Bradley (TN) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bradley (TN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bradley (TN)
29,864
Total Investors in Bradley (TN)
6,447
Investor Owned SFR in Bradley (TN)
5,715(19.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
6,086
SFR Owned
5,203
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
361
SFR Owned
572
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,715 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small, Individual Landlords Dominate Bradley County's Investor Market, Controlling 93% of Properties
Investors own 19.1% of the SFR market in Bradley County (5,715 properties), with "mom-and-pop" landlords controlling 93.2% of that portfolio versus a negligible 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q1, landlords were aggressive net buyers (5.33x buy/sell ratio) and purchased properties at a 27.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 5,715 SFRs in Bradley County, with individual investors holding a dominant 91.0%.
A significant 74.2% of investor-owned properties (4,242) are held in cash, compared to just 25.8% (1,473) that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, with 5,631 properties listed as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords purchased properties for 27.5% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $101,957.
This price gap has widened significantly over the past year, growing from just 7.6% in Q1 2025 to 27.5% in Q1 2026. Landlord acquisition prices have trended downward over the same period.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 20.2% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 59 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 86.7% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors bought just 2 properties, or 3.3% of the landlord total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Bradley County, controlling 93.2% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the investor-held housing stock. Single-property landlords alone account for 71.8% of all investor properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every single landlord tier in Bradley County.
Even in larger portfolio tiers like 51-100 properties, individuals still own a 59.2% majority. Company ownership share increases with portfolio size but never surpasses individual ownership.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with three zip codes (37311, 37312, 37323) containing 88.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
The 37311 zip code is the epicenter, holding the most investor properties (1,916) and one of the highest ownership rates at 28.3%. Several smaller zip codes show 100% investor ownership, indicating niche rental markets.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.33 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
This net buying trend is consistent over time, with a buy/sell ratio of 3.73 for the full year 2025. Institutional investors are also net buyers, though at a much smaller scale, acquiring 3 properties for every one sold in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 17.8% of all Q1 market transactions, making 80 purchases.
A significant price disparity exists, with institutional investors paying $178,886 on average, 39.9% less than the $297,704 paid by new single-property landlords. Institutions were also most likely to buy from other landlords, with 50% of their acquisitions sourced this way.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 5,715 SFRs in Bradley County, with individual investors holding a dominant 91.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 19.1% share of the single-family housing market in Bradley County, totaling 5,715 properties.

Individual investors are the primary force, owning 5,203 properties (91.0%), while companies own the remaining 572 properties (10.0%). This structure shows a market accessible to individuals, defining the local real estate investing landscape.

This ownership structure is also reflected in the entity count, where 6,086 individual landlords vastly outnumber the 361 company landlords.

Cash is the preferred acquisition method, with 4,242 properties (74.2%) owned outright, compared to 1,473 properties (25.8%) that are financed, indicating significant equity in the market.

The portfolio is clearly for investment purposes, as 5,631 of the 5,715 properties are rented, demonstrating a strong rental focus among owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords purchased properties for 27.5% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $101,957.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Bradley County secure substantial discounts, paying an average of $269,277 in Q1 2026, which is 27.5% less than the $371,234 paid by traditional homeowners.

This $101,957 price advantage per property represents a dramatic widening of the discount gap over the past year.

The discount has more than tripled in twelve months, climbing from a modest 7.6% ($26,408) in Q1 2025 to its current high, highlighting a growing investor advantage.

This widening gap highlights the strategic advantage investors have in identifying opportunities, often through detailed market analysis and property search platforms.

While homeowner prices have remained relatively stable, average landlord acquisition prices have decreased from $320,821 in Q1 2025 to $269,277 in Q1 2026, indicating a strategic focus on lower-priced assets.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 20.2% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, purchasing 59 homes.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords captured 20.2% of the market, purchasing 59 of the 292 single-family residences sold in Bradley County.

The market's new activity is overwhelmingly driven by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) responsible for 52 of these purchases, representing 86.7% of all investor acquisitions.

First-time or single-property investors were the most active group, with 55 new entities acquiring 36 properties, making up 60.0% of the quarterly landlord buying volume.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact, purchasing only 2 properties, which is just 3.3% of the investor total for the quarter.

This data indicates a robust and growing base of small, local landlords rather than a consolidation of ownership by large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Bradley County, controlling 93.2% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Bradley County is defined by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 93.2% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of this market, with their 4,283 properties representing 71.8% of the total investor portfolio.

Conversely, large-scale institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning only 7 properties, which accounts for just 0.1% of the investor market.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with landlords owning 1-5 properties controlling a combined 89.7% of the total (71.8% + 8.5% + 9.4%).

This distribution challenges the narrative of corporate dominance and highlights the importance of small, local investors in the region's rental housing supply.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority property owners in every single landlord tier in Bradley County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all portfolio sizes in Bradley County, a stark contrast to national trends where companies often dominate larger tiers.

In the entry-level single-property tier, individuals own a staggering 94.8% of the homes, establishing a foundation of personal ownership.

Even as portfolio sizes grow, individuals remain dominant. For landlords with 6-10 properties, individuals own 62.5%, and in the 51-100 property tier, they still hold a 59.2% majority.

The data shows no "crossover point" where companies become the majority owners, indicating that the path to portfolio growth in this market is primarily driven by individual effort, not corporate consolidation.

Company ownership gradually increases with portfolio size, from just 5.2% in the single-property tier to 40.8% in the 51-100 property tier, but never achieves a controlling share.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with three zip codes (37311, 37312, 37323) containing 88.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Bradley County is geographically concentrated, with just three zip codes, 37311, 37312, and 37323, accounting for 5,042 properties, or 88.2% of the entire investor portfolio.

The zip code 37311 is the primary hub for investors, containing 1,916 investor-owned homes and a high ownership rate of 28.3%.

While several smaller zip codes (30736, 37321, 37322, 37364) technically have a 100.0% investor ownership rate, this likely reflects very small housing stocks and specialized rental areas.

The top three regions by property count (37311, 37312, 37323) show investor penetration rates of 28.3%, 15.8%, and 15.5% respectively, well above the county average.

This intense geographic focus suggests investors are targeting specific neighborhoods with favorable conditions for rentals, rather than spreading acquisitions evenly across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.33 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bradley County are in a strong accumulation phase, demonstrated by a Q1 2026 buy-to-sell ratio of 5.33, with 80 properties purchased and only 15 sold.

This aggressive buying posture is a continuation of a long-term trend; for the full year 2025, investors were also net buyers with a ratio of 3.73 (481 buys vs. 129 sells).

Institutional investors (1,000+ portfolio) mirror this trend on a smaller scale, also operating as net buyers with 9 acquisitions versus 3 dispositions in 2025.

Based on Q1 transaction data, a small but notable portion of acquisitions come from within the investor community, with 8.8% of purchases (7 out of 80) being from another landlord.

The consistent, high buy-to-sell ratio signals strong confidence among local investors and a continued strategy of portfolio expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 17.8% of all Q1 market transactions, making 80 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors accounted for 17.8% of all market activity, with 80 transactions out of a total of 450.

A stark pricing difference emerges between investor tiers. First-time, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $297,704.

In contrast, institutional investors paid the least, averaging just $178,886 per property, a 39.9% discount compared to their smallest counterparts, indicating a different acquisition strategy focused on lower-cost assets.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 1-4) dominated transaction volume with 72 purchases, while institutional investors made only 2.

Larger investors appear more reliant on acquiring properties from other landlords. Half (50.0%) of institutional purchases were from existing investors, compared to only 5.5% for single-property buyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Bradley County with 93% Ownership While Securing 28% Discounts
Holdings
Investors own 5,715 SFR properties in Bradley County (19.1% of the market), with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 5,203 of these homes (91.0%) compared to 572 (10.0%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid 27.5% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $101,957 per property ($269,277 vs. $371,234).
Activity
Landlords accounted for 17.8% of all Q1 property transactions. Activity was driven by small investors, with 55 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.2% of investor-owned housing, while large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, including larger ones, with no crossover point where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 5.33x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (80 buys vs. 15 sells), a trend mirrored by institutional investors who also remain net buyers.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Bradley County, Tennessee, is overwhelmingly shaped by small, individual owners. Investors hold 5,715 single-family residential properties, representing 19.1% of the county's total market. This portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who own 91.0% of these properties, compared to just 10.0% held by companies. The market structure heavily skews toward smaller players: 'mom-and-pop' landlords with 1-10 properties control a massive 93.2% of all investor-owned homes, while large-scale institutional firms have a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 points to a confident and expanding market segment. Landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 5.33 homes for every one they sold. They demonstrated a keen ability to secure favorable pricing, paying 27.5% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $101,957 per property. This activity is highly concentrated geographically, with three zip codes (37311, 37312, and 37323) containing over 88% of all investor-owned properties, suggesting a targeted approach to acquisitions in specific neighborhoods.

The key takeaway from this data is that Bradley County's rental market is not undergoing a corporate takeover. Instead, it is being actively shaped and expanded by local, individual investors who are growing their small portfolios. The market's health is driven by the entry of new single-property landlords and the continued accumulation by existing small owners. These investors are capitalizing on significant purchasing discounts, remaining cash-heavy, and consistently adding to the local supply of rental housing. Access to accurate assessor data and market intelligence is a clear strategic advantage for this dominant investor group.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 02:36 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Bradley (TN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Bradley (TN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-tn-bradley/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.