McCone (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McCone (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McCone (MT)
293
Total Investors in McCone (MT)
296
Investor Owned SFR in McCone (MT)
224(76.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
268
SFR Owned
203
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
28
SFR Owned
26
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 224 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

McCone County Investor Market Defined by 100% Mom-and-Pop Dominance and Extreme Low Volume
Investors own a staggering 76.5% of SFR properties in McCone County, Montana, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling 100% of this portfolio. Market activity is minimal, with landlords making the single SFR purchase recorded in Q4 2025. This hyper-local market shows no institutional presence, reflecting a landscape entirely shaped by small-scale, individual real estate investing.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 224 SFR properties, with individual landlords comprising 90.6% of holdings.
Cash is the preferred acquisition method, with 174 properties owned outright versus 50 that are financed. All 224 investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied, indicating a 100% rental-focused portfolio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q1 2026 landlord or homeowner transactions were recorded, making price comparison impossible.
The absence of recent sales data highlights extremely low market liquidity. Historically, landlord acquisition prices have fluctuated, with a yearly average of $123,710 in 2025 and $181,550 in 2024.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 100% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
The entire quarter's investor activity consisted of a single property purchased by a new, single-property 'mom-and-pop' landlord. There was zero purchasing activity from institutional investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned SFR market.
Single-property landlords are the foundation of the market, owning 192 properties, an 83.1% share. There is zero ownership by institutional investors (1000+ properties). No tier-level pricing data is available due to low transaction volume.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No pricing data is available to compare individual and company buyers due to inactivity.
Individual landlords dominate every ownership tier, holding 88.3% of single-property portfolios. Companies never become the majority owner at any portfolio size in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 59215 zip code holding 217 properties.
The 59214 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 83.3%, though on a small base of 5 properties. The 59215 zip code combines high volume with a high rate of 78.9%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 11 properties while selling only 1.
This 11-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio shows a clear trend of portfolio accumulation during that period. No data on institutional transactions or landlord-to-landlord sales is available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 100% of the single SFR transaction in Q4 2025.
This sole transaction was by a Tier 01 (single-property) landlord. The property was not purchased from another landlord, indicating an acquisition from the traditional market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 224 SFR properties, with individual landlords comprising 90.6% of holdings.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold significant sway in McCone County, owning 224 single-family residential properties, which constitutes a massive 76.5% of the total 293 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by small, individual landlords, who own 203 properties (90.6%), compared to just 26 properties (11.6%) held by companies. This pattern extends to the entity level, where 268 of the 296 total landlords are individuals.

Cash transactions are the prevailing strategy for investors in this market. A substantial 174 properties (77.7%) in landlord portfolios are owned free and clear, while only 50 properties (22.3%) carry financing.

The investor portfolio is exclusively dedicated to rentals, with all 224 properties classified as non-owner-occupied. This 100% rental rate underscores the business focus of property owners in the region.

The data points to a market characterized by high investor penetration but one that is driven by local, individual capital rather than large-scale corporate real estate investing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q1 2026 landlord or homeowner transactions were recorded, making price comparison impossible.
Detailed Findings

The most significant finding in McCone County's acquisition pricing is the complete lack of sales activity in Q1 2026. With zero properties purchased by either landlords or traditional homeowners, no pricing analysis or discount calculation is possible for the current quarter.

This absence of transactions indicates an extremely illiquid market where properties rarely change hands. This trend was visible throughout 2025, with no landlord purchases recorded in multiple quarters.

Historical data from periods with activity provides some pricing context. In 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was $123,710, a notable decrease from the 2024 average of $181,550.

The average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 boom years was $124,766, suggesting that 2024 prices were an anomaly and 2025 prices represented a return to the mean.

For investors analyzing this market, the key takeaway is not the price but the challenge of entry and exit due to the very low volume of transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 100% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity completely defined the McCone County market in Q4 2025, accounting for 100% of the single SFR transaction recorded during the period.

The entirety of this activity was driven by the smallest investor segment. A new, single-property landlord (Tier 01) made the purchase, representing 100% of properties acquired by investors.

This single transaction highlights the granular nature of market growth, which is dependent on one new entrant at a time rather than portfolio-level acquisitions.

Mid-size and institutional-scale investors were completely absent from the market, with Tiers 05 through 09 recording zero purchases. This reinforces the area's character as a market exclusively for small operators.

The data indicates that any market expansion is currently happening at the grassroots level, with new mom-and-pop investors constituting the only source of demand.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned SFR market.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in McCone County is completely concentrated among small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) holding 100% of the 224 investor-owned properties.

The market's backbone is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 192 properties, representing a commanding 83.1% of all investor-owned housing.

The subsequent tiers show a sharp drop-off, with two-property landlords holding 20 properties (8.7%) and the small landlord tier (3-5 properties) holding 19 properties (8.2%).

There is absolutely no institutional investor presence in McCone County. The 1000+ property tier (Tier 09) holds zero properties, underscoring the market's isolation from large-scale capital.

This distribution reveals a hyper-local market structure built entirely on small, independent owners, a stark contrast to national trends often highlighted in market reports.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
No pricing data is available to compare individual and company buyers due to inactivity.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive owners across every active tier in McCone County, with no crossover point where companies become the majority.

In the foundational single-property tier, individuals own 174 properties (88.3%), while companies own just 23 (11.7%). This demonstrates the individual-centric nature of market entry.

This pattern of individual dominance continues in larger portfolios. Among two-property owners, individuals hold 19 properties (95.0%) versus only 1 for companies (5.0%).

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain strong control with 16 properties (84.2%) compared to 3 properties (15.8%) held by companies.

The lack of a corporate crossover point signifies a market where growth and scale are achieved primarily by private individuals rather than formalized business entities.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 59215 zip code holding 217 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in McCone County is not just high, it is extremely concentrated. The vast majority of activity is in the 59215 zip code, which contains 217 investor-owned SFRs.

While 59215 is the volume leader, the 59214 zip code exhibits the highest rate of investor ownership at 83.3%, with investors owning 5 of the 6 total SFR properties.

The primary zip code, 59215, also has a remarkably high penetration rate of 78.9%, indicating widespread investor presence in the area's main housing stock.

Other zip codes in the county, such as 59274, have a much smaller investor footprint, with just 2 properties representing a 25.0% ownership rate.

This concentration suggests that investor strategy is narrowly focused on specific communities within the county, rather than being broadly distributed.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 11 properties while selling only 1.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024, the most recent year with significant volume, shows that landlords in McCone County were aggressive net buyers.

Investors acquired 11 properties throughout 2024 while only selling one, resulting in a net gain of 10 properties to their portfolios and a powerful 11x buy/sell ratio.

This activity signals a period of confident accumulation, where local investors were actively expanding their holdings.

There is no available data on inter-landlord transactions, so it is unclear what portion of this activity represented trades between existing investors versus purchases from homeowners.

Given the market's structure, there were no institutional transactions recorded, meaning all of this net buying activity was driven by mom-and-pop landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 100% of the single SFR transaction in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the transaction market in McCone County was exclusively composed of landlord activity, with investors responsible for the one and only SFR sale.

The buyer was a new entrant to the market, falling into the single-property (Tier 01) landlord category. This highlights that recent market activity, though minimal, represents organic growth.

Notably, this transaction was not an inter-landlord sale. The 0.0% 'Bought From Landlords' rate for this purchase means the property was acquired from a homeowner or other non-investor entity.

The absence of transactions in any other tier, particularly from institutional investors, reinforces the conclusion that the market's liquidity is solely dependent on the decisions of small, individual buyers.

Pricing data for this transaction was not available, but the nature of the sale itself points to a market sustained by new, small-scale capital entering from outside the existing investor pool.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Individual landlords control 100% of McCone County's investor market, owning 76.5% of all local SFRs amid near-zero sales activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 224 SFR properties, representing a 76.5% ownership rate of the entire McCone County market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (90.6%) versus companies (11.6%).
Pricing
No landlord or homeowner sales were recorded in Q1 2026, making a price comparison impossible and highlighting the market's extremely low liquidity.
Activity
Landlords conducted 100% of market purchases in Q4 2025, with the single transaction being made by one new single-property landlord entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control, owning 100% of investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, holding 88.3% of single-property portfolios. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with an 11-to-1 buy/sell ratio. However, recent activity has slowed to a single purchase in Q4 2025, with no institutional transactions recorded.
Market Narrative

In McCone County, Montana, the investor pulse reveals a market unlike most in the nation. Investors command a staggering 76.5% of the single-family residential housing stock, with a total portfolio of 224 properties. This landscape is exclusively shaped by small operators; 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) own 100% of this portfolio, while institutional investors have zero presence. Ownership is deeply personal, with individual landlords holding 203 properties (90.6%) compared to just 26 (11.6%) for companies.

Investor behavior reflects a hyper-local, capital-cautious environment. The most recent quarter (Q4 2025) saw only a single SFR transaction, which was a purchase by a new, single-property landlord, accounting for 100% of market activity. This extremely low liquidity means recent pricing data is non-existent, and comparisons to homeowner prices are impossible. While historical data from 2024 showed investors were strong net buyers (11 buys vs. 1 sell), the current market is defined by inactivity, with owners appearing to hold assets long-term rather than actively trading.

The key takeaway for McCone County is that it operates as a closed ecosystem dominated by a small community of individual investors. The high ownership rate combined with low transaction volume suggests a stable, buy-and-hold rental market. Without the influence of large-scale capital or institutional players, market dynamics are driven by local factors and the financial decisions of individual owners, making it a challenging environment for new entrants seeking to acquire properties quickly through a property search.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 10:15 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography McCone (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 McCone (MT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-mt-mccone/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.