Tooele (UT) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Tooele (UT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Tooele (UT)
21,716
Total Investors in Tooele (UT)
3,436
Investor Owned SFR in Tooele (UT)
2,628(12.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,940
SFR Owned
1,935
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
496
SFR Owned
759
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,628 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Define Tooele County's Rental Market, Controlling 90% of Holdings and Driving Acquisitions
Investors own 12.1% of SFR properties in Tooele County, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 89.9% of that portfolio versus a mere 3.5% for institutions. In recent activity, landlords purchased 18.9% of homes sold, paying 15.9% below homeowner prices, and are acting as strong net buyers while institutional activity remains inconsistent.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,628 SFR properties in Tooele County, with individuals holding 73.6% of the portfolio.
The investor portfolio is nearly evenly split between financed (1,367 properties) and cash-owned (1,261 properties). A commanding 99.1% of these properties are non-owner-occupied and rented out.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 15.9% less than homeowners, securing a $78,782 discount per property.
The landlord discount has widened dramatically, jumping from just 2.4% in Q3 2025 to 15.9% in the latest quarter. The data does not provide a price breakdown between individual and company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 18.9% of all SFR properties sold in Tooele County during Q4 2025, purchasing 66 homes.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 78.8% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made up just 3.0% of the acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Tooele County, controlling 89.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minor 3.5% share. While current acquisition prices by tier are not available, their purchasing activity in Q4 was minimal at just 2 properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Data on acquisition prices by owner type is not available, but ownership patterns show individuals dominate small portfolios while companies control larger ones.
Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio reaches the 3-5 property tier (55.5% company-owned). Individuals are most concentrated in the single-property tier, holding 84.4% of those homes. Data does not specify institutional ownership by company vs. individual.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Tooele County is highly concentrated, with the 84074 zip code alone holding 1,688 investor-owned properties.
The highest ownership *rate* is in different areas, with zip code 84034 at 100% investor-owned and 84071 at 62.9%. This contrasts with the volume leader 84074, which has a more modest 10.2% investor penetration rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Tooele County are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.04 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
The pace of acquisitions has moderated from its 2024 peak (505 buys) but remained robust in 2025 (293 buys). In contrast, institutional investors show inconsistent behavior, acting as net sellers in 2024 before becoming slight net buyers in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 15.8% of all Q1 2026 SFR transactions in Tooele County, conducting 82 transactions.
Institutional investors paid 32.3% *more* than single-property landlords per transaction ($565,221 vs $427,117). Institutions sourced 100% of their acquisitions from other landlords, while new mom-and-pops bought from landlords only 10.3% of the time.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,628 SFR properties in Tooele County, with individuals holding 73.6% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Tooele County, real estate investing accounts for 2,628 single-family residential properties, making up 12.1% of the total 21,716 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the primary owners, holding 1,935 properties (73.6%), while company-owned portfolios consist of 759 properties (28.9%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where there are 2,940 individual landlords compared to just 496 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 6-to-1.

The financing composition of the investor portfolio is almost perfectly balanced, with 1,367 properties (52.0%) being financed and 1,261 (48.0%) owned outright with cash.

Virtually the entire investor-owned portfolio is actively used for rental income, with 2,604 of the 2,628 properties (99.1%) classified as rented and non-owner-occupied.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q1 2026, landlords paid 15.9% less than homeowners, securing a $78,782 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Q1 2026, purchasing properties for an average of $416,004, which is $78,782 less than the $494,786 paid by traditional homeowners, a 15.9% discount.

This price gap represents a substantial widening compared to previous quarters. In Q3 2025, the landlord discount was a minimal 2.4% ($11,841), and in Q2 2025, it was 12.8% ($65,179).

The volatility in the discount suggests that landlord purchasing strategies are highly adaptive, capitalizing on market conditions to secure favorable prices that are not accessible to the average homebuyer.

Recent acquisition prices for landlords in Q1 2026 ($416,004) are notably lower than prices from mid-2025, such as the $491,051 average in Q3, signaling a potential market cooldown or a strategic shift towards lower-priced assets.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 18.9% of all SFR properties sold in Tooele County during Q4 2025, purchasing 66 homes.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 66 of the 344 total SFRs sold, capturing an 18.9% market share of acquisitions.

The bulk of this activity was driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) bought 52 properties, accounting for 78.8% of all investor purchases.

In a stark contrast, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties had a minimal impact, acquiring only 2 properties, or 3.0% of the investor total. Small landlords out-purchased them 26-to-1.

The market saw a fresh influx of new investors, with 58 distinct entities buying their first rental property and entering the single-property tier.

This entry-level tier alone dominated buying activity, with its 44 property acquisitions representing 66.7% of all homes purchased by landlords in the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Tooele County, controlling 89.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership landscape in Tooele County is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale landlords. Those owning between 1 and 10 properties control a combined 89.9% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the absolute backbone of the rental market, with their 2,133 properties alone constituting 80.1% of the entire investor portfolio.

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not hold true here, as institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 92 homes, a marginal 3.5% share of the market.

There is a steep decline in ownership concentration as portfolio sizes increase. Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) collectively own just 6.6% of the investor housing stock.

This highly fragmented market structure suggests that investment activity is driven by thousands of individual decisions rather than a top-down institutional strategy.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Data on acquisition prices by owner type is not available, but ownership patterns show individuals dominate small portfolios while companies control larger ones.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists where professionalization through incorporation becomes the norm. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies assume majority ownership starting at the 3-5 property tier (55.5% company-owned).

The two-property tier acts as a transition point, with ownership split almost perfectly between individuals (50.5%) and companies (49.5%).

As portfolios grow, company ownership becomes standard. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 83.0% of the homes, and this rises to 96.2% in the 21-50 property tier.

The vast majority of entry-level investors are individuals. They own 1,846 of the single-property rentals, representing an 84.4% share of that foundational tier.

This pattern indicates a clear lifecycle for investors in Tooele County: starting as individuals and incorporating as their portfolios and operational complexity expand.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Tooele County is highly concentrated, with the 84074 zip code alone holding 1,688 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is geographically concentrated in a few key areas. The top five zip codes by property count contain 2,587 homes, which is 98.4% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio in Tooele County.

The 84074 zip code is the undisputed hub for investor activity by volume, with 1,688 properties located there, more than three times the number in the next closest zip code.

A clear distinction exists between areas with high investor counts and those with high investor penetration rates. The volume leader, 84074, has a 10.2% investor ownership rate, while smaller areas like 84071 have much higher saturation at 62.9%.

Several niche zip codes show extremely high investor density, including 84034 (100.0% investor-owned), 84083 (57.4%), and 84080 (48.1%), pointing to targeted investment strategies in specific micro-markets.

This geographic distribution reveals two separate investor approaches operating simultaneously: broad accumulation in populous areas and high-density saturation in smaller ones.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Tooele County are strong net buyers, acquiring 3.04 properties for every one they sold in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Tooele County is in an aggressive accumulation phase. In Q1 2026, landlords purchased 82 properties while selling only 27, resulting in a strong 3.04-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This net-buyer trend has been consistent over the past two years, with a powerful 4.07 ratio in 2024 (505 buys vs. 124 sells) and a solid 2.44 ratio in 2025 (293 buys vs. 120 sells).

Institutional investors are not contributing to this trend and display erratic behavior. They were net sellers in 2024, divesting 3 more properties than they acquired, and shifted to being only marginal net buyers in 2025 with a net gain of 2 properties.

The data clearly shows that portfolio growth in the region is being fueled by small and mid-sized landlords, while large institutions remain on the sidelines or are even reducing their footprint.

While acquisition volumes have fluctuated, landlord selling activity has remained relatively stable, with 124 properties sold in 2024 and 120 in 2025, suggesting a consistent level of portfolio churn.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 15.8% of all Q1 2026 SFR transactions in Tooele County, conducting 82 transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords participated in 82 of the 520 total SFR transactions in the county, for a market share of 15.8%.

A surprising pricing dynamic emerged among investor tiers: institutional buyers paid a significant premium, with an average purchase price of $565,221. This is 32.3% higher than the $427,117 average paid by single-property landlords.

Acquisition sources differ dramatically by investor size. Institutional buyers sourced 100% of their new properties from other landlords, indicating their activity is focused on trading existing rental portfolios rather than buying from the public market.

Conversely, entry-level mom-and-pop landlords acquired the vast majority of their properties from homeowners, with only 10.3% of their 58 purchases coming from another landlord.

This suggests two separate markets are in operation: a public-facing one for new and small investors, and a private, inter-investor market for large-scale portfolio transactions.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Tooele County with 89.9% Ownership as Institutions Show Little Growth
Holdings
Landlords own 2,628 SFR properties in Tooele County, representing 12.1% of the market. Individual investors hold the vast majority with 1,935 properties (73.6%), compared to 759 properties (28.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords paid an average of 15.9% less than traditional homeowners, securing a significant $78,782 discount per property ($416,004 vs $494,786).
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 66 properties, accounting for 18.9% of all market sales. This activity was led by small investors, including 58 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 89.9% of investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, large institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 3.5%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the entry-level of the market, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio grows to the 3-5 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 3.04x buy-to-sell ratio in Q1 2026 (82 buys vs 27 sells). Institutional investors are not driving this growth, having been net sellers in 2024 and only marginal net buyers in 2025.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Tooele County, UT, is fundamentally shaped by small, independent investors, not large corporations. Landlords own 2,628 SFR properties, comprising 12.1% of the county's total housing stock. The ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 73.6% of these homes. Analysis of portfolio size reveals a market dominated by 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who command an overwhelming 89.9% share. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, holding just 3.5% of the investor-owned homes.

Investor behavior underscores this grassroots characteristic. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 18.9% of all homes sold, an effort led by 58 new single-property investors entering the market. Financially, they demonstrate a distinct advantage, paying 15.9% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2026. The market is in a clear accumulation phase, with landlords acting as strong net buyers, purchasing 3.04 homes for every one they sold in the first quarter of 2026. This growth is not driven by institutions, which have shown inconsistent activity, acting as net sellers in 2024 and only marginal buyers in 2025.

The key takeaway for Tooele County is that its rental housing market is highly fragmented and locally driven. The prevailing narrative of institutional takeover is unsupported by the data; instead, the market's vitality comes from a continuous influx of new, small-scale landlords. These investors are actively growing their portfolios, securing properties at a discount, and operating on a scale that defines the local landscape. Investment is also geographically focused, with the 84074 zip code serving as the primary hub of activity by volume, further defining the local, concentrated nature of the market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 04:32 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Tooele (UT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Tooele (UT) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ut-tooele/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.