Mathews (VA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Mathews (VA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Mathews (VA)
5,065
Total Investors in Mathews (VA)
3,340
Investor Owned SFR in Mathews (VA)
2,552(50.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,029
SFR Owned
2,262
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
311
SFR Owned
343
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,552 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investors Own Over 50% of Mathews County SFR Market, Dominated by Small Landlords
Investors own 2,552 single-family homes in Mathews County, a staggering 50.4% of the total market. This landscape is controlled by small 'mom-and-pop' landlords who own 99.3% of the investor portfolio, while institutional firms hold just 0.1%. In the most recent quarter, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a significant 36.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,552 SFR properties in Mathews County, 50.4% of the market.
Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate, holding 2,262 properties (88.6%) compared to just 343 (13.4%) for companies. The portfolio is heavily weighted towards cash ownership, with 1,958 properties owned outright versus 594 that are financed. Of all landlord-owned properties, 2,538 are classified as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 36.8% discount in Q1, paying $219,811 less than homeowners.
The price advantage for landlords is highly volatile, swinging from a 24.9% premium ($96,124) in Q3 2025 to a 36.8% discount in Q1 2026. This indicates an opportunistic purchasing strategy in a market with fluctuating prices. Recent purchasing activity appears to have stalled, with zero landlord acquisitions recorded in multiple recent quarters, including all of 2024 and 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords bought 48.1% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, with small investors driving all activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of the 13 investor purchases. All of this activity came from new, single-property investors, with 17 new entities entering the market. Institutional investors made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.3% of investor-owned homes in Mathews County.
Single-property landlords alone own 81.3% of all investor-held SFRs (2,140 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal presence, owning just 2 properties, which accounts for only 0.1% of the investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies assume majority ownership at the 11-20 property tier, signaling a professionalization threshold.
While individuals own 89.4% of single-property portfolios, companies control 83.3% of portfolios in the 11-20 property range. This distinct crossover point highlights where investment strategies typically shift from personal to corporate structures. Individuals still dominate the 6-10 property tier at 81.8%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in specific zip codes, with ownership rates exceeding 80% in some areas.
The zip codes 23066 and 23064 have the highest investor penetration, at 82.8% and 82.4% respectively. The 23109 zip code has the highest raw count of investor-owned homes at 482, representing a 50.0% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers in Mathews County, acquiring 8.5 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
This accumulation trend has been consistent, with landlords acting as net buyers in every recent period, including a net gain of 106 properties in 2025 and 112 in 2024. Transaction volume shows landlords bought 17 properties while only selling 2 in the first quarter of 2026.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 42.5% of all property transactions in the most recent quarter.
All 17 landlord transactions were conducted by new, single-property investors, who paid an average price of $377,907. These new investors sourced 11.8% of their purchases from existing landlords, indicating a small but active internal market. No institutional transactions were recorded.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,552 SFR properties in Mathews County, 50.4% of the market.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership has reached a critical mass in Mathews County, with landlords now controlling 2,552 single-family properties, which constitutes 50.4% of the county's entire 5,065 SFR housing stock.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership, which accounts for 2,262 properties, or 88.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company-owned properties represent a much smaller share at 343 properties (13.4%).

This individual dominance is further reflected in the entity count, where 3,029 individual landlords operate compared to only 311 companies, a ratio of nearly 10 to 1.

Financing strategies reveal a preference for liquidity or long-term ownership, as cash-owned properties (1,958) outnumber financed ones (594) by more than three to one.

The portfolio is heavily focused on rental income, with 2,538 properties registered as non-owner-occupied, underscoring the deep integration of real estate investing into the local housing market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 36.8% discount in Q1, paying $219,811 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market rate, paying an average of $377,907 compared to the $597,718 paid by traditional homeowners. This represents a substantial 36.8% price advantage, or a $219,811 discount per property.

This pricing advantage shows extreme volatility, suggesting a market where investors act opportunistically. For instance, the deep Q1 discount contrasts sharply with Q3 2025, when landlords paid a 24.9% premium over homeowners ($482,795 vs. $386,671).

A critical trend is the apparent freeze in landlord acquisitions throughout 2024 and 2025, where transaction data shows zero properties purchased by investors in those periods. This halt in activity suggests either a highly selective buying approach or a lack of suitable inventory.

The historical price trend from the 2020-2023 period shows an average acquisition price of $380,241, indicating that the Q1 2026 price of $377,907 is consistent with longer-term valuation levels.

The large and fluctuating gap between landlord and homeowner prices highlights a key dynamic in the Mathews County market, where investors are not driving prices up but are instead capitalizing on pricing inefficiencies.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords bought 48.1% of all homes sold in Q4 2025, with small investors driving all activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a powerful force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 13 of the 27 total SFR properties sold in Mathews County, capturing a 48.1% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of all investor acquisitions, totaling 13 properties.

Notably, all 13 properties were purchased by new entrants in the single-property (Tier 01) category, signaling a grassroots expansion of the rental market rather than consolidation by larger players.

The influx of new participants is clear, with 17 new landlord entities recorded as purchasing these 13 single-property homes, indicating some properties may have been co-purchased.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from the market, reporting zero purchases and reinforcing the theme of a locally dominated investment landscape.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.3% of investor-owned homes in Mathews County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Mathews County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 99.3% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who alone accounts for 2,140 properties, representing a massive 81.3% share of the entire investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration dissipates quickly in larger tiers. Two-property landlords hold a 10.4% share, and those with 3-5 properties hold 6.8%, with all other tiers falling below 1% each.

Challenging the narrative of a corporate takeover, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a negligible footprint in the county, owning just 2 properties for a 0.1% market share.

This ownership structure indicates a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market, powered by thousands of individual investors rather than a few large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies assume majority ownership at the 11-20 property tier, signaling a professionalization threshold.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Mathews County rental market, owning 89.4% of all single-property landlord portfolios (1,948 properties for individuals vs. 232 for companies).

A clear threshold for professionalization appears once a portfolio grows beyond 10 properties. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership surges to 83.3%, marking the distinct crossover point where corporate structures become the dominant strategy.

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individual ownership remains strong at 72.3%, but the growing presence of companies (27.7%) hints at the early stages of formalization for more serious investors.

The 6-10 property tier is still heavily controlled by individuals, who own 18 of the 22 properties (81.8%), confirming that the significant shift to corporate ownership happens at a slightly larger scale.

This data illustrates a clear lifecycle: investors typically start as individuals and transition to company structures as their portfolios expand and require more sophisticated management.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in specific zip codes, with ownership rates exceeding 80% in some areas.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Mathews County is not uniform, with specific zip codes showing extreme levels of concentration. The highest raw number of investor-owned properties is in 23109, with 482 homes, representing a 50.0% ownership rate for that area.

Certain smaller zip codes exhibit hyper-saturation by investors. In 23066 and 23064, investor ownership rates reach 82.8% and 82.4% respectively, indicating these areas function primarily as rental communities.

Other areas with high investor penetration include 23125 (61.3%), 23128 (60.5%), and 23068 (57.4%), showing a widespread pattern of high investor presence across the county.

The top five zip codes by sheer volume of investor properties are 23109 (482 properties), 23035 (355), 23138 (339), 23076 (279), and 23128 (201), which together account for a significant portion of the total investor portfolio.

This geographic analysis reveals a market with deep investor saturation in key pockets, impacting local housing dynamics and availability for traditional homeowners.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers in Mathews County, acquiring 8.5 properties for every 1 sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Mathews County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 17 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a net gain of 15 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.5x.

This net-buyer behavior is a long-term trend. In 2025, investors added a net 106 properties to their portfolios (119 buys vs. 13 sells). Similarly, in 2024, they added a net 112 properties (135 buys vs. 23 sells).

The data shows a steady pace of acquisitions over time, with quarterly purchase volumes in 2025 ranging from 32 to 34 properties per quarter, indicating consistent demand from the investor community.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) recorded no transactions during these periods, underscoring that the market's transactional velocity is driven entirely by smaller, independent landlords.

The persistent and high buy-to-sell ratio signals strong confidence among local investors in the Mathews County real estate market's long-term value.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 42.5% of all property transactions in the most recent quarter.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords played a pivotal role in market liquidity, participating in 17 of the 40 total SFR transactions, a share of 42.5%.

Remarkably, 100% of this investor activity came from the single-property (Tier 01) category. This highlights that market momentum is being driven by new entrants rather than portfolio expansion by existing landlords.

These new landlords paid an average purchase price of $377,907, a figure significantly below the average price paid by traditional homeowners during the same period.

A small portion of the market is self-contained, with 11.8% of purchases by new landlords coming from existing landlords (2 of 17 transactions). This suggests a modest level of portfolio churn among investors.

The absence of transactions from mid-size or institutional tiers further confirms that the transactional engine of the Mathews County investor market is exclusively powered by mom-and-pop buyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual landlords dominate Mathews County, owning over 50% of the housing market while institutions remain absent.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,552 single-family homes, a 50.4% share of the entire Mathews County market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who control 2,262 properties (88.6%), while companies own the remaining 343 (13.4%).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a 36.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $377,907 versus the homeowners' $597,718, a savings of $219,811 per home.
Activity
Landlords purchased 48.1% of all homes sold in the latest quarter, an activity driven entirely by small investors. This quarter saw 17 new single-property landlords enter the market, highlighting grassroots growth.
Market Share
The market is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.3% of all investor-owned housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a nearly non-existent share of just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the standard for smaller portfolios, but a clear professionalization threshold exists at the 11-20 property tier, where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with an 8.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 (17 buys vs. 2 sells), indicating aggressive accumulation. Institutional investors were completely inactive, recording zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Mathews County, VA is uniquely characterized by its deep penetration of real estate investors, who now own 2,552 properties, or 50.4% of the total market. This landscape is not shaped by Wall Street firms but by local, individual operators. Individual landlords own 88.6% of the investor portfolio, and small 'mom-and-pop' investors (1-10 properties) collectively control a staggering 99.3% of all investor-owned homes. In contrast, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, holding just 0.1% of the portfolio.

Investor behavior is marked by opportunistic acquisitions and consistent accumulation. In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring homes for 36.8% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is driven exclusively by new market entrants; 100% of investor purchases in the last quarter were made by single-property landlords. Overall, investors are strong net buyers, acquiring 8.5 properties for every one they sold in Q1, a trend consistent with previous years, signaling strong confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway from the Mathews County data is the emergence of a hyper-localized, landlord-driven market where half the housing stock is investor-owned. This structure, dominated by thousands of small players, defies the common narrative of corporate consolidation. With investors continuing to accumulate properties at a discount and certain zip codes showing over 80% investor ownership, the defining characteristic of this market is the deep integration of small-scale rental housing into the community's fabric, which has profound implications for housing affordability and availability for traditional homebuyers.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 04:56 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Mathews (VA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Mathews (VA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-va-mathews/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.