Campbell (WY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Campbell (WY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Campbell (WY)
11,311
Total Investors in Campbell (WY)
2,342
Investor Owned SFR in Campbell (WY)
1,736(15.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,079
SFR Owned
1,439
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
263
SFR Owned
333
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,736 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 97% of Campbell County's Investor Market, Institutions Buy at a 27% Discount
Investors own 1,736 SFR properties in Campbell County (15.3% of the market), with small mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 97.3% of that portfolio. In Q1, landlords were strong net buyers and acquired properties for 5.8% less than traditional homeowners, though institutional buyers secured properties at a 26.7% discount compared to new single-property investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,736 SFR properties in Campbell County, with individuals holding a dominant 82.9%.
Cash-backed ownership (987 properties) surpasses financed holdings (749), indicating high liquidity. The portfolio is intensely rental-focused, with 1,694 properties, or 97.6% of all investor-owned SFRs, being rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 5.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $21,203.
The landlord purchasing advantage has narrowed significantly from the 23.0% discount observed in Q1 2025. Average acquisition prices for landlords in Q1 2026 ($347,410) show substantial appreciation from the 2020-2023 average of $243,384.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.6% of all SFRs sold in Q1, purchasing 31 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove the market, accounting for 90.6% of all investor purchases (29 properties). During the quarter, 29 new single-property landlords entered the market, while institutional investors acquired just 3 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.3% of all investor-owned SFRs in Campbell County.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 14 properties, or 0.8% of the investor-owned market. The market is defined by single-property landlords, who alone own 1,505 properties, representing 85.4% of the entire portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, controlling 56.6% of properties.
While individuals own 88.4% of single-property portfolios, their share drops as portfolios scale. Companies assert dominance in larger portfolios, controlling 87.2% of properties in the 6-10 tier, showing a clear trend of incorporation for growth.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated by volume in zip codes 82718 (600 properties) and 82716 (589 properties).
Zip code 82732 has the highest investor penetration rate at an astounding 86.2%. This contrasts sharply with the volume leaders, which have much lower ownership rates of 9.4% (82718) and 14.8% (82716).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 41 properties while selling only 9 in Q1 2026.
The net buyer trend is consistent, with a 4.8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio throughout 2025 (169 buys vs. 35 sells). Institutional investors are also accumulating properties but at a much smaller scale, with 3 buys and 2 sells in Q1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 18.2% of all market transactions in Q1, executing 41 purchases.
A significant pricing gap exists between investor tiers, as institutional investors paid 26.7% less than new single-property landlords ($276,011 vs. $376,716). Institutions also sourced a third of their deals (33.3%) from other landlords, versus just 3.4% for new buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,736 SFR properties in Campbell County, with individuals holding a dominant 82.9%.
Detailed Findings

In Campbell County, investors own 1,736 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 15.3% of the total 11,311 SFRs in the market. This reveals a significant, yet not dominant, investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 1,439 properties, accounting for 82.9% of the investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 333 properties (19.2%).

The investor base itself reflects this trend, with 2,079 individual landlords compared to just 263 company entities. This structure underscores a market built on small-scale, local real estate investing rather than large corporate ownership.

Financially, the portfolio shows more properties owned outright with cash (987) than those carrying a mortgage (749). This suggests that a majority of investor assets are held free-and-clear, providing financial stability to the local rental market.

The primary strategy for these investors is clear: 1,694 of the 1,736 properties are rented, a massive 97.6% concentration. This indicates the portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to providing long-term rental housing for the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 5.8% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, securing an average discount of $21,203.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, landlords demonstrated a consistent ability to acquire properties below typical market rates. They paid an average price of $347,410, which is $21,203, or 5.8%, less than the $368,613 paid by traditional homeowners.

However, this pricing advantage represents a significant tightening compared to previous periods. In Q1 2025, landlords enjoyed a much larger 23.0% discount, saving an average of $81,636 per property. The shrinking gap suggests increased competition in the market.

The trend extends across the prior year, with landlord discounts consistently in the double digits, including 20.2% in Q3 2025 and 17.3% in Q2 2025. The current 5.8% discount is the lowest in over a year, signaling a more competitive purchasing environment.

Acquisition prices have risen sharply since the pandemic era. The Q1 2026 average of $347,410 marks a 42.7% increase over the average price of $243,384 paid by landlords between 2020 and 2023.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.6% of all SFRs sold in Q1, purchasing 31 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a notable portion of the Campbell County market in the first quarter, with landlords purchasing 31 of the 158 total SFRs sold, a market share of 19.6%.

The overwhelming majority of this activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 29 of the 31 properties, representing 90.6% of all landlord purchases.

Grassroots growth was a key theme, as the single-property tier was the most active. In Q1, 29 new landlord entities entered the market by purchasing 23 properties, signaling a healthy and accessible entry point for first-time investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact on the acquisitions market, purchasing only 3 properties, or 9.4% of the landlord total.

This distribution of activity highlights that market demand is driven by local, small operators, not by large-scale institutional accumulation.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.3% of all investor-owned SFRs in Campbell County.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure of investment properties in Campbell County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties, commonly known as mom-and-pops, control a staggering 97.3% of all investor-owned SFRs.

This finding refutes any narrative of large-scale corporate control. Institutional investors with portfolios exceeding 1,000 properties own a mere 14 homes, accounting for just 0.8% of the local investor market.

The market's foundation is built on the smallest investors. Landlords owning just a single property hold 1,505 homes, which makes up 85.4% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. This highlights the importance of individual owners to the rental ecosystem.

The concentration at the small end of the scale is profound. The first three tiers combined (1-5 properties) account for 95.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, solidifying the market's character as one driven by local, small-scale participants.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 3-5 property tier, controlling 56.6% of properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership structure by portfolio size: as investors scale, they increasingly turn to corporate entities. While individuals dominate the overall market, companies become the majority owners in portfolios of three or more properties.

In the smallest tiers, individual ownership is paramount. Individuals own 88.4% of single-property portfolios and 75.0% of two-property portfolios, reflecting the typical entry path for new landlords.

The crossover point occurs in the 3-5 property tier, where companies take a 56.6% majority ownership stake, with individuals holding the remaining 43.4%. This marks the professionalization pivot point for growing investors.

This trend accelerates in the next tier (6-10 properties), where companies control 87.2% of the properties. This indicates that holding assets in a corporate structure is standard practice for landlords managing larger portfolios in Campbell County.

Despite this, the overall market remains dominated by individuals (82.9% of properties) because the vast majority of landlords never scale beyond one or two properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated by volume in zip codes 82718 (600 properties) and 82716 (589 properties).
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals distinct patterns of investor concentration in Campbell County. The highest volume of investor-owned properties is found in zip codes 82718 (600 properties) and 82716 (589 properties), making them the largest hubs for rental housing.

However, the highest concentration rate is located elsewhere. Zip code 82732 stands out with an investor ownership rate of 86.2%, meaning the vast majority of homes there are investor-owned. This area holds 417 investor properties and represents a true investor stronghold.

This highlights a key distinction between volume and density. The zips with the most investor properties, 82718 and 82716, have relatively modest penetration rates of 9.4% and 14.8% respectively, suggesting they are simply the most populous areas.

In contrast, areas like 82732 (86.2%), 82725 (34.4%), and 82727 (28.6%) show much higher investor saturation, indicating they are specific pockets highly targeted by investors for their rental potential.

Understanding this difference is crucial for identifying where investors are most active versus where they have the most market control.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 41 properties while selling only 9 in Q1 2026.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Campbell County are in a phase of accumulation. In Q1 2026, they were strong net buyers, purchasing 41 properties while selling only 9, resulting in a net gain of 32 properties to their portfolios.

This behavior is not a recent development but part of a consistent, multi-year trend. Throughout 2025, landlords maintained a 4.8-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, acquiring 169 properties and selling just 35. Similarly, in 2024, they purchased 150 properties and sold only 26.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) are also net buyers, though their activity is more balanced and at a far smaller scale. In Q1 2026, they acquired 3 properties and sold 2.

While institutions are generally expanding their local footprint, they have shown periods of divestment, such as in Q2 2025 when they were net sellers. This contrasts with the steady accumulation strategy seen across the broader landlord market.

The persistent net buying from the dominant mom-and-pop segment signals strong confidence in the local rental market's future.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 18.2% of all market transactions in Q1, executing 41 purchases.
Detailed Findings

In the first quarter of 2026, landlords represented 18.2% of all SFR transactions in Campbell County, with 41 purchases out of a total of 225 market-wide transactions. This activity level is consistent with their overall 15.3% market share.

A striking insight from Q1 activity is the price disparity between investor types. Institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired properties for an average of $276,011. In contrast, new single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $376,716, a 26.7% premium.

This $100,705 price gap suggests that large and small investors operate in different segments of the market, with institutions likely leveraging scale, off-market access, or a focus on different asset types to secure lower prices.

The source of deals also differs by tier. Institutional investors sourced one-third (33.3%) of their Q1 purchases from other landlords, indicating activity within an established professional network. Meanwhile, new single-property buyers rarely bought from other investors, with only 3.4% of their transactions being landlord-to-landlord.

While mom-and-pop landlords drove the majority of transaction volume (36 purchases), institutional players demonstrated a more sophisticated acquisition strategy, achieving better pricing and leveraging inter-landlord trades.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Fuel Campbell County's Market, Owning 97% of Rentals While Institutions Secure 27% Price Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 1,736 SFR properties, representing 15.3% of Campbell County's market. Ownership is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,439 of these properties (82.9%), compared to 333 (19.2%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q1, landlords paid an average of 5.8% less than traditional homeowners, securing a $21,203 discount per property ($347,410 vs. $368,613).
Activity
Landlords purchased 31 properties in Q1 (19.6% of all sales), an expansion led by small investors, with 29 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.3% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.8% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners (56.6%) in portfolios with 3-5 properties, signaling a shift to formal structures as investors scale.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4.6x buy/sell ratio in Q1 (41 buys vs. 9 sells). Institutional investors are also net buyers, though at a much smaller scale (3 buys vs. 2 sells).
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Campbell County, Wyoming is fundamentally a story of the small, local landlord. Investors own 1,736 single-family homes, or 15.3% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is not controlled by distant corporations; instead, it is overwhelmingly in the hands of mom-and-pop operators (1-10 properties), who command a 97.3% share of all investor-owned housing. Individual owners hold 82.9% of these properties, reinforcing the market's grassroots character. In contrast, institutional investors have a minimal presence, with just 14 properties, or 0.8% of the investor-owned stock.

Investor behavior reflects ongoing confidence in the local market. In Q1, landlords were active and decisive net buyers, acquiring 41 properties while selling only 9. This activity accounted for 19.6% of all home sales. Landlords consistently achieve better pricing than traditional homebuyers, securing a 5.8% discount in Q1. However, a key dynamic exists between investor tiers: institutional buyers demonstrated sophisticated acquisition strategies, paying 26.7% less on average than new single-property landlords, suggesting they operate in a different competitive sphere by targeting different assets or sourcing off-market deals.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse report is that Campbell County’s rental market is stable and supported by a broad base of individual investors. The market's health is driven by the continual entry of new, small-scale landlords, not by institutional accumulation. While large investors participate, their strategy focuses on pricing efficiency rather than volume, leaving the vast majority of the market to local operators. This structure suggests a resilient rental supply that is deeply integrated into the community fabric.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 06:10 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Campbell (WY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Campbell (WY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-wy-campbell/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.