners and continued to be aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10 properties for every one they sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,598 SFRs in Clark County, with individuals holding a dominant 72.8%.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties (4,587) were acquired with cash, compared to only 11 that are financed. Investor holdings are heavily rental-focused, with 4,426 properties classified as rented. Individual landlords (4,036 entities) far outnumber company landlords (811 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Clark County landlords bought properties for 19.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026.
In Q1 2026, investors paid an average of $201,042, a significant $49,749 discount compared to the homeowner price of $250,791. This discount has been volatile, ranging from a 26.3% discount in Q3 2025 to a 0.7% premium investors paid in Q2 2025, showing fluctuating market leverage.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors captured 25.1% of all Clark County home sales in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated this activity, accounting for 50 of the 54 investor purchases, or 92.6% of the total. In contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero purchases during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors own 93.2% of Clark County's investor-held rental housing.
Single-property landlords alone account for 68.1% of the entire investor portfolio, with 3,236 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) control a mere 0.7%, holding just 32 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type once a portfolio grows beyond five properties.
While individuals own 84.6% of single-property portfolios, companies take majority control starting at the 6-10 property tier (65.5% company-owned). This trend accelerates in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 75.4% of the assets.
Geographic Distribution
The 47130 zip code in Jeffersonville is Clark County's investor hub, with 1,941 properties.
While 47130 has the highest volume, it has a modest investor ownership rate of 12.1%. In contrast, smaller zip codes show much higher saturation, such as 47138, where investors own 55.6% of the single-family homes.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10.2 homes for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
This net buying trend is consistent, with landlords also being net buyers in 2025 (218 buys vs. 73 sells) and 2024 (271 buys vs. 74 sells). Institutional investors show more balanced activity, acting as net buyers in 2025 but being net neutral in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 24.5% of Clark County's real estate transactions in Q1 2026.
New single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $234,212. In contrast, small landlords in the 3-5 property tier acquired homes for an average of just $95,821, suggesting a strategy focused on value-add properties.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,598 SFRs in Clark County, with individuals holding a dominant 72.8%.
Detailed Findings

In Clark County, investors hold a significant portfolio of 4,598 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, making up 12.1% of the total 38,132 SFRs in the market. This demonstrates a notable concentration of real estate investing activity in the region.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards small-scale investors. Individuals own 3,348 properties (72.8% of the investor portfolio), while companies own the remaining 1,324 (28.8%). This is further reflected in the number of landlord entities, with 4,036 individuals compared to just 811 companies.

A striking financial characteristic of this market is the overwhelming preference for all-cash acquisitions. Of the entire investor portfolio, 4,587 properties are owned outright (cash), while a minuscule 11 properties carry financing. This signals a well-capitalized investor base that is not highly leveraged.

The portfolio's primary use is clear, with 4,426 of the 4,598 properties identified as rented. This high rental penetration underscores the role these investors play in providing housing supply for the local rental market.

The data highlights a market defined by individual, cash-heavy landlords rather than large corporations. The ratio of individual entities to company entities is nearly 5 to 1, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of Clark County's investor landscape.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Clark County landlords bought properties for 19.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Clark County consistently acquire properties at a lower price point than traditional homeowners. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords paid an average of $201,042, which is 19.8% less than the $250,791 paid by homeowners, representing a substantial average discount of $49,749 per property.

However, this pricing advantage is not static. The discount fluctuated significantly over the past year. For instance, in Q3 2025, the investor discount was even larger at 26.3% ($75,701), while in Q2 2025, investors surprisingly paid a slight premium of 0.7% ($1,940) more than homeowners.

This volatility in the price gap suggests that investor purchasing power and strategies adapt to changing market conditions on a quarterly basis. They are able to secure deep discounts in some periods while occasionally competing directly on price with retail buyers in others.

Comparing recent acquisition prices to the 2020-2023 average of $185,449 reveals significant price appreciation. The Q1 2026 average price of $201,042 marks an 8.4% increase from the pandemic-era boom, indicating sustained value growth in the market.

The ability to secure properties well below the typical market rate remains a key strategic advantage for investors in Clark County, enabling better potential for cash flow and return on investment.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors captured 25.1% of all Clark County home sales in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords were a major force in the Clark County housing market, purchasing 54 of the 215 total SFRs sold. This activity gave investors a significant 25.1% market share of all home purchases.

The purchasing activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 50 of these acquisitions, representing 92.6% of all investor buying. This highlights the decentralized nature of market activity.

New entrants were a key part of this trend. The single-property tier saw 45 new landlord entities enter the market, acquiring 39 properties. This group alone constituted 72.2% of all investor purchases, signaling a healthy influx of new, small-scale capital.

Mid-size landlords (11-50 properties) also contributed, with 4 entities purchasing 4 properties. However, their activity was minor compared to the volume from smaller operators.

Conspicuously absent were institutional investors (1,000+ properties), who made zero acquisitions in Q4. This reinforces the narrative that the local market is fueled by local entrepreneurs, not large Wall Street firms.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors own 93.2% of Clark County's investor-held rental housing.
Detailed Findings

The ownership landscape in Clark County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Investors in the 'mom-and-pop' category (owning 1-10 properties) collectively control 93.2% of all investor-owned SFRs, cementing their role as the primary providers of rental housing in the area.

The concentration at the smallest end of the spectrum is particularly notable. Landlords with just one property (Tier 01) own 3,236 homes, which represents 68.1% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This highlights the critical role of first-time and small-scale investors.

As portfolio sizes increase, the number of properties drops off sharply. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) own a combined 5.6% of the portfolio, demonstrating a much smaller market footprint.

The influence of large-scale investors is minimal. The 'Large' tier (101-1,000 properties) holds just 25 properties (0.5%), and the 'Institutional' tier (1,000+ properties) owns only 32 properties (0.7%).

This distribution pattern decisively shows that Clark County's rental market is not controlled by large corporations. Instead, it is a highly fragmented market built upon the holdings of thousands of individual and small-business investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type once a portfolio grows beyond five properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by entity type across different portfolio sizes in Clark County. Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller tiers, but a distinct crossover point occurs as portfolios scale.

For entry-level investors, individual ownership is the norm. Individuals own 84.6% of single-property portfolios and 67.7% of two-property portfolios. This dominance continues, albeit reduced, into the 3-5 property tier, with individuals holding a 60.7% majority.

The strategic shift to a corporate structure happens at the 6-10 property tier. Here, companies become the majority owners for the first time, holding 226 properties (65.5%) compared to the 119 owned by individuals (34.5%).

This trend toward incorporation solidifies as portfolios grow larger. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership is commanding, accounting for 135 properties or 75.4% of the total in that segment.

This data illustrates a typical investor lifecycle: individuals start the journey, but as their investment activities grow into a more substantial business, they increasingly utilize corporate entities for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 47130 zip code in Jeffersonville is Clark County's investor hub, with 1,941 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Clark County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 47130 zip code (Jeffersonville) serving as the epicenter. This single area contains 1,941 investor-owned properties, representing the largest cluster of investment activity.

Following Jeffersonville, the next most popular area for investors is the 47129 zip code (also Jeffersonville), with 824 properties, and 47111 (Charlestown) with 551 properties. These top three zip codes demonstrate a clear geographic focus for investment capital.

A key finding emerges when comparing raw property counts to ownership rates. The area with the highest count, 47130, has a relatively moderate investor penetration rate of 12.1%. This suggests a large, liquid market with room for more activity.

Conversely, several smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high investor ownership rates, indicating a different strategy focused on market saturation. For example, in 47138 (Marysville), investors own 55.6% of all SFRs, and in 47162 (Otisco), the rate is 40.4%.

This dichotomy reveals two distinct investor approaches in Clark County: one focused on volume in larger, core markets and another focused on achieving high density and market control in smaller, niche communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10.2 homes for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Clark County are in a strong accumulation phase. In the first quarter of 2026, they purchased 61 properties while selling only 6, making them decisive net buyers with a buy-to-sell ratio of over 10-to-1.

This aggressive buying posture is not a new phenomenon. The trend held steady throughout the previous two years. In 2025, landlords acquired 218 properties and sold 73, and in 2024, they bought 271 and sold 74, maintaining a consistent net-positive acquisition rate.

The behavior of institutional investors (1,000+ properties) offers a stark contrast. Their activity is far more balanced and low-volume. In 2025, they were slight net buyers (5 buys vs. 3 sells), but in 2024, their activity was perfectly neutral (2 buys vs. 2 sells).

This indicates that the market's overall growth is being driven by the cumulative activity of smaller and mid-sized investors, not by large institutional capital.

The sustained, high-velocity net buying from the broader landlord community signals strong confidence in the future of the Clark County real estate market and a continued drive to expand the local rental housing supply.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 24.5% of Clark County's real estate transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a crucial role in market liquidity during the first quarter of 2026, participating in 61 of the 249 total SFR transactions for a market share of 24.5%.

Transaction volume was, once again, dominated by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 57 of the 61 landlord transactions. Institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero transactions, underscoring their lack of active participation in the market.

A fascinating pricing pattern emerged among different investor tiers. Newcomers in the single-property tier paid the highest average price at $234,212. This suggests they are likely buying market-rate, rent-ready properties from traditional homeowners.

Conversely, more established small landlords appeared to hunt for bargains. Those in the 3-5 property tier paid an average of only $95,821, and those in the 6-10 tier paid $110,833. These much lower price points indicate a focus on acquiring distressed or dated properties requiring renovation.

Inter-landlord activity was minimal for new buyers. Only 4.4% of purchases by single-property landlords were from other investors, meaning they are primarily sourcing deals from the retail market and expanding the overall rental inventory.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Clark County with 93.2% ownership, buying at a 19.8% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 4,598 SFR properties, representing 12.1% of Clark County's market. The portfolio is controlled by individuals, who hold 3,348 properties (72.8%) versus 1,324 (28.8%) for companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q1 2026, paying 19.8% less than traditional homeowners, which translated to an average discount of $49,749 per property ($201,042 vs. $250,791).
Activity
In Q1 2026, landlords accounted for 24.5% of all property transactions, with 45 new single-property landlords entering the market in the prior quarter (Q4 2025), signaling robust grassroots growth.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 93.2% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint at just 0.7%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio reaches the 6-10 property tier, holding 65.5% of assets in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as aggressive net buyers with a 10.2x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (61 buys vs. 6 sells), while institutional investors remain largely on the sidelines.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Clark County, Indiana, is fundamentally a story of the small, independent operator. Investors currently hold 4,598 single-family properties, or 12.1% of the county's total SFR stock. This market is not driven by Wall Street but by local capital; 'mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control a staggering 93.2% of these assets. Individual investors own 72.8% of the properties, far outpacing companies, and institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a nearly invisible presence at just 0.7%. This data from our latest Investor Pulse reports paints a picture of a highly fragmented and democratized rental market.

Investor behavior in Clark County is characterized by strategic acquisition and active growth. In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were involved in 24.5% of all home sales and demonstrated a keen ability to find value, purchasing properties at a 19.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners. Transaction data shows they are aggressive net buyers, acquiring over 10 homes for every one they sold. This expansion is fueled by new entrants, with 45 new single-property landlords joining the market in the prior quarter. Interestingly, these new investors tend to pay higher prices, suggesting they buy rent-ready homes, while more seasoned small landlords target lower-priced, value-add opportunities.

The key takeaway for Clark County is that its rental housing market is robust, growing, and firmly in the hands of local investors. The overwhelming dominance of mom-and-pop owners, the preference for all-cash purchases, and the consistent net-buying activity signal strong confidence in the local economy. The absence of institutional players suggests that opportunities are best suited for those with local knowledge who can effectively find and manage smaller portfolios. This market structure provides stability and a direct connection between housing providers and the community they serve.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 04:33 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Clark (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Clark (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-in-clark/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.