Scott (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Scott (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Scott (KS)
1,594
Total Investors in Scott (KS)
419
Investor Owned SFR in Scott (KS)
453(28.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
362
SFR Owned
332
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
57
SFR Owned
122
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 453 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Control 91% of Scott County's Stagnant Investor Market
Investors own 453 SFR properties in Scott County, KS, representing 28.4% of the market. The landscape is dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (90.8% of holdings) and individual investors (73.3%), with no institutional presence. The market shows no recent activity, as investors made zero purchases in the last quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 453 properties in Scott County, with individuals holding 73.3%.
The entire investor portfolio of 453 properties was acquired with cash, as there are zero financed properties. A total of 430 properties, or 95% of the portfolio, are confirmed rentals. Individual landlords (362) outnumber company landlords (57) by more than 6 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchase activity occurred, preventing price comparison with homeowners.
There were no recorded landlord or traditional homeowner transactions in the most recent quarter. This lack of data makes it impossible to analyze price trends or compare acquisition costs between investor types.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of market activity.
With zero total purchases, neither mom-and-pop landlords nor institutional investors acquired any new properties. No new landlords entered the market, and existing investors did not expand their portfolios.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 90.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 53.4% of all investor-held homes. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in this market. The market's inactivity prevents any analysis of recent price changes by tier.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No recent transaction data is available to compare individual vs. company pricing.
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 54.7% of properties. Despite this, individuals maintain a strong presence across all tiers, even holding 64.3% in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Virtually all investor activity is concentrated in a single zip code: 67871.
The 67871 zip code contains 452 of the 453 total investor-owned properties in Scott County. In this area, investors own 28.6% of all SFR properties.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available to analyze market dynamics.
The absence of buy/sell transaction records prevents analysis of net buyer/seller status. It is also impossible to determine the level of landlord-to-landlord trading or compare average buy and sell prices.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of Q4 2025 transactions, as none occurred.
No transactions were recorded across any investor tier, from mom-and-pops to institutions. This lack of sales prevents any analysis of purchase prices or inter-landlord trading activity for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 453 properties in Scott County, with individuals holding 73.3%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 28.4% of all single-family residential properties in Scott County, KS, totaling 453 homes.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 332 properties (73.3% of the investor portfolio), while companies own the remaining 122 properties (26.9%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 362 of the 419 total landlords are individuals, a ratio of more than six to one against the 57 company landlords.

A defining feature of this market is the complete absence of financing among investors. All 453 landlord-owned properties were acquired with cash, indicating a low-leverage, long-term hold strategy is prevalent.

The portfolio is heavily focused on generating rental income, with 430 of the 453 properties classified as rented, representing 95% of all investor-owned homes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchase activity occurred, preventing price comparison with homeowners.
Detailed Findings

There is no recent acquisition pricing data available for Scott County, as no transactions by either landlords or traditional homeowners were recorded in the last quarter.

The absence of sales prevents any analysis of the typical price discount investors might achieve compared to homeowners.

Without transaction data, it is not possible to assess price appreciation trends from previous periods like 2024 or the 2020-2023 timeframe.

The complete lack of transactional data points to an extremely illiquid market where owners are holding assets rather than buying or selling.

This market stillness makes it impossible to compare pricing strategies between individual and company investors for recent periods.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made zero purchases in Q4 2025, representing 0.0% of market activity.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Scott County was entirely dormant in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero new properties.

This lack of activity means investors accounted for 0.0% of all SFR purchases in the county, as the total market itself saw no transactions.

Consequently, there was no purchasing activity from any investor tier, including the typically active mom-and-pop segment (Tiers 01-04).

The market saw no new entrants, with the count of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) at zero for the quarter.

The data indicates a period of complete stasis, with investors choosing to hold their current assets rather than acquire new ones.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 90.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership landscape in Scott County is defined by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 423 of the 453 investor-owned homes, which is a 90.8% share.

First-time or single-property landlords are the most significant group, owning 249 properties. This represents 53.4% of all investor-held SFRs, making them the backbone of the local rental market.

Mid-size landlords (11-50 properties) hold a small fraction of the market, with a combined 43 properties, or 9.2% of the total investor portfolio.

There is absolutely no institutional investor (1,000+ properties) presence in Scott County, underscoring its character as a market driven by local, small-scale real estate investing.

Due to the lack of recent sales, it is not possible to compare acquisition prices across different investor tiers to see if larger landlords pay more or less for properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
No recent transaction data is available to compare individual vs. company pricing.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of ownership in Scott County, holding the majority of properties in nearly every tier. They own 86.0% of single-property portfolios and 75.8% of two-property portfolios.

The crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type occurs in the 6-10 property tier. In this segment, companies own 29 properties (54.7%) compared to the 24 (45.3%) owned by individuals.

Despite companies taking the lead in the 6-10 property tier, individuals regain the majority in the next bracket (11-20 properties), owning 27 homes for a 64.3% share, highlighting their sustained presence even in larger local portfolios.

There is no recent transaction data, so a comparison of acquisition prices paid by individuals versus companies cannot be performed.

The ownership patterns reveal a market where individuals build small-to-medium portfolios, with corporate ownership only gaining a slight edge in one specific mid-range tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Virtually all investor activity is concentrated in a single zip code: 67871.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Scott County is extremely concentrated geographically. The vast majority of activity is in the 67871 zip code, which contains 452 of the 453 investor-owned properties.

In this dominant zip code, the investor ownership rate is 28.6%, a significant portion of the local housing market.

The only other area with any recorded investor presence is the 67863 zip code, which has just a single investor-owned property and an ownership rate of 7.1%.

This hyper-localization suggests that investor strategy is focused on a specific community or neighborhood within the county, rather than being broadly distributed.

The data highlights that for all practical purposes, the investor market in Scott County is synonymous with the market in the 67871 zip code.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available to analyze market dynamics.
Detailed Findings

There is no available historical transaction data for landlords in Scott County, preventing a detailed analysis of market dynamics over time.

Without buy and sell records, it is impossible to determine whether landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers in this market.

The percentage of transactions that occur between landlords cannot be calculated, leaving the liquidity and internal dynamics of the investor market unknown.

Analysis of implied profit margins is not possible, as there is no data on average acquisition prices versus average selling prices.

Similarly, institutional transaction patterns cannot be compared to the broader market, as no data exists for either group.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 0.0% of Q4 2025 transactions, as none occurred.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market in Scott County was completely inactive for investors in Q4 2025, with zero recorded transactions.

As a result, the landlord share of all SFR transactions during the quarter was 0.0%, reflecting a market-wide pause in activity.

Transaction volumes were zero across all nine investor tiers, from single-property owners to the largest potential institutional players.

With no purchases made, it is impossible to analyze average purchase prices by tier or identify any pricing strategies among different investor sizes.

The level of inter-landlord trading was also zero, indicating that existing owners are holding their properties rather than selling to other investors.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Scott County's Stagnant Investor Market with 91% Ownership
Holdings
Landlords own 453 single-family properties in Scott County, KS, representing 28.4% of the total market. The portfolio is primarily held by individual investors, who own 332 properties (73.3%), compared to 122 (26.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
There was no recorded transaction activity in the most recent quarter, making it impossible to compare landlord acquisition prices against those of traditional homeowners.
Activity
The investor market in Scott County was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing zero properties. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period of inactivity.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 90.8% share of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence in the county.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 54.7% of homes in that segment.
Transactions
No recent buy or sell transactions were recorded for any investor type, indicating the market is in a strong holding pattern with zero liquidity. It is not possible to determine a net buyer or seller status.
Market Narrative

In Scott County, Kansas, the real estate investor market is characterized by significant local ownership and a recent lack of transactional activity. Investors hold a substantial 453 single-family properties, which accounts for 28.4% of the county's entire SFR market. This landscape is firmly controlled by small-scale operators; individual investors own 73.3% of the portfolio, and 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command a staggering 90.8% share. In stark contrast, institutional investors have zero presence, highlighting a market driven by local capital and long-term strategies, further evidenced by the fact that 100% of these properties are owned outright with cash.

The most defining recent trend is a complete halt in market activity. In the last quarter, there were zero purchases by investors, resulting in a 0.0% share of market transactions. This period of stasis means there is no data to compare investor pricing advantages against homeowners or to track price appreciation. The lack of buying and selling signals that current landlords are in a holding phase, focusing on rental income from their existing 430 rented properties rather than portfolio expansion or divestment. This behavior suggests a stable, mature rental market where owners are content with their current assets.

The key takeaway from this analysis is that Scott County is a small, self-contained investor market dominated by individuals and small landlords who are playing a long game. The market's structure defies the narrative of large corporate consolidation, showing instead that the backbone of the local rental housing is provided by community-level investors. For those looking to enter or understand this market, the current illiquidity and high concentration of ownership in the 67871 zip code are critical factors. Future activity will likely depend on these long-term holders deciding to sell, rather than a dynamic flow of new properties coming onto the market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 21, 2026 at 05:25 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Scott (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Scott (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ks-scott/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.