Sublette (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sublette (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sublette (WY)
3,342
Total Investors in Sublette (WY)
3,691
Investor Owned SFR in Sublette (WY)
2,513(75.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,454
SFR Owned
2,314
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
237
SFR Owned
269
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,513 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Sublette County, Owning 75% of SFR Market with 99.7% Control of Investor Holdings
Investors own 2,513 single-family properties in Sublette County, WY, representing a massive 75.2% of the total market. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 99.7% of the investor-owned portfolio, while individuals account for 92.1% of all landlord-held homes. In Q1 2026, investors were aggressive net buyers, securing properties at a 29.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,513 SFR properties, a 75.2% market share, with individuals holding 92.1%.
Cash is the preferred financing method, with 1,716 properties owned outright versus 797 with a mortgage. Nearly the entire portfolio (2,512 properties) is non-owner-occupied and operated as rentals. The market consists of 3,691 distinct landlord entities, highlighting a highly fragmented ownership base.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 29.3% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a significant $159,325 discount per property.
This Q1 discount marks a sharp reversal from 2025, which saw landlords paying premiums as high as 56.3% above homeowner prices in Q2. Landlord acquisition volume has been extremely low in recent quarters, with data showing zero purchases in multiple periods, indicating a thin market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated the market in Q4 2025, purchasing 20 of 26 homes sold for a 76.9% market share.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 19 of the 20 landlord purchases (95.0%). A single institutional investor acquired the remaining property. Activity was concentrated in the smallest tier, with 28 new or expanding single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of investor-owned SFRs in the county.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 2,260 properties, which represents 87.6% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible presence, holding just one property out of 2,513.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 55.1% share within that segment.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 91.7% of single-property rentals and 87.2% of two-property portfolios. The data shows a clear pattern of investors using corporate structures as their portfolios scale up.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated in zip code 82941, which contains 1,582 properties, 63.0% of the county's investor-owned total.
Investor ownership rates are extremely high across the region, with zip code 82923 reaching an 83.2% investor-owned rate. The areas with the highest property counts are not always the ones with the highest penetration, such as 82941 which has the most properties but ranks third by rate (75.7%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Sublette County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 29 properties while selling only one in Q1 2026.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent over time, with landlords recording 179 buys versus just 19 sells for all of 2025. This pattern points to a long-term hold strategy and continued confidence in the local rental market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were the driving force in Q1 2026, accounting for 78.4% of all transactions with 29 property acquisitions.
A massive price gap emerged between investor tiers: single-property buyers paid an average of $400,979, while a single institutional acquisition was recorded at just $152,650. Notably, 100% of landlord purchases were from non-investors, with zero inter-landlord trading.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,513 SFR properties, a 75.2% market share, with individuals holding 92.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Sublette County, WY is exceptionally high, with 2,513 single-family residential properties held by investors, constituting 75.2% of the county's total 3,342 SFRs. This penetration rate signifies a market predominantly shaped by real estate investing activity rather than traditional homeownership.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors, who own 2,314 properties, or 92.1% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 269, representing 10.7% of the total, underscoring the dominance of small-scale, non-corporate landlords.

A strong preference for all-cash holdings is evident, with 1,716 properties (68.3%) owned free and clear, compared to 797 properties (31.7%) that are financed. This suggests many investors have significant equity and may be less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rental purposes, as 2,512 of the 2,513 investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied. This near-100% rental rate confirms that the primary strategy for investors in this market is generating rental income.

The number of distinct landlord entities (3,691) is significantly higher than the number of properties they own (2,513). This unusual ratio points towards a market structure with substantial co-ownership of properties among a large base of individual investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 29.3% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, a significant $159,325 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In a dramatic shift, landlords in Sublette County secured properties at a 29.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. The average landlord acquisition price was $384,423, a staggering $159,325 less than the homeowner average of $543,748.

This pricing advantage is a recent development and contrasts sharply with 2025's market dynamics. Throughout 2025, landlords frequently paid premiums, notably paying $35,902 more (7.6%) than homeowners in Q3 and an astonishing $155,996 more (56.3%) in Q2.

The pricing relationship between landlords and homeowners in this market is highly volatile, swinging from substantial premiums to deep discounts quarter-over-quarter. This volatility suggests a thin market where a small number of transactions can heavily influence average prices.

Historical price data shows appreciation from the 2020-2023 period, when the average price was $336,964. However, the recorded purchase volume for landlords was zero in every quarter from Q4 2024 through Q3 2025, making direct trend analysis difficult and highlighting the sporadic nature of acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated the market in Q4 2025, purchasing 20 of 26 homes sold for a 76.9% market share.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was overwhelmingly dominant in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 20 of the 26 total SFRs sold in Sublette County. This represents a 76.9% market share, indicating investors were the primary buyers during this period.

The buying activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) purchased 19 properties, making up 95.0% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

New and first-time landlords were the most active segment, with the single-property (Tier 01) category alone accounting for 19 purchases. These acquisitions were made by 28 distinct entities, signaling a significant influx of new capital from small investors.

In contrast, institutional-level activity was minimal. Only one property was purchased by an investor in the 1,000+ property tier, accounting for just 5.0% of the quarter's landlord acquisitions.

The data clearly shows a market where growth is fueled by a broad base of new and small investors, rather than consolidation by large-scale corporate entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.7% of investor-owned SFRs in the county.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Sublette County is characterized by an extreme concentration of ownership among small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively control 99.7% of all investor-held SFRs.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) alone accounts for the vast majority of holdings, with 2,260 properties representing an 87.6% share. This highlights a highly fragmented market dominated by first-time or small-time investors.

The next largest tiers also consist of small landlords: two-property owners hold a 6.8% share, while those with 3-5 properties control 3.4%. The scale of ownership drops off precipitously beyond this level.

Institutional ownership is virtually nonexistent in this market. The 1,000+ property tier (Tier 09) contains just a single property, accounting for 0.0% of the total investor portfolio.

This ownership structure defies the common narrative of corporate landlord consolidation, revealing a market that is almost exclusively supported by a broad base of individual, small-scale investors. These findings are based on comprehensive assessor data.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding a 55.1% share within that segment.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in Sublette County. This transition occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 27 properties, a 55.1% majority share, compared to 22 properties held by individuals.

At smaller scales, individual ownership is the standard. Individuals own 2,127 of the single-property rentals (a 91.7% share) and 156 of the two-property rentals (an 87.2% share). This demonstrates that the vast majority of investors entering the market do so as individuals.

The pattern continues into the 3-5 property tier, where individuals still hold a strong majority with 67 properties (75.3%) versus 22 for companies (24.7%).

The shift to corporate ownership in the 6-10 property tier suggests a strategic decision by landlords to incorporate as their portfolios reach a certain size, likely for liability protection and operational efficiency.

This trend provides a clear view of the investor lifecycle in the county: individuals initiate and dominate the small-portfolio landscape, while corporate structures are adopted by those who successfully scale their operations.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated in zip code 82941, which contains 1,582 properties, 63.0% of the county's investor-owned total.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor holdings in Sublette County are heavily concentrated in a single area. Zip code 82941 is the epicenter of activity, with 1,582 investor-owned properties, accounting for 63.0% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

The top five zip codes by investor property count collectively hold 2,441 properties, or 97.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, indicating that activity is confined to a few key submarkets.

Investor penetration rates are exceptionally high throughout the county's primary zip codes. Zip code 82923 leads with an 83.2% ownership rate, followed by 82922 at 80.4%. Every one of the top five zip codes by count has an investor ownership rate exceeding 54%.

A key finding is the distinction between raw counts and ownership rates. While 82941 dominates in volume, other zip codes like 82923 and 82922 show a deeper market saturation by investors, making them even more landlord-dense markets by percentage.

This data from our market reports dashboard illustrates a market where certain neighborhoods are almost entirely composed of rental properties, shaping the local housing landscape significantly.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Sublette County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 29 properties while selling only one in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Sublette County are operating in a mode of aggressive accumulation. In the first quarter of 2026, they purchased 29 properties while selling only one, establishing a clear net-buyer position.

This behavior is not a recent anomaly but part of a sustained trend. For the full year of 2025, investors bought 179 properties and sold just 19, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 9.4-to-1. In 2024, the ratio was even more skewed, with 130 buys and only 6 sells.

The consistently high volume of purchases relative to sales indicates a strong and sustained belief in the local market's potential for appreciation and rental income. Investors are focused on expanding their portfolios, not divesting.

The lack of institutional transaction data reinforces that this accumulation is being driven by the smaller, individual investors who dominate the county's ownership landscape.

This long-term buy-and-hold strategy contributes to a tightening of available housing stock for traditional homebuyers, as more properties are absorbed into the rental market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were the driving force in Q1 2026, accounting for 78.4% of all transactions with 29 property acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords overwhelmingly drove market activity, participating in 29 of the 37 total SFR transactions. This 78.4% share demonstrates that investors were the primary source of demand in the market.

Transaction volume was heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 28 of the 29 investor transactions, reaffirming that market growth is fueled by new and small-scale buyers.

A dramatic pricing disparity was observed between tiers. The 28 purchases by single-property landlords averaged $400,979. In stark contrast, the single transaction by an institutional investor was for $152,650, a 61.9% lower price point, suggesting a different asset type or a uniquely distressed sale.

An important dynamic is the source of inventory. None of the 29 properties purchased by landlords in Q1 were acquired from other landlords. This 0% inter-landlord transaction rate indicates that investors are buying from the owner-occupied market or new construction, directly converting housing stock to rentals.

This pattern of sourcing properties from outside the existing investor pool while simultaneously accumulating assets points to a steady expansion of the rental market's footprint in Sublette County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Sublette County is an investor's market: Mom-and-pops control 99.7% of investor-held homes which make up 75% of all SFRs.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,513 SFR properties, a 75.2% share of the total market in Sublette County, WY. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 2,314 properties (92.1%), compared to just 269 properties (10.7%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, paying an average of $384,423, which is 29.3% less than traditional homeowners ($543,748), securing a discount of $159,325 per property.
Activity
Landlords dominated Q1 2026 activity, purchasing 29 of the 37 homes sold (78.4% of all sales). This activity was driven by the smallest investors, with single-property landlords accounting for 28 of the 29 purchases.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-absolute control, owning 99.7% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint with just a single property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the foundation of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, holding a 55.1% share in that tier, signaling a trend of incorporation with scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 29-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 (29 buys vs 1 sell), a clear signal of portfolio accumulation. Institutional transaction activity was limited to a single purchase.
Market Narrative

In Sublette County, WY, the single-family housing market is fundamentally shaped by investors, who own an extraordinary 75.2% of all SFR properties, totaling 2,513 homes. This market is not the domain of large corporations; instead, it is built on a foundation of small, independent operators. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.7% of the investor-owned portfolio, with individuals owning 92.1% of all investor-held assets. This hyper-fragmented structure, detailed in our latest Investor Pulse reports, shows a market where institutional presence is virtually zero, challenging common narratives about Wall Street's role in housing.

Investor behavior in Q1 2026 was defined by aggressive and strategic acquisition. Landlords drove 78.4% of all market transactions and demonstrated significant purchasing power, securing properties for 29.3% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is overwhelmingly led by new and small-scale entrants, with single-property landlords responsible for 97% of investor purchases in the quarter. Furthermore, investors are consistent net buyers, with a 29-to-1 buy-sell ratio in Q1, indicating a clear strategy of long-term accumulation and expansion of the local rental housing supply.

The key takeaway from Sublette County is a portrait of an investor-dominated market that is the antithesis of a consolidated corporate landscape. It is a market defined by extremely high investor penetration, powered almost exclusively by a large base of individual, small-scale landlords who are actively growing their portfolios. These investors are sourcing properties from the owner-occupied market and are adept at finding deals, creating a housing environment where rental is the predominant form of tenure and small, local operators are the primary gatekeepers.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 06:15 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Sublette (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Sublette (WY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wy-sublette/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.