Davis (IA) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Davis (IA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Davis (IA)
1,822
Total Investors in Davis (IA)
260
Investor Owned SFR in Davis (IA)
250(13.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
224
SFR Owned
190
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
36
SFR Owned
64
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 250 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Davis County with 91.1% Ownership as Institutions Remain Absent
In Davis County, investors own 250 single-family properties, 13.7% of the total market, with small 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 91.1% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords were net buyers, purchasing 17.6% of all homes sold at a 16.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors had no activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 250 SFR properties in Davis County, with individuals holding 76%.
Cash is the preferred funding method, with 179 properties owned outright compared to 71 financed. The vast majority of the portfolio, 234 properties, is utilized for non-owner-occupied rental purposes.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 16.8% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $24,198 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners has narrowed significantly but remains substantial; in Q1 2025, the discount was a staggering 79.6%. Landlord acquisition prices have shown significant appreciation, rising from an average of $62,635 in 2020-2023 to $119,500 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 17.6% of all homes sold in the last quarter.
Mom-and-pop landlords were responsible for 100% of investor purchases, acquiring 3 properties. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing no activity in the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 91.1% of all investor-owned properties in Davis County.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have no presence, owning 0.0% of the market. Single-property landlords are the largest group, holding 152 properties, a 58.7% share of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property holders at the 11-20 property tier.
Below this threshold, individuals are the dominant owners, holding 87.7% of single-property portfolios. Companies control 94.1% of properties in the 11-20 tier, marking a clear shift in ownership structure as portfolios grow.
Geographic Distribution
The vast majority of investor activity is concentrated in a single zip code: 52537.
The 52537 zip code contains 204 investor-owned properties, which is 81.6% of the county's total. Some smaller zip codes show extreme saturation, with 52551 at 100% investor ownership and 52554 at 50%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Davis County are strong net buyers, acquiring 4 properties for every 1 sold in Q1.
This accumulation trend is consistent over time, as landlords added a net of 11 properties to their portfolios in 2025 (23 buys vs 12 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transactions, remaining entirely on the sidelines.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 17.4% of all property transactions in Q1.
All 4 investor transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop landlords. Notably, 0% of these purchases were from other landlords, indicating they are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 250 SFR properties in Davis County, with individuals holding 76%.
Detailed Findings

In Davis County, investors hold a portfolio of 250 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 13.7% of the total 1,822 SFRs in the market. This highlights a significant, yet not overwhelming, investor presence in the local housing scene.

Individual investors are the primary force in the market, owning 190 properties, or 76.0% of the investor-held portfolio. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 64 properties (25.6%), indicating that the market is driven by smaller-scale operators rather than large corporations.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 234 of the 250 properties classified as rented. This demonstrates a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies among Davis County investors.

When it comes to financing, cash is king. Investors own 179 properties free and clear, more than double the 71 properties that are financed. This suggests a market with financially stable investors who can move quickly on acquisitions without relying on traditional lending.

The ownership structure by entity count reinforces the dominance of small players. There are 260 distinct landlords, of which 224 are individuals and only 36 are companies, a ratio of more than 6-to-1.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 16.8% less than homeowners in Q1, a discount of $24,198 per property.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords in Davis County demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $119,500. This was 16.8% less than the $143,698 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a significant cash discount of $24,198 per transaction.

This pricing gap, while still large, represents a notable tightening from previous periods. For instance, the discount was an extraordinary 74.3% in Q2 2025 ($61,250 vs $238,114) and 79.6% in Q1 2025 ($35,000 vs $171,867), signaling a market that is becoming more competitive for investors.

Average acquisition prices for landlords have seen dramatic growth, indicating strong local market appreciation. Prices have nearly doubled from the 2020-2023 average of $62,635 to the Q1 2026 average of $119,500.

The trend of landlords paying significantly less than homeowners is consistent across all recent quarters. This persistent pattern suggests that investors are successfully targeting undervalued assets, purchasing off-market properties, or leveraging cash offers to secure better deals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 17.6% of all homes sold in the last quarter.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 17.6% of all SFR sales in the last quarter, with landlords purchasing 3 of the 17 total properties sold in Davis County. This level of activity establishes investors as a consistent and material component of market demand.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' investors (Tiers 01-04), who acquired all 3 properties. This highlights the grassroots nature of real estate investing in the area.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases. This absence contrasts sharply with national headlines and underscores the local, small-investor character of the Davis County market.

New market entrants are a key driver of activity. The single-property tier saw 2 new entities enter the market by purchasing 1 property, indicating a healthy influx of first-time landlords.

The purchasing was distributed among the smallest tiers, with one property each bought by landlords in the 1-property, 3-5 property, and 6-10 property tiers. This balanced activity shows sustained growth across the entire small-investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 91.1% of all investor-owned properties in Davis County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Davis County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 91.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone accounts for 152 properties, representing a 58.7% majority share of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies a low barrier to entry and a market characterized by individual investors rather than large conglomerates.

In a stark illustration of the market's structure, institutional investors (owning 1000+ properties) have zero presence, holding 0.0% of the properties. This complete absence challenges the common narrative of corporate landlords dominating housing markets.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) represent a very small fraction of the market. The combined share of all tiers from 11 properties upwards is just 8.9%, further emphasizing the concentration of ownership at the smallest scale.

The data reveals a highly fragmented ownership base, where the typical landlord owns just a few properties, shaping a market dynamic that is fundamentally local and small-business oriented.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property holders at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point in ownership structure occurs once a portfolio surpasses 10 properties. In the 11-20 property tier, companies become the dominant owners, holding 16 properties for a 94.1% share, compared to just 5.9% for individuals.

In the smaller tiers, individual investors are the clear majority. Individuals own 87.7% of single-property portfolios, 61.1% of two-property portfolios, and 81.8% of portfolios with 3-5 properties, confirming their control over the entry-level and small-scale rental market.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, individuals maintain a strong majority with 69.7% ownership (23 properties) compared to companies at 30.3% (10 properties). This suggests that incorporating is a strategy reserved for investors managing larger, more complex portfolios.

This pattern reveals a typical growth trajectory for a real estate investor in Davis County: starting as an individual and potentially incorporating into a company as their holdings scale into the double digits to manage liability and assets more formally.

The sharp transition at the 11-20 property mark indicates a strategic threshold where the benefits of a corporate structure outweigh the simplicity of individual ownership for local investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The vast majority of investor activity is concentrated in a single zip code: 52537.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Davis County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 52537 zip code (Bloomfield) serving as the undisputed hub of activity. This single area contains 204 investor-owned properties, representing an investor ownership rate of 13.7%.

While 52537 dominates by sheer volume, a few smaller, outlying zip codes exhibit extremely high saturation rates. For instance, zip code 52551 is 100% investor-owned and 52554 is 50% investor-owned, though these figures are based on very small numbers of total properties.

This geographical distribution points to a primary investment strategy focused on the county's main population center, supplemented by opportunistic purchases in more rural areas.

The second and third most active areas by property count, 52552 (15 properties) and 52560 (14 properties), have significantly less activity than the primary zip code, reinforcing the single-hub model of investment in the county.

The contrast between the high-count area (52537) and the high-percentage areas (52551, 52554) shows two different investor dynamics: a stable, scaled rental market in the main town and highly targeted, possibly niche, investments in smaller communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Davis County are strong net buyers, acquiring 4 properties for every 1 sold in Q1.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals a clear trend of portfolio growth among Davis County landlords, who are consistently net buyers. In the first quarter of 2026, investors purchased 4 properties while only selling 1, demonstrating strong confidence in the local market.

This pattern of accumulation is not new. Throughout 2025, landlords maintained their status as net buyers, acquiring 23 properties and selling 12 for a net gain of 11 properties. This steady growth highlights a long-term buy-and-hold strategy.

The buy-to-sell ratio has accelerated recently. The 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 2026 is stronger than the roughly 2-to-1 ratio observed during 2025, suggesting an increase in buying momentum at the start of the new year.

Reflecting their 0% market share, institutional investors in the 1000+ property tier were completely absent from the transaction market, recording zero buys and zero sells in all observed timeframes.

The data consistently shows that the growth in investor-owned housing in Davis County is being driven by existing small landlords expanding their portfolios and new small landlords entering the market, not by large-scale institutional players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 17.4% of all property transactions in Q1.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords participated in 4 of the 23 total SFR transactions in Davis County, capturing a 17.4% share of all market activity. This demonstrates that investors are an active and integral part of the local real estate ecosystem.

The entire volume of investor transactions was driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), reinforcing their role as the exclusive drivers of investor activity in the county. Institutional investors (Tier 09) had no transaction activity.

An important finding is that 0% of the properties purchased by investors in Q1 were acquired from other landlords. This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests that investors are sourcing their deals primarily from the traditional market, likely buying from homeowners or heirs.

Purchase prices varied within the small-investor segment. The landlord in the 3-5 property tier paid the most at $160,000, while new single-property landlords paid an average of $100,000, showcasing different acquisition strategies even among smaller players.

This transaction behavior, focused on acquiring properties from outside the investor pool, is a primary mechanism through which the share of rental housing in Davis County grows over time.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Davis County with 91.1% Ownership, Institutions Absent from Market
Holdings
Investors own 250 SFR properties, 13.7% of Davis County's market, with individual investors holding 190 (76.0%) and companies owning 64 (25.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 16.8% less than homeowners in Q1, securing a significant discount of $24,198 per property ($119,500 vs $143,698).
Activity
Landlords purchased 17.6% of all Q1 sales (3 properties), with all acquisitions made by mom-and-pop investors and two new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 91.1% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 94.1% of properties at that level.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q1 (4 buys vs 1 sell), a trend consistent with the prior year.
Market Narrative

In Davis County, Iowa, the real estate investment market is fundamentally local and small-scale. Investors own 250 single-family properties, accounting for 13.7% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 76.0% of these homes. The market structure defies national narratives about corporate dominance; small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command a 91.1% share of investor-owned housing, while institutional-scale investors have absolutely no presence.

Investor behavior in Davis County is characterized by strategic acquisition and consistent growth. In the first quarter, landlords were responsible for 17.6% of all home purchases and demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, paying 16.8% less than traditional homeowners. This activity is exclusively driven by small investors, who are persistent net buyers. They expanded their holdings with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q1, continuing a trend of steady portfolio accumulation observed over the past year. These acquisitions are sourced directly from the homeowner market, not from other investors, directly increasing the local rental supply.

The key takeaway from this market report is the resilience and dominance of the small, local landlord in a market untouched by institutional capital. The investment landscape is defined by individuals and small companies growing their portfolios incrementally, often paying with cash and focusing on buy-and-hold rental strategies. The clear crossover point, where companies take over from individuals at the 11-20 property tier, signals a natural scaling path for successful local entrepreneurs. For anyone analyzing the housing market in Davis County, understanding this grassroots dynamic is essential.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 09:44 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Davis (IA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Davis (IA) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ia-davis/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.