Apache (AZ) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Apache (AZ) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Apache (AZ)
2,751
Total Investors in Apache (AZ)
2,835
Investor Owned SFR in Apache (AZ)
1,948(70.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,519
SFR Owned
1,685
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
316
SFR Owned
322
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,948 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investors Own 71% of Apache County Homes, With Mom-and-Pop Landlords Controlling 99% of the Portfolio
Investors own 1,948 single-family properties in Apache County, AZ, a staggering 70.8% of the total market. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 99.3% of the investor-owned housing stock versus just 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q1 2026, landlords were involved in 47.1% of all transactions and are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 123 properties while selling only 4 in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,948 SFRs, representing 70.8% of all homes in Apache County, AZ.
Individual landlords own 1,685 of these properties, a commanding 86.5% share of the investor portfolio. Cash purchases significantly outpace financing, with 1,243 properties owned outright versus 705 that are financed. Nearly the entire portfolio (1,947 of 1,948 properties) is classified as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 11.7% less than traditional homeowners, a discount of $41,963 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, swinging from a 4.4% premium ($15,552) paid by landlords in Q2 2025 to the current 11.7% discount. This volatility reflects the very low transaction volume in the market. Overall, average acquisition prices have risen from a $273,784 average during 2020-2023 to $316,867 in Q1 2026.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 53.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of all landlord purchases, with 14 properties acquired by 16 new single-property landlords. Institutional (1000+ property) investors made zero acquisitions during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned homes in Apache County.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, owning just a single property, which amounts to 0.1% of the investor market. Single-property landlords alone own 1,845 properties, representing 92.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors form the backbone of every small portfolio tier, owning 85.3% of all single-property landlord homes.
Companies fail to achieve majority ownership in any tier. Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals maintain a strong 71.4% majority with 30 properties, compared to 12 properties for companies.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with five zip codes accounting for 77.8% of all landlord-owned homes.
Several areas exhibit extreme investor saturation, with ownership rates surpassing 80% in zip codes 85901 (89.7%), 85940 (84.4%), and 85936 (82.3%). The zip code 85925 alone contains 585 investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Apache County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 123 properties while selling only 4 during 2025.
The accumulation trend is consistent, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 35-to-1 in Q3 2025 (35 buys vs 1 sell). Across 2024, investors also remained strong net buyers, purchasing 89 properties and selling only 9. No institutional transaction data was available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 47.1% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
All 16 landlord transactions were made by single-property investors, who paid an average of $316,867. Institutional investors conducted zero transactions, and 0% of landlord acquisitions came from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,948 SFRs, representing 70.8% of all homes in Apache County, AZ.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Apache County, AZ reaches an exceptionally high concentration, with landlords holding 1,948 single-family properties, which accounts for 70.8% of the 2,751 total SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is defined by individual ownership rather than corporate control. Individual landlords hold 1,685 properties (an 86.5% share), while companies own just 322 properties (a 16.5% share), underscoring the market's 'mom-and-pop' character.

There are 2,835 distinct landlord entities operating in the county, with individuals comprising the vast majority at 2,519, compared to only 316 company entities. This structure points to a highly fragmented market with many small-scale participants.

Cash is the preferred method for holding property. Investors own 1,243 properties free and clear, substantially more than the 705 properties held with financing. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 1,947 of the 1,948 investor-owned properties designated as non-owner-occupied. This 99.9% rental rate confirms that the primary strategy for real estate investing in this area is generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 11.7% less than traditional homeowners, a discount of $41,963 per property.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, investors demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $316,867. This was $41,963 less than the $358,830 paid by traditional homeowners, representing a significant 11.7% discount.

However, the landlord discount is not consistent, showing significant volatility in recent quarters. In Q2 2025, landlords paid a 4.4% premium over homeowners, while in Q3 2025 the discount was a negligible 0.6%. This fluctuation is likely driven by extremely low transaction volumes, making it difficult to establish a stable trend.

Despite low recent activity, long-term price appreciation is evident. The average acquisition price of $316,867 in Q1 2026 marks a notable increase from the $273,784 average seen during the 2020-2023 period, indicating underlying market value growth.

The available data does not contain enough transactions to draw meaningful conclusions about price differences between individual and company buyers, as recent quarters show zero properties purchased across all timeframes with breakdowns.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 53.8% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlord purchasing activity dominated the market in Q4 2025, with investors buying 14 of the 26 total SFRs sold, capturing a majority 53.8% market share.

The quarter's activity was driven exclusively by new entrants and the smallest investors. The single-property tier (Tier 01) accounted for 100% of all landlord acquisitions, totaling 14 properties purchased by 16 distinct entities.

This highlights a market fueled by first-time landlords or small investors adding their first property, rather than portfolio growth from established players. The fact that there are more entities than properties suggests some co-ownership on these initial purchases.

In stark contrast to the activity at the small end of the market, mid-size and institutional investors were completely dormant. Landlords in Tiers 05-08 and the institutional Tier 09 collectively purchased zero properties.

The complete absence of institutional buying reinforces the finding that Apache County's investor market is fundamentally a local, small-scale phenomenon, with no footprint from large corporate landlords in recent acquisition activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned homes in Apache County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Apache County, AZ is extremely concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively own 99.3% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, owning 1,845 properties. This single tier accounts for 92.9% of all investor-owned housing, indicating the market is composed almost entirely of individuals with one rental property.

The scale drops off sharply even among small landlords. The two-property tier holds just 85 properties (4.3% share), and the 3-5 property tier holds 39 properties (2.0% share), showing very little portfolio consolidation.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) have a minimal footprint, collectively owning only 13 properties, which is less than 1% of the total investor portfolio. This reinforces the lack of scale and consolidation in the local market.

Institutional ownership is practically non-existent. The 1000+ property tier (Tier 09) accounts for just one single property, or 0.1% of the market. This directly counters the narrative of large corporations dominating residential real estate in this specific geography.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors form the backbone of every small portfolio tier, owning 85.3% of all single-property landlord homes.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force across all smaller portfolio sizes in Apache County. In the largest tier, single-property landlords, individuals own 1,612 of the 1,845 properties, an 85.3% share.

As portfolio sizes increase slightly, individual ownership remains robust. Among two-property landlords, individuals own 70 of the 85 homes (78.7%), and in the 3-5 property tier, they hold 30 of the 39 properties (71.4%).

Unlike in many other markets, there is no clear crossover point where companies become the majority owners. The data shows that individual, personal ownership is the preferred structure even as landlords begin to scale their portfolios.

Company ownership, while present, is a distinct minority. Companies own 278 properties in the single-property tier (14.7%) and just 12 properties in the 3-5 property tier (28.6%), playing a secondary role in the market's composition.

This ownership pattern suggests the local rental market is supplied by residents and small, local operators rather than by formalized, corporate real estate investment firms.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with five zip codes accounting for 77.8% of all landlord-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Apache County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The top five zip codes by property count (85925, 85936, 85924, 85938, and 85920) together contain 1,591 investor-owned homes, representing 77.8% of the county's total investor portfolio.

The zip code 85925 is the epicenter of investor activity, with 585 landlord-owned properties. This single area accounts for 30% of all investor homes in the county.

Penetration rates in certain zip codes are exceptionally high, indicating markets that are primarily composed of rental properties. The top areas by ownership percentage are 85901 (89.7%), 85940 (84.4%), and 85936 (82.3%), where roughly 8 or 9 out of every 10 homes are owned by an investor.

There is a strong correlation between high investor counts and high ownership rates. Three of the top five zip codes by count (85936, 85924, and 85920) also appear on the list of top regions by investor penetration, signifying deep saturation in these core areas.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific communities or neighborhoods, leading to a profound transformation of the local housing stock from owner-occupied to rental in those locations.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Apache County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 123 properties while selling only 4 during 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows a clear and sustained pattern of accumulation by landlords in Apache County. In 2025, investors were aggressive net buyers, adding 123 properties to their portfolios while selling only 4, resulting in a net gain of 119 homes.

This trend holds true on a quarterly basis, demonstrating consistent buying pressure. In the third quarter of 2025, for example, landlords purchased 35 properties and sold just one, showcasing a strong appetite for acquisitions.

The pattern was also present in the prior year. Throughout 2024, landlords acquired 89 properties and divested only 9, confirming a multi-year trend of portfolio growth rather than liquidation.

There is no transaction data available for institutional investors (1000+ tier), which aligns with their minimal ownership presence in the county. All market transaction dynamics are being driven by smaller landlords.

The extremely high buy-to-sell ratio signals strong investor confidence in the local market and a strategy focused on long-term holds and portfolio expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 47.1% of all property transactions in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords were a major force in the market, involved in 16 of the 34 total transactions, for a 47.1% market share. This high level of participation underscores their impact on local housing sales.

All investor activity was concentrated in the smallest tier. Single-property landlords accounted for 100% of the 16 transactions, indicating that market activity is driven by new landlords entering the market or existing ones with a single property adding another.

The average purchase price for these small landlords was $316,867. With no activity from any other tier, it's impossible to compare pricing strategies, but this figure sets the benchmark for entry-level investment in the county.

Notably, there was zero inter-landlord trading during the quarter. All 16 properties purchased by investors were acquired from non-landlords, suggesting that investors are buying from homeowners rather than trading assets among themselves.

The complete absence of transactions from institutional or even mid-sized investors further confirms that the transactional market, like the ownership base, is exclusively a small-investor domain in Apache County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors Own 71% of Apache County Homes, With Mom-and-Pop Landlords Controlling 99% of the Portfolio
Holdings
Landlords own 1,948 single-family properties in Apache County, AZ, representing a massive 70.8% of the total market. The portfolio is dominated by individuals, who hold 1,685 properties (an 86.5% share), while companies own just 322 (a 16.5% share).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at an 11.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $316,867 while homeowners paid $358,830, a savings of $41,963 per home.
Activity
Landlords were involved in 47.1% of all Q1 sales (16 transactions), with 100% of this activity coming from new single-property landlords. This indicates the market is being driven by new entrants, not portfolio expansion by large firms.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords, as the mom-and-pop segment (1-10 properties) owns 99.3% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners across all small portfolio tiers, making up 85.3% of single-property landlords. Companies do not achieve majority ownership at any level, underscoring a market free from corporate consolidation.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 123 properties while selling only 4 in 2025. Institutional investors recorded no transactions, reflecting their near-zero presence in this market.
Market Narrative

Apache County, AZ presents a unique real estate market defined by one of the highest concentrations of investor ownership in the nation. Investors own 1,948 single-family homes, a staggering 70.8% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. However, this market saturation is not the product of corporate acquisition. Instead, it is overwhelmingly driven by small, individual operators. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control 99.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) own just a single property, a mere 0.1% share. This dynamic is further reflected in the ownership structure, where individual investors hold 86.5% of the properties compared to 16.5% for companies.

Investor behavior reinforces this 'Main Street' narrative. In the most recent quarter, landlords were involved in 47.1% of all home sales, and 100% of that activity came from new, single-property landlords entering the market. These investors are adept at finding value, securing an 11.7% price discount compared to traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. The overarching trend is one of aggressive accumulation. In 2025, landlords acted as strong net buyers, purchasing 123 homes while selling only four, signaling deep confidence in the local market and a focus on long-term holds.

The key takeaway for Apache County is that it represents a hyper-localized, fragmented rental market. The narrative of 'Wall Street buying up neighborhoods' does not apply here. The housing landscape has been fundamentally reshaped by a large number of small-scale investors, leading to extremely high investor penetration in specific zip codes, some exceeding 80%. This creates a market characterized by high rental density, driven by cash-heavy individual investors who continue to actively accumulate properties.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 20, 2026 at 11:02 PM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Apache (AZ)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Apache (AZ) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-az-apache/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.