Allegany (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2026-Q1)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Allegany (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Allegany (NY)
11,733
Total Investors in Allegany (NY)
3,099
Investor Owned SFR in Allegany (NY)
2,430(20.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,896
SFR Owned
2,250
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
203
SFR Owned
215
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,430 represents distinct properties - if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Allegany County, Controlling 99% of Rentals with Minimal Institutional Footprint
Small, individual investors own 99.2% of the 2,430 investor-held SFRs in Allegany County, NY, making up 20.7% of the total market. In Q1 2026, landlords secured properties at a significant 21.7% discount compared to homeowners, and they remain strong net buyers, acquiring 181 properties while selling only 9 in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 92.6% of the 2,430 landlord-held properties in Allegany County.
The majority of investor properties (1,920) are owned outright with cash, compared to just 510 that are financed. Nearly the entire portfolio (2,411 properties) is classified as rented, confirming a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 21.7% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, an average discount of $33,050.
The landlord pricing advantage is highly volatile, swinging from a 13.6% premium ($15,989) in Q1 2025 to a 21.7% discount ($33,050) in Q1 2026. This indicates an opportunistic rather than a consistent purchasing strategy.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 38.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 95.0% of all investor purchases (19 properties). New, single-property investors were the primary drivers, making up 18 of the 19 landlord acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, owning just 1 property (0.0% share). Single-property landlords alone account for 91.7% of all investor-owned housing (2,251 properties).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, though individuals own 92.6% overall.
The crossover from individual to company-dominated portfolios occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 61.1% of properties. Below this level, individuals overwhelmingly control the market, holding 92.9% of single-property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 14727, 14715, and 14735.
The zip code 14727 has the highest count of investor properties at 300, representing a 23.0% ownership rate. Zip code 14735 shares this high ownership rate of 23.0%, with 141 properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 181 properties and selling only 9 in 2025.
The net buying trend was consistent throughout 2025, with landlords acquiring 42 properties and selling only 2 in both Q2 and Q3. There is no recorded transaction data for institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 35.0% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Single-property investors dominated Q4 activity, accounting for 19 of 21 landlord transactions. Notably, 0% of landlord purchases came from other investors, indicating they primarily buy from the general market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 92.6% of the 2,430 landlord-held properties in Allegany County.
Detailed Findings

In Allegany County, investors own 2,430 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 20.7% of the total 11,733 SFRs in the market. This reveals a significant rental presence driven primarily by small-scale operators rather than large corporations.

Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who control 2,250 properties or 92.6% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 215, or 8.8%, underscoring the local, non-corporate nature of the rental market.

A striking financial pattern emerges from the data: cash is the dominant form of ownership. Investors own 1,920 properties outright, nearly four times the 510 properties that are financed. This high cash-to-debt ratio suggests a financially stable and less leveraged investor base in the county.

The portfolio's purpose is clearly defined, with 2,411 of the 2,430 properties (99.2%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied. This near-total focus on rental units confirms that these properties are active components of the local housing supply for tenants.

When comparing entity counts, the dominance of small landlords is even more apparent. There are 2,896 individual landlords compared to just 203 company landlords, a ratio of over 14 to 1. This highlights a market characterized by a large number of small players, not a consolidated few.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 21.7% less than homeowners in Q1 2026, an average discount of $33,050.
Detailed Findings

In Q1 2026, investors in Allegany County demonstrated a sharp ability to secure favorable pricing, purchasing properties for an average of $119,600. This was a substantial 21.7% less than the $152,650 average paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a $33,050 discount per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners is not consistent, showing significant volatility from quarter to quarter. For example, landlords paid a 13.6% premium in Q1 2025 ($133,161 vs $117,172), but then achieved a 9.8% discount in Q2 2025 ($108,337 vs $120,100). This fluctuation suggests investors are highly opportunistic, capitalizing on specific deals rather than benefiting from a structural market discount.

Analysis of pricing trends over time shows a general upward trajectory, though recent landlord acquisitions have been at lower price points. The average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $102,668, which rose to $126,413 in 2024. The Q1 2026 average of $119,600, while lower than the 2024 average, still represents a 16.5% increase from the pandemic-era baseline.

While landlords paid more than homeowners in some recent quarters, the Q1 2026 data marks a return to a significant discount. This may signal a strategic shift to target undervalued assets or a cooling in specific submarkets that allows for more aggressive negotiations.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q1 2026 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 38.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in the most recent quarter (Q4 2025), with landlords purchasing 19 of the 49 total SFRs sold in Allegany County. This represents a 38.8% market share of all purchases, indicating that more than one in every three homes sold went to an investor.

The acquisitions were almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 19 properties, or 95.0% of all landlord buying activity, reinforcing their role as the primary engine of the local rental market.

New entrants are the lifeblood of this market. Landlords purchasing their very first investment property (Tier 01) were responsible for 18 of the 19 total investor acquisitions. This influx of 19 new landlord entities signals strong grassroots interest in real estate investing in the area.

In stark contrast to the active mom-and-pop segment, institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero purchases in Q4 2025. This 0.0% share highlights their complete absence from recent acquisition activity in the county.

The concentration of activity in the smallest tier is profound. The single-property tier alone captured 90.0% of all investor-purchased properties, demonstrating that the market's growth is fueled by individuals starting or adding just one property to their portfolio.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.2% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Allegany County is unequivocally dominated by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control 99.2% of all investor-owned SFRs. This concentration illustrates a market built on small, local ownership, not large-scale corporate holdings.

The foundation of the investor market is the single-property landlord. This tier alone accounts for 2,251 properties, representing a massive 91.7% share of the entire investor portfolio. This signifies that the vast majority of landlords in the county are individuals with just one rental unit.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero footprint in Allegany County, owning just one property for a 0.0% market share. This finding directly counters the narrative of large corporations dominating residential real estate and confirms the hyper-local nature of this market.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also hold a very small portion of the market. Combined, Tiers 05 through 08 own only 19 properties, which is less than 1% of the total investor portfolio. Ownership does not scale significantly beyond the 10-property mark.

The data clearly shows that as portfolio size increases, the number of properties and entities drops off dramatically. This structure points to a market with high barriers to scaling for investors, but a low barrier to entry for new, single-property landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, though individuals own 92.6% overall.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the Allegany County market overall with 92.6% of properties, a clear pattern emerges when analyzing ownership by portfolio size. Companies begin to take a majority share as portfolios grow, signaling a shift toward more formalized business structures.

The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04). In this segment, companies own 11 properties (61.1%), surpassing the 7 properties (38.9%) owned by individuals. This is the first tier where corporate ownership becomes the norm.

In the smallest tiers, individual ownership is nearly absolute. For single-property landlords (Tier 01), individuals own 2,122 of the 2,251 properties, a 92.9% share. This dominance continues in the two-property tier, with individuals holding an 87.0% share.

Company ownership concentration increases in the largest tiers. For landlords with 101-1,000 properties, companies control 75.0% of the homes (3 of 4 properties), indicating that significant scaling is almost exclusively pursued under a corporate entity.

This tiered analysis reveals a distinct investor lifecycle. Most enter and remain as individual owners of 1-5 properties. Those who scale beyond five properties are much more likely to incorporate, transitioning from a personal investment to a formal business operation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 14727, 14715, and 14735.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Allegany County is geographically concentrated in a few key areas. The zip code 14727 leads with 300 investor-owned properties, followed by 14715 with 143 properties and 14735 with 141 properties. These three zip codes alone account for nearly a quarter of all investor-owned homes in the county.

High investor concentration and high ownership rates often go hand-in-hand. Both 14727 and 14735 report a high investor ownership rate of 23.0%, meaning nearly one in four SFR properties in these areas is investor-owned. This is significantly above the county-wide average of 20.7%.

The zip code 14715, despite having the second-highest count of investor properties (143), has a slightly lower ownership rate of 17.9%. This indicates it is a larger market overall where investor presence is substantial but less saturated compared to 14727 and 14735.

The available assessor data for some zip codes, such as 14024 and 14437, was incomplete, preventing a full analysis of ownership rates in those smaller areas. However, the clear concentrations in the top three zip codes point to specific community characteristics that are attractive for rental property investment.

These findings can help new and existing investors identify submarkets with established rental demand and a high density of similar investment properties, which can be useful for setting rents and understanding local market dynamics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 181 properties and selling only 9 in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Allegany County are overwhelmingly net buyers, signaling strong confidence in the local market and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion. In 2025, investors acquired 181 SFR properties while selling only 9, resulting in a net gain of 172 properties and a powerful 20.1-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio.

This aggressive acquisition trend was sustained throughout the year. For instance, in both Q2 and Q3 of 2025, landlords purchased 42 properties and sold just 2 in each quarter. This consistent buying pressure demonstrates a deliberate and ongoing accumulation of rental assets.

The pattern of net buying extends back to 2024, when investors bought 153 properties and sold only 6, for a net gain of 147. The continued high volume of acquisitions in 2025 suggests that investor demand in the county is accelerating rather than slowing down.

Notably, there is no transaction data available for institutional investors (1,000+ properties). This aligns with their minimal ownership footprint and confirms that the market's transaction dynamics are driven entirely by smaller, mom-and-pop and mid-size investors.

The transactional data paints a picture of a market where investors are holding onto their assets for the long term while actively seeking new opportunities to grow their portfolios, contributing to tight inventory for other buyers.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q1 2026 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 35.0% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a significant role in market liquidity, participating in 21 of the 60 total SFR transactions, a market share of 35.0%. This level of involvement underscores their importance as a consistent source of demand in Allegany County.

Transaction activity was heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. New or single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 19 of the 21 investor transactions. This indicates that the market's transactional flow is fueled by new entrants rather than portfolio adjustments by established players.

A key finding from the quarter is that 0% of investor purchases were sourced from other landlords. This means every property acquired by an investor came from a traditional homeowner or another type of seller, not from within the investor community. This suggests investors are expanding the rental pool rather than just trading existing rental assets among themselves.

The average purchase price for the most active group, single-property landlords, was $119,600. Without any transactions from institutional investors, there is no price comparison to be made, but this price point appears to be the sweet spot for new market participants.

The complete absence of transactions from institutional landlords (Tier 09) further solidifies the conclusion that Allegany County is a market shaped and driven exclusively by the decisions of mom-and-pop investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 99% of Allegany County's Investor Market, Sidestepping Institutional Trends
Holdings
Investors own 2,430 SFR properties in Allegany County, NY (20.7% of the market), with individual investors holding a dominant 92.6% (2,250 properties) compared to companies at 8.8% (215 properties).
Pricing
In Q1 2026, landlords secured a significant 21.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $119,600 versus $152,650, a savings of $33,050 per property.
Activity
Landlords purchased 38.8% of homes sold in Q4 2025 (19 properties), with activity driven almost entirely by new entrants, as 18 of those purchases were by single-property landlords.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.2% of all investor-owned housing in the county, while institutional investors (1000+) have a nearly non-existent share of 0.0% (1 property).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority ownership (61.1%) in the 6-10 property tier, marking the transition point for professionalization.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, with a 20.1x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (181 buys vs 9 sells). There was no recorded buying or selling activity from institutional investors.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Allegany County, NY is fundamentally a story of the local, small-scale landlord. Investors own 2,430 SFR homes, comprising 20.7% of the county's housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly controlled by individuals, who own 92.6% of these properties. The market structure defies national narratives, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command an astounding 99.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, while large institutional investors have virtually no presence, owning just a single property. This composition points to a stable, community-based rental market rather than one influenced by large corporate strategies.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and savvy pricing. In the most recent quarter, landlords purchased 38.8% of all homes sold, with nearly all activity coming from new entrants buying their first rental property. These investors demonstrate a distinct pricing advantage, securing homes in Q1 2026 at a 21.7% discount compared to traditional homeowners, a savings of over $33,000 per property. Furthermore, landlords are strong net buyers, having acquired 181 properties while selling only 9 in 2025, steadily expanding the county's rental inventory by primarily purchasing from non-investors.

The key takeaway from this Investor Pulse reports is that Allegany County operates as a distinct micro-market, insulated from the institutional trends seen elsewhere. The market is defined by financial prudence, with cash purchases far outweighing financed ones, and is driven by the organic growth of new, individual landlords. For anyone looking to understand this housing market, the focus must be on the motivations and actions of the thousands of small operators who collectively shape its past, present, and future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated July 22, 2026 at 12:09 AM
Data Period Q1 2026
Geography Level County
Geography Allegany (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2026 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2026). Q1 2026 Allegany (NY) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2026-q1-county-ny-allegany/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.